UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1792394
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
or organization)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15222-5479
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (412) 394-2800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.10 Par Value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is well known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
On February 13, 2009, the Registrant had outstanding 97,454,624 shares of its Common Stock.
The aggregate market value of the Registrants voting stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2008
was approximately $5.93 billion, based on the closing price per share of Common Stock on June 30,
2008 of $59.28 as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange, and at February 13, 2009 was approximately $2.41 billion, based on the closing price per
share of Common Stock on that date of $24.91 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. Shares of
Common Stock known by the Registrant to be beneficially owned by directors and officers of the
Registrant subject to the reporting and other requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), are not included in the computation. The Registrant,
however, has made no determination that such persons are affiliates within the meaning of Rule
12b-2 under the Exchange Act.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Selected portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May
7, 2009 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
PART I
Item 1. Business
The Company
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive
offices located at 1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-5479, telephone number (412)
394-2800. References to Allegheny Technologies, ATI, the Company, the Registrant, we,
our and us and similar terms mean Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its subsidiaries,
unless the context otherwise requires.
Our Business
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers in the
world. We use innovative technologies to offer growing global markets a wide range of specialty
metals solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and
superalloys, zirconium, hafnium and niobium, stainless and specialty steel alloys, grain-oriented
electrical steel, tungsten-based materials and cutting tools, carbon alloy impression die forgings,
and large grey and ductile iron castings. Our specialty metals are produced in a wide range of
alloys and product forms and are selected for use in applications that demand metals having
exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or abrasion, or a
combination of these characteristics.
We focus our technological and unsurpassed manufacturing capabilities to serve global end use
markets with highly diversified and specialized product offerings. Strategic end use markets for
our products include:
Aerospace and Defense
. We are a world leader in the production of premium titanium alloys,
nickel-based and cobalt-based alloys and superalloys, and vacuum-melted specialty alloys used in
the manufacture of both commercial and military jet engines, as well as replacement parts for those
engines. We also produce titanium alloys, vacuum-melted specialty alloys, and high-strength
stainless alloys for use in commercial and military airframes, airframe components and missiles.
ATI produces unique titanium and high-hard steel alloys as well as engineered parts and castings
for the current and next-generation armor vehicles.
Titanium and titanium alloys are critical metals in aerospace and defense applications.
Titanium and titanium alloys possess an extraordinary combination of properties, including superior
strength-to-weight ratio, good elevated temperature resistance, low coefficient of thermal
expansion, and extreme corrosion resistance. These metals are used to produce jet engine components
such as blades, vanes, discs, and casings, and airframe components such as structural members,
landing gear, hydraulic systems, and fasteners. The latest and next-generation airframes and jet
engines use even more titanium and titanium alloys in component parts in order to minimize weight
and maximize fuel efficiency.
Our nickel-based alloys and superalloys and specialty alloys are also widely used in aerospace
and defense applications. Nickel-based alloys and superalloys remain extremely strong at high
temperatures and resist degradation under extreme conditions. Typical aerospace applications for
nickel-based alloys and superalloys include jet engine shafts, discs, blades, vanes, rings and
casings.
Our specialty alloys include vacuum-melted maraging steels used in the manufacture of aircraft
landing gear and structural components, as well as jet engine components.
We continuously seek to develop new alloys to better serve the needs of this end use market.
For example, we have developed ATI 425® titanium, a new cold-rollable alloy, as a lower cost
alternative to the most popular high-strength titanium alloys, for use in airframe components. We
have also developed Allvac® 718 Plus® alloy, a new nickel-based superalloy that can withstand
higher temperatures than the standard 718 superalloy, for use in the next generation of fuel
efficient jet engines. ATI 425® MIL cold-rollable titanium is an innovative new armor alloy that
has the advantage of superior formability as compared to conventional high-strength titanium
alloys. ATI 500 MIL high-hard steel armor is an innovative armor material that meets the
demanding specifications for superior ballistic performance and is easier to fabricate than similar
armor materials.
Demand for our products by the aerospace and defense market has increased significantly over
the last several years. Based on current forecasts and existing backlogs reported by the two
manufacturers of large commercial aircraft, we expect demand in this market to remain strong over
the next several years. However, near-term growth could be limited due to the weakening global
economy.
3
Chemical Process Industry and Oil and Gas.
The environments in which oil and gas can be found
in commercial quantities have become more challenging, involving deep offshore wells, high pressure
and temperature conditions, sour wells and unconventional sources, such as oil sands. There is also
increased interest in biofuels, such as ethanol, as an alternative or supplement to gasoline and
other fossil fuels. Ethanol is corrosive and our specialty alloys are used in its manufacture and
storage.
All of our business segments produce metals that are critical to the chemical process industry
and oil and gas industry. Our specialty metals, including titanium and titanium alloys,
nickel-based alloys, zirconium alloys, stainless steel alloys and other specialty alloys, have the
strength and corrosion resistant properties necessary in the chemical process industry, and global
demand for these materials has been increasing in recent years, particularly in growing industrial
markets in Asia. We also provide advanced specialty metals used in offshore oil and gas production,
including offshore piping systems and subsea oil and gas fields.
We continuously seek to develop new alloys to better serve the needs of this end use market.
For example, we have developed AL 2003 lean duplex alloy for use in deep-water oil and gas
applications. ATI 2003 lean duplex stainless, ATI 2205 duplex stainless, and AL-6XN
®
superaustenitic stainless steel in strip and plate product forms are NORSOK qualified. ATIs
titanium castings are also qualified under NORSOK standards. The NORSOK standards are developed by
the Norwegian petroleum industry and are intended to identify metals used in oil and gas
applications that are safe and cost-effective.
Tungsten is the most dense and heat resistant metal commercially available. One application
for our tungsten products is oil and gas drill bit inserts. As drilling methods, including
directional drilling, become more complex, our advanced tungsten carbide and diamond matrix
materials are often utilized in order to enable faster drilling and longer drill bit life.
Electrical Energy
. Our specialty metals are widely used in the global electric power
generation and distribution industry. We believe that U.S. and European energy needs and
environmental policies and the electrification of developing countries will continue to drive
demand for our specialty metals products that we sell for use in this industry.
Coal-fired power plants account for more than one-half of the electricity produced in the
United States. Under the Clean Air Interstate Rule adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), power plants in several eastern states will be required, in stages through 2015, to
dramatically reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrous oxide generated from the burning of
coal. Most of these plants will be required to install additional filtration systems, or
scrubbers, which are made of specialty metals we produce, on their smokestacks to comply with the
rule. Demand for our specialty metals for pollution control systems is also significant in growing
industrial economies, including China. We supply a broad range of alloys, including many
proprietary alloys, for these applications. AL-6XN alloy, a 6-molybdenum super-austenitic alloy, is
used in absorber towers, piping, damper doors, ducting and vessels. The nickel-based ATI 22 and
ATI 276 alloys are used in the absorber inlet, absorber outlet ducting, damper door seals, and
expansion joints.
Nuclear power plants are a sustainable source of electrical energy, and plans to construct and
refurbish nuclear power plants have been announced in many areas of the world. ATI is a premier
supplier of certified nuclear-grade alloys and specialty alloys for applications that range from
the reactor core to steam water systems to spent-fuel storage, transportation and repository
activities. ATI has a track record in the nuclear energy market that dates to the first commercial
nuclear energy reactor built in the United States. We are investing to expand our production
capabilities and capacity to support expected growth of the nuclear energy market. We are
expanding our zirconium sponge capacity, which yields hafnium as a byproduct. Zirconium alloys are
used for fuel cladding, end pins, fuel bundle components, and core pressure tubes.
For electrical power generation, our specialty metals and corrosion resistant alloys (CRAs)
and ductile iron castings are used in coal, nuclear, natural gas, and wind power applications. In
coal-fired plants, our CRAs are used for pipe, tube, and heat exchanger applications in water
systems in addition to the pollution control scrubbers mentioned above. For
nuclear power plants, we are an industry pioneer in producing reactor-grade zirconium and hafnium
alloys nuclear fuel cladding and structural components. Our CRAs are also used in water systems for
nuclear power plants. We are a technology leader for large diameter nickel-based superalloys used
in natural gas turbines for power generation. We are also one of a few producers of very large
ductile iron castings used for wind turbines.
For electrical power distribution, our grain-oriented electrical steel (GOES) is used in large
and small power transformers, where electrical conductivity and magnetic properties are important.
We believe that demand for these advanced specialty metals is in the early stage of an expected
long growth cycle as the U.S. rebuilds its electrical energy distribution grid and as developing
countries, such as China and India, electrify and build electrical power distribution grids. The
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published its
4
final rule on distribution transformer efficiency on October 12, 2007, regarding minimum
energy efficiency standard levels for electrical energy distribution transformers beginning January
1, 2010. This DOE rule establishes requirements for more efficient transformers, which increases
premium grade GOES usage per transformer. ATI is a leading producer of these premium grades of
GOES.
Medical
. ATIs advanced specialty metals are used in medical device products that save and
enhance the quality of lives.
Our zirconium-niobium, titanium-and cobalt-based alloys are used for knees, hips and other
prosthetic devices. These replacement devices offer the potential of lasting much longer than
previous implant options.
Our biocompatible nickel-titanium shape memory alloy is used for stents to support collapsed
or clogged blood vessels. Reduced in diameter for insertion, these stents expand to the original
tube-like shape due to the metals superelasticity. Our ultra fine diameter (0.002 inch/0.051 mm)
titanium wire is used for screens to prevent blood clots from entering critical areas of the body.
In addition, our titanium bar and wire are used to make surgical screws for bone repairs.
Manufacturers of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) devices rely on our niobium superconducting
wire to help produce electromagnetic fields that allow physicians to safely scan the bodys soft
tissue. In addition, our tungsten heavy alloy materials are used for shielding applications in MRI
devices.
Enhancing and Expanding Our Manufacturing Capabilities and Capacity.
Demand for our products
from the aerospace and defense, chemical process industry and oil and gas, electrical energy, and
medical markets increased significantly over the last several years. We are currently undertaking a
multi-phase program to enhance and expand our capabilities and capacities to produce premium
specialty metals aimed at these strategic markets. Over the last four years we have invested
approximately $1.3 billion of internally generated funds to renew and expand our annual titanium
sponge production capabilities to approximately 46 million pounds; expand our premium titanium
alloy melt and remelt capacity; expand our nickel-based alloy and superalloy melt and remelt
capacity; expand our titanium and specialty alloy plate capacity; and expand our premium titanium
and nickel-based superalloy forging capacity. We believe these investments will strengthen and
enhance ATIs leadership position in the production of high technology specialty metals.
Business Segments
We operate in the following three business segments, which accounted for the following percentages
of total revenues of $5.3 billion, $5.5 billion, and $4.9 billion for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
High Performance Metals Segment
Our High Performance Metals segment produces, converts and distributes a wide range of high
performance alloys, including nickel- and cobalt-based alloys and superalloys, titanium and
titanium-based alloys, exotic metals such as zirconium, hafnium, niobium, nickel-titanium, and
their related alloys, and other specialty alloys, primarily in long product forms such as ingot,
billet, bar, shapes and rectangles, rod, wire, seamless tube, and castings. We are integrated from
raw materials (sponge) to melt, remelt, and finish processing in our titanium and titanium alloys,
and zirconium and hafnium alloys products. The major end markets served by our High Performance
Metals segment are aerospace and defense, chemical process industry, oil and gas, electrical
energy, and medical. Most of the products in our High Performance Metals segment are sold directly
to end-use customers. A significant portion of our High Performance Metals segment products are
sold under multi-year agreements. The operating units in this segment are ATI Allvac, ATI Allvac
Ltd (U.K.) and ATI Wah Chang.
Approximately 70% of High Performance Metals segment revenue is derived from the aerospace and
defense market. Demand for our products is driven primarily by the commercial aerospace cycle and
the growing use of our specialty metals, particularly titanium alloys, in the latest and future
generations of airframes and jet engines. Large aircraft and aircraft engines are manufactured by
a small number of companies, such as The Boeing Company, Airbus S.A.S (an EADS company), Bombardier
Aerospace (a division of Bombardier Inc.), Embraer (Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.) for
airframes, and GE Aviation (a division of General Electric Company), Pratt & Whitney (a United
Technologies Corp. company), Rolls-Royce, Snecma, SAFRAN Group, and joint ventures for
5
jet engines. These companies and their suppliers form a substantial part of our customer base
in this business segment. ATI supplies the aerospace and defense supply chain with nickel- and
cobalt-based alloys, titanium alloys, and vacuum-melted specialty alloys for commercial and
military jet engines, both original engines and spare parts. For commercial and military airframe
and structural parts, ATI manufactures titanium alloys, vacuum-melted specialty alloys, and
high-strength stainless alloys. The loss of one or more of our customers in the aerospace and
defense market could have a material adverse effect on ATIs results of operations and financial
condition.
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment produces, converts and distributes stainless steel, nickel-based
alloys, titanium and titanium-based alloys and specialty alloys, in a variety of product forms,
including plate, sheet, engineered strip, and Precision Rolled Strip
®
products, as well as
grain-oriented electrical steel sheet. The major end markets for our flat-rolled products are
chemical process industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, automotive, food equipment and
appliances, machine and cutting tools, construction and mining, aerospace and defense, and
electronics, communication equipment and computers. The operations in this segment are ATI
Allegheny Ludlum, our 60% interest in the Chinese joint venture company known as Shanghai STAL
Precision Stainless Steel Company Limited (STAL), and our 50% interest in the industrial titanium
joint venture known as Uniti LLC. The remaining 40% interest in STAL is owned by the Baosteel
Group, a state authorized investment company whose equity securities are publicly traded in the
Peoples Republic of China. The remaining 50% interest in Uniti LLC is held by Verkhnaya Salda
Metallurgical Production Association (VSMPO), a Russian producer of titanium, aluminum, and
specialty steel products.
Stainless steel, nickel-based alloys and titanium sheet products are used in a wide variety of
industrial and consumer applications. In 2008, approximately 60% by volume of our stainless sheet
products were sold to independent service centers, which have slitting, cutting or other processing
facilities, with the remainder sold directly to end-use customers.
Engineered strip and very thin Precision Rolled Strip products are used by customers to
fabricate a variety of products primarily in the automotive, construction, and electronics markets.
In 2008, approximately 85% by volume of our engineered strip and Precision Rolled Strip products
were sold directly to end-use customers or through our own distribution network, with the remainder
sold to independent service centers.
Stainless steel, nickel-based alloy and titanium plate products are primarily used in
industrial markets. In 2008, approximately 50% by volume of our plate products were sold to
independent service centers, with the remainder sold directly to end-use customers.
Grain-oriented electrical steel is used in power transformers where electrical conductivity
and magnetic properties are important. Nearly all of our grain-oriented electrical steel products
are sold directly to end-use customers.
Engineered Products Segment
The principal business of our Engineered Products segment includes the production of tungsten
powder, tungsten heavy alloys, tungsten carbide materials, and tungsten carbide cutting tools. We
are now integrated from the raw materials (ammonium paratungstate (APT)) to the manufacture of
finished cutting tools. The segment also produces carbon alloy steel impression die forgings, and
large grey and ductile iron castings, and provides precision metals processing services. The
operating units in this segment are ATI Metalworking Products, ATI Portland Forge, ATI Casting
Service and ATI Rome Metals.
We produce a line of sintered tungsten carbide products that approach diamond hardness for
industrial markets including automotive, chemical process industry, oil and gas, machine and
cutting tools, aerospace, construction and mining, and other markets requiring tools with extra
hardness. Technical developments related to ceramics, coatings and other disciplines are
incorporated in these products. We also produce tungsten and tungsten carbide powders.
We forge carbon alloy steels into finished forms that are used primarily in the transportation
and construction equipment markets. We also cast grey and ductile iron metals used in the
transportation, wind power generation and automotive markets. We have precision metals processing
capabilities that enable us to provide process services for most high-value metals from ingots to
finished product forms. Such services include grinding, polishing, blasting, cutting, flattening,
and ultrasonic testing.
6
Competition
Markets for our products and services in each of our three business segments are highly
competitive. We compete with many producers and distributors who, depending on the product
involved, range from large diversified enterprises to smaller companies specializing in particular
products. Factors that affect our competitive position are the quality of our products, services
and delivery capabilities, our capabilities to produce a wide range of specialty materials in
various alloys and product forms, our technological capabilities including our research and
development efforts, our marketing strategies, the prices for our products and services, our
manufacturing costs, and industry manufacturing capacity.
We face competition from both domestic and foreign companies. Some of our foreign competitors
are either directly or indirectly government subsidized. In 1999, the United States imposed
antidumping and countervailing duties on dumped and subsidized imports of stainless steel sheet and
strip in coils and stainless steel plate in coils from companies in ten foreign countries. These
duties were reviewed by the U.S. Commerce Department and the U.S. International Trade Commission in
2005 and generally remain in effect. We continue to monitor unfairly traded imports from foreign
producers for appropriate action.
Major Competitors
Nickel-based alloys and superalloys and specialty steel alloys
|
|
|
Carpenter Technology Corporation: A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Metals Corporation, a PCC company: C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haynes International, Inc.: B
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThyssenKrupp VDM GmbH, a company of ThyssenKrupp Stainless (Germany): C
|
Titanium and titanium-based alloys
|
|
|
Titanium Metals Corporation: C
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMI Titanium, an RTI International Metals Company: C
|
|
|
|
|
|
VSMPO AVISMA (Russia): A
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
|
Cezus, a group member of AREVA (France): A
|
|
|
|
|
|
HC Stark: A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Zirconium Plant of Westinghouse Electric Company, owned by Toshiba Corporation: A
|
Stainless steel
|
|
|
AK Steel Corporation: B
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Stainless (NAS), owned by Acerinox S.A. (Spain): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outokumpu Stainless Plate Products, owned by Outokumpu Oyj (Finland): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imports from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Arcelor Mittal (France, Belgium and Germany): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mexinox S.A. de C.V., group member of ThyssenKrupp AG: B
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
ThyssenKrupp AG (Germany): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ta Chen International Corporation (Taiwan): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Various Chinese producers: B
|
Tungsten and tungsten carbide products
|
|
|
Kennametal Inc.: D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iscar (Israel): D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandvik AB (Sweden): D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seco Tools AB (Sweden), owned by Sandvik A.B.: D
|
KEY A = Primarily High Performance Metals segment, B = Primarily Flat-Rolled Products segment, C
= Both High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products segments, D = Primarily Engineered
Products segment
Raw Materials and Supplies
Substantially all raw materials and supplies required in the manufacture of our products are
available from more than one supplier and presently the sources and availability of raw materials
essential to our businesses are adequate. The principal raw materials we use in the production of
our specialty metals are scrap (including iron-, nickel-, chromium-, titanium-, molybdenum-, and
tungsten-bearing scrap), nickel, titanium sponge, zirconium sand and sponge, ferrochromium,
ferrosilicon, molybdenum and molybdenum alloys, manganese and manganese alloys, cobalt, niobium,
vanadium and other alloying materials.
Purchase prices of certain principal raw materials have been volatile. As a result, our
operating results may be subject to significant fluctuation. We use raw materials surcharge and
index mechanisms to offset the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors
in the marketplace may limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay
between the increase in the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such
mechanisms. For example, in 2008 we used approximately 80 million pounds of nickel; therefore a
hypothetical increase of $1.00 per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of
approximately $80 million. We also used approximately 500 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the
production of our flat-rolled products in 2008 so that a hypothetical increase of $0.01 per pound
in ferrous scrap prices would result in increased costs of approximately $5 million.
While we are increasing our manufacturing capacity to produce titanium sponge, the major raw
material for our titanium products, a portion of our needs, together with certain other raw
materials, such as nickel, cobalt, and ferrochromium, are available to us and our specialty metals
industry competitors primarily from foreign sources. Some of these foreign sources are located in
countries that may be subject to unstable political and economic conditions, which might disrupt
supplies or affect the price of these materials.
We purchase our nickel requirements principally from producers in Australia, Canada, Norway,
Russia, and the Dominican Republic. Zirconium sponge is purchased from a source in France, while
zirconium sand is purchased from both U.S. and Australian sources. Cobalt is purchased primarily
from producers in Canada. More than 80% of the worlds reserves of ferrochromium are located in
South Africa, Zimbabwe, Albania, and Kazakhstan. We also purchase titanium sponge from sources in
Kazakhstan and Japan.
Export Sales and Foreign Operations
Direct international sales represented approximately 28% of our total annual sales in 2008, 27% of
our total sales in 2007, and 24% of our total sales in 2006. These figures include direct export
sales by our U.S.-based operations to customers in foreign countries, which accounted for
approximately 21% of our total sales in 2008, 19% of our total sales in 2007, and 16% of our total
sales in 2006. Our overseas sales, marketing and distribution efforts are aided by our
international marketing and distribution offices, ATI Europe, ATI Europe Distribution, and ATI
Asia, or by independent representatives located at various locations throughout the world. We
believe that nearly 50% of ATIs 2008 sales were driven by global markets when we consider exports
of our customers.
8
Direct sales by geographic area in 2008, and as a percentage of total sales, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,816.4
|
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
796.1
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
Far East
|
|
|
445.6
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
154.1
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
South America, Middle East and other
|
|
|
97.5
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$
|
5,309.7
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
ATI Allvac Ltd has manufacturing capabilities for melting, remelting, forging and finishing
nickel-based alloys and specialty alloys in the United Kingdom. ATI Metalworking Products, which
has manufacturing capabilities in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, sells high precision
threading, milling, boring and drilling components, tungsten carbide burrs, rotary tooling and
specialty abrasive wheels and discs for the European market from locations in the United Kingdom,
Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy and Spain. Our STAL joint venture in the Peoples Republic of
China produces Precision Rolled Strip products, which enables us to offer these products more
effectively to markets in China and other Asian countries. Our Uniti LLC joint venture allows us to
offer titanium products to industrial markets more effectively worldwide.
Backlog, Seasonality and Cyclicality
Our backlog of confirmed orders was approximately $1.3 billion at December 31, 2008 and $1.0
billion at December 31, 2007. We expect that approximately 95% of confirmed orders on hand at
December 31, 2008 will be filled during the year ending December 31, 2009. Backlog of confirmed
orders of our High Performance Metals segment was approximately $674 million at December 31, 2008
and $683 million at December 31, 2007. We expect that approximately 93% of the confirmed orders on
hand at December 31, 2008 for this segment will be filled during the year ending December 31, 2009.
Backlog of confirmed orders of our Flat-Rolled Products segment was approximately $0.5 billion at
December 31, 2008 and $0.2 billion at December 31, 2007. We expect that all of the confirmed orders
on hand at December 31, 2008 for this segment will be filled during the year ending December 31,
2009.
Generally, our sales and operations are not seasonal. However, demand for our products is
cyclical over longer periods because specialty metals customers operate in cyclical industries and
are subject to changes in general economic conditions and other factors both external and internal
to those industries.
Research, Development and Technical Services
We believe that our research and development capabilities give ATI an advantage in developing
new products and manufacturing processes that contribute to the profitable growth potential of our
businesses on a long-term basis. We conduct research and development at our various operating
locations both for our own account and, on a limited basis, for customers on a contract basis.
Research and development expenditures for each of our three segments for the years ended December
31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Company-Funded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
$
|
5.9
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-Funded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
Total Research and Development
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Our research, development and technical service activities are closely interrelated and are
directed toward cost reduction and process improvement, process control, quality assurance and
control, system development, the development of new manufacturing methods, the improvement of
existing manufacturing methods, the improvement of existing products, and the development of new
products.
9
We own hundreds of United States patents, many of which are also filed under the patent laws
of other nations. Although these patents, as well as our numerous trademarks, technical
information, license agreements, and other intellectual property, have been and are expected to be
of value, we believe that the loss of any single such item or technically related group of such
items would not materially affect the conduct of our business.
Environmental, Health and Safety Matters
We are subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and regulations that govern
the discharge of pollutants, and disposal of wastes, and which may require that we investigate and
remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and
present operations. We could incur substantial cleanup costs, fines, civil or criminal sanctions,
third party property damage or personal injury claims as a result of violations or liabilities
under these laws or non-compliance with environmental permits required at our facilities. We are
currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of our current and former sites
as well as third party sites.
We consider environmental compliance to be an integral part of our operations. We have a
comprehensive environmental management and reporting program that focuses on compliance with all
federal, state, regional and local environmental laws and regulations. Each operating company has
an environmental management system that includes mechanisms for regularly evaluating environmental
compliance and managing changes in business operations while assessing environmental impact.
Our
Corporate Guidelines for Business Conduct and Ethics
address compliance with environmental laws
as well as employment and workplace safety laws, and also describe our commitment to equal
opportunity and fair treatment of employees. We continued to realize significant progress in safety
across ATIs operations. As a result of our continuing focus on and commitment to safety, in 2008
our OSHA Total Recordable Incident Rate improved by 17% to 2.51 and our Lost Time Case Rate
improved by 35% to 0.34, which we believe to be competitive with world class performance.
Employees
We have approximately 9,600 full-time employees. A portion of our workforce is covered by various
collective bargaining agreements, principally with the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW),
including: approximately 2,745 Allegheny Ludlum production, office and maintenance employees
covered by collective bargaining agreements that are effective through June 2011, approximately 390
Allvac Albany, Oregon (Oremet) employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is
effective through June 2011, approximately 650 Wah Chang employees covered by a collective
bargaining agreement that continues through March 2013, approximately 270 employees at our Casting
Service facility in LaPorte, Indiana, covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is
effective through December 2011, approximately 140 employees at our Rome Metals facilities in
western Pennsylvania, covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is effective through May
2013, and approximately 250 employees at our Portland Forge facility in Portland, Indiana, covered
by collective bargaining agreements with three unions that are effective through April 2013.
Available Information
Our Internet website address is http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com. Our annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
well as proxy and information statements and other information that we file, are available free of
charge through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
such material with, or furnish such material to, the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Our Internet website and the content contained therein or connected thereto are not
intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You may read and copy materials
we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.
You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet website at
http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports,
proxy and information statements and other information that we file electronically with the SEC.
10
Executive Management, Including Executive Officers under Federal Securities Laws
The Companys executive officers under the federal securities laws and members of the Companys
management executive committee as of February 13, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
|
L. Patrick Hassey*
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Harshman*
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
Douglas A. Kittenbrink*
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Corporate Planning and International Business
Development
|
|
|
|
Jon D. Walton*
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Chief Legal and Compliance
Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
|
|
|
Dale G. Reid*
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
Terry L. Dunlap*
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Flat-Rolled Products and ATI Allegheny Ludlum
Business Unit President
|
|
|
|
Hunter R. Dalton
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Long Products and ATI Allvac Business Unit President
|
|
|
|
Lynn D. Davis
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Primary Metals and Exotic Alloys
|
|
|
|
David M. Hogan
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Engineered Products and ATI Metalworking Products
Business Unit President
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Such individuals are subject to the reporting and other requirements of Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
Set forth below are descriptions of the business background for the past five years of the
Companys executive management.
L
.
Patrick Hassey
has been President and Chief Executive Officer since October 1, 2003. He was
elected to the Companys Board of Directors in July 2003 and has served as Chairman since May 2004.
Prior to this position, he worked as an outside management consultant to Allegheny Technologies
executive management team. Mr. Hassey was Executive Vice President and a member of the corporate
executive committee of Alcoa, Inc. at the time of his early retirement in February 2003. He had
served as Executive Vice President of Alcoa and Group President of Alcoa Industrial Components from
May 2000 to October 2002. Prior to May 2000, he served as Executive Vice President of Alcoa and
President of Alcoa Europe, Inc.
Richard J. Harshman
has served as Executive Vice President, Finance since October 2003 and
Chief Financial Officer since December 2000. Mr. Harshman was Senior Vice President, Finance from
December 2001 to October 2003 and Vice President, Finance from December 2000 to December 2001.
Previously, he had served in a number of financial management roles for Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and Teledyne, Inc.
Douglas A. Kittenbrink
has served as Executive Vice President, Corporate Planning and
International Business Development since March 1, 2007. Mr. Kittenbrink was Executive Vice
President, ATI Business System and Group President, Engineered Products Segment from October 2003
to March 2007. Mr. Kittenbrink was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from July
2001 to October 2003 and served as President of Allegheny Ludlum from April 2000 to November 2002.
Mr. Kittenbrink has announced his decision to leave the Company effective March 1, 2009.
Jon D. Walton
has been Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Chief Legal and Compliance
Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2003. Mr. Walton was Senior Vice
President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer from July 2001 to October 2003. Previously, he
was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
Dale G. Reid
has served as Vice President, Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
since December 2003. Mr. Reid was Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from
December 2000 through November 2003.
11
Terry
L. Dunlap
has served as Group President, Flat-Rolled Products since October 2008, and as
ATI Allegheny Ludlum Business Unit President since November 2002.
Hunter R. Dalton
has served as Group President, ATI Long Products since October 2008, and as
ATI Allvac Business Unit President since April 2008. Mr. Dalton previously served as Senior
Vice President of Sales and Marketing for ATI Allvac since November 2003.
Lynn D. Davis
has served as Group President, ATI Primary Metals and Exotic Alloys since
October 2008. Mr. Davis was ATI Wah Chang Business Unit President from September 2000 to October
2008.
David
M. Hogan
has served as Group President, Engineered Products since April 2007, and as ATI
Metalworking Products Business Unit President since 1997.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are inherent risks and uncertainties associated with our business that could adversely affect
our operating performance and financial condition. Set forth below are descriptions of those risks
and uncertainties that we currently believe to be material, but the risks and uncertainties
described are not the only risks and uncertainties that could affect our business. See the
discussion under Forward-Looking Statements in Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cyclical Demand for Products.
The cyclical nature of the industries in which our customers
operate causes demand for our products to be cyclical, creating potential uncertainty regarding
future profitability. Various changes in general economic conditions may affect the industries in
which our customers operate. These changes could include decreases in the rate of consumption or
use of our customers products due to economic downturns. Other factors that may cause fluctuation
in our customers positions are changes in market demand, lower overall pricing due to domestic and
international overcapacity, currency fluctuations, lower priced imports and increases in use or
decreases in prices of substitute materials. As a result of these factors, our profitability has
been and may in the future be subject to significant fluctuation.
Worldwide economic conditions have recently deteriorated significantly and may remain
depressed, or could worsen, in the foreseeable future. These conditions have had, and may continue
to have, a material adverse effect on demand for our customers products and, in turn, on demand
for our products. If these conditions persist or worsen, our results of operations and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected.
Product Pricing.
From time-to-time, reduced demand, intense competition and excess
manufacturing capacity have resulted in reduced prices, excluding raw material surcharges, for many
of our products. These factors have had and may have an adverse impact on our revenues, operating
results and financial condition.
Although inflationary trends in recent years have been moderate, during most of the same
period certain critical raw material costs, such as nickel, titanium sponge, chromium, and
molybdenum and scrap containing iron, nickel, titanium, chromium, and molybdenum have been volatile
and at historically high levels. While we have been able to mitigate some of the adverse impact of
rising raw material costs through raw material surcharges or indices to customers, rapid increases
in raw material costs may adversely affect our results of operations.
We change prices on certain of our products from time-to-time. The ability to implement price
increases is dependent on market conditions, economic factors, raw material costs and availability,
competitive factors, operating costs and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. The
benefits of any price increases may be delayed due to long manufacturing lead times and the terms
of existing contracts.
Risks Associated with Commercial Aerospace.
A significant portion of the sales of our High
Performance Metals segment represents products sold to customers in the commercial aerospace
industry. The commercial aerospace industry has historically been cyclical due to factors both
external and internal to the airline industry. These factors include general economic conditions,
airline profitability, consumer demand for air travel, varying fuel and labor costs, price
competition, and international and domestic political conditions such as military conflict and the
threat of terrorism. The length and degree of cyclical fluctuation are influenced by these factors
and therefore are difficult to predict with certainty. Demand for our products in this segment is
subject to these cyclical trends. For example, the average price per pound for our titanium mill
products was $11.89 for the period 2002 through 2004, $22.75 in 2005,
12
$33.83 in 2006, $30.14 in 2007 and $25.60 in 2008, and the average price per pound for our
nickel-based and specialty alloys was $7.19 for the period 2002 through 2004, $11.25 in 2005,
$14.35 in 2006, $19.16 in 2007 and $18.14 in 2008. A downturn in the commercial aerospace industry
has had, and may in the future have, an adverse effect on the prices at which we are able to sell
these and other products, and our results of operations, business and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected.
Risks Associated with Strategic Capital Projects.
From time-to-time, we undertake strategic
capital projects in order to enhance, expand and/or upgrade our facilities and operational
capabilities. For instance, in 2006, 2007, and 2008 we announced major expansions of our titanium
and premium-melt nickel-based alloy, superalloy and specialty alloy production capabilities and a
new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility. Our ability to achieve the
anticipated increased revenues or otherwise realize acceptable returns on these investments or
other strategic capital projects that we may undertake is subject to a number of risks, many of
which are beyond our control, including a variety of market, operational, permitting, and labor
related factors. In addition, the cost to implement any given strategic capital project ultimately
may prove to be greater than originally anticipated. If we are not able to achieve the anticipated
results from the implementation of any of our strategic capital projects, or if we incur
unanticipated implementation costs, our results of operations and financial position may be
materially adversely effected.
Dependence on Critical Raw Materials Subject to Price and Availability Fluctuations.
We rely
to a substantial extent on third parties to supply certain raw materials that are critical to the
manufacture of our products. Purchase prices and availability of these critical raw materials are
subject to volatility. At any given time we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of these
critical raw materials on a timely basis, on price and other terms acceptable, or at all.
If suppliers increase the price of critical raw materials, we may not have alternative sources
of supply. In addition, to the extent that we have quoted prices to customers and accepted customer
orders for products prior to purchasing necessary raw materials, or have existing contracts, we may
be unable to raise the price of products to cover all or part of the increased cost of the raw
materials.
The manufacture of some of our products is a complex process and requires long lead times. As
a result, we may experience delays or shortages in the supply of raw materials. If unable to obtain
adequate and timely deliveries of required raw materials, we may be unable to timely manufacture
sufficient quantities of products. This could cause us to lose sales, incur additional costs, delay
new product introductions, or suffer harm to our reputation.
We acquire certain important raw materials that we use to produce specialty materials,
including nickel, chromium, cobalt, and titanium sponge, from foreign sources. Some of these
sources operate in countries that may be subject to unstable political and economic conditions.
These conditions may disrupt supplies or affect the prices of these materials.
Volatility of Raw Material Costs.
The prices for many of the raw materials we use have been
extremely volatile. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the last-in, first-out (LIFO)
inventory costing methodology, a rapid rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our
operating results. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw materials
and production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these
material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due to the length
of time of our production cycle. For example, in 2008 and 2007, the effect of falling raw material
costs on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $169.0 million
and $92.1 million, respectively, lower than have been recognized had we utilized the first-in,
first-out (FIFO)
methodology to value our inventory. Conversely in 2006, the increase in raw material costs on the
LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which was $197.0 million higher than
would have been recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology to value our inventory. In a period
of rising raw material prices, cost of sales expense recognized under LIFO is generally higher than
the cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. However, in a period of declining raw
material prices, cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally lower than cash costs incurred to
acquire the inventory sold.
Availability of Energy Resources.
We rely upon third parties for our supply of energy
resources consumed in the manufacture of our products. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Disruptions in the supply of energy resources could temporarily impair the ability to manufacture
products for customers. Further, increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy
costs paid by competitors, has and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the
extent that these uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased
energy prices may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
13
Risks Associated with Environmental Matters.
We are subject to various domestic and
international environmental laws and regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants, and
disposal of wastes, and which may require that we investigate and remediate the effects of the
release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and present operations. We could
incur substantial cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage
or personal injury claims as a result of violations or liabilities under these laws or
non-compliance with environmental permits required at our facilities. We are currently involved in
the investigation and remediation of a number of our current and former sites as well as third
party sites.
With respect to proceedings brought under the federal Superfund laws, or similar state
statutes, we have been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at approximately 35 of
such sites, excluding those at which we believe we have no future liability. Our involvement is
limited or de minimis at approximately 27 of these sites, and the potential loss exposure with
respect to any of the remaining 8 individual sites is not considered to be material.
We are a party to various cost-sharing arrangements with other PRPs at the sites. The terms of
the cost-sharing arrangements are subject to non-disclosure agreements as confidential information.
Nevertheless, the cost-sharing arrangements generally require all PRPs to post financial assurance
of the performance of the obligations or to pre-pay into an escrow or trust account their share of
anticipated site-related costs. In addition, the Federal government, through various agencies, is a
party to several such arrangements.
We believe that we operate our businesses in compliance in all material respects with
applicable environmental laws and regulations. However, from time-to-time, we are a party to
lawsuits and other proceedings involving alleged violations of, or liabilities arising from
environmental laws. When our liability is probable and we can reasonably estimate our costs, we
record environmental liabilities in our financial statements. In many cases, we are not able to
determine whether we are liable, or if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or
range of loss. Estimates of our liability remain subject to additional uncertainties, including the
nature and extent of site contamination, available remediation alternatives, the extent of
corrective actions that may be required, and the participation number and financial condition of
other PRPs, as well as the extent of their responsibility for the remediation. We intend to adjust
our accruals to reflect new information as appropriate. Future adjustments could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations in a given period, but we cannot reliably predict the
amounts of such future adjustments. At December 31, 2008, our reserves for environmental matters
totaled approximately $17 million. Based on currently available information, we do not believe that
there is a reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the
sites with which we are currently associated (either individually or in the aggregate) will be an
amount that would be material to a decision to buy or sell our securities. Future developments,
administrative actions or liabilities relating to environmental matters, however, could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Associated with Current or Future Litigation and Claims.
A number of lawsuits, claims
and proceedings have been or may be asserted against us relating to the conduct of our currently
and formerly owned businesses, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contracting work, employment, employee benefits, taxes,
environmental, health and safety and occupational disease, and stockholder matters. Due to the
uncertainties of litigation, we can give no assurance that we will prevail on all claims made
against us in the lawsuits that we currently face or that additional claims will not be made
against us in the future. While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and
some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to us, we do not believe
that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of
these matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for that period.
Also, we can give no assurance that any other matters brought in the future will not have a
material effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
Labor Matters.
We have approximately 9,600 full-time employees. A portion of our workforce is
covered by various collective bargaining agreements, principally with the USW, including:
approximately 2,745 Allegheny Ludlum production, office and maintenance employees covered by
collective bargaining agreements, which are effective through June 2011; approximately 390 Allvac
Albany, Oregon (Oremet) employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement, which is effective
through June 2011; approximately 650 Wah Chang employees covered by a collective bargaining
agreement, which is effective through March 2013, approximately 270 employees at the Casting
Service facility in LaPorte, Indiana, covered by a collective bargaining agreement, which is
effective through December 2011, approximately 140 employees at our Rome Metals facilities in
western Pennsylvania, covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is effective through May
2013, and approximately 250 employees at our Portland Forge facility in Portland, Indiana, covered
by collective bargaining agreements with three unions that are effective through April 2013.
Generally, collective bargaining agreements that expire may be terminated after notice by the
union. After termination, the union may authorize a strike. A strike by the employees covered by
one or more of the collective bargaining agreements could have a materially adverse affect on our
operating results. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in concluding collective
bargaining agreements with the unions to replace those that expire.
14
Export Sales.
We believe that export sales will continue to account for a significant
percentage of our future revenues. Risks associated with export sales include: political and
economic instability, including weak conditions in the worlds economies; accounts receivable
collection; export controls; changes in legal and regulatory requirements; policy changes affecting
the markets for our products; changes in tax laws and tariffs; and exchange rate fluctuations
(which may affect sales to international customers and the value of profits earned on export sales
when converted into dollars). Any of these factors could materially adversely effect our results
for the period in which they occur.
Risks Associated with Retirement Benefits.
Our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan was
underfunded as of December 31, 2008. In accordance with current funding regulations, we are not
required to make a contribution to this pension plan in 2009. However, we may be required to fund
the U.S. defined benefit pension plan in the years beyond 2009 depending upon the value of plan
investments and obligations in the future and changes in laws or regulations that govern pension
plan funding. Depending on the timing and amount, a requirement that we fund our defined benefit
pension plan could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Risks Associated with Acquisition and Disposition Strategies.
We intend to continue to
strategically position our businesses in order to improve our ability to compete. Strategies we
employ to accomplish this may include seeking new or expanding existing specialty market niches for
our products, expanding our global presence, acquiring businesses complementary to existing
strengths and continually evaluating the performance and strategic fit of our existing business
units. From time-to-time, management holds discussions with management of other companies to
explore acquisition, joint ventures, and other business combination opportunities as well as
possible business unit dispositions. As a result, the relative makeup of the businesses comprising
our Company is subject to change. Acquisitions, joint ventures, and other business combinations
involve various inherent risks, such as: assessing accurately the value, strengths, weaknesses,
contingent and other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition or other transaction
candidates; the potential loss of key personnel of an acquired business; our ability to achieve
identified financial and operating synergies anticipated to result from an acquisition or other
transaction; and unanticipated changes in business and economic conditions affecting an acquisition
or other transaction. International acquisitions and other transactions could be affected by export
controls, exchange rate fluctuations, domestic and foreign political conditions and a deterioration
in domestic and foreign economic conditions.
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Insurance.
We have maintained various forms of insurance, including insurance covering claims
related to our properties and risks associated with our operations. Our existing property and
liability insurance coverages contain exclusions and limitations on coverage. From time-to-time, in
connection with renewals of insurance, we have experienced additional exclusions and limitations on
coverage, larger self-insured retentions and deductibles and significantly higher premiums. As a
result, in the future our insurance coverage may not cover claims to the extent that it has in the
past and the costs that we incur to procure insurance may increase significantly, either of which
could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Political and Social Turmoil.
The war on terrorism and recent political and social turmoil,
including terrorist and military actions and the implications of the military actions in Iraq,
could put pressure on economic conditions in the United States and worldwide. These political,
social and economic conditions could make it difficult for us, our suppliers and our customers to
forecast accurately and plan future business activities, and could adversely affect the financial
condition of our suppliers and customers and affect customer decisions as to the amount and timing
of purchases from us. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Associated with Government Contracts.
Some of our operating companies directly perform
contractual work for the U.S. Government. Various claims (whether based on U.S. Government or
Company audits and investigations or otherwise) could be asserted against us related to our U.S.
Government contract work. Depending on the circumstances and the outcome, such proceedings could
result in fines, penalties, compensatory and treble damages or the cancellation or suspension of
payments under one or more U.S. Government contracts. Under government regulations, a company, or
one or more of its operating divisions or units, can also be suspended or debarred from government
contracts based on the results of investigations. Currently, there is no material portion of our
business with the U.S. Government which might be subject to renegotiation of profits or termination
of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. Government.
15
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our principal domestic melting facilities for our high performance metals are located in Monroe,
NC, Bakers, NC, and Lockport, NY (vacuum induction melting, vacuum arc re-melt, electro-slag
re-melt, plasma melting); Richland, WA (electron beam melting); and Albany, OR (vacuum arc
re-melt). Production of high performance metals, most of which are in long product form, takes
place at our domestic facilities in Monroe, NC, Lockport, NY, Richburg, SC, and Albany, OR. In
2006, we announced plans to design and construct a new greenfield titanium sponge facility in
Rowley, UT. Construction of this facility began in the first half of 2007 and the facility is
expected to commence initial production in the third quarter 2009. Our production of exotic alloys
takes place at facilities located in Albany, OR, Huntsville, AL, and Frackville, PA.
Our principal domestic locations for melting stainless steel and other flat-rolled specialty
metals are located in Brackenridge, Midland, Natrona and Latrobe, PA. Hot rolling of material is
performed at our domestic facilities in Brackenridge, Washington and Houston, PA. Finishing of our
flat-rolled products takes place at our domestic facilities located in Brackenridge, Bagdad,
Vandergrift, Midland and Washington, PA, and in Wallingford and Waterbury, CT, New Castle, IN, New
Bedford, MA, and Louisville, OH. In September 2008, we announced plans to construct a new advanced
specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility for our Flat-Rolled Products business segment
at our existing Brackenridge, PA site. This investment, which is expected to be completed in 2012,
is designed to produce exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled coils at reduced cost
with shorter lead times and require lower working capital requirements.
Our principal domestic facilities for the production of our engineered products are located in
Nashville, TN, Huntsville, Grant and Gurley, AL, Houston, TX, and Waynesboro, PA (tungsten powder,
tungsten carbide materials and carbide cutting tools and threading systems). Other domestic
facilities in this segment are located in Portland, IN and Lebanon, KY (carbon alloy steel
forgings); LaPorte, IN and Alpena, MI (grey and ductile iron castings); and southwestern
Pennsylvania (precision metals conversion services).
Substantially all of our properties are owned, and four of our properties are subject to
mortgages or similar encumbrances securing borrowings under certain industrial development
authority financings.
We also own or lease facilities in a number of foreign countries, including France, Germany,
Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the Peoples Republic of China. We own and/or lease and operate
facilities for melting and re-melting, machining and bar mill operations, laboratories and offices
located in Sheffield, England. Through our STAL joint venture, we operate facilities for finishing
Precision Rolled Strip products in the Xin-Zhuang Industrial Zone, Shanghai, China.
Our executive offices, located in PPG Place in Pittsburgh, PA, are leased.
Although our facilities vary in terms of age and condition, we believe that they have been
well maintained and are in sufficient condition for us to carry on our activities.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
In a letter dated May 20, 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) informed a
subsidiary of the Company that it alleges that the company and forty other potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) are not in compliance with the Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO) issued to the
company and the PRPs for the South El Monte Operable Unit of the San Gabriel Valley (California)
Superfund Site, a multi-part area-wide groundwater cleanup. The EPA indicated that it may take
action to enforce the UAO and collect penalties, as well as reimbursement of the EPAs costs
associated with the site. The PRPs continue to mediate with the EPA to resolve their obligations
under the UAO on both technical and legal grounds, and enforcement of the UAO has been stayed.
In November 2007, the EPA sent a subsidiary of the Company a Notice of Violation (NOV)
alleging that the companys Natrona, PA facility is operating in violation of the Clean Air Act.
The notice invited the company to meet with the EPA to discuss a resolution of the NOV. The
company met with the EPA in 2008 and will continue meeting in 2009 in an attempt to resolve this
matter.
16
We become involved from time-to-time in various lawsuits, claims and proceedings relating to
the conduct of our current and formerly owned businesses, including those pertaining to product
liability, patent infringement, commercial, employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental,
health and safety and occupational disease, and stockholder matters. While we cannot predict the
outcome of any lawsuit, claim or proceeding, our management believes that the disposition of any
pending matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
liquidity. The resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters, including those
described above, however, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for
that period.
Information relating to legal proceedings is included in Note 12. Commitments and
Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Common Stock Prices
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol ATI). At February 13, 2009, there
were approximately 5,440 record holders of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated common stock. We
paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock for each quarter of 2008. During
the first three quarters of 2007, we paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.13 per share. In the
fourth quarter of 2007, our Board of Directors increased the quarterly cash dividend paid on our
common stock to $0.18 per share. The ranges of high and low sales prices for shares of our common
stock for the periods indicated were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
87.32
|
|
|
$
|
85.49
|
|
|
$
|
58.85
|
|
|
$
|
29.74
|
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
59.00
|
|
|
$
|
58.40
|
|
|
$
|
26.60
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
110.00
|
|
|
$
|
119.70
|
|
|
$
|
116.25
|
|
|
$
|
115.55
|
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
85.10
|
|
|
$
|
99.17
|
|
|
$
|
80.00
|
|
|
$
|
82.59
|
|
|
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys stock repurchases during the period covered
by this report, including purchases under ATIs publicly announced share repurchase program
described below, and also including shares repurchased by ATI from employees to satisfy
employee-owed taxes on share-based payments.
ATIs Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500 million on November 1,
2007. Repurchases of Company common stock are made in the open market or in unsolicited or
privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are funded from internal cash flow and cash on
hand. The number of shares purchased, and the timing of the purchases, are based on several
factors, including other investment opportunities, the level of cash balances, and general business
conditions. During 2008, 6,162,200 shares of common stock were purchased at a cost of $278.3
million. As of December 31, 2008, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had been purchased under this
program at a cost of $339.5 million. All of these purchases were made in the open market.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as Part
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Average Price
|
|
of Publicly Announced
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
|
January 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
1,091,796
|
|
|
$
|
69.60
|
|
|
|
862,200
|
|
|
$
|
378,274,242
|
|
|
February 1-29, 2008
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
71.80
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
376,479,144
|
|
|
March 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,479,144
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,116,796
|
|
|
|
69.65
|
|
|
|
887,200
|
|
|
|
376,479,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1-30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,479,144
|
|
|
May 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,479,144
|
|
|
June 1-30, 2008
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
61.46
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
350,359,494
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
61.46
|
|
|
|
425,000
|
|
|
|
350,359,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
46.34
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
331,813,014
|
|
|
August 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
|
47.38
|
|
|
|
1,800,000
|
|
|
|
246,522,584
|
|
|
September 1-30, 2008
|
|
|
1,450,000
|
|
|
|
40.31
|
|
|
|
1,450,000
|
|
|
|
177,403,829
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
3,650,000
|
|
|
|
44.46
|
|
|
|
3,650,000
|
|
|
|
177,403,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
27.08
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
167,753,939
|
|
|
November 1-30, 2008
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
16.11
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
December 1-31, 2008
|
|
|
14,196
|
|
|
|
22.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,214,196
|
|
|
$
|
22.96
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
$
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Total Stockholder Return
The graph set forth below shows the cumulative total stockholder return (i.e., price change plus
reinvestment of dividends) on our common stock from December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2008 as
compared to the S&P 500 Index, and two Peer Groups of companies. We believe the Peer Groups of
companies, which are defined below, are representative of companies in our industry that serve
similar markets during the applicable periods. The total stockholder return for the Peer Groups is
weighted according to the respective issuers stock market capitalization at the beginning of each
period. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2003.
18
Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 03
|
|
|
Dec 04
|
|
|
Dec 05
|
|
|
Dec 06
|
|
|
Dec 07
|
|
|
Dec 08
|
|
|
|
Company / Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Technologies
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
166.28
|
|
|
279.61
|
|
|
707.14
|
|
|
|
677.56
|
|
|
|
|
203.36
|
|
|
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
110.88
|
|
|
116.33
|
|
|
134.70
|
|
|
|
142.10
|
|
|
|
|
89.53
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group 2008
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
113.01
|
|
|
125.78
|
|
|
168.78
|
|
|
|
230.21
|
|
|
|
|
102.18
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group Through 2007
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
109.99
|
|
|
119.71
|
|
|
155.29
|
|
|
|
230.61
|
|
|
|
|
99.16
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Standard & Poors
The Peer Group 2008 has been expanded from the Peer Group used in 2007. The number of companies in
the prior group had decreased due to acquisitions. The current peer
group is a broader group of companies, and reflects a broader view of the Companys products,
markets and services.
19
Peer Group companies for the cumulative five year total return period ended December 31, 2008 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group 2008
|
|
Peer Group Through 2007
|
|
AK Steel Holding Corp.
|
|
AK Steel Holding Corp.
|
|
ALCOA Inc.
|
|
ALCAN Inc. *
|
|
Brush Engineered Materials
|
|
ALCOA Inc.
|
|
Carpenter Technology Corp.
|
|
Carpenter Technology Corp.
|
|
Castle (A M) & Co.
|
|
IPSCO Inc. *
|
|
Commercial Metals
|
|
Kennametal Inc.
|
|
Gerdau Ameristeel Corp.
|
|
Nucor Corp.
|
|
Kennametal Inc.
|
|
Quanex Corp. **
|
|
Ladish Co. Inc.
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
Metal Management Inc. **
|
|
RTI International Metals Inc.
|
|
Nucor Corp.
|
|
Steel Dynamics Inc.
|
|
Precision Castparts Corp.
|
|
Titanium Metals Corp.
|
|
Quanex Corp. **
|
|
United States Steel Corp.
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
|
|
RTI International Metals Inc.
|
|
|
|
Schnitzer Steel Industries CL A
|
|
|
|
Steel Dynamics Inc.
|
|
|
|
Timken Co.
|
|
|
|
Titanium Metals Corp.
|
|
|
|
United States Steel Corp.
|
|
|
|
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products
|
|
|
|
Worthington Industries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Included through 2006.
|
|
|
|
**
|
|
Included through 2007.
|
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected volume, price and financial information for ATI. The
financial information has been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in
this report for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006. The historical selected
financial information may not be indicative of our future performance and should be read in
conjunction with the information contained in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Volume (000s lbs.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals titanium mill products
|
|
|
32,530
|
|
|
|
30,689
|
|
|
|
27,361
|
|
|
|
24,882
|
|
|
|
22,012
|
|
|
High Performance Metals nickel-based and
specialty alloys
|
|
|
42,525
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
42,873
|
|
|
|
39,939
|
|
|
|
34,353
|
|
|
High Performance Metals exotic alloys
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
4,018
|
|
|
|
4,318
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
500,375
|
|
|
|
491,891
|
|
|
|
502,524
|
|
|
|
495,868
|
|
|
|
508,946
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
584,389
|
|
|
|
557,016
|
|
|
|
889,105
|
|
|
|
652,870
|
|
|
|
666,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products total
|
|
|
1,084,764
|
|
|
|
1,048,907
|
|
|
|
1,391,629
|
|
|
|
1,148,738
|
|
|
|
1,175,506
|
|
|
Average Prices (per lb.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals titanium mill products
|
|
$
|
25.59
|
|
|
$
|
30.14
|
|
|
$
|
33.83
|
|
|
$
|
22.75
|
|
|
$
|
12.34
|
|
|
High Performance Metals nickel-based and
specialty alloys
|
|
|
18.14
|
|
|
|
19.16
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
11.25
|
|
|
|
8.60
|
|
|
High Performance Metals exotic alloys
|
|
|
48.53
|
|
|
|
41.85
|
|
|
|
40.39
|
|
|
|
40.38
|
|
|
|
40.95
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products combined average
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
1,944.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,067.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,806.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,246.0
|
|
|
$
|
794.1
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
2,909.1
|
|
|
|
2,951.9
|
|
|
|
2,697.3
|
|
|
|
1,900.5
|
|
|
|
1,643.9
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
455.7
|
|
|
|
433.0
|
|
|
|
432.7
|
|
|
|
393.4
|
|
|
|
295.0
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$
|
5,309.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,452.5
|
|
|
$
|
4,936.6
|
|
|
$
|
3,539.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,733.0
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
539.0
|
|
|
$
|
729.1
|
|
|
$
|
657.2
|
|
|
$
|
335.1
|
|
|
$
|
86.0
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
377.4
|
|
|
|
505.2
|
|
|
|
348.0
|
|
|
|
154.1
|
|
|
|
62.8
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
56.7
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
20.8
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
$
|
937.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,266.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,061.9
|
|
|
$
|
536.7
|
|
|
$
|
169.6
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
$
|
860.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,147.3
|
|
|
$
|
872.6
|
|
|
$
|
311.1
|
|
|
$
|
22.3
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
565.9
|
|
|
|
747.1
|
|
|
|
574.1
|
|
|
|
364.4
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
565.9
|
|
|
$
|
747.1
|
|
|
$
|
574.1
|
|
|
$
|
362.4
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
3.77
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.26
|
|
|
$
|
5.61
|
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.26
|
|
|
$
|
5.61
|
|
|
$
|
3.59
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except per share amounts and ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
19.4
|
x
|
|
|
25.0
|
x
|
|
|
18.1
|
x
|
|
|
6.5
|
x
|
|
|
1.4
|
x
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
1,235.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,544.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,344.8
|
|
|
$
|
926.1
|
|
|
$
|
670.2
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,170.4
|
|
|
|
4,095.6
|
|
|
|
3,280.5
|
|
|
|
2,729.9
|
|
|
|
2,315.4
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
494.6
|
|
|
|
507.3
|
|
|
|
529.9
|
|
|
|
547.0
|
|
|
|
553.3
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
509.8
|
|
|
|
528.2
|
|
|
|
553.6
|
|
|
|
560.4
|
|
|
|
582.7
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
469.9
|
|
|
|
623.3
|
|
|
|
502.3
|
|
|
|
362.7
|
|
|
|
250.8
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,961.3
|
|
|
|
2,223.5
|
|
|
|
1,502.9
|
|
|
|
808.0
|
|
|
|
431.4
|
|
|
|
Net income for 2005 included a $20.9 million net special gain, which included the tax benefit
associated with the reversal of the Companys remaining valuation allowance for U.S. Federal net
deferred tax assets of $44.9 million, partially offset by asset impairments and charges related to
legal matters of $22.0 million, and a $2.0 million charge, reported as a cumulative effect
accounting change for conditional asset retirement obligations. Net income in 2004 was favorably
impacted by a curtailment gain, net of restructuring costs, of $40.4 million. We did not recognize
an income tax provision or benefit in 2004 primarily as a result of the uncertainty regarding full
utilization of the net deferred tax asset and available operating loss carryforwards.
Stockholders equity for 2008 included a $424.9 million net decrease to adjust pension and
other postretirement liabilities, and a $11.6 million decrease for the tax benefit on stock-based
compensation. In addition, stockholders equity for 2008 was reduced by $278.3 million for the
repurchases of the Companys common stock. Stockholders equity for 2007 included a $71.4 million
net increase to adjust pension and other postretirement liabilities, and a $50.7 million increase
for the tax benefit on stock-based compensation. In addition, stockholders equity for 2007 was
reduced by $61.2 million for the repurchases of the Companys common stock. Stockholders equity
for 2006 included a $47 million net increase to adjust pension and other postretirement
liabilities, and an $81 million increase for the tax benefit on stock-based compensation.
Stockholders equity for 2005 included a $36 million reduction to adjust the minimum pension
liability, and a $25 million increase for the tax benefit on stock-based compensation.
Stockholders equity for 2004 included $229.7 million in net proceeds from a common stock offering,
and a $2 million increase to adjust the minimum pension liability.
21
For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings include pre-tax
income plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest). Fixed charges consist of interest on
all indebtedness (including capitalized interest) plus that portion of operating lease rentals
representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third of operating lease rentals).
In the 2005 fourth quarter, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations (FIN 47), an interpretation of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 143, Asset Retirement Obligations (FAS 143). Net income for 2005
included a charge for the cumulative effect of adopting FIN 47 of $2.0 million net of related tax
effects.
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Certain statements contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements. Actual results or performance could
differ materially from those encompassed within such forward-looking statements as a result of
various factors, including those described below.
Overview of 2008 Financial Performance
While 2008 presented a challenging business environment, we enhanced our position in key global
growth markets, launched new production facilities, and maintained our strong balance sheet while
achieving sales and earnings per share representing the second best year in the history of the
Company. Net income for the full year 2008 was $565.9 million, or $5.67 per share, compared to
$747.1 million, or $7.26 per share, for 2007. For 2008, return on capital employed was 21.8%, and
return on stockholders equity was 27.0%. Sales were $5.31 billion compared to $5.45 billion for
2007. Direct international sales increased 2% to $1.49 billion, and represented 28% of our total
sales.
Our 2008 results reflect ATIs transformation into a globally focused, diversified high-value
specialty metals company with strong cash flow and liquidity, and a solid balance sheet. The
aerospace and defense and global infrastructure markets, chemical process industry, oil and gas,
electrical energy, and medical have been driving our performance for the last several years. For
2008, 29% of our sales were to the aerospace and defense market, 23% to the chemical process
industry and oil and gas markets, 16% to the electrical energy market, and 3% to the medical
market. These major high-value global markets represented 71% of ATIs 2008 sales.
In our High Performance Metals segment, year-over-year sales decreased 6% to $1.94 billion,
due primarily to decreased demand from the aerospace and defense market, primarily as a result of
delays in new aircraft build schedules and the weakening global economy, and softening demand in
the oil and gas market, as a result of the rapid decline in crude oil and natural gas prices in the
second half of 2008 due to the weakening global economy. The declines in these markets were
partially offset by increased demand for our exotic materials, especially from the chemical process
industry and nuclear energy markets. Operating profit for the High Performance Metals segment was
$539.0 million, a 26% decrease compared to 2007, due primarily to lower shipments and average
selling prices for our nickel-based alloys and specialty alloys, and lower average selling prices
for our titanium alloys, which were partially offset by increased shipments of our titanium and
exotic alloys, and benefits from our gross cost reduction efforts.
In our Flat-Rolled Products segment, sales decreased 1% to $2.91 billion primarily as a result
of lower average base selling prices and raw material surcharges for most of our products, which
was partially offset by increased product shipments. While total product shipments increased 3% for
the full year 2008, demand for many of our products declined significantly in the second half of
the year, and especially in the fourth quarter, as a result of the worsening effects of the
financial credit crisis and the weakening global economy. Demand for our specialty and titanium
sheet, and grain-oriented electrical steel products improved during the first nine months of 2008
from the global electrical energy, oil and gas, and chemical process industry markets, but softened
in the fourth quarter. Shipments of standard stainless products increased 5% for the full year but
declined significantly in the second half of 2008 as demand from service center and other customers
weakened considerably. Operating profit for the Flat-Rolled Products segment was $377.4 million, a
25% decrease compared to 2007. The decline in 2008 operating profit was due primarily to lower
average base selling prices for most of our products, which was partially offset by increased
shipments and the benefits from our gross cost reduction efforts.
In our Engineered Products segment, 2008 sales increased 5% to $455.7 million primarily due to
improved demand from the cutting tool, transportation, electrical energy, and construction and
mining markets. However, operating profit declined to $20.9 million, compared to $32.1 million in
2007, primarily due to an abrupt decrease in demand in the 2008 fourth quarter as a result of the
worsening financial credit crisis and the weakening global economy, lower selling prices, and
start-up costs associated with our Alpena, MI casting operation.
22
For 2008, total segment operating profit decreased 26% to $937.3 million, a decrease of $329.1
million compared to 2007. Total segment operating profit as a percentage of total sales was 17.7%
in 2008, compared to 23.2% in 2007.
During 2008, we enhanced our positions in key global growth markets, continued to enhance our
manufacturing capabilities, reduced costs, and maintained our strong balance sheet. We also
realized continued success in implementing the ATI Business System, which is continuing to drive
lean manufacturing throughout our operations. Our accomplishments during 2008 from these important
efforts included:
|
|
|
We continued to grow our global market presence as direct international sales reached a
record $1.49 billion, or 28% of total sales. We believe that nearly 50% of ATIs 2008 sales
were driven by global markets when we consider exports of our customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to transform the Company moving from a products focus to a market focus through
the formation of market sector teams which are empowered to assist our customers in dealing
with Mission Critical Metallics
®
, manufacturing, and certainty of supply challenges they face.
These teams, ATI Aerospace, ATI Defense, ATI Oil & Gas, and ATI Nuclear Energy, integrate our
Companys broad capabilities to deliver product breadth and technical depth to address
customers current and future needs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to realize significant benefits from our strategic focus on high value specialty
products, especially titanium, and on long-term customer relationships. In 2008, shipments of
titanium products, including ATI produced products for our Uniti titanium joint venture,
increased 15% to over 47 million pounds. Over the past three
years, our shipments of all
titanium products have increased 47%. These volume increases are being achieved utilizing our
manufacturing capabilities across both our High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products
segments and demonstrate our ability to supply the marketplace with both long and flat-rolled
products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to build a foundation for further profitable growth. We significantly increased
self-funded strategic capital investments in our businesses to support the expected long-term
growth in our markets, especially for titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and
superalloys, and vacuum melted specialty alloys. During the past four years, we have invested
over $1.3 billion, of which $515.7 million was spent in 2008, to expand our titanium sponge
production, and our melting, rolling and finishing capabilities. Our recently completed and
on-going major strategic capital projects include:
|
|
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production capabilities,
including our titanium sponge facility in Albany, OR, and our greenfield premium-grade
titanium sponge facility in Rowley, UT for a total capital investment of approximately $600
million. Titanium sponge is an important raw material used to produce our titanium mill
products. The last phase of the titanium sponge production expansion at our Albany, OR
facility was completed at the end of the 2008 first quarter. Initial production at the
Rowley, UT premium-grade sponge facility is expected to commence in the 2009 third quarter.
When both the Oregon and Utah facilities are operational, our total annual titanium sponge
production capacity is expected to be approximately 46 million pounds, and is intended to
reduce our purchased titanium sponge and purchased titanium scrap requirements. The capacity
of the Utah facility could be increased by an additional 18 million pounds with a further
capital investment if market conditions warrant such an investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The design and construction of a titanium alloys and nickel-based alloys and superalloys
forging facility at our operations in North Carolina at an estimated cost of approximately
$260 million. This new facility, which is being constructed in phases through 2009, will
include a new 10,000 ton press forge and a new 700mm rotary forge, both of which will be the
largest of their kind in the world for producing these types of alloys. It will also include
billet conditioning and finishing equipment. The conditioning, finishing and inspection
assets commenced operations in the 2008 third quarter and the forging equipment is expected
to be operational by the third quarter 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $60 million upgrade and expansion of our titanium and specialty plate facility in
Washington, PA. In addition to titanium and titanium alloys, our specialty plate products
include duplex alloys, superaustenitic, nickel-based alloys, zirconium alloys, armor plate,
and specialty and standard stainless grades. This upgrade and expansion was completed in the
second quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The design and construction of a new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing
facility at our Brackenridge, PA site. In September 2008, our Board of Directors approved a
strategic investment in ATIs Flat-Rolled Products segment. The project is expected to cost
approximately $1.16 billion and is expected to be completed in 2012. It is designed to
produce exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled coils at reduced cost with
shorter lead times, and require lower working capital requirements. The return on investment
should be more than 20% by 2014, including estimated annual cost reductions
|
23
|
|
|
|
of $120 million. When completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals hot rolling
and processing facility will provide unsurpassed manufacturing capability and versatility in
the production of a wide range of flat-rolled specialty metals. In connection with the new
advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility, we announced the consolidation
of our Natrona, PA grain-oriented electrical steel melt shop into ATIs Brackenridge, PA melt
shop. This consolidation is expected to improve the overall productivity of ATIs flat-rolled
grain-oriented electrical steel and other stainless and specialty alloys, and reduce the cost
of producing slabs and ingots. The investment should also result in significant reduction of
particulate emissions. This consolidation is expected to be completed in 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Our Chinese joint venture company known as Shanghai STAL Precision Stainless Steel
Company Limited (STAL), in which ATI has a 60% interest, commenced an expansion of its
Precision Rolled Strip
®
operations in Shanghai, China. This expansion is expected to more
than triple STALs precision rolling and slitting capacity when operational in the first
quarter of 2009.
|
As a result of these strategic investments, we currently plan to spend approximately $450 million
for capital expenditures, excluding the capital expansion underway at our STAL joint venture, in
2009. We are committed to continuing to self-fund these projects and can further adjust the
timing of any project if necessary.
|
|
|
We realized strong cash generation in 2008 with cash flow from operations of $755 million.
Cash on hand at the end of 2008 was $470 million after investing $516 million in capital
expenditures, repurchasing 6.2 million shares of the Companys common stock at a cost of $278
million, paying dividends of $71 million, making a $30 million voluntary cash contribution to
the Companys U.S. defined benefit pension plan, and reducing debt by $18 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to maintain our strong balance sheet. At the end of 2008, our net debt to total
capitalization was 2.0% compared to (4.5%), 3.3%, 19.7% and 43.5% at year-end 2007, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. Total debt to total capital was 20.6% compared to 19.2%, 26.9%,
41.0%, and 57.5% at year-end 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to realize significant progress in safety across ATIs operations. As a result
of our continuing focus on and commitment to safety, in 2008 our OSHA Total Recordable
Incident Rate improved by 17% to 2.51 and our Lost Time Case Rate improved by 35% to 0.34,
which we believe to be competitive with world class performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We realized continued success from the ATI Business System, which is continuing to drive lean
manufacturing throughout our operations. In addition to the improved safety performance
discussed above, we realized $134 million in gross cost reductions in 2008 which exceeded our
goal of $100 million. We have targeted additional gross cost reductions of at least $150
million in 2009.
|
While we believe ATI is well-positioned for long-term profitable growth, we expect 2009 to be
challenging as a result of the effects of the current credit crisis in the financial markets and
the global recession on many of our end markets. In addition, as a result of the historic negative
returns in equity and fixed income markets in 2008, we expect annual 2009 pretax retirement benefit
expense, which includes pension and other postretirement benefits, of approximately $140 million.
This represents an increase of nearly $132 million compared to 2008. We have taken actions to
adjust our production schedules, preserve cash and maintain our liquidity, and implement new cost
reductions in response to the challenging and uncertain economic conditions. We continue to
believe that the aerospace and defense and global infrastructure markets, namely chemical process
industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, and medical, have strong growth potential over the
intermediate and long-term. We intend to use these difficult market conditions to continue to
positively differentiate ATI as a uniquely positioned, diversified, technology-driven global
specialty metals producer.
Results of Operations
Sales were $5.31 billion in 2008, $5.45 billion in 2007 and $4.94 billion in 2006. Direct
international sales represented approximately 28% of 2008 sales, 27% of 2007 sales and 24% of 2006
sales.
Segment operating profit was $937.3 million in 2008, $1.27 billion in 2007, and $1.06 billion
in 2006. Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and
results of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses, net interest expense,
retirement benefit expense, other costs net of gains on asset sales and restructuring costs, if
any. We believe segment operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of
controllable operating results at the business segment level.
Income before tax was $860.1 million in 2008, $1.15 billion in 2007, and $872.6 million in
2006.
24
Net income was $565.9 million for 2008, $747.1 million for 2007, and $574.1 million for 2006.
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Profit
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Profit
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Profit
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Information with respect to our business segments is presented below and in Note 9 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
High Performance Metals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
2007
|
|
% Change
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
1,944.9
|
|
|
|
(6
|
%)
|
|
$
|
2,067.6
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,806.6
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
539.0
|
|
|
|
(26
|
%)
|
|
|
729.1
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
657.2
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Direct international sales as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
|
|
Our High Performance Metals segment produces, converts and distributes a wide range of high
performance alloys, including titanium and titanium-based alloys, nickel- and cobalt-based alloys
and superalloys, exotic alloys such as zirconium, hafnium, niobium, nickel-titanium, and their
related alloys, and other specialty metals, primarily in long product forms such as ingot, billet,
bar, rod, wire, shapes and rectangles, seamless tube and castings. These products are designed for
the high performance requirements of such major end markets as aerospace and defense, chemical
process industry, oil and gas, electrical energy and medical. The operating units in this segment
are ATI Allvac, ATI Allvac Ltd (U.K.) and ATI Wah Chang.
2008 Compared to 2007
Sales for the High Performance Metals segment for 2008 decreased 6% to $1.94 billion, due
primarily to decreased demand from the aerospace and defense market, primarily as a result of
delays in aircraft build schedules and the weakening global economy, and the softening demand in
the oil and gas market as a result of the rapid decline in crude oil and natural gas prices in the
second half of 2008 due to the weakening global economy. The declines in these markets were
partially offset by increased demand for our exotic materials, especially from the chemical process
industry and nuclear energy markets. While our direct international sales of exotic material
increased 8%, overall direct international sales decreased $77.8 million, or 12%, to $583.0
million, and represented 30% of sales for the High Performance Metals segment. Comparative
information on the segments products for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s lbs.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
|
32,530
|
|
|
|
30,689
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty steel alloys
|
|
|
42,525
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Average Prices (per lb.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
$
|
25.60
|
|
|
$
|
30.14
|
|
|
|
(15
|
%)
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty steel alloys
|
|
$
|
18.14
|
|
|
$
|
19.16
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
$
|
48.53
|
|
|
$
|
41.85
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
Aerospace represents a significant market for our High Performance Metals segment, especially
for premium quality specialty metals used in the manufacture of jet engines for the original
equipment and spare parts markets. In addition, we have become a larger supplier of specialty
metals used in airframe construction. Since 2005 we have increased our sales to the airframe
segment of the market by over 110%, to $481 million in 2008. In January 2007, we announced a
long-term sourcing agreement with GE Aviation for the supply of premium titanium alloys,
nickel-based superalloys, and vacuum-melted specialty alloys products for commercial and military
jet engine applications. Total revenues under this agreement plus Allvacs direct sales to GE
Aviation for the period 2007
25
through 2011 may exceed $2 billion. In addition, in October 2006 we announced a long-term
agreement with The Boeing Company to supply titanium alloys products for Boeings aircraft
airframes and structural components, including Boeings 787 Dreamliner. Total revenues under this
contract may be as much as $2.5 billion for the years 2007 through 2015. This long-term agreement
includes both long-product forms which are manufactured within the High Performance Metals segment,
and a significant amount of plate products which are manufactured utilizing assets of both the High
Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products segments. Revenues and profits associated with these
titanium mill products covered by the long-term agreement are included primarily in the results for
the High Performance Metals segment.
The commercial aerospace markets use of titanium alloys is expected to increase significantly
as new aircraft airframe designs use a larger percentage of titanium alloys. For example, the new
Boeing 787 Dreamliner airframe (excluding engines) is expected to require the purchase of
approximately 250,000 pounds of titanium alloy mill products per aircraft, a significant increase
over any previous commercial aircraft airframe. New aircraft designs from Airbus, the A380 and
A350-XWB, and from defense contractors are also expected to utilize a greater percentage of
titanium alloys. Given the significant current backlogs of both Boeing and Airbus, as well as the
engine manufacturers, this increasing demand for titanium alloys mill products is expected to last
into the next decade. However, The Boeing Company has experienced production difficulties with the
construction of the new Boeing 787. These production difficulties, together with a labor work
stoppage at The Boeing Company in September and October of 2008, resulted in excess availability of
materials in the aerospace supply chain which has had an adverse effect in 2008 on the demand and
selling prices for certain of the materials we produce, especially titanium alloys and nickel-based
superalloys.
Annually, airline revenue passenger miles and freight miles have increased 5.5% and 7.0%,
respectively, since 2004, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) data.
Based on December 2008 forecasts, the ICAO expects minimal growth in 2009, and then expects this
growth trend to resume at between 4 5% annually well into the next decade based on the demand for
passenger and freight travel from developing economies, especially in Asia and the Middle East, and
expected continuing economic growth in the rest of the world. New commercial and military jet
aircraft deliveries have increased 2.7% annually since 2004. Independent forecasts from both
Airline Monitor and Forecast International project continuing growth of commercial and military jet
aircraft deliveries into the next decade, following a period of near-term declines in aircraft
deliveries. Because of the current economic downturn, the actual rate and timing of future aircraft
deliveries is uncertain. Due to manufacturing cycle times, demand for our specialty metals leads
the deliveries of new aircraft by 12 to 18 months. In addition, as our specialty metals are used in
rotating components of jet engines, demand for our products for spare parts is impacted by aircraft
flight activity and engine refurbishment requirements of U.S. and foreign aviation regulatory
authorities.
Airline Miles Revenue Passenger
(Worldwide, per year in billions)
Passenger Miles
Airline Miles Revenue Passenger (Worldwide, per year) Revenue Passenger Miles (Billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
00
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
|
2,656
|
|
|
|
|
Source: International Civil Aviation Organization
Airline Miles Freight
(Worldwide, per year in billions)
Freight Miles
Airline Miles Freight (Worldwide, per year) Freight Ton-Miles (Billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
00
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
Source: International Civil Aviation Organization
26
Commercial & Military Jet Aircraft Build Rate and Forecast
(Worldwide, per year)
Sources: Airline Monitor, Forecast International
Commercial & Military Jet Aircraft Build Rate and Forecast
(Worldwide, per year)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
Boeing deliveries
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
Airbus deliveries
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
Regional jet del.
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
Military A/C del.
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
Total deliveries
|
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
|
1,430
|
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals segment operating profit for 2008 decreased 26% to $539.0 million
compared to 2007 primarily due to lower volume and average selling prices for our nickel-based
alloys and specialty alloys, and lower average selling prices for our titanium alloys, which were
partially offset by increased shipments of our titanium and exotic alloys, and the benefits from
our gross cost reduction efforts. In addition, operating profit in
2008 and 2007 was affected by
volatile raw material costs. Nickel and nickel-bearing scrap, and titanium and titanium scrap
prices decreased significantly in 2008 and the second of half of 2007 after increasing
significantly during the first half of 2007. These material costs are largely recovered in product
selling prices through raw material indices which attempt to match purchased material costs with
shipments. However in an environment of rapidly declining, or increasing costs, these raw material
indices included in product selling prices may not completely match related raw material costs. The
fall in raw material costs in 2008 and in the second half of 2007 had a significant negative effect
on operating profit as shipments produced with raw material purchased earlier in the year at higher
costs were sold based upon raw material indices which reflected lower raw material prices. These
negative impacts on operating profit were offset by LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefits of
$70.6 million in 2008 and $96.3 million in 2007.
27
We continued to aggressively reduce costs in 2008. Gross cost reductions, before the effects
of inflation, totaled approximately $65 million. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $55
million from operating efficiencies and procurement savings, and $10 million from reductions in
compensation and benefit expenses.
2007 Compared to 2006
Sales for the High Performance Metals segment increased 14% to $2.07 billion in 2007 due primarily
to improved volume and higher average selling prices for our nickel-based alloys and superalloys,
vacuum-melted specialty alloys, and exotic alloy products driven by increased demand from the
aerospace and defense, oil and gas, chemical process industry, and electrical energy markets.
Comparative information on the segments products for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s lbs.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
|
30,689
|
|
|
|
27,361
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty steel alloys
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
42,873
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
Average Prices (per lb.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
$
|
30.14
|
|
|
$
|
33.83
|
|
|
|
(11
|
%)
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty steel alloys
|
|
$
|
19.16
|
|
|
$
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
$
|
41.85
|
|
|
$
|
40.39
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
Segment operating profit for 2007 increased 11% to $729.1 million compared to 2006 primarily
due to higher volume, higher average selling prices for many of our products, and improved product
mix. Segment results in 2007 and 2006 were affected by volatile raw material costs. Nickel and
nickel-bearing scrap, and titanium scrap increased significantly in 2006 and the first half of
2007, but declined sharply in the 2007 second half. These material costs are largely recovered in
product selling prices through raw material indices which attempt to match purchased material costs
with shipments. However in an environment of rapidly increasing, or declining costs, these raw
material indices included in product selling prices may not completely offset purchased material
costs. The rapid fall in raw material costs in the 2007 second half had a significant, negative
effect on operating profit as shipments produced with raw material purchased earlier in the year at
higher costs were sold based upon raw material indices which reflected lower raw material prices.
This negative impact on operating profit was offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit
of $96.3 million. In 2006, higher nickel, nickel-bearing scrap, and titanium raw material costs
resulted in a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $49.4 million.
We continued to aggressively reduce costs in 2007. Gross cost reductions, before the effects
of inflation, totaled approximately $42 million. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $26
million from procurement, $11 million from operating efficiencies, and $5 million from salaried and
hourly labor cost savings.
In the first quarter 2007, we entered into a new labor agreement, which expires on June 30,
2011, with the United Steelworkers represented at ATIs Allvac Albany, Oregon operations. As a
result of this new agreement, we recognized a non-recurring pre-tax charge of $0.7 million.
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
2007
|
|
% Change
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
2,909.1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
$
|
2,951.9
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,697.3
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
377.4
|
|
|
|
(25
|
%)
|
|
|
505.2
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
348.0
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
Direct international sales as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment produces, converts and distributes stainless steel,
nickel-based alloys, specialty alloys, and titanium and titanium-based alloys, in a variety of
product forms including plate, sheet, engineered strip, and Precision Rolled Strip products, as
well as grain-oriented electrical steel sheet. The major end markets for our flat-rolled products
are electrical energy, oil and gas, chemical processing, automotive, food processing equipment and
appliances, construction and mining, electronics, communication equipment and computers, and
aerospace and defense. The operations in this segment are ATI Allegheny Ludlum, our
28
60% interest in the Chinese joint venture company known as Shanghai STAL Precision Stainless Steel Company Limited
(STAL), and our 50% interest in the industrial titanium joint venture known as Uniti LLC. The
remaining 40% interest in STAL is owned by the Baosteel Group, a state authorized investment
company whose equity securities are publicly traded in the Peoples Republic of China. The
financial results of STAL are consolidated into the segments operating results with the 40%
interest of our minority partner recognized in the consolidated statement of income as other income
or expense. The remaining 50% interest in Uniti LLC is held by VSMPO, a Russian producer of
titanium, aluminum, and specialty steel products. We account for the results of the Uniti joint
venture using the equity method since we do not have a controlling interest.
2008 Compared to 2007
Sales for the Flat-Rolled Products segment for 2008 were $2.91 billion, or 1% lower than 2007, due
primarily to lower average base selling prices and raw material surcharges for most products, which
were partially offset by increased product shipments. While total product shipments increased 3%
for the full year 2008, demand for many of our products declined significantly in the second half
of 2008, and especially in the fourth quarter, as a result of the worsening effects of the
financial credit crisis and the weakening global economy. Demand for our high value products, such
as specialty alloys and titanium sheet, and grain-oriented electrical steel, improved during the
first nine months of 2008 from the global electrical energy, oil and gas, and chemical process
industry markets but softened in the fourth quarter. Shipments of standard stainless products
increased 5% for the full year but declined significantly in the second half of 2008 as demand from
service center and other customers weakened considerably. Comparative information on the segments
products for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s lbs.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
500,375
|
|
|
|
491,891
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
584,389
|
|
|
|
557,016
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
1,084,764
|
|
|
|
1,048,907
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Average Prices (per lb.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
Standard
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
(11
|
%)
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
|
Total shipments in 2008 increased by 3% to 1,085 million pounds compared to shipments of 1,049
million pounds in 2007. The average transaction prices to customers, which include the effect of
lower average raw material surcharges, decreased by 5% to $2.65 per pound in 2008. Our direct
international sales increased $100.3 million, or 15%, to a record $780.7 million, and represented
27% of sales for the Flat-Rolled Products segment. While the majority of direct international sales
were for high-value products, sales of standard products, primarily stainless steel cold roll
sheet, increased to $184 million, which represents an increase of approximately 124% since 2006.
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment high-value product shipments, which include engineered strip,
Precision Rolled Strip, super stainless steel, nickel-based alloys, specialty alloys, titanium, and
grain-oriented electrical steel products, increased 2% while average transaction prices for these
high-value products increased 1%. Strong demand for our titanium products from the chemical process
industry, and oil and gas markets, and for our grain-oriented electrical steel products from the
electrical energy distribution market was offset by lower demand for our engineered strip,
Precision Rolled Strip, nickel-based alloys, and super stainless steel products. Shipments of
titanium and ATI-produced Uniti titanium products grew 41% to approximately 14.7 million pounds,
and shipments of our grain-oriented electrical steel products grew 9%, both compared to 2007.
Shipments of our standard products, which primarily include stainless steel hot roll and cold
roll sheet, and stainless steel plate, increased 5% while average transaction prices for these
products decreased by 11%. In 2008, consumption in the U.S. of stainless steel strip, sheet and
plate products decreased by more than 14%, compared to 2007 consumption, according to the Specialty
Steel Institute of North America (SSINA). The decrease in shipments was primarily attributable to
weakening demand from consumer and industrial markets due to the U.S. recession and inventory
adjustments by service center customers primarily for stainless steel sheet.
29
Apparent Domestic Consumption
Stainless Sheet and Strip
(Millions of tons)
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
2008 represents November YTD, annualized
|
Apparent Domestic Consumption
Stainless Sheet and Strip
(Millions of tons)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
00
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
02
|
|
|
03
|
|
|
04
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
06
|
|
|
07
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
Millions/Tons
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
|
1.30
|
|
|
|
|
Source: SSINA
The majority of our flat-rolled products are sold at prices that include surcharges for raw
materials, including purchased scrap, that are required to manufacture our products. These raw
materials include nickel, iron, chromium, and molybdenum. Nickel, which comprises a significant
percentage of our material costs, continued to be volatile during 2008. The cost of nickel
increased 20% during the first three months of 2008 to an average monthly cost of $14.16 per pound
in March 2008. However, during the next nine months of 2008, the cost of nickel declined 69% to an
average monthly cost of $4.39 per pound in December 2008. The 2008 fourth quarter was an
exceptional period of volatility for our other major raw materials: iron, chromium, and molybdenum
which declined in value during the quarter by approximately 60%, 52%, and 71%, respectively.
Iron Scrap Prices
($/gross ton)
Iron Scrap Prices
($/Gross Ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
00
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
02
|
|
|
03
|
|
|
04
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
06
|
|
|
07
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
30
Nickel Prices
($/lb)
Nickel Prices
($/lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
00
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
02
|
|
|
03
|
|
|
04
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
06
|
|
|
07
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
3.67
|
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
|
6.09
|
|
|
|
|
15.68
|
|
|
|
|
11.79
|
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
|
|
|
Source: London Metals Exchange
Chromium Prices
($/lb)
Chromium Prices
($/lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
00
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
02
|
|
|
03
|
|
|
04
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
06
|
|
|
07
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
|
1.03
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Platts Metals Week
31
Molybdenum Oxide Prices
($/lb)
Molybdenum Oxide
($/lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
00
|
|
|
01
|
|
|
02
|
|
|
03
|
|
|
04
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
06
|
|
|
07
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
|
31.24
|
|
|
|
|
26.58
|
|
|
|
|
24.78
|
|
|
|
|
32.38
|
|
|
|
|
9.60
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Platts Metals Week
Operating income was $377.4 million, a 25% decrease compared to 2007. The decline in 2008
operating profit was due primarily to lower average base selling prices for most of our products,
which was partially offset by increased shipments and the benefits from our gross cost reduction
initiatives. In addition, operating profit in 2008 and 2007 was affected by volatile raw material
costs. Nickel and nickel-bearing scrap, iron scrap, chromium, and molybdenum prices decreased
significantly in 2008, especially in the fourth quarter. These material costs are largely recovered
in product selling prices through raw material surcharges which attempt to match purchased material
costs with shipments. However in an environment of rapidly declining, or increasing costs, these
raw material indices included in product selling prices may not completely match our raw material
costs due to the long manufacturing cycle times for some of our products. The rapid fall in raw
material costs in 2008 had a significant, negative effect on operating profit as shipments produced
with raw material purchased earlier in the year at higher costs were sold based upon raw material
surcharges which reflected lower raw material costs. This negative impact on operating profit was
offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $89.8 million in 2008. During 2007, the
average cost of our raw materials in our Flat-Rolled Products segment increased approximately 6%
compared to the 2006 average cost. These increased costs, largely offset by lower inventory
quantities, resulted in a LIFO inventory valuation charge of $1.9 million for 2007.
We continued to aggressively reduce costs and streamline our flat-rolled products operations.
In 2008, we achieved gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately $59
million in our Flat-Rolled Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $52
million from procurement savings and operating efficiencies and $7 million from reductions in
compensation and benefit expenses.
2007 Compared to 2006
Sales for the Flat-Rolled Products segment for 2007 were $2.95 billion, or 9% higher than 2006, due
primarily to higher average raw material surcharges and increased average base prices for most
products, especially titanium and grain-oriented electrical steel products, and improved product
mix, partially offset by a significant reduction in shipments of standard stainless products.
Comparative information on the segments products for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
was:
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s lbs.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
491,891
|
|
|
|
502,524
|
|
|
|
(2
|
%)
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
557,016
|
|
|
|
889,105
|
|
|
|
(37
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
1,048,907
|
|
|
|
1,391,629
|
|
|
|
(25
|
%)
|
|
|
|
Average Prices (per lb.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
Standard
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
$
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
Total shipments in 2007 decreased by 25% to 1,049 million pounds compared to shipments of
1,392 million pounds for 2006. The average transaction prices to customers, which includes the
effect of higher average raw material surcharges, increased by 44% to $2.79 per pound in 2007. Our
direct international sales increased $192.2 million, or 39%, to $680.4 million, and represented 23%
of sales for the Flat-Rolled Products segment. While the majority of direct international sales
were for high-value products, sales of standard products, primarily stainless steel cold roll
sheet, increased to $145 million.
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment high-value product shipments, which include engineered strip,
Precision Rolled Strip, super stainless steel, nickel-based alloys, titanium and titanium-based
alloys, grain-oriented electrical steel, and tool steel products, decreased 2% while average
transaction prices for our high-value products increased 29%. Strong demand for our nickel-based
alloy, titanium, and grain-oriented electrical steel products from the chemical process industry,
oil and gas, and electrical energy markets was offset by lower demand for our engineered strip,
Precision Rolled Strip, and super stainless steel products. Shipments of titanium and ATI-produced
Uniti titanium products grew nearly 25% to approximately 10.4 million pounds, and shipments of our
grain-oriented electrical steel grew 5%, both compared to 2006.
Shipments of our standard products, which primarily include stainless steel hot roll and cold
roll sheet, and stainless steel plate, decreased 37% while average transaction prices for these
products increased 50%. In 2007, consumption in the U.S. of stainless steel strip, sheet and plate
products decreased by more than 17%, compared to 2006 consumption, according to the Specialty Steel
Institute of North America (SSINA). The decrease in shipments was primarily attributable to
inventory adjustments by service center customers primarily for stainless steel sheet. Our
The
Switch is On
marketing campaign had its best year ever in 2007 as customers in both the U.S. and
Europe recognized the value of lean nickel products, such as ATI201HP stainless, which has
approximately one-half the nickel content as the most common Type 304 stainless product with
similar corrosion properties and greater strength. In 2007, shipments of ATI201HP stainless
increased over 57% compared to 2006.
The majority of our flat-rolled products are sold at prices that include surcharges for raw
materials, including purchased scrap, that are required to manufacture our products. These raw
materials include nickel, iron, chromium, and molybdenum. Nickel, which comprises a significant
percentage of our material costs, continued to be volatile during 2007. The cost of nickel
increased 51% during the first five months of 2007 to an average monthly cost of $23.63 per pound
in May 2007. However, during the next seven months of 2007, the cost of nickel declined 50% to an
average monthly cost of $11.79 per pound in December 2007. While the rapid run-up in nickel costs
increased our average transactional selling prices for 2007, we believe the volatility of these
costs had a negative effect on our shipment volumes, as customers reduced the amount of material
that was held in stock and altered their normal purchasing patterns.
Operating income increased $157.2 million, or 45%, to $505.2 million for 2007, compared to
2006. The benefits of higher average base-selling prices, improved product mix and the benefits
from our gross cost reduction initiatives, offset significantly lower shipments. During 2007, the
average cost of our raw materials in our Flat-Rolled Products segment increased approximately 6%
compared to the 2006 average cost. These increased costs, largely offset by lower inventory
quantities, resulted in a LIFO inventory valuation charge of $1.9 million for 2007 compared to a
LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $147.3 million in 2006.
We continued to aggressively reduce costs and streamline our operations. In 2007, we achieved
gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately $60 million in our
Flat-Rolled Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $28 million from
operating efficiencies, $24 million from procurement savings, and $8 million from lower
compensation and fringe benefit expenses.
In the first quarter 2007, we entered into a new labor agreement with the United Steelworkers
represented at ATIs Allegheny Ludlum operations. The new agreement expires on June 30, 2011. The
new agreement provides for profit sharing above specified minimum pre-tax profit for the
Flat-Rolled Products segment and is capped to provide for no more than $20 million of profit
sharing
33
payments under this provision over the four-year life of the contract. Any profit sharing
payments under this provision are contributed to an independently administered VEBA (Voluntary
Employee Benefit Association) trust. As a result of this new agreement, we recognized a
non-recurring pre-tax charge of $4.8 million.
Engineered Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
2007
|
|
% Change
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
455.7
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
433.0
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
432.7
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
(35
|
%)
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
(43
|
%)
|
|
|
56.7
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Direct international sales as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
Our Engineered Products segment includes the production of tungsten powder, tungsten heavy
alloys, tungsten carbide materials and carbide cutting tools. The segment also produces carbon
alloy steel impression die forgings, and large grey and ductile iron castings, and provides
precision metals processing services. The operations in this segment are ATI Metalworking Products,
ATI Portland Forge, ATI Casting Service and ATI Rome Metals.
The major markets served by our products of the Engineered Products segment include a wide
variety of industrial markets including oil and gas, machine and cutting tools, transportation,
construction and mining, electrical energy, aerospace and defense, and automotive.
2008 Compared to 2007
Sales for the Engineered Products segment increased $22.7 million to $455.7 million in 2008. Demand
for our tungsten and tungsten-carbide products improved from the cutting tool, construction and
mining, and electrical energy markets, but was lower from the oil and gas market for down-hole
drilling applications. Demand increased for our forged products from the transportation market.
Demand for our cast products improved from the electrical energy market for wind and natural gas
power generation applications. Demand remained steady for our titanium precision metal processing
conversion services, primarily due to the aerospace market. While total sales increased 5% for full
year 2008, demand for many of our products declined significantly in the fourth quarter of 2008 as
a result of the worsening effects of the financial credit crisis and the weakening global economy.
Segment operating profit in 2008 declined to $20.9 million, or 4.6% of sales, compared to
$32.1 million, or 7.4% of sales for 2007. The decline in operating profit was primarily due to a
more competitive pricing environment for our tungsten and tungsten-carbide products, higher raw
material costs and $4.7 million of start-up expenses associated with our Alpena, MI casting
operation. This decline was partially offset by increased shipment volumes and the benefits of
gross cost reductions. In addition, a rapid decline during the 2008 fourth quarter in raw material
costs, primarily tungsten scrap, cobalt, and forging steel, resulted in higher cost material
purchased earlier in the year flowing through cost of sales and not matching raw material
surcharges included in selling prices due to manufacturing cycle time. This compression in profit
margins was partially offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $8.6 million. In
2007, operating profit included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $2.3 million as a
result of higher raw material costs and inventory levels.
In 2008, we achieved gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately
$10 million in our Engineered Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $7
million from operating efficiencies and procurement savings and $3 million from lower compensation
and benefit expenses.
2007 Compared to 2006
Sales for the Engineered Products segment in 2007 were $433.0 million, comparable to 2006 sales.
Demand for our tungsten and tungsten-carbide products improved from the aerospace and defense, and
cutting tool markets, but was lower from the oil and gas market for down-hole drilling
applications. Demand was strong for our forged products from the construction and mining, and oil
and gas markets and demand was soft from the transportation market. Demand for our cast products
was strong from the electrical energy market for wind and natural gas power generation
applications. Demand remained strong for our titanium precision metal processing conversion
services, primarily due to the aerospace market.
34
Segment operating profit in 2007 was $32.1 million, or 7.4% of sales, compared to $56.7
million, or 13.1% of sales for 2006. The decline in operating profit was primarily due to higher
purchased raw material costs, start-up costs associated with our newly expanded ammonium
paratungstate (APT) plant, and the slower than planned ramp-up of this plant. In 2007, we commenced
commercial operations at the new APT plant, a $17 million capital investment that began in the 2005
fourth quarter. The new APT plant allows us to expand our production capacity to internally source
all of our APT and cobalt requirements at what is expected to be significantly lower costs than
purchased material. Operating profit included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $2.3
million in 2007, and a charge of $0.3 million in 2006 as a result of higher raw material costs and
inventory levels.
In 2007, we achieved gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately
$9 million in our Engineered Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $5
million from operating efficiencies, $3 million from procurement savings, and $1 million from lower
compensation and fringe benefit expenses.
Corporate Expenses
Corporate expenses were 1.1% of sales, or $56.8 million, in 2008 compared to 1.4% of sales, or
$73.8 million, in 2007 and 1.4% of sales, or $68.9 million, in 2006. The higher level of corporate
expenses in 2007 and 2006 compared to 2008 was primarily the result of higher expenses associated
with annual and long-term performance-based incentive compensation programs.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net of interest income and interest capitalization, was $3.5 million for 2008
compared to $4.8 million for 2007 and $23.3 million for 2006. Interest expense is presented net of
interest income of $9.8 million for 2008, $26.0 million for 2007, and $15.0 million for 2006. The
decrease in interest income for 2008 was primarily due to lower interest rates on invested cash.
The increase in interest income for 2007 primarily resulted from higher cash balances. Increased
capital expenditures associated with strategic investments to expand our production capabilities
resulted in higher interest capitalization in 2008 and 2007. Interest expense in 2008, 2007, and
2006 was reduced by $25.0 million, $9.8 million, and $4.5 million, respectively, related to
interest capitalization on capital projects.
In prior years, we entered into receive fixed, pay floating interest rate swap contracts
related to our $300 million, 8.375% 10-year Notes (Notes), which were later settled, resulting in
a gain. The settlement gain is being amortized into income as an offset to interest expense over
the remaining life of the 10-year Notes. Interest expense decreased by $2.0 million in 2008, $1.8
million in 2007, and $1.7 million in 2006 due to these previously settled interest rate swap
agreements.
Other Expenses, Net of Gains on Asset Sales
Other expenses, net of gains on asset sales, includes charges incurred in connection with closed
operations, pretax gains and losses on the sale of surplus real estate, non-strategic investments
and other assets, operating results from equity-method investees, minority interest, and other
non-operating income or expense. These items are presented primarily in selling and administrative
expenses, and in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of income and resulted in
net charges of $8.5 million in 2008, $10.2 million in 2007 and $15.2 million in 2006. Other
expenses for 2008, 2007 and 2006 primarily related to legal costs associated with closed
operations.
Retirement Benefit Expense
Retirement benefit expense, which includes pension and postretirement medical benefits, had
declined since 2004 primarily due to actual returns on plan assets exceeding expected returns, and
the positive benefits of voluntary pension contributions totaling
$415.2 million over the past five
years. Retirement benefit expense was $8.4 million for 2008, $30.3 million for 2007, and $81.9
million for 2006. Retirement benefit expenses are included in both cost of sales and selling and
administrative expenses. Retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales and selling and
administrative expenses for the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
$
|
55.3
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
30.3
|
|
|
$
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
35
Primarily as a result of the historic negative returns in equity and fixed income markets in
2008, total retirement benefit expense for 2009 is expected to be approximately $140 million, an
increase of $132 million compared to 2008. This increase is primarily attributable to the pension
component of retirement benefit expense. As a result of lower than expected returns on pension
assets in 2008, we expect pension expense for 2009 to be approximately $120 million compared to
pension income of $12.2 million for 2008. Postretirement medical expense, the other component of
retirement benefit expense, is expected to increase to approximately $20 million in 2009, compared
to $20.6 million in 2008, primarily as a result of lower plan assets in 2009 as benefit payments
are expected to reduce VEBA trust assets, offsetting lower expenses of defined contribution plans.
Income Taxes
Results of operations for 2008 included a provision for income taxes of $294.2 million, or 34.2% of
income before tax, for U.S. Federal, foreign and state income taxes. The results for 2008 benefited
from a $11.9 million favorable adjustment of prior years taxes. Results of operations for 2007
included a provision for income taxes of $400.2 million, or 34.9% of income before tax, for U.S.
Federal, foreign and state income taxes. The results for 2007 benefited from a $23.1 million
reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance with respect to certain state tax credits expected
to be realized in future periods. Results of operations for 2006 included a provision for income
taxes of $298.5 million, or 34.2% of income before tax, for U.S. Federal, foreign and state income
taxes. The results for 2006 benefited from a favorable $8.7 million adjustment of prior years
taxes.
Deferred taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for
financial and income tax reporting purposes, and differences between the fair value of assets
acquired in business combinations accounted for as purchases for financial reporting purposes and
their corresponding tax bases. Deferred income taxes represent future tax benefits or costs to be
recognized when those temporary differences reverse. At December 31, 2008, we had a net deferred
tax asset of $203.4 million. A significant portion of our deferred tax assets relates to retirement
benefit obligations, which have been recorded in the accompanying financial statements but which
are not recognized for income tax reporting purposes until the benefits are paid. These benefit
payments are expected to occur over an extended period of years.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings under
existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including the
previously announced substantial expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years.
We did not borrow funds under our domestic senior unsecured credit
facility, or former facility,
during 2008, 2007 or 2006, although a portion has been utilized to support letters of credit.
Our ability to access the credit markets in the future to obtain additional financing, if
needed, may be influenced by our credit rating. As of December 31, 2008, Moodys Investor Services
senior unsecured debt rating for our Company was Baa3 with a stable ratings outlook. As of December
31, 2008, Standard & Poors Ratings Services corporate credit and senior unsecured debt rating for
our Company was BBB- with a stable ratings outlook. Changes in our credit rating do not impact our
access to, or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
In 2008, cash generated by operations of $784.5 million was used to invest $515.7 million in
capital expenditures, repurchase $278.3 million of the Companys common stock, pay dividends of
$71.4 million, and fund a $30 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. qualified defined
benefit pension plan, decreasing our cash balance $153.4 million, to $469.9 million at December 31,
2008. In 2007, cash generated by operations of $809.8 million and the proceeds from the exercises
of stock options of $5.5 million were used to invest $457.1 million in capital expenditures and
purchases of businesses, fund a $100 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. qualified
defined benefit pension plan, purchase $61.2 million of the Companys common stock, pay dividends
of $58.1 million, repay debt of $23.9 million, and increase cash balances by $121.0 million to
$623.3 million at December 31, 2007. In 2006, cash generated by operations of $411.6 million, the
proceeds from exercises of stock options of $33.1 million, and tax benefits on share-based
compensation of $80.9 million were used to invest $238.3 million in capital expenditures, fund a
$100 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan, pay
dividends of $43.1 million, repay debt of $7.1 million, and increase cash balances by $139.6
million to $502.3 million at December 31, 2006. We use cash flow from operations before voluntary
pension plan contributions in order to evaluate and compare fiscal periods that do not include
these contributions, and to make resource allocation decisions among operational requirements,
investing and financing alternatives.
36
As part of managing the liquidity of the business, we focus on controlling inventory, accounts
receivable and accounts payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working
capital, we exclude the effects of the LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete
inventory reserves, and reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature,
are managed separately. We also measure managed working capital as a percentage of the prior two
months annualized sales to evaluate our performance based on recent levels of business volume.
Managed Working Capital
($ Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03
|
|
|
04
|
|
|
05
|
|
|
06
|
|
|
07
|
|
|
08
|
|
|
|
Millions/$
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
% of Annualized Revenue
|
|
|
30.7%
|
|
|
29.5%
|
|
|
30.3%
|
|
|
29.0%
|
|
|
32.2%
|
|
|
35.2%
|
|
|
|
In 2008, managed working capital, which we define as gross inventory plus gross accounts
receivable less accounts payable, decreased by $214.8 million due to declining business levels,
primarily in the fourth quarter 2008, and lower raw material costs. The decline in managed working
capital was a source of cash in 2008, as gross inventory declined $203.5 million and accounts
receivable declined $124.9 million, which was partially offset by an accounts payable decrease of
$82.0 million. In 2007 and 2006, the favorable impact of improved operating results on cash flow
from operations was offset by continuing investment in managed working capital to support the
higher business levels and the effect of higher costs for certain raw materials. During 2007,
managed working capital increased by $44.3 million. This increase resulted from a $41.1 million
increase in accounts receivable due to the timing of sales in the fourth quarter 2007 compared to
the fourth quarter 2006, and a $36.2 million increase in inventory, mostly as a result of increased
operating volumes particularly for the High Performance Metals segment products, partially offset
by a $33.0 million increase in accounts payable. During 2006, managed working capital increased by
$534.2 million. This increase resulted from a $166.5 million increase in accounts receivable due to
a higher level of sales in the 2006 fourth quarter compared to the fourth quarter of 2005, and a
$409.2 million increase in inventory, mostly as a result of increased operating volumes and higher
raw materials costs, partially offset by a $41.5 million increase in accounts payable. Managed
working capital has increased approximately $0.8 billion over the past five years as our level of
business activity and raw material costs have both increased. Increases in managed working capital
are expected to represent a future source of cash as the level of business activity declines.
Managed working capital as a percent of annualized sales increased to 35.2% at the end of 2008,
compared to 32.2% at the end of 2007, and 29.0% at the end of 2006. The rapid decline in demand as
measured by annualized November and December 2008 sales increased our managed working capital on a
percentage of sales basis. Additionally, the increase in 2008 of managed working capital as a
percentage of sales was due to a continuing shift in mix to more value added products, primarily in
the High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products business segments, which have a longer
manufacturing process. Days sales outstanding, which measures actual collection timing for accounts
receivable, remained relatively constant in 2008 compared to 2007.
37
The components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
530.5
|
|
|
$
|
652.2
|
|
|
$
|
610.9
|
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
887.6
|
|
|
|
916.1
|
|
|
|
798.7
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(278.5
|
)
|
|
|
(388.4
|
)
|
|
|
(355.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,139.6
|
|
|
|
1,179.9
|
|
|
|
1,054.5
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
205.6
|
|
|
|
374.6
|
|
|
|
466.7
|
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
60.2
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital
|
|
$
|
1,411.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,626.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,582.2
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior 2 months sales
|
|
$
|
4,008.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,058.5
|
|
|
$
|
5,453.5
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a % of sales
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for 2008 were $515.7 million, compared to $447.4 million in 2007, and
$238.3 million in 2006.
We are significantly expanding our manufacturing capabilities to meet current and expected
demand growth from the aerospace (engine and airframe) and defense, chemical process industry, oil
and gas, electrical energy, and medical markets, especially for titanium and titanium-based alloys,
nickel-based alloys and superalloys, specialty alloys, and exotic alloys. These self-funded capital
investments remain on track to be completed as planned and include:
|
§
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production
capabilities, including our titanium sponge facility in Albany, OR,
and our greenfield premium-grade titanium sponge (jet engine rotating
parts) facility in Rowley, UT for a total capital investment of
approximately $600 million. Titanium sponge is an important raw
material used to produce our titanium mill products. The Albany, OR
facility expansion was completed at the end of the 2008 first quarter.
Initial production at the Rowley, UT premium-grade sponge is expected
to commence in the 2009 third quarter. When both the Oregon and Utah
sponge facilities are fully operational, our total annual sponge
production capacity is projected to be approximately 46 million
pounds, and these secure supply sources are intended to reduce our
purchased titanium sponge and purchased titanium scrap requirements.
In addition, the Utah facility will have the infrastructure in place
to further expand annual capacity by approximately 18 million pounds,
bringing the total annual capacity at that facility to 42 million
pounds, if needed.
|
|
|
|
§
|
|
The expansion of ATIs melting capabilities for titanium and
titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and
specialty alloys. For titanium melting, four new vacuum-arc remelt
(VAR) furnaces are on line, and we expect one more titanium VAR
furnace to be customer qualified by the end of the first quarter 2009.
VAR melting is a consumable electrode re-melting process that improves
the cleanliness and chemical homogeneity of the alloys. Our third
Plasma Arc Melt (PAM) premium titanium melt furnace is in production
and has completed conditional customer qualifications. This PAM
furnace is now qualified for most of our products, including certain
premium grade jet engine rotating quality products, and we expect the
remaining qualifications to be completed in the second quarter 2009.
Plasma arc melting is a superior cold-hearth melting process for
making alloyed titanium products for jet engine rotating parts,
medical applications, and other critical applications. One new VAR
furnace for nickel-based alloys and superalloys was qualified and
began commercial production in the first quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
§
|
|
The expansion of ATIs mill products processing and finishing
capabilities for titanium and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based
alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys. Announced projects
include a $260 million expansion of our titanium and superalloy
forging capacity at our Bakers, NC facility through the addition of an
integrated 10,000 ton press forge, 700mm rotary forge, and
conditioning, finishing and inspection facilities to produce large
diameter products needed for certain demanding applications. The
conditioning, finishing and inspection facilities began operations in
the third quarter 2008, and the forging operations are expected to be
operational by the third quarter 2009. Forging is a hot-forming
process that produces wrought forging billet and forged machining bar
from an ingot. In June 2008, we commissioned the $60 million expansion
of our titanium and specialty plate facility located in Washington,
PA. In addition to titanium and titanium alloys, ATIs specialty plate
products include duplex alloys, superaustenitic alloys, nickel-based
alloys, zirconium alloys, armor plate, and specialty and standard
stainless grades. The Washington, PA expansion included increasing
reheat furnace, annealing, and flattening capacity at the existing
plate mill, expanding plate size capabilities, and implementing
productivity improvements.
|
|
|
|
§
|
|
A new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility at
our existing Brackenridge, PA site. Our Board of Directors approved a
strategic investment in ATIs Flat-Rolled Products segment. The
project is estimated to cost approximately $1.16 billion and is
expected to be completed in 2012. It is designed to produce
exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled coils at
|
38
|
|
|
reduced cost with shorter lead times, and require lower working capital
requirements. The return on investment should be more than 20% by
2014, including estimated annual cost reductions of $120 million. When
completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals hot rolling
and processing facility will provide unsurpassed manufacturing
capability and versatility in the production of a wide range of
flat-rolled specialty metals. We expect improved productivity, lower
costs, and higher quality for our diversified product mix of
flat-rolled specialty metals, including nickel-based and specialty
alloys, titanium and titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision
Rolled Strip products, and stainless sheet and coiled plate products.
Our new advanced hot-rolling and processing facility is designed to be
the most powerful mill in the world for production of specialty
metals. It is designed to roll and process exceptional quality hot
bands of up to 78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide.
|
|
|
|
§
|
|
In connection with the new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and
processing facility, we announced the consolidation of our Natrona, PA
grain-oriented electrical steel melt shop into ATIs Brackenridge, PA
melt shop. This consolidation is expected to improve the overall
productivity of ATIs flat-rolled grain-oriented electrical steel and
other stainless and specialty alloys, and reduce the cost of producing
slabs and ingots. The investment should also result in significant
reduction of particulate emissions. This consolidation is expected to
be completed in 2010.
|
|
|
|
§
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products through
capital expansions of zirconium sponge production and VAR melting.
This new zirconium sponge and melting capacity better positions ATI
for the current and expected strong growth in demand from the nuclear
electrical energy and chemical process industry markets.
|
|
|
|
§
|
|
Our STAL joint venture commenced an expansion of its operations in
Shanghai, China in late 2006. This expansion, which is expected to
more than triple STALs rolling and slitting capacity to produce
Precision Rolled Strip products, is estimated to cost approximately
$110 million and is expected to be operational in the first quarter
2009.
|
We currently expect that our projected 2009 capital expenditures will be approximately $450
million, excluding the STAL joint venture, and we expect capital spending to remain in this range
for the next few years as we complete these strategic projects. We are committed to continuing to
self-fund these projects and can further adjust the timing of any project, if necessary.
Debt
Total debt outstanding decreased by $18.4 million, to $509.8 million at December 31, 2008, from
$528.2 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease was primarily related to scheduled debt maturity
payments. In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net
debt to total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be
available to reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. Our net debt to total capitalization was 2.0%,
compared to a negative 4.5% at December 31, 2007, a positive 3.3% at December 31, 2006 and 19.7% at
December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2007, our cash on hand exceeded our total debt. Total debt to
total capitalization was 20.6% at December 31, 2008, compared to 19.2% at December 31, 2007, 26.9%
at December 31, 2006, and 41.0% at December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
509.8
|
|
|
$
|
528.2
|
|
|
Less: Cash
|
|
|
(469.9
|
)
|
|
|
(623.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash)
|
|
$
|
39.9
|
|
|
$
|
(95.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash)
|
|
$
|
39.9
|
|
|
$
|
(95.1
|
)
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,961.3
|
|
|
|
2,223.5
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
|
|
$
|
2,001.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,128.4
|
|
|
Net debt to capital ratio
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
(4.5
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
509.8
|
|
|
$
|
528.2
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,961.3
|
|
|
|
2,223.5
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
|
|
$
|
2,471.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,751.7
|
|
|
Total debt to total capital ratio
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
39
We have a $400 million senior unsecured domestic revolving credit facility that expires in
July 2012, and includes a $200 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. Under this
facility, the Company may increase the size of the facility by up to $100 million without seeking
the further approval of the lending group. The unsecured facility requires us to maintain a
leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness divided by consolidated earnings before interest,
taxes and depreciation and amortization) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an interest
coverage ratio (consolidated earnings before interest and taxes divided by interest expense) of not
less than 2.0. For the year ended December 31, 2008, our leverage ratio was 0.55, and our interest
coverage ratio was 65.06. We have not borrowed funds under the senior unsecured domestic facility
during 2008, although a portion has been utilized to support the issuance of letters of credit.
Outstanding letters of credit issued under the unsecured facility at December 31, 2008, were
approximately $14 million, compared to $43 million at the end of 2007. In 2008, the Company
established a separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit. As of December 31,
2008, $30 million in letters of credit were outstanding under this separate facility.
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 19.4.
STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60% interest, has a five year
revolving credit facility with a group of banks. Under the credit facility, STAL may borrow up to
585 million renminbi (approximately $85 million at December 2008 exchange rates) at an interest
rate equal to 90% of the applicable lending rate published by the Peoples Bank of China. The
credit facility is supported solely by STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the
joint venture partners, and is intended to be utilized in the future for the expansion of STALs
operations, which are located in Shanghai, China. The credit facility requires STAL to maintain a
minimum level of shareholders equity, and certain financial ratios. As of December 31, 2008, there
had been no borrowings made under this credit facility.
STAL had approximately $6 million in letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
These letters of credit are supported solely by STALs financial capability without any guarantees
from the joint venture partners.
Interest rate swap contracts have been used from time-to-time to manage our exposure to
interest rate risks. At December 31, 2008, we have no interest rate swap contracts in place. We
have deferred gains on settled receive fixed, pay floating interest rate swap contracts
associated with our $300 million, 8.375% Notes. These gains on settlement, which occurred in 2004
and 2003, remain a component of the reported balance of the Notes, and are ratably recognized as a
reduction to interest expense over the remaining life of the Notes,
which is approximately three
years. At December 31, 2008, the deferred settlement gain was $6.7 million. The result of the
receive fixed, pay floating arrangements was a decrease in interest expense of $2.0 million, $1.8
million, and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively,
compared to the fixed interest expense of the ten-year Notes.
A summary of required payments under financial instruments (excluding accrued interest) and
other commitments are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
1-3
|
|
4-5
|
|
After 5
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
1year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt including Capital Leases
|
|
$
|
505.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.2
|
|
|
$
|
334.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
153.9
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
Other Long-term Liabilities (A)
|
|
|
195.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
122.4
|
|
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
|
|
|
Raw materials (B)
|
|
|
1,015.0
|
|
|
|
344.4
|
|
|
|
229.2
|
|
|
|
120.4
|
|
|
|
321.0
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
90.4
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (C)
|
|
|
35.4
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,936.3
|
|
|
$
|
479.2
|
|
|
$
|
681.1
|
|
|
$
|
156.7
|
|
|
$
|
619.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of Credit (D)
|
|
$
|
597.2
|
|
|
$
|
83.9
|
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
$
|
485.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
|
|
$
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
Other long-term liabilities exclude pension liabilities and accrued postretirement
benefits.
|
40
(B) We have contracted for physical delivery for certain of our raw materials to meet a
portion of our needs. These contracts are based upon fixed or variable price provisions. We used
current market prices as of December 31, 2008, for raw material obligations with variable pricing.
(C) We have various contractual obligations that extend through 2015 for services involving
production facilities and administrative operations. Our purchase obligation as disclosed
represents the estimated termination fees payable if we were to exit these contracts.
(D) Drawn amounts were $21.7 million at December 31, 2008 under foreign credit agreements, and
drawn amounts are included in total debt. Drawn amounts also include $13.9 million utilized under
the $400 million domestic senior unsecured credit facility for standby letters of credit, which
renew annually, and $29.8 million under a separate letter of credit facility. These letters of
credit are used to support: $29.8 million in workers compensation and general insurance
arrangements, and $13.9 million related to environmental, legal and other matters.
Retirement Benefits
The value of the liabilities of our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan exceeded pension
plan investments as of the end of 2008, by $342 million, or approximately 17%. We have not been
required to make cash contributions to this defined benefit pension plan since 1995. However,
during the past five years, we have made $415 million in voluntary cash and stock contributions to
this plan to improve the plans funded position. These voluntary contributions were comprised of
cash contributions of $30 million during the fourth quarter of 2008, and $100 million during each
of the fourth quarters of 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, plus $50 million during the third
quarter 2004. Additionally in the fourth quarter of 2008, we contributed 1.5 million shares of ATI
common stock, valued at $35.2 million, to the pension plan. Based on current regulations and
actuarial studies, we do not expect to be required to make cash contributions to our U.S. qualified
defined benefit pension plan for 2009. However, we may elect, depending upon investment performance
of the pension plan assets and other factors, to make additional voluntary cash contributions to
this pension plan in the future.
We fund certain retiree health care benefits for Allegheny Ludlum using investments held in a
Company-administered Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) trust. This allows us to recover
a portion of the retiree medical costs. In accordance with our labor agreements, during 2008, 2007,
and 2006, we funded $34.3 million, $30.8 million, and $28.1 million, respectively, of retiree
medical costs using the investments of this VEBA trust. We may continue to fund certain retiree
medical benefits utilizing the investments held in the VEBA. The value of the investments held in
the VEBA was approximately $35 million as of December 31, 2008.
Dividends
We paid a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock for each quarter of 2008. The
payment of dividends and the amount of such dividends depends upon matters deemed relevant by our
Board of Directors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements,
future prospects, any limitations imposed by law, credit agreements or senior securities, and other
factors deemed relevant and appropriate.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 1, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500 million.
Repurchases of Company common stock are expected to be made on the open market or in unsolicited or
privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are expected to be funded from internal cash
flow and cash on hand. The number of shares to be purchased, and the timing of the purchases, will
be based on several factors, including other investment opportunities, the level of cash balances,
and general business conditions. During 2008, 6,162,200 shares of common stock were purchased at a
cost of $278.3 million. As of December 31, 2008, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had been
purchased under this program at a cost of $339.5 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with United
States generally accepted accounting principles. When more than one accounting principle, or the
method of its application, is generally accepted, management selects the principle or method that
is appropriate in our specific circumstances. Application of these accounting principles requires
our management to make estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties; as a
result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these financial statements,
management has made its best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the
financial statements giving due regard to materiality.
41
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable
Revenue is recognized when title passes or as services are rendered. We have no significant unusual
sale arrangements with any of our customers.
We market our products to a diverse customer base, principally throughout the United States.
Trade credit is extended based upon evaluations of each customers ability to perform its
obligations, which are updated periodically. Accounts receivable reserves are based upon an aging
of accounts and a review for collectability of specific accounts. Accounts receivable are presented
net of a reserve for doubtful accounts of $6.3 million at both December 31, 2008 and 2007, which
represented 1.2% and 1.0%, respectively, of total gross accounts receivable. During 2008, we
recognized expense of $2.1 million to increase the reserve for doubtful accounts and wrote off $2.1
million of uncollectible accounts, which reduced the reserve. During 2007, we recognized expense
of $1.0 million to increase the reserve for doubtful accounts and wrote off $0.4 million of
uncollectible accounts, which reduced the reserve.
Inventories
At December 31, 2008, we had net inventory of $887.6 million. Inventories are stated at the lower
of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or market,
less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing
and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued utilizing the
LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using average cost or FIFO
methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw materials and
production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these
material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due to the length
of time of our production cycle. The prices for many of the raw materials we use have been
extremely volatile during the past three years. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the
LIFO inventory costing methodology, a rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our
operating results, while, conversely, a fall in material costs results in a benefit to operating
results. For example, in 2008 and 2007, the effect of falling raw material costs on our LIFO
inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $169.0 million and $92.1 million,
respectively, lower than would have been recognized had we utilized the FIFO methodology to value
our inventory. However, in 2006 the effect of increases in raw material costs on our LIFO inventory
valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $197.0 million higher than would have been
recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology to value our inventory. In a period of rising
prices, cost of sales expense recognized under LIFO is generally higher than the cash costs
incurred to acquire the inventory sold. Conversely, in a period of declining raw material prices,
cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally lower than cash costs incurred to acquire the
inventory sold.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be comparable
to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to the
differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory valuation
methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as an
expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At December 31, 2008, no
significant reserves were required. It is our general policy to write-down to scrap value any
inventory that is identified as obsolete and any inventory that has aged or has not moved in more
than twelve months. In some instances this criterion is up to twenty-four months due to the longer
manufacturing and distribution process for such products.
Asset Impairment
We monitor the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets. An impairment charge
is recognized when the expected net undiscounted future cash flows from an assets use (including
any proceeds from disposition) are less than the assets carrying value, and the assets carrying
value exceeds its fair value. Changes in the expected use of a long-lived asset group, and the
financial performance of the long-lived asset group and its operating segment, are evaluated as
indicators of possible impairment. Future cash flow value may include appraisals for property,
plant and equipment, land and improvements, future cash flow estimates from operating the
long-lived assets, and other operating considerations. There were no significant charges for
impairment of long-lived assets in the periods presented.
Retirement Benefits
We have defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans covering substantially all of our
employees. We account for our defined benefit pension plans in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions (FAS 87), as amended
by FAS 158 regarding the balance sheet presentation of pension assets and liabilities. FAS 87
42
requires that amounts recognized in financial statements be determined on an actuarial basis,
rather than as contributions are made to the plan. A significant element in determining our pension
(expense) income in accordance with FAS 87 is the expected investment return on plan assets. In
establishing the expected return on plan investments, which is reviewed annually in the fourth
quarter, we take into consideration input from our third party pension plan asset managers and
actuaries regarding the types of securities the plan assets are invested in, how those investments
have performed historically, and expectations for how those investments will perform in the future.
Our expected long-term return on pension plan investments has been
8.75% for each of the past five
years. We apply this assumed rate to the market value of plan assets at the end of the previous
year. This produces the expected return on plan assets that is included in annual pension (expense)
income for the current year. The actual return on pension plan assets
was a negative 25.3% for 2008,
reversing a trend of positive returns of 10.9% for 2007, 18.2% for 2006, 9.7% for 2005, and 11.7%
for 2004. Based upon our strategic allocation of pension assets across the various
investments asset classes, our expected long-term return on pension plan investments for 2009
remains at 8.75%. The effect of increasing, or lowering, the expected return on pension plan
investments by 0.25% results in additional annual income, or expense, of approximately $4.2
million. The cumulative difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan
assets is deferred and amortized into pension income or expense over future periods. The amount of
expected return on plan assets can vary significantly from year-to-year since the calculation is
dependent on the market value of plan assets as of the end of the preceding year. U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles allow companies to calculate the expected return on pension assets
using either an average of fair market values of pension assets over a period not to exceed five
years, which reduces the volatility in reported pension income or expense, or their fair market
value at the end of the previous year. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission currently
does not permit companies to change from the fair market value at the end of the previous year
methodology, which is the methodology that we use, to an averaging of fair market values of plan
assets methodology. As a result, our results of operations and those of other companies, including
companies with which we compete, may not be comparable due to these different methodologies in
calculating the expected return on pension investments.
In accordance with changes in the accounting standards, we determined the discount rate used
to value pension plan liabilities as of the end of 2008. Previously, we had used November
30
th
as our measurement date. The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the
pension liabilities could be effectively settled. In estimating this rate, we receive input from
our actuaries regarding the rates of return on high quality, fixed-income investments with
maturities matched to the expected future retirement benefit payments. Based on this assessment at
the end of December 2008, we established a discount rate of 6.85% for valuing the pension
liabilities as of the end of 2008, and for determining the pension expense for 2009. We had
previously assumed a discount rate of 6.25% for 2007, which determined the 2008 expense, 5.8% for
2006, which determined the 2007 expense, and 5.9% for 2005, which determined the 2006 expense. The
estimated effect of changing the discount rate by 0.50%, would decrease pension liabilities in the
case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase pension liabilities in the case of a decrease
in the discount rate by approximately $100 million. Such a change in the discount rate would
decrease pension expense in the case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase pension
expense in the case of a decrease in the discount rate by approximately $8 million. The effect on
pension liabilities for changes to the discount rate, as well as the net effect of other changes in
actuarial assumptions and experience, are deferred and amortized over future periods in accordance
with the accounting standards.
We also sponsor several postretirement plans covering certain hourly and salaried employees
and retirees. These plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible employees.
Under most of the plans, our contributions towards premiums are capped based upon the cost as of
certain dates, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans,
we maintain the right to amend or terminate the plans in the future. We account for these benefits
in accordance with FAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions (FAS 106), as amended by FAS 158, which requires that amounts recognized in financial
statements be determined on an actuarial basis, rather than as benefits are paid. We use actuarial
assumptions, including the discount rate and the expected trend in health care costs, to estimate
the costs and benefit obligations for the plans. The discount rate, which is determined annually at
the end of each year, is developed based upon rates of return on high quality, fixed-income
investments. At the end of 2008, we determined this rate to be 6.85%, compared to a 6.25% discount
rate in 2007, 5.8% discount rate in 2006, and 5.9% discount rate in 2005. The estimated effect of
changing the discount rate by 0.50%, would decrease postretirement obligations in the case of an
increase in the discount rate, or increase postretirement obligations in the case of a decrease in
the discount rate by approximately $18 million. Such a change in the discount rate would decrease
postretirement benefit expense in the case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase
postretirement benefit expense in the case of a decrease in the discount rate by approximately $0.5
million. Based upon predictions of continued significant medical cost inflation in future years,
the annual assumed rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered benefits of health care
plans is 10.37% in 2009 and is assumed to gradually decrease to 5.0% in the year 2028 and remain
level thereafter.
Certain of these postretirement benefits are funded using plan investments held in a
Company-administered VEBA trust. The expected return on plan investments is a significant element
in determining postretirement benefits expenses in accordance with accounting standards. In
establishing the expected return on plan investments, which is reviewed annually in the fourth
quarter, we
43
take into consideration the types of securities the plan assets are invested in, how
those investments have performed historically, and expectations for how those investments will
perform in the future. For 2008, our expected return on investments held in the VEBA trust was 9%.
This assumed long-term rate of return on investments is applied to the market value of plan assets
at the end of the previous year. This produces the expected return on plan investments that is
included in annual postretirement benefits expenses for the current year. The actual return on
investments held in the VEBA trust was a negative 9.5% in 2008, reversing a trend of positive
returns of 16.9% in 2007, 50.0% in 2006, and 11.6% in both 2005 and 2004. Our expected return on
investments in the VEBA trust is 8.3% for 2009. The expected return on investments held in the
VEBA trust is expected to be lower than the return on pension plan investments due to the mix of
assets held by the VEBA trust and the reduction of VEBA trust assets due to benefit payments.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In the first quarter 2008, as required, we began the adoption process for the change in measurement
date provisions of FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans (FAS 158), which amended the standards for defined benefit pension
and other postretirement benefit plans accounting. These provisions require assets and benefits to
be measured at the date of the employers statement of financial position, which is December 31 in
our case, rather than our measurement date of November 30, as was previously permitted. The
adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on our financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This
Standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair
value measurements. The Standard covers financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any other
assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements.
FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 for financial assets and
liabilities, and for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for other nonfinancial assets
and liabilities. The adoption of FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (FAS
159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities. FAS 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. If the fair
value option is elected, unrealized gains and losses will be recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. FAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on our financial statements.
Pending Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161),
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS 161 amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. It requires qualitative disclosures about
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts
of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent
features in derivative agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We will include the required disclosures
beginning with our 2009 financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (FAS
160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. FAS 160 changes the
classification of noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for
and reporting of transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling
interests. Under the new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are to be
reported as an element of stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability
sections of the balance sheet. In addition, the current practice of reporting minority interest
expense or benefit will change. Under the new standard, net income will encompass the total income
before minority interest expense. The income statement will include separate disclosure of the
attribution of income between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and decreases
in the noncontrolling ownership interest amount are to be accounted for as equity transactions. FAS
160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and earlier application is
prohibited. Upon adoption, the balance sheet and the income statement will be recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling interests. The other accounting provisions
of the statement are required to be adopted prospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact
of adopting FAS 160, including the reporting of the minority interest in our STAL joint venture, on
our financial statements. As of December 31, 2008, other long-term liabilities included $68 million
for minority interest in our STAL joint venture, which will be reported as an element of
stockholders equity upon adoption of FAS 160.
44
Forward-Looking Statements
From time-to-time, the Company has made and may continue to make forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in
this report relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates,
believes, estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast,
outlook, projects, and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are based on
managements current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which the Company is unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual
results or performance to materially differ from any future results or performance expressed or
implied by such statements. Various of these factors are described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and will be described from time-to-time in the Company filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Companys Annual Reports on Form 10-K
and the Companys subsequent reports filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, which are
available on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and on the Companys website at
http://www.alleghenytechnologies.com. We assume no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative financial instruments, from time to
time, to hedge our exposure to changes in raw material prices, foreign currencies, and interest
rates. We monitor the third-party financial institutions which are our counterparty to these
financial instruments on a daily basis and diversify our transactions among counterparties to
minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Fair values for derivatives were measured using
exchange-traded prices for the hedged items. Upon adoption of FAS 157 in 2008, fair value was
determined using Level 2 information, including consideration of counterparty risk and the
Companys credit risk.
Interest Rate Risk.
We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At December 31, 2008, we had approximately $46
million of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately
2.1%. Approximately $31 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate.
Since the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest,
we are exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest expense in
situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a hypothetical 1% increase in the
rate of interest on the $15 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not subjected to a cap
would result in increased annual financing costs of approximately $0.1 million.
Volatility of Energy Prices.
Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, have
and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the extent that these uncertainties
cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We use approximately 10 to 12
million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon business conditions, in the manufacture of
our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us to risk of higher gas prices. For example, a
hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of natural gas would result in increased annual
energy costs of approximately $10 to $12 million. We use several approaches to minimize any
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations from volatile energy
prices. These approaches include incorporating an energy surcharge on many of our products and
using financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy price volatility.
At December 31, 2008, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to
natural gas cost volatility represented approximately 30% of our forecasted requirements for the
next three years. The net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges at December 31,
2008 was an unrealized pre-tax loss of $24.3 million, of which $14.3 million was presented in
accrued liabilities on the balance sheet with the remainder included in other long-term
liabilities. The effects of the hedging activity will be recognized in income over the designated
hedge periods. For the 2008 year, the effects of natural gas hedging activity reduced cost of
sales by $3.8 million.
Volatility of Raw Material Prices.
We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2008 we used approximately 80 million pounds of nickel; therefore a hypothetical change of $1.00
per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of approximately $80 million. In
addition, in 2008 we also used approximately 500 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the production
of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per pound would result in increased
costs of approximately $5 million. While we enter into raw materials futures contracts from
time-to-time to hedge exposure to price
45
fluctuations, such as for nickel, we cannot be certain that
our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that we have adequate controls to
monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess exposure to price volatility
in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of December 31, 2008, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements primarily at
the request of our customers related to firm orders for approximately 15% of our total annual
nickel requirements. Any gain or loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included in
the selling price to the customer requesting the hedge over the designated hedge period. At
December 31, 2008, the net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges was an unrealized
pre-tax loss of $37.0 million, of which $31.6 million is included in accrued liabilities on the
balance sheet with the remainder included in other long-term liabilities.
Foreign Currency Risk.
Foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit
transactional exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We sometimes purchase foreign
currency forward contracts that permit us to sell specified amounts of foreign currencies expected
to be received from our export sales for pre-established U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates.
The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign currencies in which export sales are
denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows of a portion
of the forecasted future export sales transactions which otherwise would expose the Company to
foreign currency risk. In addition, we may also designate cash balances held in foreign currencies
as hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions. At December 31, 2008, the net mark-to-market
valuation of the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was an unrealized pre-tax gain of
$17.0 million, of which $7.0 million is included in other current assets on the balance sheet and
$0.2 million is recorded in accrued liabilities, with the remainder included in other long-term
assets.
46
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and
subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and
their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As described in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Company changed its accounting for
income tax uncertainties in 2007. As described in Note 8 to the financial statements, in 2006 and
in 2008 the Company changed its method of accounting for pensions and other postretirement
benefits.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Allegheny Technologies Incorporateds
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated February 18, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 18, 2009
47
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
5,309.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,452.5
|
|
|
$
|
4,936.6
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
4,157.8
|
|
|
|
4,003.1
|
|
|
|
3,740.4
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
282.7
|
|
|
|
296.7
|
|
|
|
295.3
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, other expense, and income taxes
|
|
|
869.2
|
|
|
|
1,152.7
|
|
|
|
900.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(23.3
|
)
|
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
860.1
|
|
|
|
1,147.3
|
|
|
|
872.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
294.2
|
|
|
|
400.2
|
|
|
|
298.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
565.9
|
|
|
$
|
747.1
|
|
|
$
|
574.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.26
|
|
|
$
|
5.61
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
48
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions except share and per share amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
469.9
|
|
|
$
|
623.3
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
530.5
|
|
|
|
652.2
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
887.6
|
|
|
|
916.1
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
38.3
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
1,929.4
|
|
|
|
2,248.7
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,633.6
|
|
|
|
1,239.5
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
281.6
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired
|
|
|
190.9
|
|
|
|
209.8
|
|
|
Prepaid pension asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.3
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
134.9
|
|
|
|
125.2
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
4,170.4
|
|
|
$
|
4,095.6
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
278.5
|
|
|
$
|
388.4
|
|
|