AIRNET SYSTEMS INC (Form: 10-Q)

Dated: August 15, 2005

/s/ Joel E. Biggerstaff

Printed Name: Joel E. Biggerstaff

Title: Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive

Officer and President

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

or


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-13025

AirNet Systems, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ohio		31-1458309
(State or other jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

7250 Star Check Drive
Columbus, Ohio 43217
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(614) 409-4900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of August 3, 2005, 10,133,134 of the registrant’s common shares, par value $0.01, were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	PAGE
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements:

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: June 30, 2005 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2004		3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited): Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004		4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited): Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004		5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		22

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		22

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		23

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		23

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		23

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		23

Item 5. Other Information		23

Item 6. Exhibits		24

SIGNATURES		25

INDEX TO EXHIBITS		26
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32

2

AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


In thousands, except par value	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,126		$	1,086
Accounts receivable, less allowances		23,414			24,591
Inventory		265			502
Taxes receivable		1,286			1,137
Deferred income taxes		446			187
Deposits and prepaids		2,576			2,820

Total current assets		29,113			30,323

Net property and equipment		112,495			106,816

Deposits and other assets		330			331

Total assets	$	141,938		$	137,470


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	10,892		$	11,311
Salaries and related liabilities		5,233			4,496
Deferred revenue		—			102
Accrued expenses		1,238			912
Current portion of notes payable		3,141			3,076

Total current liabilities		20,504			19,897

Other liabilities		378			670
Notes payable, less current portion		57,199			59,169
Deferred income taxes		9,740			7,268

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred shares, $.01 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		—			—
Common shares, $.01 par value; 40,000 shares authorized; 12,763 shares issued at March 31, 2005 and at December 31, 2004		128			128
Additional paid-in-capital		76,608			76,835
Retained earnings (deficit)		1,363			(2,208	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(6	)		(13	)
Treasury shares, 2,635 and 2,644 common shares held at cost at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		(23,976	)		(24,276	)

Total shareholders’ equity		54,117			50,466

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	141,938		$	137,470

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - Unaudited


In thousands, except per share data	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
NET REVENUES
Delivery services, net of excise tax:
Bank services	$	28,845		$	26,230		$	56,138		$	52,062
Express services		12,428			12,083			25,533			22,881

Total delivery services revenues		41,273			38,313			81,671			74,943

Passenger charter services		8,499			3,616			17,827			7,253
Aviation services and other operations		117			211			284			415

Total net revenues		49,889			42,140			99,782			82,611

COSTS AND EXPENSES
Wages and benefits		6,194			6,251			12,398			12,123
Aircraft fuel		8,921			6,186			17,175			11,722
Aircraft maintenance		4,782			3,690			10,169			6,881
Contracted air costs		3,826			3,127			7,094			6,198
Ground courier		7,642			7,887			15,531			15,029
Depreciation		3,628			5,050			7,270			9,939
Insurance, rent and landing fees		2,326			2,638			5,136			5,202
Travel, training and other		3,746			2,264			6,941			4,536
Selling, general and administrative		4,974			4,842			10,461			9,562
Net (gain) loss on disposition of assets		(2	)		(3	)		(52	)		289

Total costs and expenses		46,037			41,932			92,123			81,481


Income from operations		3,852			208			7,659			1,130
Interest expense		1,024			407			1,879			774


Income (loss) before income taxes		2,828			(199	)		5,780			356
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		774			(86	)		2,209			153


Net income (loss)	$	2,054			($113	)	$	3,571		$	203


Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted	$	0.20			($0.01	)	$	0.35		$	0.02

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - Unaudited


In thousands	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2005			2004
Operating activities:
Net income	$	3,571		$	203
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		7,270			9,939
Deferred taxes		2,210			98
Provision for losses on accounts receivable		93			117
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets		(52	)		289
Cash provided by (used in) operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		1,084			(2,599	)
Inventory		237			(1,045	)
Deposits and prepaids		245			1,260
Accounts payable		(711	)		2,106
Deferred revenues and accrued expenses		224			2,103
Taxes receivable		(145	)		(160	)
Salaries and related liabilities		737			(387	)
Other, net		7			62

Net cash provided by operating activities		14,770			11,986

Investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(13,053	)		(34,625	)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment		156			3,103

Net cash used in investing activities		(12,897	)		(31,522	)

Financing activities:
Proceeds from incentive stock plan programs		69			80
Net (repayments) borrowings under revolving credit facilities		(500	)		4,000
(Repayments) borrowings under term loans		(1,405	)		16,575
Issuance of treasury shares		3			94

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,833	)		20,749


Net increase in cash		40			1,213
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		1,086			125

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	1,126		$	1,338

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

AirNet Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“AirNet” or the “Company”) operate a fully integrated national air transportation network which provides delivery service for time-critical shipments for customers in the U.S. banking industry and other industries requiring the express delivery of packages. AirNet also offers nationwide passenger charter services.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AirNet Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries. These financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted as permitted by the instructions for Form 10-Q. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

The financial information included herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of interim periods.

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in those financial statements and accompanying notes thereto. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior year’s financial statements to conform to the presentation for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005.

2. Segment Reporting

AirNet operates a fully integrated national air transportation network and has determined that its reportable segments are based on AirNet’s methods of internal reporting and management structure. AirNet’s reportable segments are Delivery Services, which provides delivery service of time-critical shipments for Bank customers and other Express customers, and Passenger Charter Services (provided by Jetride, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of AirNet Systems, Inc.). AirNet evaluates segment performance based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is contribution margin. Contribution margin represents the net revenues of the reportable segment less costs and expenses directly associated with the reportable segment, including depreciation expense, but does not include interest and income taxes and certain selling, general and administrative costs. The accounting policies used for segment reporting are the same as those used for consolidated reporting described in the summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in “Item 8 – Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. There were no material amounts of revenues or transfers between reportable segments.

6

Financial information by reportable segments follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Net Revenues
Delivery Services	$	41,273	$	38,313	$	81,671	$	74,943
Passenger Charter Services		8,499		3,616		17,827		7,253

Total net revenues	$	49,772	$	41,929	$	99,498	$	82,196


Contribution Margin
Delivery Services	$	6,746	$	3,307	$	13,142	$	6,825
Passenger Charter Services		1,299		407		2,808		1,216

Total contribution margin	$	8,045	$	3,714	$	15,950	$	8,041


Depreciation Expense
Delivery Services	$	2,831	$	4,401	$	5,758	$	8,740
Passenger Charter Services		492		345		1,018		643

Total depreciation expense	$	3,323	$	4,746	$	6,776	$	9,383

A reconciliation of reportable segment net revenues to total net revenues follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Reportable segment net revenues	$	49,772	$	41,929	$	99,498	$	82,196
Aviation services and other		117		211		284		415

Total net revenues	$	49,889	$	42,140	$	99,782	$	82,611

A reconciliation of reportable segment contribution margin to income from operations follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Reportable segment contribution margin	$	8,045		$	3,714		$	15,950		$	8,041
Net selling and administrative expenses excluded from reportable segment contribution margin		(4,193	)		(3,506	)		(8,291	)		(6,911	)

Income from operations	$	3,852		$	208		$	7,659		$	1,130

A reconciliation of reportable segment depreciation expense to total depreciation expense follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Reportable segment depreciation	$	3,323	$	4,746	$	6,776	$	9,383
Corporate depreciation		305		304		494		556

Total depreciation expense	$	3,628		5,050	$	7,270	$	9,939

3. Stock Plans and Awards

7

At June 30, 2005, AirNet had two stock-based employee compensation plans, the Amended and Restated 1996 Incentive Stock Plan and the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. AirNet has accounted for the plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all stock options granted under the plans have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant. Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure” (SFAS No. 148), and has been determined as if AirNet had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123).

On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “ Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123(R)), which is a revision of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" , and amends SFAS No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows . ” Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as expense in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure will no longer be an alternative.

SFAS No. 123(R) must be adopted no later than the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. AirNet expects to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. SFAS No. 123(R) permits companies to adopt its requirements using one of two methods:

	1.		A “modified prospective” method in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date (a) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after the effective date and (b) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date.

	2.		A “modified retrospective” method which includes the requirements of the modified prospective method described above, but also permits entities to restate financial statements based on the amounts previously recognized under SFAS No. 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures either (a) all prior periods presented or (b) prior interim periods of the year of adoption.

AirNet plans to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had AirNet adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and net income per share below. AirNet does not anticipate that adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will have a material impact on its results of operations or its financial position. However, SFAS No. 123(R) also requires that the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. While AirNet cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amount of operating cash flows recognized in prior periods for such excess tax deductions were not material.

AirNet adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2003 using the “modified prospective method” described in SFAS No. 148. Currently, AirNet uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the value of stock options granted to employees for purposes of computing the pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 123.

8

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share if AirNet had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net income (loss), as reported	$	1,895		$	(113	)	$	3,412		$	203

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(28	)		(29	)		(51	)		(182	)


Pro forma net income (loss)	$	1,867		$	(142	)	$	3,361		$	21


Net income (loss) per share – basic and diluted:
As reported	$	.20		$	(.01	)	$	.35		$	.02
Pro forma	$	.18		$	(.01	)	$	.33		$	.00

4. Income (Loss) Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share (in thousands, except per share data):


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2005		2004			2005		2004
Numerator:
Net income (loss)	$	2,054	$	(113	)	$	3,571	$	203

Denominator:
Basic – weighted average shares outstanding		10,127		10,076			10,123		10,063

Diluted
Stock options–employees, officers, and directors		32		40			16		35

Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding		10,159		10,116			10,139		10,098

Net income (loss) per share – Basic and diluted	$	.20	$	(.01	)	$	.35	$	.02

Common shares subject to outstanding stock options excluded from the diluted adjusted weighted average shares outstanding calculation were 623,000 and 729,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These stock options were antidilutive and excluded from the calculation because the exercise price of these stock options was greater than the average fair market value of the underlying common shares in the respective periods.

5. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income of AirNet and the change in the fair value of interest rate swap agreements and foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes. Comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $2.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. Comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $3.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

9

6. Bank Financing Matters

Term Notes and Revolving Credit Facility

In September 2002, AirNet entered into a $35.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and a five-year $20.0 million unsecured term loan (collectively, the “Credit Agreement”). The term loan required quarterly installments of $1.0 million beginning in December 2002 and continuing through September 30, 2007. The revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement was originally scheduled to expire on September 30, 2005 and the secured term loan was to mature on September 30, 2007.

On May 28, 2004, AirNet and its lenders amended the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The Amended Credit Agreement was further amended by the First Change in Terms Agreement and the Second Change in Terms Agreement as described below. The Amended Credit Agreement is secured by a first lien on all of the property of AirNet and its subsidiaries, other than any interest in real estate and certain excluded fixed assets. AirNet also pledged the stock and interests of its subsidiaries to secure the loans under the Amended Credit Agreement, and each of AirNet’s subsidiaries guaranteed AirNet’s obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement. The Amended Credit Agreement permits AirNet and its subsidiaries to incur other indebtedness for the purpose of purchasing or refinancing aircraft and related tangible fixed assets, subject to certain annual limitations. The Amended Credit Agreement contains limitations on operating leases, indebtedness, significant corporate changes including mergers and sales of assets, investments in subsidiaries and acquisitions, liens, capital expenditures, transactions with affiliates, sales of accounts receivable, sale and leaseback transactions and other off-balance sheet liabilities, contingent obligations and hedging transactions. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains certain financial covenants that require AirNet to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and to not exceed certain fixed charge coverage and leverage ratios specified in the Amended Credit Agreement.

The Amended Credit Agreement provided for a secured revolving credit facility of up to $35.0 million and a secured term loan in the aggregate amount of $14.0 million. The amount of revolving loans available under the Amended Credit Agreement is limited to a borrowing base equal to the aggregate of 80% of eligible accounts receivable, plus 50% of eligible inventory, plus 70% of the market value of certain fixed assets, reduced by the aggregate amount of AirNet’s outstanding letters of credit. The Amended Credit Agreement bears interest, at AirNet’s option, at (a) a fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, or (b) a floating rate based on the greater of (i) the prime rate established by The Huntington National Bank from time to time plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio or (ii) the sum of 0.5% plus the federal funds rate in effect from time to time plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio. At June 30, 2005, as a result of the various timing and duration of short-term debt maturities, AirNet’s interest rates ranged from 4.5% to 6.3%.

As of June 30, 2005, $19.0 million was outstanding under the secured revolving credit facility which is included in “Notes payable, less current portion” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, AirNet had $1.6 million in letters of credit outstanding as of such date related to insurance programs, which reduced the amount available under the revolving credit facility. After giving effect to the Second Change in Terms Agreement discussed below, AirNet had approximately $11.0 million available to borrow under its secured revolving credit facility under the Amended Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2005.

As a result of the impairment charge recorded in September 2004 as described in Note 2 of AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, AirNet was not in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and the leverage ratio calculated as of September 30, 2004, and AirNet would not have been in compliance with the minimum consolidated tangible net worth requirement as of December 31, 2004. On November 12, 2004, AirNet and its lenders under the Amended Credit Agreement agreed to modify the terms and conditions of the Amended Credit Agreement (the “First Change in Terms Agreement”). The First Change in Terms Agreement modified the fixed charge coverage ratio, the leverage ratio, and the minimum consolidated tangible net worth financial covenants in such a manner that, on a going-forward basis, the impairment charge, in and of itself, would not cause a default of these financial covenants in the future. At the same time as the First Change of Terms Agreement was entered into, AirNet and its lenders executed a waiver of any defaults or potential defaults under the Amended Credit Agreement which occurred, or may have occurred, as a result of AirNet’s failure to comply with the foregoing financial covenants due to the impairment charge.

On March 24, 2005, AirNet and its lenders entered into a “Second Change in Terms Agreement” that further modified the terms and conditions of the Amended Credit Agreement. In accordance with the Second Change in Terms Agreement, AirNet prepaid in full the remaining $11.0 million balance outstanding on its secured term loan. Upon the prepayment of the term loan, the term loan portion of the Amended Credit Agreement was terminated. In addition, the revolving credit facility under the Amended Credit Agreement was reduced from $35.0 million to $30.0

10

million. In the event AirNet secures permanent financing on all or a portion of its facility within Rickenbacker International Airport (the “Rickenbacker Facility”), the revolving credit facility will be reduced from $30.0 million to $25.0 million. Under the Second Change in Terms Agreement, the term of the revolving credit facility was extended from September 30, 2005 to October 15, 2006. The December 31, 2004 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet gives effect to the Second Change in Terms Agreement entered into on March 24, 2005. The Second Change in Terms Agreement also provided for the release of certain fixed assets that were securing the loans under the Amended Credit Agreement and modified certain other financial covenants.

Other Term Notes

On March 24, 2005, AirNet entered into a three-year term loan totaling $11.0 million with a fixed interest rate of 8.12%. This term loan is secured by seven Cessna Caravans and nine Learjet 35’s from AirNet’s cargo aircraft fleet. The aircraft securing this loan were released from the collateral securing the loans under Amended Credit Agreement in accordance with the Second Change in Terms Agreement. The proceeds from this term loan were used to prepay in full AirNet’s term loan under the Amended Credit Agreement as described above. The December 31, 2004 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects the reclassification of approximately $22.4 million from current to long-term notes payable as a result of the extension of the Amended Credit Agreement under the Second Change in Terms Agreement and the financing of the cargo aircraft described above. As of June 30, 2005, $10.5 million was outstanding under these term loans.

During the second quarter of 2004, Jetride entered into four seven-year term loans totaling $22.5 million with fixed interest rates of approximately 6.7%. In July 2004, Jetride financed two additional passenger charter Learjet 60’s for the Passenger Charter fleet at $5.0 million each with seven year terms and fixed rates of approximately 6.5%, for a total of $32.5 million in financing related to AirNet’s Passenger Charter services. As of June 30, 2005, there was $30.8 million outstanding under all six loans. These term loans are secured by aircraft used in the Passenger Charter fleet. Each of the term loans is guaranteed by AirNet. AirNet incurred approximately $0.5 million and $1.0 million in interest expense in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively, related to the financing of the nine Passenger Charter aircraft under all six loans.

7. Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 varies from the statutory rates due to changes in AirNet’s valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as well as the changes in the tax laws in the State of Ohio.

8. Contingencies

In June 2005, AirNet relocated its corporate and operational headquarters from its Port Columbus Facility to a new facility at Rickenbacker International Airport. In connection with vacating its Port Columbus Facility, AirNet was required to return certain portions of the premises to their prior condition. Accordingly, AirNet is in the process of installing certain fencing, returning its former ramp to a parking lot, and reinstalling certain outdoor lighting. In addition, at the request of the Columbus Regional Airport Authority, AirNet conducted an environmental assessment of the Port Columbus Facility. The results of the environmental assessment demonstrated concentrations below the regulatory limits for petroleum hydrocarbons, volatiles, and semi-volatiles in all samples except those associated with one of three oil-water separators located in the hanger portion of the Port Columbus Facility. The petroleum hydrocarbon results from the samples taken around this oil-water separator demonstrated concentrations above the regulatory limit. Except for the area associated with the one oil -water separator, no obviously recognized environmental conditions exist at AirNet’s Port Columbus Facility in the areas assessed. AirNet is in the process of reviewing the results of the environmental assessment with the Authority to determine what, if any, remedial action is necessary with regard to the oil-water separator. As of June 30, 2005, AirNet had an accrual of $0.1 million for such remedial work and the cost of returning certain portions of the premises to their prior condition.

9. Subsequent Events

In June 2005, AirNet received written notice from a managed aircraft owner indicating that, effective July 14, 2005, the owner was canceling the agreements under which AirNet manages a Model 60 Learjet and a Model 604 Challenger aircraft for the owner. Also in June 2005, AirNet received a written notice from a second managed aircraft owner indicating that, effective July 22, 2005, the owner was canceling the agreement under which AirNet manages a Model 601 Challenger aircraft for the owner. The Passenger Charter Services revenues from these three managed aircraft accounted for $2.6 million and $4.6 million, respectively, for the three and six month periods

11

ended June 30, 2005. The Challenger 601 and Challenger 604 aircraft were managed by AirNet for only a portion of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. AirNet has identified direct cost reductions of approximately 90% of the revenues related to the elimination of these three managed aircraft from the Passenger Charter fleet.

In addition to the termination of the management agreements for the three aircraft discussed in the preceding paragraph, in July 2005, the owner of three Model 60 Learjet aircraft managed by AirNet informed AirNet that the owner may sell one or more of the aircraft and, as a result, would terminate its three aircraft management agreements with AirNet in the near future. Revenues related to these three managed aircraft were $1.7 million and $3.1 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005. In the event the owner does terminate the agreements, AirNet has identified direct cost reductions of approximately 90 % of the revenues if these aircraft were eliminated from the Passenger Charter fleet.

12

AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Safe Harbor Statement

Except for the historical information contained in this Form 10-Q, the matters discussed, including, but not limited to, information regarding future economic performance and plans and objectives of AirNet’s management, are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. When used in this document, the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “project” and similar expressions are intended to be among statements that identify forward-looking statements. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following which could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement: potential regulatory changes by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”), Department of Transportation (“DOT”) and Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”), which could increase the regulation of AirNet’s business, or the Federal Reserve, which could change the competitive environment of transporting cancelled checks; changes in check processing and shipment patterns of bank customers; the continued acceleration of migration of AirNet’s Bank customers to electronic alternatives to the physical movement of cancelled checks; disruptions to operations due to adverse weather conditions, air traffic-control related constraints or aircraft accidents; potential further declines in the values of aircraft in AirNet’s fleet and any related asset impairment charges; the ability to successfully market the Passenger Charter business in light of global changes in the commercial airline industry; potential changes in locally and federally mandated security requirements; increases in aviation fuel costs not fully offset by AirNet’s fuel surcharge program; acts of war and terrorist activities; the acceptance of AirNet’s time-critical service offerings within targeted Express markets; technological advances and increases in the use of electronic funds transfers; the availability and cost of financing required for operations; the impact of unusual items resulting from ongoing evaluations of our business strategies; as well as other economic, competitive and domestic and foreign governmental factors affecting AirNet’s markets, prices and other facets of its operations. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated. Please refer to the sections captioned “Forward-looking statements” and “Risk Factors” in Item 7 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of AirNet Systems, Inc. (File No. 1-13025) for additional details relating to risk factors that could affect AirNet’s results and cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements.

General

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to adopt accounting policies and make significant judgments and estimates to develop amounts reflected and disclosed in the financial statements. In many cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques that could be used. AirNet maintains a thorough process to review the application of its accounting policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the estimates; however, even under optimal circumstances, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information. Certain estimates that have a significant effect on quarterly results, such as incentive compensation expense and the effective income tax rates, could require substantial adjustments from quarter to quarter due to changes in estimates of net income for the year.

Management has discussed the development and selection of AirNet’s critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Board of Directors and with its independent registered public accounting firm. AirNet’s critical accounting policies have not changed significantly from the policies disclosed under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Item 7 of AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

AirNet’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, included in Item 8 of AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, contain additional disclosures regarding AirNet’s significant accounting policies and Item 7 of that Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a summary of AirNet’s critical accounting policies. The information appearing therein may be useful when reading this discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations.

13

Results of Operations

Net Revenues


	*Three Months Ended*										Increase (Decrease)					*Six Months Ended*										Increase (Decrease)
	*June 30,*										*2005 to 2004*					*June 30,*										*2005 to 2004*
*Dollars in ‘000’s*			*% of*					*% of*										*% of*					*% of*
*Net Revenues*	*2005*		*Total*			*2004*		*Total*			$			%		*2005*		*Total*			*2004*		*Total*			$			%

Delivery Services Revenues:
Bank Services	$	28,845		57.9	%	$	26,230		62.2	%	$	2,615		10.0	%	$	56,138		56.3	%	$	52,062		63.0	%	$	4,076			7.8	%
Express Services		12,428		24.9	%		12,083		28.7	%		345		2.9	%		25,533		25.6	%		22,881		27.7	%		2,652			11.6	%

Total Delivery Services Revenues		41,273		82.8	%		38,313		90.9	%		2,960		7.7	%		81,671		81.9	%		74,943		90.7	%		6,728			9.0	%
Passenger Charter Services Revenues		8,499		17.0	%		3,616		8.6	%		4,883		135.0	%		17,827		17.9	%		7,253		8.8	%		10,574			145.8	%
Aviation Services and Other Revenues		117		0.2	%		211		0.5	%		(94	)	(44.5	)%		284		0.2	%		415		0.5	%		(131	)		(31.6	)%

Total Net Revenues	$	49,889		100.0	%	$	42,140		100.0	%	$	7,749		18.4	%	$	99,782		100.0	%	$	82,611		100.0	%	$	17,171			20.8	%

AirNet experienced overall net revenue growth for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 over the same periods in the prior year. This can be attributed to several factors, including significant growth in Passenger Charter services as well as additional fuel surcharge revenues.

AirNet generally assesses its Delivery Services customers a fuel surcharge which is based on the Oil Price Index Summary – Columbus, Ohio (OPIS-CMH index). As index rates increase above a set threshold, surcharge rates increase. The second quarter 2005 average price on the OPIS index increased approximately 44% from the second quarter of 2004. In addition, Jetride, Inc. charges its customers a fuel surcharge computed as a percentage of the base charter fee which changes according to prevailing market rates.

Bank Services Revenues


	*Three Months Ended*				Increase (Decrease)					*Six Months Ended*				Increase (Decrease)
Dollars in ‘000’s	*June 30,*				*2005 to 2004*					*June 30,*				*2005 to 2004*
*Bank Services Revenues*	2005		2004		$		%			2005		2004		$		%

Bank Services Revenues, Net of Federal Excise Tax Fees	$	26,003	$	25,080	$	923		3.7	%	$	51,185	$	49,958	$	1,227		2.5	%
Fuel Surcharge		2,842		1,150		1,692		147.1	%		4,953		2,104		2,849		135.4	%

Total Net Bank Services Revenues	$	28,845	$	26,230	$	2,615		10.0	%	$	56,138	$	52,062	$	,076		7.8	%

Bank Services revenues increased during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 from the same periods in the prior year primarily due to the significant increase in fuel surcharge revenues as a result of the increase in fuel prices experienced during 2005. Bank Services revenues (excluding the impact of the fuel surcharge and federal excise tax fees) increased in the second quarter of 2005, although the volume of cancelled checks transported declined approximately 3% during the same period. There was one more flying day for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 over the same periods of the prior year. As cancelled check volumes decline, AirNet continues to focus on additional services for banks, such as proof of deposit and interoffice mail delivery services. In the second quarter of 2005, certain Bank Services customers terminated agreements to transport cancelled checks from the Western U.S. to various points in the East resulting in an anticipated loss of approximately $6.1 million of Bank Services revenue on an annual basis. In response to the anticipated loss in revenue AirNet negotiated additional surcharges for several of its Bank Services customers, primarily those requiring transportation services from the Eastern portions of the U.S. to the West, which generally took effect in June 2005. These additional surcharges substantially replaced the contribution margin which was lost due to the termination of the Bank Services agreements discussed above.

Revenue yields per pound are similar for Bank and Express shipments; however, because the density of cancelled check shipments is much greater than the typical Express shipment, profit margins on Bank shipments are substantially higher than Express shipments after considering cubic dimensions. AirNet believes that lower check delivery volume as a result of the declining use of checks and electronic alternatives to the physical movement of

14

cancelled checks will contribute to a significant reduction in Bank Services revenues and the contribution margin from Delivery Services in future periods.

Express Services Revenues


Dollars in ‘000’s	*Three Months Ended*						Increase (Decrease)						*Six Months Ended*						Increase (Decrease)
	*June 30,*						*2005 to 2004*						*June 30,*						*2005 to 2004*
*Express Services Revenues*	2005			2004			$			%			2005			2004			$			%

Express Revenues — Non Charter	$	8,214		$	9,073		$	(859	)		(9.5	)%	$	17,244		$	17,138		$	106			0.6	%
Express Revenues — Charters		3,621			2,960			661			22.3	%		7,208			5,692			1,516			26.6	%
Fuel Surcharge		1,012			437			575			131.6	%		1,888			761			1,127			148.1	%
Federal Excise Tax Fee		(419	)		(387	)		(32	)		(8.3	)%		(807	)		(710	)		(97	)		(13.7	)%

Net Express Services Revenues	$	12,428		$	12,083		$	345			2.9	%	$	25,533		$	22,881		$	2,652			11.6	%

Express Revenues - Non Charter represent revenues AirNet derives from shipments on AirNet’s airline, commercial airlines and point-to-point surface (ground only) shipments. Non-Charter Express shipments decreased approximately 13% and 8%, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year. In May 2005, an Express Services customer notified AirNet that the customer had lost a bid to continue providing services under a government contract for which AirNet had provided transportation services, resulting in an anticipated loss of approximately $1.2 million of Express Services revenue on an annual basis. The customer has indicated that AirNet’s Express services related to the contract will be terminated late in the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter of 2005. Because most of the shipments related to the contract are transported on AirNet’s scheduled routes, AirNet estimates that it will be able to reduce direct costs by 15-20 percent of the anticipated loss in revenues. Additionally, AirNet is in the process of negotiating an extension of its agreement with its largest Express Services customer which expires on August 21, 2005. As part of the extension, AirNet has agreed to reduce certain of its minimum and variable transportation charges. AirNet anticipates that the pricing changes under the extended agreement will significantly lower contribution margins with respect to this customer. Revenues generated from this customer amounted to $1.7 million and $3.4 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005.

Express Revenues - Charters represent revenues AirNet derives from cargo charters transported on AirNet’s airline and on aircraft operated by other third parties on both a scheduled and unscheduled basis. Express Revenues – Charters increased for the three and six month periods ended on June 30, 2005 over the same periods in the prior year primarily due to an increase in the number of charters in those periods. During the second quarter of 2005, a charter customer cancelled one of its scheduled routes effective July 25, 2005. Revenues derived from the cancelled route amounted to approximately $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005.

Higher fuel prices during 2005 and changes to the fuel surcharge program instituted in October 2004 resulted in significantly higher fuel surcharge revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year.

Passenger Charter Services Revenues


Dollars in ‘000’s	*Three Months Ended*				Increase (Decrease)					*Six Months Ended*				Increase (Decrease)
	*June 30,*				*2005 to 2004*					*June 30,*				*2005 to 2004*
*Passenger Charter Services Revenues*	2005		2004		$		%			2005		2004		$		%

Passenger Charter Services revenues	$	7,525	$	3,375	$	4,150		123.0	%	$	16,084	$	6,764	$	9,320		137.8	%
Management fee revenues		421		127		294		231.5	%		784		253		531		209.9	%
Fuel Surcharge		553		114		439		385.1	%		959		236		723		306.4	%

Total Passenger Charter services revenues	$	8,499	$	3,616	$	4,883		135.0	%	$	17,827	$	7,253	$	10,574		145.8	%

Passenger Charter Services derives its revenues primarily from fractional aircraft ownership programs, card membership programs and passenger charter brokers. In 2004, AirNet invested in additional aircraft to support passenger charter demand. AirNet increased its Passenger Charter fleet from fourteen aircraft at June 30, 2004 to

15

sixteen aircraft at June 30, 2005 as a result of the addition of two large-cabin Challenger aircraft, both of which are no longer managed by AirNet as noted below. Flight hours for Passenger Charter Services increased approximately 82% and 100%, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year. AirNet’s Passenger Charter Services revenues include revenue from both owned and managed aircraft. Management fee revenues generally include a monthly fee and a specific percentage of revenues earned under each managed aircraft agreement.

In June 2005, AirNet received written notice from a managed aircraft owner indicating that, effective July 14, 2005, the owner was canceling the agreements under which AirNet manages a Model 60 Learjet and a Model 604 Challenger aircraft for the owner. Also in June 2005, AirNet received a written notice from a second managed aircraft owner indicating that, effective July 22, 2005, the owner was canceling the agreement under which AirNet manages a Model 601 Challenger aircraft for the owner. The Passenger Charter Services revenues from these three managed aircraft accounted for $2.0 million and $4.6 million, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005. The Challenger 601 and Challenger 604 aircraft were managed by AirNet for only a portion of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. AirNet has identified direct cost reductions of approximately 90% of the revenues related to the elimination of these three managed aircraft from the Passenger Charter fleet.

In addition to the termination of the management agreements for the three aircraft discussed in the preceding paragraph, in July 2005, the owner of three Model 60 Learjet aircraft managed by AirNet informed AirNet that the owner may sell one or more of the aircraft and, as a result, would terminate its three aircraft management agreements with AirNet in the near future. Revenues related to these three managed aircraft were $1.4 million and $3.1 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005. In the event the owner does terminate the agreements, AirNet has identified direct cost reductions of approximately 90% of the revenues if these managed aircraft were eliminated from the Passenger Charter fleet.

Costs and Expenses


Dollars in ‘000’s	*Three Months Ended*						Increase (Decrease)						*Six Months Ended*					Increase (Decrease)
	*June 30,*						*2005 to 2004*						*June 30,*					*2005 to 2004*
*Costs and Expenses*	2005			2004			$			%			2005			2004		$			%

Wages and benefits	$	6,194		$	6,251		$	(57	)		(0.9	)%	$	12,398		$	12,123	$	275			2.3	%
Aircraft fuel		8,921			6,186			2,735			44.2	%		17,175			11,722		5,453			46.5	%
Aircraft maintenance		4,782			3,690			1,092			29.6	%		10,169			6,881		3,288			47.8	%
Contracted air costs		3,826			3,127			699			22.4	%		7,094			6,198		896			14.5	%
Ground courier		7,642			7,887			(245	)		(3.1	)%		15,531			15,029		502			3.3	%
Depreciation		3,628			5,050			(1,422	)		(28.2	)%		7,270			9,939		(2,669	)		(26.9	)%
Insurance, rent and landing fees		2,326			2,638			(312	)		(11.8	)%		5,136			5,202		(66	)		(1.3	)%
Travel, training and other		3,746			2,264			1,482			65.5	%		6,941			4,536		2,405			53.0	%
Selling, general and administrative		4,974			4,842			132			2.7	%		10,461			9,562		899			9.4	%
Net (gain) loss on disposition of assets		(2	)		(3	)		1			33.3	%		(52	)		289		(341	)		(118.0	)%

Total costs and expenses	$	46,037		$	41,932		$	4,105			9.8	%	$	92,123		$	81,481	$	10,642			13.1	%


Hours flown — Total		26,592			26,187			405			1.5	%		55,325			51,951		3,374			6.5	%

As operating activities for AirNet’s Passenger Charter Services increased, total costs and expenses increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in the use of Passenger Charter services for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in 2004 accounted for approximately $3.7 million and $8.2 million, or 89% and 77%, respectively, of the overall increase in operating costs and expenses. The Passenger Charter fleet increased by two aircraft in the second quarter 2005 compared to the same period in the prior year. Flight hours for Passenger Charter services increased approximately 82% and 100%, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year.

16


Dollars in ‘000’s	*Three Months Ended*						Increase (Decrease)						*Six Months Ended*						Increase (Decrease)
	*June 30,*						*2005 to 2004*						*June 30,*						*2005 to 2004*
*Aircraft Fuel*	2005			2004			$			%			2005			2004			$			%

Aircraft fuel	$	8,921		$	6,186		$	2,735			44.2	%	$	7,175		$	11,722		$	5,453			46.5	%
Less — Fuel surcharge revenues related to AirNet operated aircraft		(4,022	)		(1,549	)		(2,473	)		(159.7	)%		(7,067	)		(2,829	)		(4,238	)		(149.8	)%

Net	$	4,899		$	4,637		$	262			5.7	%	$	10,108		$	8,893		$	1,215			13.7	%

Aircraft fuel expense increased significantly for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year as a result of higher fuel prices and the increase in the number of Passenger Charter hours flown. Net aircraft fuel expense increased at a much lower rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 as a result of the significant increase in fuel surcharge revenues as AirNet continues to maintain its fuel surcharge program to offset increases in fuel prices. The billed amounts related to the fuel surcharge program are classified as revenue. Approximately 21% and 23% of the total aircraft fuel expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively, relates to Passenger Charter Services.

Maintenance expense increased during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to the expansion of the Passenger Charter fleet, including managed aircraft, an increase in related flight hours for the Passenger Charter fleet and the additional maintenance incurred due to the age of AirNet’s cargo aircraft fleet including Learjets which averaged approximately 24 years as of June 30, 2005.

The fees paid by AirNet to managed aircraft owners under aircraft management agreements for the use of the owners’ aircraft are included in travel, training and other expenses. The increase in travel, training and other expenses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 over the same periods in the prior year is primarily due to the increase in fees paid by AirNet to managed aircraft owners as a result of the significant increase in the number and use of managed aircraft by AirNet’s Passenger Charter Services. At June 30, 2005, AirNet managed seven aircraft, including two large-cabin Challenger aircraft, compared to four aircraft at June 30, 2004. As noted above, the owners of the two Challenger aircraft and one Model 60 Learjet terminated their respective aircraft management agreements with AirNet effective in July 2005.

Aircraft depreciation decreased $1.5 million and $3.1 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2004 due to a reduction in AirNet’s aircraft values as a result of the impairment charge recorded on September 30, 2004 discussed below. This decline was partially offset by $0.1 million and $0.4 million of additional depreciation for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively, related to the increase in the number of aircraft in the Passenger Charter fleet. AirNet continually reviews the remaining useful life and expected salvage value of its aircraft in connection with its depreciation calculation. Aircraft engines are depreciated based on the number of hours flown. Other depreciation includes depreciation related to building and leasehold improvements, computer hardware and software, and vehicles. The amount of the reduction in depreciation expense incurred in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods in the prior year is expected to decrease over the remainder of fiscal year 2005 as a result of additional Passenger Charter aircraft added throughout fiscal year 2004.

AirNet’s long-lived assets used in its cargo operations, consisting primarily of aircraft and spare parts, were determined to be impaired as of September 30, 2004. This determination was made as a result of industry trends in the adoption of electronic payment alternatives and evolving alternatives to the physical movement of cancelled checks at a more rapid pace than previously anticipated by the industry. AirNet believes that enactment of the Check 21 Act in October 2004 contributes to this trend. Furthermore, market data and other disclosures by the Federal Reserve confirm the accelerating decline in cancelled check volume. AirNet’s cargo airline was originally designed, and continues to operate, primarily to meet the needs of Bank Services customers. AirNet believes that its airline capacity will exceed future demand, which created an impairment of the aircraft and related assets. The impairment also reflected the overall decline in the market values of the aircraft in its cargo fleet which have not recovered as in previous economic cycles. AirNet determined that the expected future undiscounted cash flows from its assets used in its cargo operations were less than the carrying value of those assets and were impaired. Accordingly, a non-cash impairment charge of $43.0 million was recorded on September 30, 2004, using estimated aircraft fair values. The aircraft fair values used for this purpose were based upon published market sources at September 30, 2004, which are also used under AirNet’s Amended Credit Agreement.

The increase in selling, general and administrative costs is primarily due to $0.3 million and $1.2 million of incentive compensation expense accrued for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 under the 2005 Incentive

17

Compensation Plan as a result of higher pre-tax income for those same periods, respectively, whereas no incentive compensation was recorded in the same period of the prior year. No incentive compensation will be paid to four of AirNet’s five executive officers under the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan unless AirNet achieves a designated threshold level of pre-tax income for fiscal year 2005.

AirNet recognized a net loss on disposition of assets of $0.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004. This amount included a loss of approximately $0.6 million related to an accident involving one of its cargo aircraft (net of insurance proceeds of $2.3 million). In addition, AirNet sold seven piston aircraft during the six months ended June 30, 2004 resulting in a loss on sale of approximately $0.1 million. Offsetting these losses at June 30, 2004 was a gain on the sale of an aircraft of approximately $0.4 million.

The effective income tax rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005 varies from the statutory rates due to changes in AirNet’s valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as well as the changes in the tax laws in the State of Ohio.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flow from operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $14.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, compared to $12.0 million for the same period in 2004. The increase in cash flow from operating activities was primarily due to the increase in net income for the six month period ended June 30, 2005.

Financing Matters

In September 2002, AirNet entered into a $35.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and a five-year $20.0 million unsecured term loan (collectively, the “Credit Agreement”). The term loan required quarterly installments of $1.0 million beginning in December 2002 and continuing through September 30, 2007. The revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement was originally scheduled to expire on September 30, 2005 and the secured term loan was to mature on September 30, 2007.

On May 28, 2004, AirNet and its lenders amended the terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The Amended Credit Agreement was further amended by the First Change in Terms Agreement and the Second Change in Terms Agreement as described below. The Amended Credit Agreement is secured by a first lien on all of the property of AirNet and its subsidiaries, other than any interest in real estate and certain excluded fixed assets. AirNet also pledged the stock and interests of its subsidiaries to secure the loans under the Amended Credit Agreement, and each of AirNet’s subsidiaries guaranteed AirNet’s obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement. The Amended Credit Agreement permits AirNet and its subsidiaries to incur other indebtedness for the purpose of purchasing or refinancing aircraft and related tangible fixed assets, subject to certain annual limitations. The Amended Credit Agreement contains limitations on operating leases, indebtedness, significant corporate changes including mergers and sales of assets, investments in subsidiaries and acquisitions, liens, capital expenditures, transactions with affiliates, sales of accounts receivable, sale and leaseback transactions and other off-balance sheet liabilities, contingent obligations and hedging transactions. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains certain financial covenants that require AirNet to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth and to not exceed certain fixed charge coverage and leverage ratios specified in the Amended Credit Agreement.

The Amended Credit Agreement provided for a secured revolving credit facility of up to $35.0 million and a secured term loan in the aggregate amount of $14.0 million. The amount of revolving loans available under the Amended Credit Agreement is limited to a borrowing base equal to the aggregate of 80% of eligible accounts receivable, plus 50% of eligible inventory, plus 70% of the market value of certain fixed assets, reduced by the aggregate amount of AirNet’s outstanding letters of credit. The Amended Credit Agreement bears interest, at AirNet’s option, at (a) a fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, or (b) a floating rate based on the greater of (i) the prime rate established by The Huntington National Bank from time to time plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio or (ii) the sum of 0.5% plus the federal funds rate in effect from time to time plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio. At June 30, 2005, as a result of the various timing and duration of short-term debt maturities, AirNet’s interest rates ranged from 4.5% to 6.3%.

As of June 30, 2005, $19.0 million was outstanding under the secured revolving credit facility which is included in “Notes payable, less current portion” in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, AirNet had $1.6 million in letters of credit outstanding as of such date related to insurance programs, which reduced the amount available under the revolving credit facility. After giving effect to the Second Change in Terms Agreement discussed below, AirNet had approximately $11.0 million available to borrow under its secured revolving credit facility under the Amended Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2005.

18

As a result of the impairment charge recorded in September 2004 as described in Note 2 of AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, AirNet was not in compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio and the leverage ratio calculated as of September 30, 2004, and AirNet would not have been in compliance with the minimum consolidated tangible net worth requirement as of December 31, 2004. On November 12, 2004, AirNet and its lenders under the Amended Credit Agreement agreed to modify the terms and conditions of the Amended Credit Agreement (the “First Change in Terms Agreement”). The First Change in Terms Agreement modified the fixed charge coverage ratio, the leverage ratio, and the minimum consolidated tangible net worth financial covenants in such a manner that, on a going-forward basis, the impairment charge, in and of itself, would not cause a default of these financial covenants in the future. At the same time as the First Change of Terms Agreement was entered into, AirNet and its lenders executed a waiver of any defaults or potential defaults under the Amended Credit Agreement which occurred, or may have occurred, as a result of AirNet’s failure to comply with the foregoing financial covenants due to the impairment charge.

On March 24, 2005, AirNet and its lenders entered into a “Second Change in Terms Agreement” that further modified the terms and conditions of the Amended Credit Agreement. In accordance with the Second Change in Terms Agreement, AirNet prepaid in full the remaining $11.0 million balance outstanding on its secured term loan. Upon the prepayment of the term loan, the term loan portion of the Amended Credit Agreement was terminated. In addition, the revolving credit facility under the Amended Credit Agreement was reduced from $35.0 million to $30.0 million. In the event AirNet secures permanent financing on all or a portion of its Rickenbacker Facility, the revolving credit facility will be reduced from $30.0 million to $25.0 million. Under the Second Change in Terms Agreement, the term of the revolving credit facility was extended from September 30, 2005 to October 15, 2006. The December 31, 2004 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet gives effect to the Second Change in Terms Agreement entered into on March 24, 2005. The Second Change in Terms Agreement also provided for the release of certain fixed assets that were securing the loans under the Amended Credit Agreement and modified certain other financial covenants.

On March 24, 2005, AirNet entered into a three-year term loan totaling $11.0 million with a fixed interest rate of 8.12%. This term loan is secured by seven Cessna Caravans and nine Learjet 35’s from AirNet’s cargo aircraft fleet. The aircraft securing this loan were released from the collateral securing the loans under Amended Credit Agreement in accordance with the Second Change in Terms Agreement. The proceeds from this term loan were used to prepay in full AirNet’s term loan under the Amended Credit Agreement as described above. The December 31, 2004 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects the reclassification of approximately $22.4 million from current to long-term notes payable as a result of the extension of the Amended Credit Agreement under the Second Change in Terms Agreement and the financing of the cargo aircraft described above. As of June 30, 2005, $10.5 million was outstanding under these term loans.

During the second quarter of 2004, Jetride entered into four seven-year term loans totaling $22.5 million with fixed interest rates of approximately 6.7%. In July 2004, Jetride financed two additional passenger charter Learjet 60’s for the Passenger Charter fleet at $5.0 million each with seven year terms and fixed rates of approximately 6.5%, for a total of $32.5 million in financing related to AirNet’s Passenger Charter Services. As of June 30, 2005, there was $30.8 million outstanding under all six loans. These term loans are secured by aircraft used in the Passenger Charter fleet. Each of the term loans is guaranteed by AirNet. AirNet incurred approximately $0.5 million and $1.0 million in interest expense in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2005, respectively, related to the financing of the nine Passenger Charter aircraft under all six loans.

Investing activities. Capital expenditures totaled $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus $35.0 million for the same period in 2004. Of the 2005 expenditures, $8.3 million was for major periodic aircraft inspections, major engine overhauls and related flight equipment, $4.3 million related to the Rickenbacker Facility and $0.5 million for computers, furniture and other equipment. AirNet’s income from operations and revolving credit facility has been used to finance these capital expenditures. AirNet anticipates it will spend between $18.0 million and $25.0 million in total capital expenditures in 2005.

In February 2000, AirNet announced a stock repurchase plan allowing AirNet to purchase up to $3.0 million of its common shares. As of the end of the 2001 fiscal year, $2.4 million of common shares had been repurchased, and there has been no repurchase activity under the plan since. As such, purchases of approximately $0.6 million of AirNet’s common shares may still be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. Such future purchases would be considered based on availability of funds, current market conditions, the stock price and restrictions in AirNet’s financing agreements.

AirNet anticipates that operating cash and capital expenditure requirements will continue to be funded by cash flow from operations, cash on hand, borrowings in conjunction with the Amended Credit Agreement or other sources, including leasing. There were no material capital commitments at June 30, 2005, other than the Company’s construction of its new office and hangar facility described below.

19

On January 20, 2004, AirNet entered into a Land Lease with the Columbus Regional Airport Authority (the “Authority”) to lease approximately 8 acres located within the Rickenbacker International Airport (“Rickenbacker”). AirNet completed construction of its new corporate and operational headquarters at Rickenbacker (the “Rickenbacker Facility”) in May 2005 and AirNet’s relocation to the Rickenbacker Facility was completed in June 2005. AirNet’s corporate and operational functions that were previously conducted at the Port Columbus Facility and the administrative functions previously conducted at 555 Morrison Road were consolidated at the new Rickenbacker Facility. Rickenbacker is located in Franklin and Pickaway Counties, Ohio, southeast of Columbus, Ohio, approximately fifteen miles from AirNet’s former Port Columbus Facility.

On January 20, 2004, in anticipation of AirNet’s move to its new Rickenbacker Facility, AirNet also entered into an agreement to sell its Port Columbus Facility to the Authority for $3.9 million. Closing of the sale of the Port Columbus Facility to the Authority took place on December 15, 2004. Concurrently with the sale, AirNet entered into a new lease agreement with the Authority (the “New Port Columbus Lease”) pursuant to which AirNet leased the real property associated with the Port Columbus Facility and the buildings and all other improvements thereon pending AirNet’s relocation to its Rickenbacker Facility. AirNet is in the process of conducting an environmental assessment of its Port Columbus Facility and negotiating the transfer of certain assets related to its former fuel farm at the Port Columbus Facility to the Authority. Upon the conclusion of the environmental assessment and transfer of the fuel farm assets to the Authority, the New Port Columbus Lease will be terminated. AirNet remains responsible for all utility costs associated with the Port Columbus Facility until the New Port Columbus Lease is formally terminated. As of June 30, 2005, AirNet had an accrual of $0.1 million for such remedial work and the cost of returning certain portions of the premises to their prior condition.

In connection with the pending termination of the New Port Columbus Lease, the Authority requested that AirNet conduct an environmental assessment of the Port Columbus Facility, including the underground storage tanks associated with AirNet’s fuel farm operation. The objective of the environmental assessment was to determine and quantify any environmental impact AirNet’s operations may have had at the Port Columbus Facility. The results of the environmental sampling demonstrated concentrations below the regulatory limits for petroleum hydrocarbons, volatiles, and semi-volatiles in all samples except those associated with one of three oil-water separators located in the hanger portion of the Port Columbus Facility. The petroleum hydrocarbon results from the samples taken around the one oil-water separator demonstrated concentrations above the regulatory limit. Except for the area associated with the one oil -water separator, it was the opinion of the environmental testing firm engaged to conduct the assessment that no obviously recognized environmental conditions exist at AirNet’s Port Columbus Facility in the areas assessed, including the fuel farm. AirNet is in the process of reviewing the results of the environmental assessment with the Authority to determine what, if any, remedial action is necessary with regard to the one oil-water separator. As of June 30, 2005, AirNet had an accrual of $0.1 million for such remedial work and the cost of returning certain portions of the premises to their prior condition.

As a result of the marketing process and potential sale of AirNet as described below under “Brown Gibbons Lang & Company”, AirNet is not currently seeking long-term financing of the Rickenbacker Facility.

There have been no material changes in AirNet’s contractual obligations from those disclosed in AirNet Systems, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Regulation

The U. S. Department of Transportation has implemented new regulations regarding the transportation of hazardous materials that became effective on April 1, 2005. These new regulations require that certain information concerning hazardous material shipments be maintained by the pilot-in-command of an aircraft and be readily accessible at the airport of departure and the intended airport of arrival for the duration of each flight leg. AirNet has been implementing new operating procedures to comply with the regulations. Compliance with the new regulations will likely increase AirNet’s cost of transporting hazardous materials.

A significant portion of AirNet’s operations are conducted at night at airports where it maintains no ground operations. In order to comply with the regulatory requirement that information concerning hazardous material shipments be readily accessible at each airport of departure, AirNet has made arrangements to deposit such information with ground vendors, fixed based operators, or in drop boxes located at departing airports. The location of the deposited information is maintained at AirNet’s control center in Columbus, Ohio. AirNet’s control center personnel can direct any regulatory authorities or emergency response team to the location of the hazardous material information in the event of an emergency. While AirNet continues to implement procedures to comply with the new regulations, there can be no assurances that the TSA, DOT or FAA would agree that AirNet’s operating procedures comply with all of the requirements of the new regulations.

20

AirNet conducts a portion of its operations under an Indirect Air Carrier Standard Security Program (“IACSSP”) approved by the TSA. The IACSSP permits AirNet to tender shipments to commercial airlines. The TSA previously informed AirNet that the TSA would no longer approve AirNet’s IACSSP based upon the definition of an “indirect air carrier” provided under 49 CFR §1540.5. The TSA requested that AirNet submit an application for a new IACSSP under the name of an affiliated company. In accordance with the TSA’s request, AirNet submitted an application for a new IACSSP under the name of AirNet Management, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of AirNet. On June 21, 2005, the TSA approved the IACSSP submitted by AirNet Management, Inc.

AirNet is in the process of transitioning the tender of packages to commercial airlines to the AirNet Management, Inc. IACSSP. As part of the transition process, AirNet Systems, Inc. intends to enter into a service agreement with AirNet Management, Inc. under which AirNet Systems, Inc. will retain the services of AirNet Management, Inc. to process packages with commercial airlines. During the transition process, AirNet will continue to partially operate under the AirNet Systems, Inc.’s IACSSP, the certification of which is due to expire on August 28, 2005. AirNet anticipates that the transition process to the new AirNet Management, Inc. IACSSP will be completed by August 28, 2005. Upon completion of the transition process, AirNet intends to provide the TSA with written notice of the steps that it has taken and will follow to comply with all TSA rules, regulations and directives regarding the tender of packages to commercial airlines under the new AirNet Management, Inc. IACSSP.

Brown Gibbons Lang & Company

On January 2, 2005, upon the approval of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of AirNet, AirNet engaged Brown Gibbons Lang & Company (“BGL”) to serve as AirNet’s exclusive financial advisor and investment banker to review, develop and evaluate various strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value.

On May 4, 2005, AirNet announced that the Board had unanimously authorized BGL to solicit potential offers to acquire AirNet. The Board’s decision came after careful consideration of and is consistent with the recommendations provided by BGL.

AirNet’s Board also established a Special Committee consisting solely of the independent directors to oversee the marketing process. AirNet, through the Special Committee and Board, reserves the right to alter or terminate the marketing process at any time.

By taking these steps, AirNet’s Board is seeking to increase shareholder value while addressing the resource needs of its businesses amid the challenges arising from the evolution of electronic settlement alternatives in the Bank marketplace.

AirNet has received initial responses from interested parties based on the marketing process initiated in May 2005. AirNet and BGL are currently assisting these parties in evaluating the Company’s delivery services and passenger charter services businesses. During the marketing process, the Company continues to pursue growth opportunities in it’s delivery services and passenger charter businesses. In view of the marketing process, AirNet’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders has been postponed until later in the year.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

AirNet had no “off-balance sheet” arrangements as of June 30, 2005, as that term is described by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Seasonality and Variability in Quarterly Results

AirNet’s operations historically have been somewhat seasonal and somewhat dependent on the number of banking holidays falling during the week. Because financial institutions are currently AirNet’s principal customers, AirNet’s air system is scheduled primarily around the needs of financial institution customers. When financial institutions are closed, AirNet does not operate a full system. AirNet’s fiscal quarter ending December 31 is often the most impacted by bank holidays (including Thanksgiving and Christmas) recognized by its primary customers. When these holidays fall on Monday through Thursday, AirNet’s revenues and net income are adversely affected. AirNet’s annual results fluctuate as well based on when holidays fall during the week over the course of the year. Operating results are also affected by the weather. AirNet generally experiences higher maintenance costs during its fiscal quarter ending March 31. Winter weather often requires additional costs for de-icing, hangar rental and other aircraft services.

21

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Inflation and Interest Rates

AirNet is exposed to certain market risks from transactions that are entered into during the normal course of business. AirNet’s primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk. At June 30, 2005, AirNet had a $19.0 million outstanding balance under its Amended Credit Agreement (described above in “Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”) subject to market rate changes in interest. The Amended Credit Agreement bears interest, at AirNet’s option, at (a) a fixed rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, or (b) a floating rate based on the greater of (i) the prime rate established by The Huntington National Bank from time to time plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement or (ii) the sum of 0.5% plus the federal funds rate in effect from time to time plus a margin determined by AirNet’s leverage ratio. Assuming borrowing levels at June 30, 2005, a one hundred basis point change in interest rates would impact net interest expense by approximately $190,000 per year.

Following the effectiveness of the Amended Credit Agreement dated May 28, 2004, AirNet paid off three secured term loans which had been secured by aircraft. One of those loans had an interest rate swap agreement associated with it. This interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $3.0 million and a fixed rate of 4.25% plus a margin based on AirNet’s funded debt ratio remains in place. At June 30, 2005, the aggregate fair value of the interest rate swap was approximately ($4,100).

Fuel Surcharge

AirNet generally assesses its Delivery Services customers fuel surcharges which are based on the Oil Price Index Summary – Columbus, Ohio (OPIS-CMH index). Fuel surcharges are assessed to customers as a percentage of transportation charges. As index rates increase above established base rates, AirNet increases the fuel surcharge percentage applied to transportation charges. Jetride, Inc. charges its customers a fuel surcharge computed as a percentage of the base charter fee which changes according to prevailing market rates.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

With the participation of the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President (the principal executive officer) and the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (the principal financial officer) of AirNet Systems, Inc. (“AirNet”), AirNet’s management has evaluated the effectiveness of AirNet’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, AirNet’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and AirNet’s Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary have concluded that:

	•		information required to be disclosed by AirNet in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the other reports that AirNet files or submits under the Exchange Act would be accumulated and communicated to AirNet’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure;

	•		information required to be disclosed by AirNet in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the other reports that AirNet files or submits under the Exchange Act would be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and

	•		AirNet’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to ensure that material information relating to AirNet and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to them by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is being prepared.

22

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in AirNet’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during AirNet’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, AirNet’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings .

On July 26, 2005, AirNet was notified by the U. S. Department of Labor that it had received a complaint alleging discriminatory employment practices in violation of Title VIII, Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The complaint was filed by a former employee of Jetride, Inc. who alleged that his employment was terminated as a result of expressing concerns regarding allegedly unethical behavior in his department. The concerns raised by the employee were immediately investigated by AirNet’s senior management at the time they were raised and could not be substantiated. The employee subsequently separated from the employment of Jetride, Inc. and executed a release in exchange for the payment of severance benefits. AirNet believes that the discrimination complaint file by the former employee is without merit.

In July 2005, AirNet received a letter from an attorney representing an association of software publishers indicating that the association had evidence that AirNet had engaged in the unlawful installation and use of certain software products. The attorney requested that AirNet conduct a company wide review of its use of certain software published by members of the association. A preliminary internal review of AirNet’s software did not disclose any unauthorized installation or use of such software. AirNet informed the attorney representing the association of the results of its audit and requested specific information as to the nature of the alleged unlawful use of software. The attorney for the association refused to supply AirNet with any specific information regarding the nature of the alleged unlawful use. AirNet intends to formally reply to the attorney for the association indicating that it believes AirNet is in compliance with all software licensing requirements and that it has not engaged in any unlawful use of the association’s software.

Other than the items noted above, there are no pending legal proceedings involving AirNet other than routine litigation incidental to their respective business. In the opinion of AirNet’s management, these proceedings should not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on AirNet’s results of operations or financial condition.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

	(a)		Not applicable.

	(b)		Not applicable.

	(c)		Neither AirNet Systems, Inc. nor any “affiliated purchaser,” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, purchased any common shares of AirNet Systems, Inc. during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005. On February 18, 2000, AirNet Systems, Inc. announced a stock repurchase plan under which up to $3.0 million of its common shares may be repurchased from time to time. These repurchases may be made in open market transactions or through privately negotiated transactions. As of June 30, 2005, AirNet Systems, Inc. had the authority to still repurchase approximately $0.6 million of its common shares under this stock repurchase plan.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. Not Applicable

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. No response required

Item 5. Other Information.

In May 2005, AirNet relocated its corporate and operational headquarters to the new Rickenbacker Facility located at 7250 Star Check Drive, Columbus, OH, 43217.

23

On August 9, 2005, Gerald Hellerman was appointed to the Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

On August 9, 2005, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, adopted the following amendments and clarifications to the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2005 Incentive Plan”) to address the possibility that a transaction for the sale of the Company is consummated prior to the end of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 (the “2005 Fiscal Year”). In such event, (1) participants in the 2005 Incentive Plan will be entitled to receive incentive compensation measured as a percentage of their full year base salary rather than a pro rated portion; (2) to the extent that bonuses are based in part on pre-tax income for Fiscal 2005, such pre-tax income will be measured through the month ending immediately prior to the consummation date of the sale transaction; (3) to the extent bonuses for any individual are determined in part based upon the performance of a business unit against a pre-determined target, the performance of such business unit would be based upon the performance through the month ending immediately prior to the consummation date of the sale transaction versus the targeted performance through such month end; and (4) individuals who are employed by the Company at the time of the consummation of a sale transaction will be entitled to a bonus under the 2005 Incentive Plan whether or not they are employed at the time the bonus is to be paid.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibits:


Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Executive Officer)

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Financial Officer)

32		Section 1350 Certification (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

24

AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

Dated: August 15, 2005	By:	/s/ Gary W. Qualmann

		Gary W. Qualmann,
		Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
		(Duly Authorized Officer)
		(Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: August 15, 2005	By:	/s/ Ray L. Druseikis

		Ray L. Druseikis,
		Controller
		(Duly Authorized Officer)
		(Principal Accounting Officer)

25

AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.		Description
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Executive Officer)

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Financial Officer)

32		Section 1350 Certification (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

26

Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Executive Officer)

I, Joel E. Biggerstaff, certify that:

	1.		I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;

	2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

	3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

	4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a.		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b.		[Reserved];

	c.		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	d.		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b.		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

27

Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Principal Financial Officer)

I, Gary W. Qualmann, certify that:

	1.		I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 of AirNet Systems, Inc.;

	2.		Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

	3.		Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

	4.		The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

	a.		Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

	b.		[Reserved];

	c.		Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

	d.		Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	a.		All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

	b.		Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

28

Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AirNet Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Joel E. Biggerstaff, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Gary W. Qualmann, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

	(1)		The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2)		The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


/s/ Joel E. Biggerstaff		/s/ Gary W. Qualmann

Joel E. Biggerstaff		Gary W. Qualmann
Chairman of the Board, Chief		Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
Executive Officer and President		Secretary

Dated: August 15, 2005		Dated: August 15, 2005


*		This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.

29