New York 13-3156768
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (IRS Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)
85 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendments to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [ ] No [X]
The aggregate market value at December 23, 2003 of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, $.01 par value (based upon the closing price per share of such stock on the Nasdaq National Market) held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $23,201,000. Solely for the purposes of this calculation, shares held by directors and officers of the Registrant have been excluded. Such exclusion should not be deemed a determination or an admission by the Registrant that such individuals are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant.
At December 23, 2003, there were outstanding 3,181,299 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, $.01 par value.
Documents Incorporated by Reference: Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of this Report.
Item 1. Business
Overview
Ark Restaurants Corp. (the "Registrant" or the "Company") is a New York
corporation formed in 1983. Through its subsidiaries, it owns and operates 24
restaurants and bars, 12 fast food concepts, catering operations, and wholesale
and retail bakeries. Initially its facilities were located only in New York
City. At this time, 12 of the restaurants are located in New York City, four are
located in Washington, D.C., and eight are located in Las Vegas, Nevada. The
Company's Las Vegas operations include three restaurants within the New York-New
York Hotel & Casino Resort, and operation of the resort's room service, banquet
facilities, employee dining room and eight food court operations. The Company
also owns and operates two restaurants, two bars and four food court facilities
at the Venetian Casino Resort, one restaurant at the Neonopolis Center at
Fremont Street, and one restaurant within the Forum Shops at Caesar's Shopping
Center.
In addition to the shift from a Manhattan-based operation to a multi-city
operation, the nature of the facilities operated by the Company has shifted from
smaller, neighborhood restaurants to larger, destination restaurants intended to
benefit from high patron traffic attributable to the uniqueness of the
restaurant's location. Most of the Company's restaurants which are in operation
and which have been opened in recent years are of the latter description. These
include the restaurant operations at the New York-New York Hotel & Casino in Las
Vegas, Nevada (1997); the Stage Deli located at the Forum Shops in Las Vegas,
Nevada, and Red, located at the South Street Seaport in New York (1998); Thunder
Grill in Union Station, Washington, D.C. (1999); two restaurants and four food
court facilities at the Venetian Casino Resort in Las Vegas, Nevada (2000); and
a restaurant, The Saloon, at the Neonopolis Center in downtown Las Vegas, Nevada
The names and themes of each of the Company's restaurants are different except
for the Company's three America restaurants, two Sequoia restaurants, two
Gonzalez y Gonzalez restaurants and two Lutece restaurants. The menus in the
Company's restaurants are extensive, offering a wide variety of high quality
foods at generally moderate prices. Of the Company's restaurants, the two Lutece
restaurants may be classified as expensive. The atmosphere at many of the
restaurants is lively and extremely casual. Most of the restaurants have
separate bar areas. A majority of the net sales of the Company is derived from
dinner as opposed to lunch service. Most of the restaurants are open seven days
a week and most serve lunch as well as dinner.
While decor differs from restaurant to restaurant, interiors are marked by
distinctive architectural and design elements which often incorporate dramatic
interior open spaces and extensive glass exteriors. The wall treatments,
lighting and decorations are typically vivid, unusual and, in some cases, highly
theatrical.
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company's facilities
currently in operation.
(2) Seating capacity refers to the seating capacity of the
indoor part of a restaurant available for dining in all seasons and weather
conditions. Outdoor seating capacity, if applicable, is set forth in parentheses
and refers to the seating capacity of terraces and sidewalk cafes which
are available for dining only in the warm seasons and then only in clement
weather.
(3) Assumes the exercise of all available lease renewal options.
(4) The landlord has the option to terminate the lease for
this restaurant at any time after October 1, 2003 with thirty (30) day's
prior written notice.
(5) The landlord has the option to cancel the lease for this
restaurant any time after December 1, 2003 upon six month's prior written
notice and the payment of $250,000.
(6) Restaurant owned by a third party and managed by the
Company. Management fees earned by the Company are based on a percentage
of cash flow of the restaurant.
(7) The Company owns a 19% interest in the partnership that
owns El Rio Grande.
(8) The lease governing a substantial portion of the outside
eating area of this restaurant expires in 2005.
(9) Includes two five-year renewal options exercisable by
the Company if certain sales goals are achieved during the two year period
prior to the exercise of the renewal option. Under the America lease, the
sales goal is $6.0 million. Under the Gallagher's Steakhouse lease the sales
goal is $3.0 million. Under the lease for Gonzalez y Gonzalez and the Village
Eateries, the combined sales goal is $10.0 million. Each of the restaurants
is currently operating at a level substantially in excess of the minimum
sales level required to exercise the renewal option for each respective
restaurant.
(10) The Company operates eight small food court restaurants in the Villages
Eateries food court at the New York-New York Hotel & Casino. The Company
also operates that hotel's room service, banquet facilities and employee cafeteria.
(11) The restaurant experienced damage in the attack on the World Trade Center
on September 11, 2001. In addition, substantial damage was sustained by the
World Financial Center in which the restaurant is located. The restaurant closed
on September 11, 2001 and reopened in early December 2002.
(*) Represents common area seating.
Restaurant Expansion
In fiscal 2002, the Company opened The Saloon at the new Neonopolis Center
at Fremont Street in downtown Las Vegas, Nevada. The Company received a construction
and pre-opening expense allowance from the landlord. The Saloon was opened within
the limits of that allowance.
The opening of a new restaurant is invariably accompanied by substantial pre-opening
expenses and early operating losses associated with the training of personnel,
excess kitchen costs, costs of supervision and other expenses during the pre-opening
period and during a post-opening "shake out" period until operations
can be considered to be functioning normally. The amount of such pre-opening
expenses and early operating losses can generally be expected to depend upon
the size and complexity of the facility being opened. The Company incurred no
pre-opening expenses or early operating losses in fiscal 2003 or 2002. The Company
incurred pre-opening expenses and early operating losses of approximately $100,000
in fiscal 2001.
The Company's restaurants generally do not achieve substantial increases from
year to year in revenue, which the Company considers to be typical of the restaurant
industry. To achieve significant increases in revenue or to replace revenue
of restaurants that lose customer favor or which close because of lease expirations
or other reasons, the Company would have to open additional restaurant facilities
or expand existing restaurants. There can be no assurance that a restaurant
will be successful after it is opened, particularly since in many instances
the Company does not operate its new restaurants under a trade name currently
used by the Company, thereby requiring new restaurants to establish their own
identity.
The Company recently entered into agreements to manage fast food restaurants
at the Hard Rock Casinos in Hollywood and Tampa, Florida. The agreements are
subject to approval by the United States Department of the Interior. Apart from
these agreements, the Company is not currently committed to any projects. The
Company may take advantage of opportunities it considers to be favorable, when
they occur, depending upon the availability of financing and other factors.
Recent Restaurant Dispositions and Charges
In fiscal 2002 the Company determined that its restaurant and food court operations
at the Aladdin in Las Vegas, Nevada were significantly impaired by the events
of September 11, 2001, Aladdin's bankruptcy on September 28, 2001 and a general
decline in tourism and economic conditions. In light of the declining sales
and Aladdin's bankruptcy, the Company negotiated a termination of the lease,
which related to both the food court and Fat Anthony's at the Aladdin. The Company
abandoned the space as of the close of business on September 23, 2002. The Company
terminated the lease effective as of October 6, 2002, and has no further liabilities
under the lease. In addition, certain of the Company's equipment and trade fixtures
at the Aladdin were sold for a total price of $240,000, in October 2002. The
Company recorded an impairment charge of $10,045,000 in fiscal 2001 related
to the Aladdin.
In fiscal 2003, the Company determined that its restaurant, Lutece, located
in New York City had been impaired by the events of September 11th and the continued
weakness in the economy. Based upon the sum of the future undiscounted cash
flows related to the Company's long-lived fixed assets at Lutece, the Company
determined that impairment had occurred. To estimate the fair value of such
long-lived fixed assets, for determining the impairment amount, the Company
used the expected present value of the future cash flows. The Company projected
continuing negative operating cash flow for the foreseeable future with no value
for subletting or assigning the lease for the premises. As a result, the Company
determined that there was no value to the long-lived fixed assets. The Company
had an investment of $667,000 in leasehold improvements, and furniture fixtures
and equipment. The Company believed that these assets would have nominal value
upon disposal and recorded an impairment charge of $667,000 during the fiscal
quarter ended March 29, 2003.
On December 1, 2003, the Company sold a restaurant, Lorelei, for approximately
$850,000. The book value of inventory, fixed assets, intangible assets and goodwill
related to this entity was approximately $610,000. The Company recorded a gain
on the sale of approximately $240,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2004.
Restaurant Management
Each restaurant is managed by its own manager and has its own chef. Food products
and other supplies are purchased primarily from various unaffiliated suppliers,
in most cases by Company headquarters' personnel. The Company's Columbus Bakery
supplies bakery products to most of the Company's New York City restaurants
in addition to operating a retail bakery. Each of the Company's restaurants
has two or more assistant managers and sous chefs (assistant chefs). Financial
and management control is maintained at the corporate level through the use
of an automated data processing system that includes centralized accounting
and reporting.
Purchasing and Distribution
The Company strives to obtain quality menu ingredients, raw materials and
other supplies and services for its operations from reliable sources at competitive
prices. Substantially all menu items are prepared on each restaurant's premises
daily from scratch, using fresh ingredients. Each restaurant's management determines
the quantities of food and supplies required and orders the items from local,
regional and national suppliers on terms negotiated by the Company's centralized
purchasing staff. Restaurant-level inventories are maintained at a minimum dollar-value
level in relation to sales due to the relatively rapid turnover of the perishable
produce, poultry, meat, fish and dairy commodities that are used in operations.
The Company attempts to negotiate short-term and long-term supply agreements
depending on market conditions and expected demand. However, the Company does
not contract for long periods of time for its fresh commodities such as produce,
poultry, meat, fish and dairy items and, consequently, such commodities can
be subject to unforeseen supply and cost fluctuations. Independent foodservice
distributors deliver most food and supply items daily to restaurants. The financial
impact of such supply agreements, would not have a material adverse effect on
the Company's financial position.
Employees
At December 12, 2003, the Company employed 2,003 persons (including employees
at managed facilities), 1,442 of whom were full-time employees, 561 of whom were
part-time employees, 32 of whom were headquarters personnel, 196 of whom were
restaurant management personnel, 587 of whom were kitchen personnel and 1,186
of whom were restaurant service personnel. A number of the Company's restaurant
service personnel are employed on a part-time basis. Changes in minimum wage levels
may affect the labor costs of the Company and the restaurant industry generally
because a large percentage of restaurant personnel are paid at or slightly above
the minimum wage. With the exception of some of the employees at Lutece in New
York, the Company's employees are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
Government Regulation
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws affecting
its business. Each restaurant is subject to licensing and regulation by a number
of governmental authorities that may include alcoholic beverage control, health,
sanitation, environmental, zoning and public safety agencies in the state or
municipality in which the restaurant is located. Difficulties in obtaining or
failures to obtain the required licenses or approvals could delay or prevent
the development and openings of new restaurants, or could disrupt the operations
of existing restaurants.
Alcoholic beverage control regulations require each of our restaurants to
apply to a state authority and, in certain locations, county and municipal authorities
for licenses and permits to sell alcoholic beverages on the premises. Typically,
licenses must be renewed annually and may be subject to penalties, temporary
suspension or revocation for cause at any time. Alcoholic beverage control regulations
impact many aspects of the daily operations of our restaurants, including the
minimum ages of patrons and employees consuming or serving such beverages; employee
alcoholic beverages training and certification requirements; hours of operation;
advertising; wholesale purchasing and inventory control of such beverages; seating
of minors and the service of food within our bar areas; and the storage and
dispensing of alcoholic beverages. State and local authorities in many jurisdictions
routinely monitor compliance with alcoholic beverage laws. The failure to receive
or retain, or a delay in obtaining, a liquor license for a particular restaurant
could adversely affect the Company's ability to obtain such licenses elsewhere.
The Company is subject to "dram-shop" statutes in most of the states
in which it has operations, which generally provide a person injured by an intoxicated
person the right to recover damages from an establishment that wrongfully served
alcoholic beverages to such person. The Company carries liquor liability coverage
as part of its existing comprehensive general liability insurance. A settlement
or judgment against the Company under a "dram-shop" statute in excess
of liability coverage could have a material adverse effect on operations.
Various federal and state labor laws govern the Company's operations and its
relationship with employees, including such matters as minimum wages, breaks,
overtime, fringe benefits, safety, working conditions and citizenship requirements.
The Company is also subject to the regulations of the Immigration and Naturalization
Service (INS). If employees of the Company do not meet federal citizenship or
residency requirements, this could lead to a disruption in the Company's work
force. Significant government-imposed increases in minimum wages, paid leaves
of absence and mandated health benefits, or increased tax reporting, assessment
or payment requirements related to employees who receive gratuities could be
detrimental to the profitability of the Company.
The Company's facilities must comply with the applicable requirements of the
Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA") and related state
statutes. The ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability with respect
to public accommodations and employment. Under the ADA and related state laws,
when constructing new restaurants or undertaking significant remodeling of existing
restaurants, the Company must make them more readily accessible to disabled
persons.
The New York State Liquor Authority must approve any transaction in which
a shareholder of the Company increases his holdings to 10% or more of the outstanding
capital stock of the Company and any transaction involving 10% or more of the
outstanding capital stock of the Company.
Seasonal Nature Of Business
The Company's business is highly seasonal. The second quarter of the Company's
fiscal year, consisting of the non-holiday portion of the cold weather season
in New York and Washington (January, February and March), is the poorest performing
quarter. The Company achieves its best results during the warm weather, attributable
to the Company's extensive outdoor dining availability, particularly at Bryant
Park in New York and Sequoia in Washington, D.C. (the Company's largest restaurants)
and the Company's outdoor cafes. However, even during summer months these facilities
can be adversely affected by unusually cool or rainy weather conditions. The
Company's facilities in Las Vegas generally operate on a more consistent basis
through the year.
Terrorism and International Unrest
The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon
in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001 had a material adverse effect on the
Company's revenues. As a result of the attacks, one Company restaurant, The
Grill Room, located at 2 World Financial Center, which is adjacent to the World
Trade Center, experienced some damage. The Grill Room was closed from September
11, 2001 and reopened in early December 2002.
The Company's restaurants in New York, Las Vegas, Washington D.C. and Florida
benefit from tourist traffic. Though the Las Vegas market has shown resiliency,
the sluggish economy and the lingering effects of September 11, 2001 have had
an adverse effect on the Company's restaurants. Recovery depends upon a general
improvement in economic conditions and the public's willingness and inclination
to resume vacation and convention travel. Additional acts of terrorism in the
United States or substantial international unrest may have a material adverse
effect on the Company's business and revenues.
Forward Looking Statements and Risk Factors
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in the material
set forth under "Item 1. Business" and "Item 7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"
as well as throughout this report generally. The Company's actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements
as a result of certain factors, including those discussed below.
The restaurant business is intensely competitive and involves an extremely
high degree of risk. The Company believes that a large number of new restaurants
open each year and that a significant number of them do not succeed. Even successful
restaurants can rapidly lose popularity due to changes in consumer tastes, turnover
in personnel, the opening of competitive restaurants, unfavorable reviews and
other factors. There can be no assurance that the Company's existing restaurants
will retain such patronage as they currently enjoy or that new restaurants opened
by the Company will be successful. There is active competition for competent
chefs and management personnel and intense competition among major restaurateurs
and food service companies for the larger, unique sites suitable for restaurants.
To achieve significant increases in revenue or to replace revenue of restaurants
which experience declining popularity or which close because of lease expirations
or other reasons, the Company would have to open additional restaurant facilities.
The opening of new restaurants is subject to a wide variety of uncertainties,
including the ability to negotiate favorable lease provisions, the location
of the restaurant, the development of a menu and concept that appeals to consumers
and the availability of skilled restaurant managers. The acquisition or construction
of new restaurants also requires significant capital resources. New large-scale
projects that have been the focus of the Company's efforts in recent years would
likely require additional financing. If the Company were to identify a favorable
restaurant opportunity, there is no assurance that the required financing would
be available.
Item 2. Properties
The Company's restaurant facilities and the Company's executive offices are
occupied under leases. Most of the Company's restaurant leases provide for the
payment of base rents plus real estate taxes, insurance and other expenses and,
in certain instances, for the payment of a percentage of the Company's sales
at such facility. These leases (including leases for managed restaurants) have
terms (including any available renewal options) expiring as follows:
The Company's executive, administrative and clerical offices, located in approximately
8,500 square feet of office space at 85 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, are
occupied under a lease which expires in October 2008, including a five-year
renewal option. The Company terminated its lease for office space related to
its Washington, D.C. catering operations as of December 31, 2002, and has moved
into new facilities under a lease that expires in 2012.
For information concerning the Company's future minimum rental commitments
under non-cancelable operating leases, see Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
See also "Item I. Business - Overview" for a list of restaurant
properties.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is a party to various
lawsuits arising from accidents at its restaurants and workers' compensation
claims, which are generally handled by the Company's insurance carriers.
The employment by the Company of management personnel, waiters, waitresses
and kitchen staff at a number of different restaurants has resulted in the institution,
from time to time, of litigation alleging violation by the Company of employment
discrimination laws. The Company does not believe that any of such suits will
have a materially adverse effect upon the Company, its financial condition or
operations.
Several unfair labor practice charges were filed against the Company in 1997
with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) with respect to the Company's
Las Vegas subsidiary. The charges were heard in October 1997. At issue was whether
the Company unlawfully terminated nine employees and disciplined six other employees
allegedly in retaliation for their union activities. An Administrative Law Judge
(ALJ) found that six employees were terminated unlawfully, three were discharged
for valid reasons, four employees were disciplined lawfully and two employees
were disciplined unlawfully. On appeal, the NLRB found that the Company lawfully
disciplined five employees, and unlawfully disciplined one employee. The Company
appealed the adverse rulings of the NLRB to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In July 2003 the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the determinations of
the NLRB. The Company has offered to reinstate the employees and when an estimate
of potential liability can be determined a reserve will be established. The
Company does not expect this reserve to have a material impact on its financial
statements.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth the names and ages of executive officers of
the Company and all offices held by each person:
Each executive officer of the Company serves at the pleasure of the Board
of Directors and until his successor is duly elected and qualifies.
Michael Weinstein has been the President and a director of the Company since
its inception in January 1983. During the past five years, Mr. Weinstein has
been an officer, director and 25% shareholder of Easy Diners, Inc., RSWB Corp.
and BSWR Corp. (since 1998). Mr. Weinstein is the owner of 24% of the membership
interests in each of Dockeast, LLC and Dockwest, LLC. These companies operate
four restaurants in New York City, and none of these companies is a parent,
subsidiary or other affiliate of the Company. Mr. Weinstein spends substantially
all of his business time on Company-related matters.
Vincent Pascal was elected Vice President, Assistant Secretary and a director
of the Company in October 1985. Mr. Pascal became Secretary of the Company in
January 1994. Mr. Pascal became a Senior Vice President in 2001.
Robert Towers has been employed by the Company since November 1983 and was
elected Vice President, Treasurer and a director in March 1987. Mr. Towers became
an Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in 2001.
Paul Gordon has been employed by the Company since 1983 and was elected as
a director in November 1996 and a Senior Vice President in 2001. Mr. Gordon
is the manager of the Company's Las Vegas operations. Prior to assuming that
role in 1996, Mr. Gordon was the manager of the Company's operations in Washington,
D.C. since 1989.
Robert Stewart has been employed by the Company since June 2002 and was elected
Chief Financial Officer effective as of June 24, 2002. For the three years prior
to joining the Company, Mr. Stewart was a Chief Financial Officer and Executive
Vice President at Fortis Capital Holdings. For nine years prior to joining Fortis
Capital Holdings, Mr. Stewart held senior financial and audit positions in Skandinaviska
Enskilda Banken in their New York, London and Stockholm offices.
Item 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity and
Related Stockholder Matters
Market Information
The Company's Common Stock, $.01 par value, is traded in the over-the-counter
market on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "ARKR." The
high and low sale prices for the Common Stock from October 1, 2001 through September
27, 2003 are as follows:
Dividends
The Company has not paid any cash dividends since its inception and does not
intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
Number of Shareholders
As of December 21, 2003, there were 65 holders of record of the Company's
Common Stock, $.01 par value. This does not include the number of persons whose
stock is in nominee or "street name" accounts through brokers.
The following table sets forth certain financial data for the fiscal years
ended in 1999 through 2003. This information should be read in conjunction with
the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto beginning
at page F-1.
(a) Fiscal 2003 income was adversely affected by an asset impairment charge
of $667,000 related to the fixed assets of a restaurant, Lutece, located in
New York.
(b) Fiscal 2001 income was adversely affected by an asset impairment charge
of $10,045,000 related to the Aladdin operations and a charge of $935,000 due
to the cancellation of a development project.
(c) Fiscal 2000 income was adversely affected by an asset impairment charge for
a closed restaurant of $811,000, expenses of $280,000 from the sale of a restaurant
and a $1,300,000 charge associated with a wage and hour lawsuit. Fiscal 2000 was
also adversely affected by charges of $4,988,000 from the write-off of advances
and working capital needs related to a project the Company withdrew from.
Accounting period
The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest September 30. The fiscal
years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 each
included 52 weeks.
Revenues
Total revenues at restaurants owned by the Company increased by 0.8% from
fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2003 and decreased by 9.4% from fiscal 2001 to fiscal
2002. Of the $936,000 increase in revenues from fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2003,
$585,000 is attributable to the recognition of a previously deferred gain on
the sale of a restaurant in October 1997 resulting from the resolution of concerns
regarding the Company's ability to collect a note received in connection with
the sale. A review of the performance of this note and the security underlying
it indicated that the loss was no longer probable.
Same store sales increased 1.1%, or $1,230,000, on a Company-wide basis from
fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2003. This increase was the result of an 8.4%, or $4,491,000,
increase in same store sales at the Company's Las Vegas restaurants offset by
decreases in same store sales in New York and Washington D.C. of 5.0% and 8.3%,
respectively. The decreases in New York and Washington D.C. were principally
due to the residual effects on tourism of the terrorist attacks on September
11th, the sluggish economy in these markets and record rainfalls in these areas
during late spring and early summer 2003 which limited the use of outdoor cafe
seating. Menu prices did not significantly change during fiscal 2003.
During the fourth quarter of 2002 the Company abandoned its restaurant and
food court operations at the Desert Passage, the retail complex at the Aladdin
Resort & Casino in Las Vegas. During fiscal 2002 sales decreased 42.9% at
this location compared to fiscal 2001, resulting in the Company's decision to
abandon these operations. If this decrease is excluded from same store Las Vegas
sales, the Company's remaining operations in Las Vegas experienced a sales increase
of $190,000 during fiscal 2002.
Of the $11,896,000 decrease in revenues from fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2002, $3,282,000
is attributable to the year long closure of the Grill Room restaurant located
in 2 World Financial Center, an office building adjacent to the World Trade
Center site. This restaurant was damaged in the September 11, 2001 attack and
reopened in early fiscal 2003. A $256,000 increase in sales is attributable
to the opening of the Saloon at the Neonopolis Center in downtown Las Vegas.
Same store sales decreased 6.7% or $8,262,000, on a Company-wide basis from
fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2002. The decrease in same store sales was 3.3% in Las
Vegas, 8.1% in New York and 13.7% in Washington D.C. Such decreases were principally
due to a decrease in customer counts. The change in menu prices did not significantly
affect revenues. The Company believes its fiscal 2002 revenues compared to fiscal
2001 were adversely affected by the terrorist attacks on September 11th, the
residual effects on tourism and the sluggish economy. While Las Vegas has rebounded
considerably in the past year, New York and Washington continue to experience
soft sales.
Other operating income, which consists of the sale of merchandise at various restaurants,
management fee income, door sales and for fiscal 2003 the reversal of the previously
mentioned provision, was $1,337,000 in fiscal 2003, $550,000 in fiscal 2002, and
$546,000 in fiscal 2001.
Costs and Expenses
Food and beverage cost of sales as a percentage of total revenue was 25.1%
in fiscal 2003, 24.9% in fiscal 2002 and 25.5% in fiscal 2001.
Total costs and expenses increased by $3,449,000, or 3.2%, from fiscal 2002
to fiscal 2003. Increases in rent, advertising and maintenance contributed to
this increase. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002 rent concessions granted
by landlords in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 disaster were in place.
These concessions were not available during fiscal 2003 and as a result of this,
and other slight increases in rent levels, rent expense for fiscal 2003 increased
by $224,000 when compared to fiscal 2002. Also, sales increases in restaurants
where the Company pays a percentage rent resulted in an increase in percentage
rent of $168,000 during fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002. During fiscal 2003
advertising expenses increased by $623,000 over fiscal 2002 as a result of increased
advertising for the Lutece restaurant in New York and additional advertising
for the operations in Las Vegas. Maintenance expenses increased by $548,000
during fiscal 2003 compared to fiscal 2002. After September 11, 2001 discretionary
spending was sharply restricted. Though the Company has continued to keep tight
control over spending, maintenance of restaurants has been performed when required
and maintenance delayed during fiscal 2002 has been completed.
Total costs and expenses decreased by $26,408,000, or 19.5%, from fiscal 2001
to fiscal 2002. The main reasons for this decrease in total costs and expenses
include the reduction in payroll expenses of $7,673,000 from fiscal 2001 to
fiscal 2002 as a result of the Company's response to the events of September
11, 2001 and the continued weakened economy. Food and beverage costs decreased
$3,755,000 resulting from the decrease in food and beverage sales of $11,900,000.
Additionally, during fiscal 2001, total costs and expenses were adversely affected
by an asset impairment charge of $10,045,000 associated with the write down
of the Company's Desert Passage restaurant and food court operations. Total
costs and expenses were also impacted in fiscal 2001 by a charge of $935,000
due to the cancellation of a development project.
Payroll expenses as a percentage of total revenues was 33.1% in fiscal 2003
compared to 32.3% in fiscal 2002 and 35.3% in fiscal 2001. Payroll expense was
$38,583,000, $37,412,000 and $45,085,000 in fiscal 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company aggressively adapted its cost structure in response to lower sales
expectations following September 11th and continues to review its cost structure
and make adjustments where appropriate. Head count stood at 2,003 as of year
end 2003 compared to 1,959 and 2,070 at year-end 2002 and 2001 respectively.
Severance pay to key personnel was approximately $250,000 during fiscal 2002.
No pre-opening expenses and early operating losses were incurred during fiscal
2003 or 2002. The Company received a construction and operating allowance from
the landlord for the Saloon at the Neonopolis Center at Freemont Street in downtown
Las Vegas, the one restaurant opened in fiscal 2002. The Company incurred pre-opening
and early operating losses at newly opened restaurants of approximately $100,000
in fiscal 2001. The Company typically incurs significant pre-opening expenses
in connection with its new restaurants that are expensed as incurred. Furthermore,
it is not uncommon that such restaurants experience operating losses during
the early months of operation.
General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenue, were 5.7%
in fiscal 2003, 5.7% in fiscal 2002 and 5.5% in fiscal 2001. General and administrative
expenses were adversely impacted by a $370,000 increase in casualty insurance
costs during fiscal 2002. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2001 were
impacted by $400,000 in legal expenses incurred in connection with a potential
transaction.
The Company managed one restaurant it did not own (El Rio Grande) at September
27, 2003, September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001. Sales of this restaurant,
which are not included in consolidated sales, were $2,765,000 in fiscal 2003,
$2,973,000 in fiscal 2002 and $4,380,000 in fiscal 2001. The Company recently
entered into agreements to manage 11 fast food restaurants located in the Hard
Rock Casinos in Hollywood and Tampa, Florida.
Interest expense was $732,000 in fiscal 2003, $1,212,000 in fiscal 2002 and
$2,446,000 in fiscal 2001. The significant decrease from fiscal 2002 to fiscal
2003 and from fiscal 2001 to fiscal 2002 is due to lower outstanding borrowings
on the Company's credit facility and the benefit from rate decreases in the
prime-borrowing rate. Interest income was $163,000 in fiscal 2003, $133,000
in fiscal 2002 and $150,000 in fiscal 2001.
Other income, which generally consists of purchasing service fees and other
income at various restaurants was $983,000, $253,000 and $144,000 for fiscal
203, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Other income was impacted during fiscal 2003
by the Company receipt of $508,000 in World Trade Center Grants for four restaurants
located in downtown New York that were adversely impacted by the September 11,
2001 terrorist attacks.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes reflects Federal income taxes calculated on
a consolidated basis and state and local income taxes calculated by each New
York subsidiary on a non-consolidated basis. Most of the restaurants owned or
managed by the Company are owned or managed by a separate subsidiary.
For state and local income tax purposes, the losses incurred by a subsidiary
may only be used to offset that subsidiary's income, with the exception of the
restaurants operating in the District of Columbia. Accordingly, the Company's
overall effective tax rate has varied depending on the level of losses incurred
at individual subsidiaries. Due to losses incurred in fiscal 2001 and the carry
back of such losses, the Company realized an overall tax benefit of 32.8% of
such losses in fiscal 2001. During fiscal 2002 the Company abandoned its restaurant
and food court operations at the Desert Passage, the retail complex at the Aladdin
Resort & Casino in Las Vegas. In fiscal 2002, the Company was able to utilize
the deferred tax asset created in fiscal 2001, by the impairment of these operations.
The Company's effective tax rate for fiscal 2003 was 24.1%. During the year
ended September 27, 2003, the Company decreased its allowance for the utilization
of the deferred tax asset arising from state and local operating loss carryforwards
by $445,000 in the current year based on the merger of certain unprofitable
subsidiaries into profitable ones.
The Company's overall effective tax rate in the future will be affected by
factors such as the level of losses incurred at the Company's New York facilities,
which cannot be consolidated for state and local tax purposes, pre-tax income
earned outside of New York City and the utilization of state and local net operating
loss carry forwards. Nevada has no state income tax and other states in which
the Company operates have income tax rates substantially lower in comparison
to New York. In order to utilize more effectively tax loss carry forwards at
restaurants that were unprofitable, the Company has merged certain profitable
subsidiaries with certain loss subsidiaries.
The Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 provides tax credits to the Company for
FICA taxes paid by the Company on tip income of restaurant service personnel.
The net benefit to the Company was $793,000 in fiscal 2003, $741,000 in fiscal
2002 and $489,000 in fiscal 2001.
During fiscal 2002, the Company and the Internal Revenue Service finalized
the adjustments to the Company's Federal income tax returns for fiscal years
1995 through 1998. The settlement did not have a material effect on the Company's
financial statements.
Liquidity and Sources of Capital
The Company's primary source of capital has been cash provided by operations
and funds available from its main bank, Bank Leumi USA. The Company from time
to time also utilizes equipment financing in connection with the construction
of a restaurant and seller financing in connection with the acquisition of a
restaurant. The Company utilizes capital primarily to fund the cost of developing
and opening new restaurants, acquiring existing restaurants owned by others
and remodeling existing restaurants owned by the Company.
The net cash used in investing activities in fiscal 2003 of ($1,851,000) was
used for the expansion of an existing restaurant in Las Vegas and for the replacement
of fixed assets at existing restaurants. The net cash used in investing activities
in fiscal 2002 ($153,000) was primarily used for the replacement of fixed assets
at existing restaurants. The net cash used in investing activities in fiscal
2001 ($1,891,000) was principally used for the Company's continued investment
in fixed assets associated with constructing new restaurants. In fiscal 2001
the Company opened two bars at the Venetian in Las Vegas, Nevada (V-Bar and
Venus).
The net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2003 ($8,356,000), fiscal
2002 ($8,072,000) and fiscal 2001 ($5,618,000) was principally due to repayments
of long-term debt on the Company's main credit facility in excess of borrowings
on such facility.
The Company had a working capital deficit of $4,802,000 at September 27, 2003
as compared to a working capital deficit of $7,990,000 at September 28, 2002.
The restaurant business does not require the maintenance of significant inventories
or receivables; thus the Company is able to operate with negative working capital.
The Company's Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility (the "Facility")
with its main bank (Bank Leumi USA), as amended in November 2001, December 2001
April 2002, and February 2003, included a $26,000,000 credit line to finance
the development and construction of new restaurants and for working capital
purposes at the Company's existing restaurants. On July 1, 2002, the Facility
converted into a term loan in the amount of $17,890,000 payable in 36 monthly
installments of approximately $497,000. Upon amendment in February 2003, the
term loan was converted into a revolving loan. The credit line was reduced to
$11,500,000 on June 29, 2003 and $8,500,000 on September 29, 2003 until the
maturity date of February 12, 2005. The Company had borrowings of $6,975,000
outstanding on this facility at September 27, 2003. The loan bears interest
at 1/2% above the bank's prime rate and at September 27, 2003 and September
28, 2002, the interest rate on outstanding loans was 4.50% and 5.25% respectively.
The Facility also includes a $500,000 Letter of Credit Facility for use in lieu
of lease security deposits. The Company has delivered $495,000 in irrevocable
letters of credit on this Facility at September 27, 2003. The Company generally
is required to pay commissions of 1 1/2% per annum on outstanding letters of
credit.
The Company's subsidiaries each guaranteed the obligations of the Company under
the Facility and granted security interests in their respective assets as collateral
for such guarantees. In addition, the Company pledged stock of such subsidiaries
as security for obligations of the Company under such Facility.
The Facility includes restrictions relating to, among other things, indebtedness
for borrowed money, capital expenditures, mergers, sale of assets, dividends
and liens on the property of the Company. The Facility also requires the Company
to comply with certain financial covenants at the end of each quarter such as
minimum cash flow in relation to the Company's debt service requirements, ratio
of debt to equity, and the maintenance of minimum shareholders' equity.
At September 29, 2001, the Company was not in compliance with several of the
requirements of the Facility principally due to the impairment charges incurred
in connection with its restaurant and food service operations at the Aladdin
in Las Vegas, Nevada. The Company received a waiver from the bank to cure the
non-compliance. In December 2001, the covenants were amended for forthcoming
periods. During the year ended September 27, 2003, the Company violated covenants
related to a limitation on employee loans and maintaining minimum cash flow
in relation to the Company's debt service requirements. The Company received
waivers from the bank for the covenants it was not in compliance with, for the
year ended September 27, 2003 and through December 30, 2003.
In April 2000, the Company borrowed $1,570,000 from its main bank at an interest
rate of 8.8% to refinance the purchase of various restaurant equipment at the
Venetian. The note which is payable in 60 equal monthly installments through
May 2005, is secured by such restaurant equipment. At September 27, 2003 the
Company had $601,000 outstanding on this facility.
The Company entered into a sale and leaseback agreement with GE Capital for
$1,652,000 in November 2000 to refinance the purchase of various restaurant
equipment at its food and beverage facilities in a hotel and casino in Las Vegas,
Nevada. The lease bears interest at 8.65% per annum and is payable in 48 equal
monthly installments of $32,000 until maturity in November 2004 at which time
the Company has an option to purchase the equipment for $519,000. Alternatively,
the Company can extend the lease for an additional 12 months at the same monthly
payment until maturity in November 2005 and repurchase the equipment at such
time for $165,000.
The Company originally accounted for this agreement as an operating lease
and did not record the assets or the lease liability in the financial statements.
During the year ended September 29, 2001, the Company recorded the entire amount
payable under the lease as a liability of $1,600,000 based on the anticipated
abandonment of the Aladdin operations. In 2002, the operations at the Aladdin
were abandoned and at at September 27, 2003 $874,000 remained accrued in other
current liabilities representing future operating lease payments.
In September 2001, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a lease agreement
with World Entertainment Centers LLC regarding the leasing of premises at the
Neonopolis Center at Freemont Street for the restaurant Saloon. The Company
provided a lease guaranty ("Guaranty") to induce the landlord to enter
into the lease agreement. The Guaranty is for a term of two years from the date
of the opening of the Saloon, May 2002, and during the first year of the Guaranty
was in the amount of $350,000. Upon the first anniversary of the opening of
the Saloon, May 2003, the Guaranty was reduced to $175,000 and it will expire
in May 2004.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
To facilitate an understanding of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments,
the following data is provided:
Restaurant Expansion
The Company did not open any new restaurants in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2002
the Company opened one restaurant at the Neonopolis Center at Freemont Street
in downtown Las Vegas, Nevada (The Saloon). The Company opened two bars (V-Bar
and Venus) at the Venetian in Las Vegas, Nevada in fiscal 2001.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements requires the application of certain
accounting policies, which may require the Company to make estimates and assumptions
of future events. In the process of preparing its consolidated financial statements,
the Company estimates the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities,
which are not readily apparent from other sources. The primary estimates underlying
the Company's financial statements include allowances for potential bad debts
on accounts and notes receivable, the useful lives and recoverability of its
assets, such as property and intangibles, fair values of financial instruments,
the realizable value of its tax assets and other matters. Management bases its
estimates on certain assumptions, which they believe are reasonable in the circumstances,
and actual results could differ from those estimates. Although management does
not believe that any change in those assumptions in the near term would have
a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or the results
of operation, differences in actual results could be material to the financial
statements.
The Company's significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note
1 to the Company's financials. Below are listed certain policies that management
believes are critical.
Long-Lived Assets - The Company annually assesses any impairment in value
of long-lived assets to be held and used. The Company evaluates the possibility
of impairment by comparing anticipated undiscounted cash flows to the carrying
amount of the related long-lived assets. If such cash flows are less than carrying
value the Company then reduces the asset to its fair value. Fair value is generally
calculated using discounted cash flows. Various factors such as sales growth
and operating margins and proceeds from a sale are part of this analysis. Future
results could differ from the Company's projections with a resulting adjustment
to income in such period.
Deferred Income Tax Valuation Allowance - The Company provides such allowance
due to uncertainty that some of the deferred tax amounts may not be realized.
Certain items, such as state and local tax loss carry forwards, are dependent
on future earnings or the availability of tax strategies. Future results could
require an increase or decrease in the valuation allowance and a resulting adjustment
to income in such period.
Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
During 2001, the FASB issued FAS 142, which requires that for the Company,
effective September 28, 2002, goodwill, including the goodwill included in the
carrying value of investments accounted for using the equity method of accounting,
and certain other intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful life,
cease amortizing. FAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets
be assessed for impairment using fair value measurement techniques. Specifically,
goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of
the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing
the fair value of the reporting unit (the Company is being treated as one reporting
unit) with its net book value (or carrying amount), including goodwill. If the
fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the
reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment
test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to
measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill
impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill
with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting
unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment
loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value
of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized
in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is
allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized
intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price
paid to acquire the reporting unit. The impairment test for other intangible
assets consists of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible asset with
its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its
fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Determining the fair value of the reporting unit under the first step of the
goodwill impairment test and determining the fair value of individual assets
and liabilities of the reporting unit (including unrecognized intangible assets)
under the second step of the goodwill impairment test is judgmental in nature
and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Similarly,
estimates and assumptions are used in determining the fair value of other intangible
assets. These estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether
or not an impairment charge is recognized and also the magnitude of any such
charge. To assist in the process of determining goodwill impairment, the Company
obtains appraisals from independent valuation firms. In addition to the use
of independent valuation firms, the
Company performs internal valuation analyses and considers other market information
that is publicly available. Estimates of fair value are primarily determined using
discounted cash flows and market comparisons and recent transactions. These approaches
use significant estimates and assumptions including projected future cash flows
(including timing), discount rate reflecting the risk inherent in future cash
flows, perpetual growth rate, determination of appropriate market comparables
and the determination of whether a premium or discount should be applied to comparables.
Based on the above policy, no impairment charge was recorded upon adoption or
during the year ended September 27, 2003.
Recent Developments
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has recently issued the following
accounting pronouncements:
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,
supersedes existing accounting literature dealing with impairment and disposal
of long-lived assets, including discontinued operations. It addresses financial
accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived
assets to be disposed of and expands current reporting for discontinued operations
to include disposals of a "component" of an entity that has been disposed
of or is classified as held for sale. The Company adopted this standard in the
first quarter of fiscal year 2003. The adoption of this standard did not have
a material impact on the Company's financial statements; however, the Company
will be required to separately disclose the results of closed restaurants as
discontinued operations in the future.
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,
was issued in July 2002. SFAS No. 146 replaces current accounting literature
and requires the recognition of costs associated with exit or disposal activities
when they are incurred rather than at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal
plan. The provisions of the Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities
that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did
not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
FIN No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, was issued in November
2002. This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor
in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required
to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value
of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition
and initial measurement provisions of FIN No. 45 are applicable on a prospective
basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, while disclosure
requirements are effective for interim or annual periods ending after December
15, 2002. The Company adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year
2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial statements (see Note 8).
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure
was issued in December 2002. This statement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, providing alternative methods of transition for
a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based
employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure requirements
of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim
financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company
has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 (see Note 10).
FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, was issued on January
17, 2003. Such Interpretation addresses consolidation of entities that are not
controllable through voting interests or in which the equity investors do not
bear the residual economic risks and rewards. The Interpretation provides guidance
related to identifying variable interest entities and determining whether such
entities should be consolidated. In October 2003, the effective date of FIN No.
46 was deferred for variable interests held by public companies in all entities
that were acquired prior to February 1, 2003. The deferral revised the effective
date for consolidation of these entities for the Company to the quarter ended
December 27, 2003. The Company believes the adoption of this standard will not
have a material effect on its financial statements.
SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for
hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 149 is generally effective for
contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 (with a few exceptions)
and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of
this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics
of both Liabilities and Equity" improves the accounting for certain financial
instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity.
The new statement requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities
in statements of financial position. This statement was adopted by the Company
in the quarter ended September 27, 2003, and it did not have a material impact
on the Company's financial statements.
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates with
respect to its outstanding credit agreement with its main bank, Bank Leumi USA.
Outstanding loans under the agreement bear interest at prime plus one-half percent.
Based upon a loan balance of $6,975,000 (at September 27, 2003), a 100 basis
point change in interest rates would change annual interest expense by $69,750.
The Company's Consolidated Financial Statements are included in this report
immediately following Part IV.
None.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures; Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation,
the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the "Exchange Act")) are effective as of September 27,
2003 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports
that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes
in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2003 that materially affected or are reasonably likely
to materially affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
See Part I, Item 4. "Executive Officers of the Registrant." Other
information relating to the directors and executive officers of the Company
is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement for the Company's
2004 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") pursuant to Regulation 14A no later than 120
days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form (the "Proxy
Statement"). Information relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the
Exchange Act is incorporated by reference to the Proxy Statement.
Code of Ethics.
The Company has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller,
and persons performing similar functions. The Company will provide any person
without charge, upon request, a copy of such code of ethics by mailing the request
to the Company at 85 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003, Attention: Robert Towers.
Audit Committee Financial Expert
The Company's Board of Directors has determined that Marcia Allen, Director,
is the Company's Audit Committee Financial Expert, as defined under Section
407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated by the SEC in
furtherance of Section 407. Ms. Allen is independent of management. Other information
regarding the Audit Committee is incorporated by reference from the Proxy Statement.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the
Proxy Statement.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on
Form 8-K
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None
(3) Exhibits:
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of New York on January 4, 1983, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 28, 2002 ("2002 10-K").
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of New York on October 11, 1985,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the 2002 10-K.
3.3 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of New York on July 21, 1988,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the 2002 10-K.
3.4 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of New York on May 13, 1997,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the 2002 10-K.
3.5 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed on April 24, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2002
(the "Second Quarter 2002 Form 10-Q").
(b) Reports Report on Form 8-K dated July 31, 2003 on Form Report on Form
8-K dated August 5, 2003 8-K
* Filed herewith.
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Ark Restaurants Corp.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ark Restaurants
Corp. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 27, 2003 and
September 28, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
September 27, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Ark Restaurants Corp. and subsidiaries
as of September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
September 27, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Ark Restaurants Corp. and subsidiaries (the "Company") own and operate
25 restaurants, 12 fast food concepts, catering operations and wholesale and
retail bakeries. Twelve restaurants are located in New York City, eight in Las
Vegas, Nevada, four in Washington, D.C., and one in Islamorada, Florida. The
Las Vegas operations include three restaurants within the New York-New York
Hotel & Casino Resort and operation of the resort's room service, banquet
facilities, employee dining room and eight food court concepts. Four restaurants
and bars are within the Venetian Casino Resort as well as four food court concepts;
one restaurant is within the Forum Shops at Caesar's Shopping Center and one
restaurant is in downtown Las Vegas at the Neonopolis Center.
Accounting Period--The Company's fiscal year ends on the Saturday nearest
September 30. The fiscal years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002,
and September 29, 2001, included 52 weeks.
Significant Estimates--In the process of preparing its consolidated financial
statements, the Company estimates the appropriate carrying value of certain
assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources. The
primary estimates underlying the Company's financial statements include allowances
for potential bad debts on accounts and notes receivable, the useful lives and
recoverability of its assets, such as property and intangibles, fair values
of financial instruments, the realizable value of its tax assets and other matters.
Management bases its estimates on certain assumptions, which they believe are
reasonable in the circumstances, and while actual results could differ from
those estimates, management does not believe that any change in those assumptions
in the near term would have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.
Principles of Consolidation--The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash Equivalents--Cash equivalents include instruments with original maturities
of three months or less.
Accounts Receivable--Accounts receivable is primarily composed of normal business
receivables such as credit card receivables that are paid off in a short period
of time. See Notes 16 and 17 for a discussion of related party receivables.
Inventories--Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out)
or market, and consist of food and beverages, merchandise for sale and other
supplies.
Fixed Assets--Leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment are
stated at cost. Depreciation of furniture, fixtures and equipment (including equipment
under capital leases) is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the respective assets (seven years). Amortization of improvements
to leased properties is computed using the straight-line method based upon the
initial term of the applicable lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements,
whichever is less, and ranges from 5 to 35 years.
The Company includes in leasehold improvements in progress restaurants that
are under construction. Once the projects have been completed the Company will
begin amortizing the assets. Start-up costs incurred during the construction
period of restaurants, including rental of premises, training and payroll, are
expensed as incurred.
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which
requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations
when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated
to be generated by those assets are less than the asset's carrying amount. In
the evaluation of the fair value and future benefits of long-lived assets, the
Company performs an analysis of the anticipated undiscounted future net cash
flows of the related long-lived assets. If the carrying value of the related
asset exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is reduced to
its fair value. Various factors including future sales growth and profit margins
are included in this analysis. Management believes at this time that carrying
values and useful lives continue to be appropriate.
For the year ended September 27, 2003, an impairment charge of $667,000 was
incurred on the restaurant Lutece (Note 2). For the year ended September 28,
2002, no impairment charges were deemed necessary. For the year ended September
29, 2001, an impairment charge of $10,045,000 was incurred on the Company's
restaurant operations at Desert Passage, the retail complex at the Aladdin Resort
& Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada (Note 2).
Intangible Assets and Goodwill--As of September 29, 2002, the Company adopted
the provisions for SFAS No. 142. This statement requires that goodwill and intangible
assets with indefinite lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for
impairment at least annually and written down with a charge to operations when
the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value. Prior to the adoption
of SFAS No. 142, the Company amortized goodwill. The amount of such amortized
goodwill was $3,515,000 as of September 28, 2002. In accordance with SFAS No.
142 the Company discontinued the amortization of goodwill effective September
29, 2002. Had the provisions of SFAS No. 142 been in effect during the years
ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, a reduction of amortization
expense in pretax income of $364,000 or an increase of $0.11 in basic and diluted
earnings per share would have been recorded. The Company has completed its impairment
analysis as of the transition date to SFAS No. 142 and as of September 27, 2003
and has determined that there is no impairment of goodwill.
Costs associated with acquiring leases and subleases, principally purchased
leasehold rights, have been capitalized and are being amortized on the straight-line
method based upon the initial terms of the applicable lease agreements, which
range from 10 to 21 years.
Covenants not to compete arising from restaurant acquisitions are amortized
over the contractual period of five years.
Amortization expense for intangible assets not including goodwill was $15,000,
$39,000 and $95,000 for the years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002,
and September 29, 2001, respectively.
Estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal
years is $56,000 for 2004 and 2005 and $53,000 for 2006-2008.
Other Assets-- Certain legal and bank commitment fees incurred in connection
with the Company's Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility, as discussed in
Note 7, were capitalized as deferred financing fees and are being amortized
over two years, the remaining term of the facility.
Operating Lease Deferred Credit--Several of the Company's operating leases
contain predetermined increases in the rentals payable during the term of such
leases. For these leases, the aggregate rental expense over the lease term is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The excess of the expense
charged to operations in any year and amounts payable under the leases during
that year are recorded as a deferred credit. The deferred credit subsequently
reverses over the lease term (Note 8).
Occupancy Expenses--Occupancy expenses include rent, rent taxes, real estate
taxes, insurance and utility costs.
Income Per Share of Common Stock--Net income per share is computed in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 128,
Earnings Per Share, and is calculated on the basis of the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during each period plus the additional dilutive
effect of common stock equivalents. Common stock equivalents consist of dilutive
stock options.
Stock Options--The Company accounts for its stock options granted to employees
under the intrinsic value-based method for employee stock-based compensation
and provides pro forma disclosure of net income and earnings per share as if
the accounting provision of SFAS No. 123 had been adopted. The Company generally
does not grant options to outsiders.
Statement of Financial Accountings Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation ("SFAS No. 123"), requires the Company to disclose pro
forma net income and pro forma earnings per share information for employee stock
option grants to employees as if the fair-value method defined in SFAS No. 123
had been applied. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
to quantify the pro forma effects on net income and earnings per share of the
options granted and outstanding for fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001. There were
no options granted during fiscal 2003.
The weighted-average assumptions which were used for fiscal 2002 and fiscal
2001 included risk free interest rates of 4.25% and 5.50% and volatility of
35% and 45%, respectively. An expected life of four years for both years was
used. No annual dividend yield was assumed. The weighted average grant date
fair value of options granted and outstanding during fiscal 2002 and fiscal
2001 was $2.05 and $2.87 respectively.
The pro forma impact was as follows:
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards-- SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, supersedes existing accounting
literature dealing with impairment and disposal of long-lived assets, including
discontinued operations. It addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed
of and expands current reporting for discontinued operations to include disposals
of a "component" of an entity that has been disposed of or is classified
as held for sale. The Company adopted this standard in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact
on the Company's financial statements; however, the Company will be required
to separately disclose the results of closed restaurants as discontinued operations
in the future.
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,
was issued in July 2002. SFAS No. 146 replaces current accounting literature
and requires the recognition of costs associated with exit or disposal activities
when they are incurred rather than at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal
plan. The provisions of the Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities
that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement did
not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
FIN No. 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, was issued in November
2002. This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor
in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain
guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required
to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value
of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition
and initial measurement provisions of FIN No. 45 are applicable on a prospective
basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, while disclosure
requirements are effective for interim or annual periods ending after December
15, 2002. The Company adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year
2003. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's
financial statements (see Note 8).
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure
was issued in December 2002. This statement amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, providing alternative methods of transition for
a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based
employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure requirements
of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim
financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company
has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123 (see Note 10).
FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, was issued on January
17, 2003. Such Interpretation addresses consolidation of entities that are not
controllable through voting interests or in which the equity investors do not
bear the residual economic risks and rewards. The Interpretation provides guidance
related to identifying variable interest entities and determining whether such
entities should be consolidated. In October 2003, the effective date of FIN
No. 46 was deferred for variable interests held by public companies in all entities
that were acquired prior to February 1, 2003. The deferral revised the effective
date for consolidation of these entities for the Company to the quarter ended
December 27, 2003. The Company believes the adoption of this standard will not
have a material effect on its financial statements.
SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for
hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 149 is generally effective for
contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 (with a few exceptions)
and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of
this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics
of both Liabilities and Equity" improves the accounting for certain financial
instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity.
The new statement requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities
in statements of financial position. This statement was adopted by the Company
in the quarter ended September 27, 2003, and it did not have a material impact
on the Company's financial statements.
Reclassifications--Certain reclassifications of prior year balances have been
made to conform with current year presentation.
2. EFFECTS OF THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 TERRORIST ATTACKS
The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon
in Washington D.C. on September 11, 2001 have had a material adverse effect
on the Company's revenue. As a result of the attacks, one Company restaurant,
The Grill Room, experienced some damage. The Grill Room, located at 2 World
Financial Center which is adjacent to the World Trade Center and which was substantially
damaged, was closed for all of fiscal 2002. The Grill Room reopened in early
December 2002. The Company recorded $450,000 as a reduction of other operating
costs and expenses for the year ended September 28, 2002 for partial insurance
recoveries of certain out of pocket costs and business interruption losses incurred.
The Company believes that its restaurant and food court operations at Desert
Passage which adjoins the Aladdin Casino Resort in Las Vegas, Nevada (the "Aladdin")
were significantly impaired by the events of September 11th. The restaurant
and food court operations experienced severe sales declines in the aftermath
of September 11th and the Aladdin declared bankruptcy on September 28, 2001.
Based upon the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows related to the Company's
long-lived assets at the Aladdin, the Company determined that impairment had
occurred. To estimate the fair value of such long-lived assets, for determining
the impairment amount, the Company used the expected present value of the future
cash flows. The Company projected continuing negative operating cash flow for
the foreseeable future with no value for subletting or assigning the lease for
the premises. Therefore, the Company determined that there was no value to such
long-lived assets. The Company had an investment of $8,445,000 in leasehold
improvements, and furniture, fixtures and equipment. The Company believed that
these assets would have nominal, if any, value upon disposal. In addition, the
estimated future payments under the lease for kitchen equipment at the location
totaled $1,600,000. The Company recorded in the fiscal year ended September
29, 2001 an impairment charge of $8,445,000 for the net book value of the assets
and recorded an additional $1,600,000 of expense and liability for the future
lease payments, of which $874,000 and $1,253,000 remained accrued in other current
liabilities at September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002, respectively. In September
2002, the Company abandoned its restaurant and food court operations at the
Aladdin.
In October 2002, the Company sold certain furniture, fixtures and equipment
related to the Aladdin operations for $240,000. The Company recognized a gain
of $240,000 in fiscal 2003 with respect to the transaction (included in other
non-operating income),
The Company believes that its restaurant, Lutece, located in New York City
has been impaired by the events of September 11th and the continued weakness
in the economy. Based upon the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows related
to the Company's long-lived fixed assets at Lutece, the Company determined that
impairment had occurred. To estimate the fair value of such long-lived fixed
assets, for determining the impairment amount, the Company used the expected
present value of the future cash flows. The Company projected continuing negative
operating cash flow for the foreseeable future with no value for subletting
or assigning the lease for the premises. As a result, the Company determined
that there was no value to the long-lived fixed assets. The Company had an investment
of $667,000 in leasehold improvements, and furniture fixtures and equipment.
The Company believes that these assets would have nominal value upon disposal.
The Company recorded an impairment charge of $667,000 during the fiscal year
ended September 27, 2003.
3. LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES
Long-term receivables consist of the following:
(a) In December 1996, the Company sold a restaurant for $900,000. Cash of
$50,000 was received on sale and the balance is due in installments through
December 2006.
(b) In October 1997, the Company sold a restaurant for $1,750,000, of which
$200,000 was paid in cash and the balance is due in monthly installments under
the terms of two notes bearing interest at a rate of 7.5%. One note, with an
initial principal balance of $400,000, was paid in 24 monthly installments of
$19,000 through April 2000. The second note, with an initial principal balance
of $1,150,000, will be paid in 104 monthly installments of $15,000 commencing
May 2000 and ending December 2008. At December 2008, the then outstanding balance
of $519,000 matures.
The Company recognized a gain of approximately $585,000, $0, and $209,000
in the fiscal years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002, and September
29, 2001, respectively, in connection with the sale of this restaurant. The
gain of $585,000 recognized during the year ended September 27, 2003 reflected
the realization of a gain that had been deferred originally due to the length
of the note and the substantial balance due upon maturity ($519,000). A review
of the performance of this note and the security underlying it has lead management
to conclude that the full amount will likely be collected and, accordingly,
the note no longer requires a reserve. Consequently, the Company eliminated
this reserve and included the amount in revenue, in other income, for the year
ended September 27, 2003.
(c) In June 2000, the Company sold this restaurant for $438,000. Cash of $188,000
was received on sale and the balance was due in installments through June 2006.
In February 2001, the buyer defaulted and the Company took possession of this
restaurant and sold it to another party in June 2002. The total price was $270,000,
cash of $145,000 was received on sale and the balance is due in installments
through December 2007.
The Company recognized a gain during the year ended September 28, 2002 of
$105,000, the net of funds received from the buyer and the outstanding $165,000
note which was written down on the default.
The carrying value of the Company's long-term receivables approximates their
current aggregate fair value.
4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consist of the following:
(a) Purchased leasehold rights arise from acquiring leases and subleases of
various restaurants.
5. OTHER ASSETS
Other assets consist of the following:
(a) This balance represents certain costs paid on behalf of a landlord, that under
an agreement with the landlord will be used as a future offset to contingent rent
payments for certain Las Vegas restaurants.
6. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:
(a) During the year ended September 29, 2001, the Company recorded the entire
amount payable under an operating lease for restaurant equipment for the Aladdin
operations as a liability of $1,600,000 based on their anticipated abandonment.
During the year ended September 28, 2002, the operations at the Aladdin were
abandoned (see Note 2).
7. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
(a) The Company's Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility (the "Facility")
with its main bank (Bank Leumi USA), as amended in November 2001, December 2001
April 2002, and February 2003, included a $26,000,000 credit line to finance
the development and construction of new restaurants and for working capital
purposes at the Company's existing restaurants. On July 1, 2002, the Facility
converted into a term loan in the amount of $17,890,000 payable in 36 monthly
installments of approximately $497,000. Upon amendment in February 2003, the
term loan was converted into a revolving loan. The credit line was reduced to
$11,500,000 on June 29, 2003 and $8,500,000 on September 29, 2003 until the
maturity date of February 12, 2005. The Company had borrowings of $6,975,000
outstanding on this facility at September 27, 2003. The loan bears interest
at 1/2% above the bank's prime rate and at September 27, 2003 and September
28, 2002, the interest rate on outstanding loans was 4.50% and 5.25% respectively.
The Facility also includes a $500,000 Letter of Credit Facility for use in lieu
of lease security deposits. The Company has delivered $495,000 in irrevocable
letters of credit on this Facility as of September 27, 2003. The Company generally
is required to pay commissions of 1 1/2% per annum on outstanding letters of
credit.
The Company's subsidiaries each guaranteed the obligations of the Company
under the foregoing facilities and granted security interests in their respective
assets as collateral for such guarantees. In addition, the Company pledged stock
of such subsidiaries as security for obligations of the Company under such facilities.
The agreement includes restrictions relating to, among other things, indebtedness
for borrowed money, capital expenditures, mergers, sale of assets, dividends
and liens on the property of the Company. The agreement also contains financial
covenants such as minimum cash flow in relation to the Company's debt service
requirements, ratio of debt to equity, and the maintenance of minimum shareholders'
equity. During the year ended September 27, 2003, the Company violated covenants
related to a limitation on employee loans and maintaining minimum cash flow
in relation to the Company's debt service requirements. The Company received
waivers from the bank for the covenants it was not in compliance with, for the
year ended September 27, 2003 and through December 30, 2003.
(b) In April 2000, the Company borrowed from its main bank $1,570,000 to refinance
the purchase of various restaurant equipment at its food and beverage facilities
in a hotel and casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. The notes bear interest at 8.80%
per annum and are payable in 60 equal monthly installments of $32,439 inclusive
of interest, until maturity in May 2005.
Required principal payments on long-term debt are as follows:
During the fiscal years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002 and September
29, 2001, interest expense was $732,000, $1,212,000 and $2,446,000, respectively,
none of which was capitalized.
The carrying value of the Company's long-term debt approximates its current
aggregate fair value.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases--The Company leases its restaurants, bar facilities, and administrative
headquarters through its subsidiaries under terms expiring at various dates
through 2029. Most of the leases provide for the payment of base rents plus
real estate taxes, insurance and other expenses and, in certain instances, for
the payment of a percentage of the restaurants' sales in excess of stipulated
amounts at such facility.
As of September 27, 2003, future minimum lease payments, net of sublease rentals,
under noncancelable leases are as follows:
In connection with the leases included in the table above, the Company obtained
and delivered irrevocable letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $889,000
as security deposits under such leases.
Rent expense was $12,412,000, $12,001,000 and $12,756,000 during the fiscal
years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, respectively.
Rent expense for the fiscal years ended September 27, 2003 and September 29,
2001 includes approximately $11,000 and $218,000 of operating lease deferred
credits, representing the difference between rent expense recognized on a straight-line
basis and actual amounts currently payable. There was no effect for operating
lease deferred credits for the year ended September 28, 2002. Contingent rentals,
included in rent expense, were $3,366,000, $3,198,000 and $3,236,000 for the
fiscal years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002 and September 29,
2001, respectively.
Legal Proceedings--In the ordinary course of its business, the Company is
a party to various lawsuits arising from accidents at its restaurants and worker's
compensation claims, which are generally handled by the Company's insurance
carriers.
The employment by the Company of management personnel, waiters, waitresses
and kitchen staff at a number of different restaurants has resulted in the institution,
from time to time, of litigation alleging violation by the Company of employment
discrimination laws. The Company does not believe that any of such suits will
have a materially adverse effect upon the Company's financial statements or
operations.
A lawsuit was commenced against the Company in October 1997 in the District Court
for the Southern District of New York by 44 present and former employees alleging
various violations of Federal wage and hour laws. The complaint sought an injunction
against further violations of the labor laws and payment of unpaid minimum wages,
overtime and other allegedly required amounts, liquidated damages, penalties and
attorney's fees. The lawsuit was settled for approximately $1,245,000 in May 2001.
Based upon settlement discussion in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company
recorded a charge of $1,300,000 at that time.
Several unfair labor practice charges were filed against the Company in 1997
with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) with respect to the Company's
Las Vegas subsidiary. The charges were heard in October 1997. At issue was whether
the Company unlawfully terminated nine employees and disciplined six other employees
allegedly in retaliation for their union activities. An Administrative Law Judge
(ALJ) found that six employees were terminated unlawfully, three were discharged
for valid reasons, four employees were disciplined lawfully and two employees
were disciplined unlawfully. On appeal, the NLRB found that the Company lawfully
disciplined five employees, and unlawfully disciplined one employee. The Company
appealed the adverse rulings of the NLRB to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
In July 2003, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the determinations
of the NLRB. The Company has offered to reinstate the employees and when an
estimate of potential liability can be determined a reserve will be established.
The Company does not expect this reserve to have a material impact on its financial
statements or operations.
Guaranties-- In September 2001, a subsidiary of the Company entered into a
lease agreement with World Entertainment Centers LLC regarding the leasing of
premises at the Neonopolis Center at Freemont Street for the restaurant Saloon.
The Company provided a lease guaranty ("Guaranty") to induce the landlord
to enter into the lease agreement. The Guaranty is for a term of two years from
the date of the opening of the Saloon, May 2002, and during the first year of
the Guaranty was in the amount of $350,000. Upon the first anniversary of the
opening of the Saloon, May 2003, the Guaranty was reduced to $175,000 and it
will expire in May 2004.
The Company has not provided any additional financial guaranties other than
discussed above as of September 27, 2003.
9. COMMON STOCK REPURCHASE PLAN
In August 1998, the Company authorized the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares
of the Company's outstanding common stock. In April 1999, the Company authorized
the repurchase of an additional 300,000 shares of the Company's outstanding
common stock. For the year ended September 29, 2001, the Company repurchased
400 shares at a total cost of $3,000. For the years ended September 27, 2003
and September 28, 2002, there were no repurchases of common stock.
10. STOCK OPTIONS
The Company has a Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") pursuant to which
the Company reserved for issuance an aggregate of 1,098,000 shares of common
stock. Options granted under the Plan to key employees are exercisable at prices
at least equal to the fair market value of such stock on the dates the options
were granted. The options expire five years after the date of grant and are
generally exercisable as to 25% of the shares commencing on the first anniversary
of the date of grant and as to an additional 25% commencing on each of the second,
third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant.
Additional information follows:
(a) Options become exercisable at various times until expiration dates ranging
from December 2003 through December 2006.
11. MANAGEMENT FEE INCOME
As of September 27, 2003, the Company provides management services to one
restaurant it does not own. In accordance with the contractual arrangements,
the Company earns management fees based on operating profits as defined by the
agreement.
Management fee income relating to these services was $120,000, $30,000 and
$181,000 for the years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002 and September
29, 2001, respectively.
Restaurants managed had sales of $2,765,000, $2,973,000 and $4,380,000 during
the management periods within the years ended September 27, 2003, September
28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, respectively, which are not included in consolidated
net sales of the Company.
12. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes reflects Federal income taxes calculated on
a consolidated basis and state and local income taxes calculated by each subsidiary
on a nonconsolidated basis. For New York State and City income tax purposes,
the losses incurred by a subsidiary may only be used to offset that subsidiary's
income.
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the following:
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying
the Federal statutory rate due to the following:
Deferred tax assets or liabilities are established for: (a) temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and (b) operating loss
carryforwards. The tax effects of items comprising the Company's net deferred
tax asset are as follows:
A valuation allowance for deferred taxes is required if, based on the evidence,
it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The Company believes that uncertainty exists with respect to future
realization of certain operating loss carryforwards and operating lease deferred
credits. Therefore, the Company provided a valuation allowance of $900,000 at
September 27, 2003 and $1,031,000 at September 28, 2002. During the year ended
September 27, 2003, the Company decreased its allowance for the utilization
of the deferred tax asset arising from state and local operating loss carryforwards
by $445,000 based on the merger of certain unprofitable subsidiaries into profitable
ones. The Company has state operating loss carryforwards of $27,652,000 and
local operating loss carryforwards of $22,595,000, which expire in the years
2004 through 2017.
During the fiscal year ended September 27, 2003, the Company and the Internal
Revenue Service finalized the adjustments to the Company's Federal income tax
returns for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1995 through October 3, 1998.
The final adjustments, in both settlements, primarily relate to: (i) legal and
accounting expenses incurred in connection with new or acquired restaurants
that the Internal Revenue Service asserts should have been capitalized and amortized
rather than currently expensed and (ii) travel and meal expenses for which the
Internal Revenue Service asserts the Company did not comply with certain record
keeping requirements or the Internal Revenue Code. These settlements did not
have a material effect on the Company's financial condition.
13. OTHER INCOME
Other income consists of the following:
(a) During the fiscal year ended September 27, 2003, the Company applied for
grants to the World Trade Center Business Recovery Grant Program for four restaurants
located in downtown New York. The program was established to compensate businesses
for economic loss resulting from the September 11, 2001 disaster. As a result
of our applications, the Company received compensation of $508,000 during the
fourth quarter of the year ended September 27, 2003.
14. INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
per share computations for the fiscal years ended September 27, 2003 and September
28, 2002 follows. For the year ended September 29, 2001, there were no dilutive
stock options and warrants.
For the years ended September 27, 2003, September 28, 2002, and September
29, 2001, stock options for shares of 168,000, 178,000, and 330,000, respectively,
were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have
been antidilutive.
15. QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The following table sets forth certain quarterly operating data.
16. STOCK OPTION RECEIVABLES
Stock option receivables include amounts due from officers and directors totaling
$655,000 and $716,000 at September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002, respectively.
Such amounts which are due from the exercise of stock options in accordance
with the Company's Stock Option Plan are payable on demand with interest (4%
at September 27, 2003 and 5.25% at September 28, 2002).
17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Mr. Donald D. Shack, a former director of the Company, who did not stand for
re-election at the 2003 annual shareholder meeting, is a member of the firm
Shack Siegel Katz Flaherty & Goodman P.C., which acts as counsel to the
Company. The Company incurred $69,000 to such firm, while a related party, during
the year ended September 27, 2003. The Company incurred $353,000, and $436,000
in legal fees to such firm during the years ended September 28, 2002, and September
29, 2001, respectively.
Receivables due from officers and directors, excluding stock option receivables,
totaled $85,000 at September 27, 2003 compared to $897,000 at September 28,
2002. Other employee loans totaled $166,000 at September 27, 2003 compared to
$148,000 at September 28, 2002. Such loans bear interest at the minimum statutory
rate (1.52% at September 27, 2003 and 2.13% at September 28, 2002).
18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On December 1, 2003, the Company sold a restaurant, Lorelei, for approximately
$850,000. The book value of inventory, fixed assets, intangible assets and goodwill
related to this entity was approximately $610,000. The Company recorded a gain
on the sale of approximately $240,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2004.
In December 2003, the Company entered into agreements with the ultimate intention
to manage fast food operations at the Hard Rock Casinos in Hollywood and Tampa,
Florida. The agreements are subject to approval by the Department of the Interior
of the United States of America.
******
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: December 26, 2003
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
this report has been duly signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of New York on January 4, 1983.
3.2 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of New York on October 11, 1985.
3.3 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of New York on July 21, 1988.
3.4 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed with the Secretary of State of the State of New York on May 13, 1997.
3.5 Certificate of Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
filed on April 24, 2002 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 30, 2002
(the "Second Quarter 2002 Form 10-Q").
3.6 By-Laws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to
the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-18 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on October 17, 1985.
10.1 Amended and Restated Redemption Agreement dated June 29, 1993 between
the Registrant and Michael Weinstein, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October
2, 1999 ("1994 10-K").
10.2 Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the Registrant
and each of Michael Weinstein, Ernest Bogen, Vincent Pascal, Robert Towers,
Jay Galin, Robert Stewart, Bruce R. Lewin, Paul Gordon and Donald D. Shack,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 1994 10-K.
10.3 Ark Restaurants Corp. Amended Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 to the 1994 10-K.
10.4 Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27,
1999 between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.4 to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 2, 1999.
10.5 Ark Restaurants Corp. 1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended, incorporated
by reference to the Registrant's Definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Section
14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1) filed on March
16, 2001.
10.6 Lease Agreement dated May 17, 1996 between New York-New York Hotel, LLC,
and Las Vegas America Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3,
1998 (the "1998 10-K").
10.7 Lease Agreement dated May 17, 1996 between New York-New York Hotel, LLC,
and Las Vegas Festival Food Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7
to the 1998 10-K.
10.8 Lease Agreement dated May 17, 1996 between New York-New York Hotel, LLC,
and Las Vegas Steakhouse Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to
the 1998 10-K.
* Filed herewith.
(2002). The Company recently entered into agreements to manage 11 fast food
restaurants to be constructed in the Hard Rock Casinos in Hollywood and Tampa,
Florida. Apart from these agreements, the Company is not currently committed to
any new projects. The Company has sold a number of its smaller, neighborhood
restaurants.
Seating
Capacity(2)
Restaurant Size Indoor Lease
Name Location Year Opened(1) (Square Feet) (Outdoor) Expiration(3)
---------------------- ----------------------------- -------------- --------------- ----------- -------------
Metropolitan Cafe(4) First Avenue 1982 4,000 180(50) 2006
(between 52nd and 53rd
Streets)
New York, New York
La Rambla(5) Broadway 1983 6,600 300 2008
(between 75th and 76th
Streets) New York, New York
America 18th Street 1984 9,600 350 2004
(between Fifth Avenue and
Broadway) New York, New York
Jack Rose Eighth Avenue 1986 8,000 400 2011
(at 47th Street)
New York, New York
El Rio Grande (6)(7) Third Avenue 1987 4,000 160 2014
(between 38th and 39th
Streets) New York, New York
Gonzalez y Gonzalez Broadway 1989 6,000 250 2007
(between Houston and Bleecker
Streets) New York, New York
America Union Station 1989 10,000 400(50) 2009
Washington, D.C.
Center Cafe Union Station 1989 4,000 200 2009
Washington, D.C.
Sequoia Washington Harbour 1990 26,000 600(400) 2017
Washington, D.C.
Sequoia South Street Seaport 1991 12,000 300(100) 2006
New York, New York
Canyon Road First Avenue 1984 2,500 130 2009
(between 76th and 77th
Streets) New York, New York
Seating
Capacity(2)
Restaurant Size Indoor Lease
Name Location Year Opened(1) (Square Feet) (Outdoor) Expiration(3)
---------------------- ----------------------------- -------------- --------------- ----------- -------------
Lutece East 50th Street 1994 2,500 92 Month to
(between Second and Third Month
Avenues) New York, New York
Columbus Bakery Columbus Avenue 1988 3,000 75 2012
(between 82nd and 83rd
Streets) New York, New York
Bryant Park Grill & Bryant Park 1995 25,000 180(820) 2025
Cafe(8) New York, New York
Columbus Bakery First Avenue 1995 2000 75 2006
(between 52nd and 53rd
Streets)
New York, New York
America(9) New York-New York Hotel and 1997 20,000 450 2017(9)
Casino
Las Vegas, Nevada
Gallagher's New York-New York 1997 5,500 260 2017(9)
Steakhouse(9) Hotel & Casino
Las Vegas, Nevada
Gonzalez y Gonzalez(9) New York-New York 1997 2,000 120 2017(9)
Hotel & Casino
Las Vegas, Nevada
Village Eateries New York-New York 1997 6,300 400(*) 2017(9)
(9)(10) Hotel & Casino
Las Vegas, Nevada
The Grill Room (11) World Financial Center 1997 10,000 250 2011
New York, New York
The Stage Deli Forum Shops 1997 5,000 200 2008
Las Vegas, Nevada
Red South Street Seaport 1998 7,000 150(150) 2013
New York, New York
Thunder Grill Union Station 1999 10,000 500 2019
Washington, D.C.
Venetian Food Court Venetian Casino Resort 1999 5,000 300(*) 2014
Las Vegas, Nevada
Seating
Capacity(2)
Restaurant Size Indoor Lease
Name Location Year Opened(1) (Square Feet) (Outdoor) Expiration(3)
---------------------- ----------------------------- -------------- --------------- ----------- -------------
Tsunami Grill Venetian Casino Resort 1999 13,000 300 2019
Las Vegas, Nevada
Lutece Venetian Casino Resort 1999 6,400 90(90) 2019
Las Vegas, Nevada
Venus Venetian Casino Resort 2001 9,700 250 2019
Las Vegas, Nevada
V-Bar Venetian Casino Resort 2000 3,000 100 2015
Las Vegas, Nevada
The Saloon Neonopolis Center 2002 6,000 200 2014
at Fremont Street
Las Vegas, Nevada
(1) Restaurants are, from time to time, renovated and/or renamed. "Year
Opened" refers to the year in which the Company or an affiliated predecessor
of the Company first opened, acquired or began managing a restaurant at
the applicable location, notwithstanding that the restaurant may have been
renovated and/or renamed since that date.
Years Lease Number of
Terms Expire Facilities
------------ ----------
2004-2005 2
2006-2010 10
2011-2015 9
2016-2020 9
2021-2025 1
Name Age Positions and Offices
---- --- ---------------------
Michael Weinstein 60 President and Chief Executive Officer
Vincent Pascal 60 Senior Vice President and Secretary
Robert Towers 56 Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer and Treasurer
Paul Gordon 52 Senior Vice President
Robert Stewart 47 Chief Financial Officer
Calendar 2001 High Low
-------------- ------ -----
Fourth Quarter $10.00 $6.75
Calendar 2002
-------------
First Quarter 8.00 6.10
Second Quarter 8.15 6.41
Third Quarter 8.49 6.60
Fourth Quarter 7.42 6.05
Calendar 2003
-------------
First Quarter 7.24 5.75
Second Quarter 7.75 6.20
Third Quarter 11.99 7.45
Years Ended
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
September 27, September 28, September 29, September 30, October 2,
2003 2002 2001 2000 1999
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ----------
(In thousands, except per share data)
(a) (b) (c)
OPERATING DATA:
Total revenue $ 116,593 $ 115,657 $ 127,553 $ 119,887 $ 111,884
Cost and expenses (112,632) (109,183) (135,591) (123,729) (104,836)
Operating income (loss) 3,961 6,474 (8,038) (3,842) 7,048
Other income (expense), net 414 (826) (2,152) (1,598) 23
Income (loss) before provision for
income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change 4,375 5,648 (10,190) (5,440) 7,071
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 1,056 1,419 (3,342) (1,906) 2,576
Income (loss) before cumulative
effect on accounting change 3,319 4,229 (6,848) (3,534) 4,495
Cumulative effect of accounting
charge--net -- -- -- (189) --
NET INCOME (LOSS) 3,319 4,229 (6,848) (3,723) 4,495
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Basic $ 1.04 $ 1.33 $ (2.15) $ (1.17) $ 1.30
Diluted $ 1.03 $ 1.32 $ (2.15) $ (1.17) $ 1.29
Weighted average number of shares
Basic 3,181 3,181 3,181 3,186 3,461
Diluted 3,213 3,206 3,181 3,186 3,476
BALANCE SHEET DATA
(end of period):
Total assets $ 43,635 $ 47,960 $ 53,091 $ 66,297 $ 46,709
Working capital (deficit) (4,802) (7,990) (6,569) (5,640) (3,714)
Long-term debt 7,226 9,547 21,700 24,447 6,683
Shareholders' equity 24,826 21,446 17,173 24,065 28,843
Shareholders' equity per share 7.80 6.74 5.40 7.55 8.33
Facilities in operations--end of year,
including managed 41 41 47 49 42
Payments Due by Period
---------------------------------------------------
Within After 5
Total 1 year 2-3 years 4-5 years years
------- ------- --------- --------- -------
(in thousands of dollars)
Contractual Obligations:
Long Term Debt $ 7,576 $ 350 $ 7,226 $ -- $ --
Operating Leases 46,572 7,988 15,727 8,751 14,106
------- ------ ------- ------ -------
Total Contractual Cash Obligations $54,148 $8,338 $22,953 $8,751 $14,106
======= ====== ======= ====== =======
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
---------------------------------------------------
Within After 5
Total 1 year 2-3 years 4-5 years years
------- ------- --------- --------- -------
(in thousands of dollars)
Other Commercial Commitments:
Letters of Credit $500 $-- $500 $-- $--
---- --- ---- --- ---
Total Commercial Commitments $500 $-- $500 $-- $--
==== === ==== === ===
(a) (1) Financial Statements: Page
----
Independent Auditors' Report F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets --
at September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002 F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations -- For each of
the three fiscal years ended September 27, 2003,
September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 F-3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- For each of
the three fiscal years ended September 27, 2003,
September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 F-4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity --
For each of the three fiscal years ended September
27, 2003, September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-6
3.6 By-Laws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-18 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on October 17, 1985.
10.1 Amended and Restated Redemption Agreement dated June 29, 1993
between the Registrant and Michael Weinstein, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 1994 ("1994
10-K").
10.2 Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between the
Registrant and each of Michael Weinstein, Ernest Bogen,
Vincent Pascal, Robert Towers, Jay Galin, Robert Stewart,
Bruce R. Lewin, Paul Gordon and Donald D. Shack, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 1994 10-K.
10.3 Ark Restaurants Corp. Amended Stock Option Plan, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the 1994 10-K.
10.4 Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
December 27, 1999 between the Company and Bank Leumi USA,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October
2, 1999.
10.5 Ark Restaurants Corp. 1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended,
incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Definitive
Proxy Statement pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 1) filed on March 16,
2001.
10.6 Lease Agreement dated May 17, 1996 between New York-New York
Hotel, LLC, and Las Vegas America Corp., incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 1998 (the
"1998 10-K").
10.7 Lease Agreement dated May 17, 1996 between New York-New York
Hotel, LLC, and Las Vegas Festival Food Corp., incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the 1998 10-K.
10.8 Lease Agreement dated May 17, 1996 between New York-New York
Hotel, LLC, and Las Vegas Steakhouse Corp., incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the 1998 10-K.
10.9 Amendment dated August 21, 2000 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000
(the "2000 10-K").
10.10 Amendment dated November 21, 2000 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the 2000 10-K.
10.11 Amendment dated November 1, 2001 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2001
(the "2001 10-K").
10.12 Amendment dated December 20, 2001 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the 2001 10-K.
10.13 Amendment dated as of April 23, 2002 to the Fourth Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Second Quarter 2002 Form
10-Q.
10.14 Amendment dated as of January 22, 2002 to the Fourth Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the First Quarter 2003 Form
10-Q.
*14.1 Code of Ethics
*21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
*23 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
*31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*32 Section 1350 Certification
/s/ Deloitte and Touche LLP
New York, New York
December 24, 2003
(In thousands)
September 27, September 28,
2003 2002
------------- -------------
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 486 $ 819
Accounts receivable 1,677 2,000
Employee receivables (net of reserves of $0 and $45 respectively) 255 1,045
Current portion of long-term receivables (Note 3) 193 164
Inventories 1,997 1,925
Deferred income taxes (Note 12) 281 293
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 886 779
Refundable and prepaid income taxes -- 957
------- -------
Total current assets 5,775 7,982
------- -------
LONG-TERM RECEIVABLES (Note 3) 1,291 904
FIXED ASSETS--At cost:
Leasehold improvements 34,385 33,542
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 29,427 28,320
------- -------
63,812 61,862
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 36,748 31,602
------- -------
27,064 30,260
------- -------
INTANGIBLE ASSETS--Net (Note 4) 473 341
GOODWILL 3,515 3,515
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES (Note 12) 4,622 4,255
OTHER ASSETS (Note 5) 895 703
------- -------
TOTAL $43,635 $47,960
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable--trade $ 3,443 $ 3,332
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (Note 6) 5,586 6,356
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 7) 350 6,284
Accrued income taxes 1,198 --
------- -------
Total current liabilities 10,577 15,972
------- -------
LONG-TERM DEBT--Net of current maturities (Note 7) 7,226 9,547
OPERATING LEASE DEFERRED CREDIT (Notes 1 and 8) 1,006 995
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (Notes 7, 9 and 10):
Common stock, par value $.01 per share--authorized, 10,000
shares; issued, 5,249 52 52
Additional paid-in capital 14,743 14,743
Retained earnings 19,037 15,718
------- -------
33,832 30,513
Less stock options receivables 655 716
Less treasury stock, 2,068 shares 8,351 8,351
------- -------
Total shareholders' equity 24,826 21,446
------- -------
TOTAL $43,635 $47,960
======= =======
(In thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended
---------------------------------------------
September 27, September 28, September 29,
2003 2002 2001
------------- ------------- -------------
REVENUES:
Food and beverage sales $115,256 $115,107 $127,007
Other income 1,337 550 546
-------- -------- --------
Total revenues 116,593 115,657 127,553
-------- -------- --------
COST AND EXPENSES:
Food and beverage cost of sales 29,267 28,794 32,549
Payroll expenses 38,583 37,412 45,085
Occupancy expenses 18,200 17,306 18,320
Other operating costs and expenses 14,964 13,951 16,499
General and administrative expenses 6,665 6,548 7,005
Depreciation and amortization 4,286 5,172 5,938
Asset impairment (Note 2) 667 -- 10,045
Joint venture losses -- -- 150
-------- -------- --------
Total cost and expenses 112,632 109,183 135,591
-------- -------- --------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 3,961 6,474 (8,038)
-------- -------- --------
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:
Interest expense (Note 7) 732 1,212 2,446
Interest income (163) (133) (150)
Other income (Note 13) (983) (253) (144)
-------- -------- --------
(414) 826 2,152
-------- -------- --------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 4,375 5,648 (10,190)
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES (Note 12) 1,056 1,419 (3,342)
-------- -------- --------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 3,319 $ 4,229 $ (6,848)
======== ======== ========
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE--Basic: $ 1.04 $ 1.33 $ (2.15)
======== ======== ========
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE--Diluted: $ 1.03 $ 1.32 $ (2.15)
======== ======== ========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES--Basic 3,181 3,181 3,181
======== ======== ========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES--Diluted 3,213 3,206 3,181
======== ======== ========
(In thousands)
Years Ended
---------------------------------------------
September 27, September 28, September 29,
2003 2002 2001
------------- ------------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) $ 3,319 $ 4,229 $(6,848)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 4,286 5,172 5,938
Recognition of deferred gain on sale of restaurant (585) -- --
Gain on sale of restaurants -- (105) (209)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets and intangibles 57 -- --
Write-off of joint venture advances and investments -- -- 1,086
Impairment of fixed assets 667 -- 10,045
Write-off of accounts and notes receivable -- 165 209
Operating lease deferred credit 11 -- (218)
Deferred income taxes (355) 1,786 (3,107)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and employee receivables 1,113 (756) 1,037
Inventories (72) 185 23
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets (163) (124) (308)
Refundable and prepaid
income taxes 957 162 189
Other assets 100 (382) (502)
Accounts payable-trade 111 (900) (1,061)
Accrued income taxes 1,198 -- --
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (770) (388) 538
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided by operating activities 9,874 9,044 6,812
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to fixed assets (1,884) (704) (3,014)
Proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets -- 394 --
Purchases of intangible assets (136) -- --
Issuance of demand notes and long-term receivables -- (125) (98)
Payments received on long-term receivables 169 282 1,221
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities (1,851) (153) (1,891)
------- ------- -------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 1,100 1,500 4,400
Principal payment on long-term debt (9,355) (9,616) (9,974)
Payment (borrowings) under stock options receivables 61 44 (41)
Payment of debt issuance costs (162) -- --
Purchase of treasury stock -- -- (3)
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in financing activities (8,356) (8,072) (5,618)
------- ------- -------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (333) 819 (697)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS--
Beginning of year 819 -- 697
------- ------- -------
$ 486 $ 819 $ --
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS--End of year ======= ======= =======
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:
Cash payments for:
Interest $ 768 $ 1,271 $ 2,446
======= ======= =======
Income taxes $ 114 $ 187 $ 852
======= ======= =======
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2003, SEPTEMBER 28, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER 29,
2001
(In thousands)
Common Stock Additional Stock Total
--------------- Paid-In Retained Treasury Options Shareholders'
Shares Amount Capital Earnings Stock Receivable Equity
------ ------ ---------- -------- -------- ---------- -------------
BALANCE, OCTOBER 1, 2000 5,249 $52 $14,743 $18,337 $(8,348) $(719) $24,065
Purchase of treasury stock -- -- -- -- (3) -- (3)
Net borrowings of stock option receivables -- -- -- -- -- (41) (41)
Net loss -- -- -- (6,848) -- -- (6,848)
----- ---- -------- ------- ------- ----- -------
BALANCE--September 29, 2001 5,249 52 14,743 11,489 (8,351) (760) 17,173
Net payment on stock options receivables -- -- -- -- -- 44 44
Net income -- -- -- 4,229 -- -- 4,229
----- --- ------- ------- ------- ----- -------
BALANCE--September 28, 2002 5,249 52 14,743 15,718 (8,351) (716) 21,446
Payment on stock options receivables -- -- -- -- -- 61 61
Net income -- -- -- 3,319 -- -- 3,319
----- --- ------- ------- ------- ----- -------
BALANCE--September 27, 2003 5,249 $52 $14,743 $19,037 $(8,351) $(655) $24,826
===== === ======= ======= ======= ===== =======
YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 2003, SEPTEMBER 28, 2002 AND SEPTEMBER
29, 2001
Years Ended
---------------------------------------------
September 27, September 28, September 29,
2003 2002 2001
------------- ------------- -------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income (loss) as reported $3,319 $4,229 $(6,848)
Deduct stock based compensation expense
computed under the fair value method 118 141 205
Net income (loss) - pro forma $3,201 $4,088 $(7,053)
Net income (loss) per share as reported - basic $ 1.04 $ 1.33 $ (2.15)
Net income (loss) per share as reported - diluted $ 1.03 $ 1.32 $ (2.15)
Net income (loss) per share pro forma - basic $ 1.01 $ 1.29 $ (2.22)
Net income (loss) per share pro forma - diluted $ 1.00 $ 1.28 $ (2.22)
September 27, September 28,
2003 2002
------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Note receivable secured by fixed assets and lease at a
restaurant sold by the Company, at 8% interest; due in
monthly installments through December 2006 (a) $ 268 $ 337
Note receivable secured by fixed assets and lease at a
restaurant sold by the Company, at 7.5% interest; due in
monthly installments through December 2008 (b) 1,104 606
Note receivable secured by fixed assets and lease at a
restaurant at 7.0% interest; due in monthly installments
through December 2007 (c) 112 125
------ ------
1,484 1,068
Less current portion 193 164
------ ------
$1,291 $ 904
====== ======
September 27, September 28,
2003 2002
------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Intangible assets:
Purchased leasehold rights (a) $ 751 $ 751
Noncompete agreements and other 926 790
------ ------
1,677 1,541
Less accumulated amortization 1,204 1,200
------ ------
Total intangible assets $ 473 $ 341
====== ======
September 27, September 28,
2003 2002
------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Deposits and other $378 $261
Deferred financing fees 117 42
Landlord receivable (a) 400 400
---- ----
$895 $703
==== ====
September 27, September 28,
2003 2002
------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Sales tax payable $ 737 $ 673
Accrued wages and payroll related costs 1,390 1,508
Customer advance deposits 815 924
Accrued and other liabilities 1,770 1,998
Impairment accrual (a) 874 1,253
------ ------
$5,586 $6,356
====== ======
September 27, September 28,
2003 2002
------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility with interest at the
prime rate, plus 1/2%, due February 16, 2005 (a) $6,975 $14,908
Notes issued in connection with refinancing of restaurant
equipment, at 8.80%, payable in monthly installments
through May 2005 (b) 601 923
------ -------
7,576 15,831
Less current maturities 350 6,284
------ -------
$7,226 $ 9,547
====== =======
Amount
Fiscal Year (In thousands)
----------- --------------
2004 $ 350
2005 7,226
------
$7,576
======
Amount
Fiscal Year (In thousands)
----------- --------------
2004 $ 7,988
2005 7,857
2006 7,870
2007 5,031
2008 3,720
Thereafter 14,106
-------
Total minimum payments $46,572
=======
2003 2002 2001
------------------------ ------------------------ -------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Exercise Exercise Exercise
Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
------------- -------- ------------- -------- -------------- --------
Outstanding, beginning of year 392,500 $7.91 330,000 $10.72 343,000 $10.76
Options:
Granted -- 240,000 6.30 10,000 7.50
Exercised -- -- --
Canceled or expired -- (177,500) 10.24 (23,000) 9.89
------------- ------------- --------------
Outstanding, end of year (a) 392,500 7.91 392,500 7.91 330,000 10.72
============= ============= ==============
Exercise price, outstanding options $6.30 - 10.00 $6.30 - 10.00 $7.50 - $12.00
Weighted average years 2.06 Years 3.06 Years 1.65 Years
Shares available for future grant 371,000 371,000 320,000
Options exercisable (a) 222,000 9.10 168,000 10.00 229,000 11.15
Years Ended
---------------------------------------------
September 27, September 28, September 29,
2003 2002 2001
------------- ------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Current provision (benefit):
Federal $1,534 $(2,151) $(1,008)
State and local 316 872 773
------ ------- -------
1,850 (1,279) (235)
------ ------- -------
Deferred provision (benefit):
Federal 3 2,784 (3,022)
State and local (797) (86) (85)
------ ------- -------
(794) 2,698 (3,107)
------ ------- -------
$1,056 $ 1,419 $(3,342)
====== ======= =======
Years Ended
---------------------------------------------
September 27, September 28, September 29,
2003 2002 2001
------------- ------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Provision (benefit) for Federal
income taxes (34%) $1,488 $1,920 $(3,465)
State and local income taxes net of
Federal tax benefit 208 575 454
Amortization of goodwill -- 26 26
Tax credits (132) (755) (489)
State and local net operating loss
carryforward allowance
adjustment (445) -- --
Other (63) (347) 132
------ ------ -------
$1,056 $1,419 $(3,342)
====== ====== =======
September 27, September 28,
2003 2002
------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Operating loss carryforwards $2,206 $1,721
Operating lease deferred credits 458 461
Carryforward tax credits 5,472 5,641
Depreciation and amortization (2,140) (1,829)
Deferred gains (151) (146)
Valuation allowance (900) (1,031)
Inventory (270) (269)
Asset impairment 228 --
------ ------
$4,903 $4,548
====== ======
Years Ended
---------------------------------------------
September 27, September 28, September 29,
2003 2002 2001
------------- ------------- -------------
(In thousands)
Purchasing service fees $ 58 $123 $106
World Trade Center Recovery Grants (a) 508 -- --
Other 417 130 38
---- ---- ----
$983 $253 $144
==== ==== ====
Income Shares Per-Share
(Numerator) (Denominator) Amount
----------- ------------- ----------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Year ended September 27, 2003:
Basic EPS $3,319 3,181 $ 1.04
Stock options -- 32 (0.01)
------ ----- ------
Diluted EPS $3,319 3,213 $ 1.03
====== ===== ======
Year ended September 28, 2002:
Basic EPS 4,229 3,181 $ 1.33
Stock options -- 25 (0.01)
------ ----- ------
Diluted EPS $4,229 3,206 $ 1.32
====== ===== ======
Fiscal Quarters Ended
---------------------------------------------------
December 28, March 29, June 28, September 27,
2002 2003 2003 2003
------------ --------- -------- -------------
(In thousands except per share amounts)
2003
Food and beverage sales $26,169 $25,779 $31,642 $31,667
Net income (loss) (116) 30 1,619 1,786
Net income (loss) per share $ (0.04) $ 0.01 $ 0.51 $ 0.56
basic
Net income (loss) per share $ (0.04) $ 0.01 $ 0.50 $ 0.55
diluted
Fiscal Quarters Ended
---------------------------------------------------
December 31, March 29, June 29, September 28,
2001 2002 2002 2002
------------ --------- -------- -------------
(In thousands except per share amounts)
2002
Food and beverage sales $25,781 $26,149 $33,261 $29,916
Net income (loss) 974 (189) 1,836 1,608
Net income (loss) per share
basic $ 0.31 $ (0.06) $ 0.58 $ 0.51
Net income (loss) per share
diluted $ 0.31 $ (0.06) $ 0.57 $ 0.50
Fiscal Quarters Ended
---------------------------------------------------
December 30, March 31, June 30, September 29,
2000 2001 2001 2001
------------ --------- -------- -------------
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
2001
Food and beverage sales $30,815 $28,417 $36,805 $30,970
Net income (loss) 225 (1,000) 1,958 (8,031)
Net income (loss) per share
basic and diluted $ 0.07 $ (0.31) $ 0.62 $ (2.52)
By: /s/ Michael Weinstein
-------------------------------------
Michael Weinstein
President and Chief Executive Officer
Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----
/s/ Ernest Bogen Chairman of the Board and December 26, 2003
--------------------- Director
(Ernest Bogen)
/s/ Michael Weinstein President, Chief Executive December 26, 2003
--------------------- Officer and Director
(Michael Weinstein)
/s/ Vincent Pascal Senior Vice President, December 26, 2003
--------------------- Secretary and Director
(Vincent Pascal)
/s/ Robert Towers Executive Vice President, December 26, 2003
--------------------- Treasurer, Chief Operating
(Robert Towers) Officer and Director
/s/ Robert Stewart Chief Financial Officer December 26, 2003
---------------------
(Robert Stewart)
/s/ Marcia Allen Director December 26, 2003
---------------------
(Marcia Allen)
/s/ Steven Shulman Director December 26, 2003
---------------------
(Steven Shulman)
/s/ Paul Gordon Senior Vice President December 26, 2003
--------------------- and Director
(Paul Gordon)
/s/ Bruce R. Lewin Director December 26, 2003
---------------------
(Bruce R. Lewin)
10.9 Amendment dated August 21, 2000 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000
(the "2000 10-K").
10.10 Amendment dated November 21, 2000 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the 2000 10-K.
10.11 Amendment dated November 1, 2001 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2001
(the "2001 10-K").
10.12 Amendment dated December 20, 2001 to the Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the 2001 10-K.
10.13 Amendment dated as of April 23, 2002 to the Fourth Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Second Quarter 2002 Form
10-Q.
10.14 Amendment dated as of January 22, 2002 to the Fourth Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 27, 1999
between the Company and Bank Leumi USA, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the First Quarter 2003 Form
10-Q.
*14.1 Code of Ethics
*21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
*23 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.
*31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*32 Section 1350 Certification.
1. TREAT IN AN ETHICAL MANNER THOSE TO WHOM ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. HAS AN OBLIGATION
The officers, directors and employees of Ark Restaurants Corp. (the "Company") are committed to performing the business of the Company with the highest levels of honesty and ethical conduct.
For the communities in which we live and work we are committed to acting as concerned and responsible neighbors, reflecting all aspects of good citizenship. For our shareholders we are committed to pursuing sound growth and earnings objectives and to exercising prudence in the use of our assets and resources. For our suppliers and partners we are committed to fair competition and the sense of responsibility required of a good customer and teammate.
2. OBEY THE LAW
We will conduct our business in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. Compliance with the law does not comprise our entire ethical responsibility. Rather, it is a minimum, absolutely essential condition for performance of our duties. In conducting business, we shall:
Officer, directors and employees must strictly adhere to all antitrust laws. These laws prohibit practices in restraint of trade such as price fixing and boycotting suppliers or customers. They also bar pricing intended to run a competitor out of business; disparaging, misrepresenting, or harassing a competitor; stealing trade secrets; bribery; and kickbacks.
In our role as a publicly owned company, we must always be alert to and comply with the security laws and regulations of the United States.
Federal law and Company policy prohibits officers, directors and employees, directly or indirectly through their families or others, from purchasing or selling Company stock while in the possession of material, non-public information concerning the Company. This same prohibition applies to trading in the stock of other publicly held companies on the basis of material, non-public information.
Material, non-public information is any information that could reasonably be expected to affect the price of a stock. If an officer, director or employee is considering buying or selling a stock because of inside information they possess, they should assume that such information is material. It is also important for the officer, director or employee to keep in mind that if any trade they make becomes the subject of an investigation by the government, the trade will be viewed after-the-fact with the benefit of hindsight.
Consequently, officers, directors and employees should always carefully consider how their trades would look from this perspective.
Two simple rules can help protect you in this area: (1) Do not use non-public information for personal gain. (2) Do not pass along such information to someone else who has no need to know.
As a public company, the Company must file disclosure reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission that are full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable. Officers, directors and management of the Company are responsible for ensuring that these reports and the other public communications made by the Company are accurate and fairly present the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
Securities laws are vigorously enforced. Violations may result in severe penalties including forced sales of parts of the business and significant fines against the Company. There may also be sanctions against individual employees including substantial fines and prison sentences.
The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company will certify to the accuracy of reports filed with the SEC in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Officers and directors who knowingly or willingly make false certifications may be subject to criminal penalties or sanctions including fines and imprisonment.
3. AVOID CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Our officers, directors and employees have an obligation to give their complete loyalty to the best interests of the Company. They should avoid any action that may involve, or may appear to involve, a conflict of interest with the Company. Officers, directors and employees should not have any financial or other business relationships with suppliers, customers or competitors that might impair the independence of any judgment they may need to make on behalf of the Company.
Officers, directors and employees are under a continuing obligation to disclose any situation that presents the possibility of a conflict or disparity of interest between the officer, director or employee and the Company. Disclosure of any potential conflict is the key to remaining in full compliance with this policy.
4. AVOID ILLEGAL AND QUESTIONABLE GIFTS OR FAVORS
The sale and marketing of our products and services should always be free from even the perception that favorable treatment was sought, received, or given in exchange for the furnishing or receipt of business courtesies. Officers, directors and employees of the Company will neither give nor accept business courtesies that constitute, or could be reasonably perceived as constituting, unfair business inducements or that would violate law, regulation or policies of the Company, or could cause embarrassment to or reflect negatively on the Company's reputation.
5. KEEP ACCURATE AND COMPLETE RECORDS
We must maintain accurate and complete Company records. Transactions between the Company and outside individuals and organizations must be promptly and accurately entered in our books in accordance with generally accepted accounting practices and principles. No one should rationalize or even consider misrepresenting facts or falsifying records. It will not be tolerated and will result in disciplinary action.
6. ENFORCEMENT
The Company has empowered its Audit Committee to enforce this Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. The Audit Committee will report to the Board of Directors at least once each year regarding the general effectiveness of this Code, the Company's controls and reporting procedures and the Company's business conduct. Officers, directors and employees of the Company who do not adhere to this Code will be held accountable for their actions.
7. DISCIPLINARY MEASURES
The Company shall consistently enforce its Code of Ethics and Business Conduct through appropriate means of discipline. Violations of the Code shall be promptly reported to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall determine whether violations of the Code have occurred and, if so, shall determine the disciplinary measures to be taken against any employee or agent of the Company who has so violated the Code.
The disciplinary measures, which may be invoked at the discretion of the Audit Committee, include, but are not limited to, counseling, oral or written reprimands, warnings, probation or suspension without pay, demotions, reductions in salary, termination of employment and restitution.
Persons subject to disciplinary measures shall include, in addition to the violator, others involved in the wrongdoing such as (i) persons who fail to use reasonable care to detect a violation, (ii) persons who if requested to divulge information withhold material information regarding a violation, and (iii) supervisors who approve or condone the violations or attempt to retaliate against employees or agents for reporting violations or violators.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary Trade name(s) Incorporation
---------- ------------- -------------
AFC Restaurant, Inc. (1) Fat Anthony's and Nevada
(2) Alakazam Food Court
Ark 47th St. Corp. Jack Rose New York
Ark 474 Corp. Columbus Bakery New York
Ark Bryant Park Corp. Bryant Park Grill & Cafe New York
Ark D.C. Kiosk, Inc. Center Cafe District of Columbia
Ark Fifth Avenue Corp. N/A New York
Ark Fremont, Inc. The Saloon Nevada
Ark Fulton Street Corp. Red New York
Ark Islamorada Corp. Lorelei Restaurant and Cabana Bar Florida
Ark JMR Corp. N/A New York
Ark Las Vegas Restaurant Corp. N/A Nevada
Ark of Seaport, Inc. Sequoia New York
Ark Operating Corp. El Rio Grande New York
Ark Potomac Corporation Sequoia District of Columbia
Ark Rio Corp. El Rio Grande New York
Ark Seventh Avenue South Corp. N/A New York
Ark Southfield Corp. N/A Michigan
Ark Southwest D.C. Corp. Thunder Grill District of Columbia
Ark Sub-One Corp. Gonzalez y Gonzalez New York
Ark Union Station, Inc. America District of Columbia
Ark WFC Corp. The Grill Room New York
Aroc and Ark Corporation N/A New York
Conis Realty Corp. (1) Metropolitan Cafe and New York
(2) Columbus Bakery
Las Vegas America Corp. America Nevada
Las Vegas Asia Corp. Tsunami Asian Grill Nevada
Las Vegas Downstairs Deli Corp. Rialto Deli Nevada
(Venetian Food Court)
Las Vegas Festival Food Corp. (1) Gonzalez y Gonzalez and Nevada
(2) Village Eateries
(New York-New York Hotel Food Court)
Las Vegas Lutece Corp. (1) Lutece and Nevada
(2) Venus
Las Vegas Mexico Corp. Vico's Burritos
(Venetian Food Court)
Las Vegas Steakhouse Corp. Gallagher's Steakhouse Nevada
Las Vegas Venice Deli Corp. Towers Deli Nevada
(Venetian Food Court)
|
Las Vegas Venice Food Corp. Seaport Grill Nevada
(Venetian Food Court)
Las Vegas Venus Corp. Venus Las Vegas
Lutece, Inc. Lutece New York
MEB Dining 18, Inc. America New York
MEB Emporium Corp. Ernie's New York
MEB On First, Inc. Canyon Road Grill New York
Sam & Emma's Deli, Inc. The Stage Deli New York
Tysons America Corp. N/A Virginia
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-25363 and Registration Statement No. 333-67836 of Ark Restaurants Corp. on Form S-8 of our report dated December 24, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ark Restaurants Corp. for the year ended September 27, 2003.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP ------------------------------ New York, New York December 26, 2003 |
I, Michael Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Ark Restaurants Corp., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ark Restaurants Corp.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's accountants and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial a reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: December 26, 2003
/s/ MICHAEL WEINSTEIN -------------------------------------- Michael Weinstein President and Chief Executive Officer |
I, Robert Stewart, Chief Financial Officer of Ark Restaurants Corp., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Ark Restaurants Corp.
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's accountants and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial a reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Dated: December 26, 2003
/s/ Robert Stewart ------------------------------ Robert Stewart Chief Financial Officer |
The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Ark Restaurants Corp.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:
(i) this report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
(ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ark Restaurants Corp.
Dated as of this 26th day of December 2003.
/s/ Michael Weinstein /s/ Robert Stewart ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Michael Weinstein Robert Stewart President and Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer |