UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 1O-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
25-1792394
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
15222-5479
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (412) 394-2800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.10 Par Value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is well known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
On
February 12, 2010, the Registrant had outstanding 98,198,719 shares of its Common Stock.
The aggregate market value of the Registrants voting stock held by non-affiliates at June 30, 2009
was approximately $3.39 billion, based on the closing price per share of Common Stock on June 30,
2009 of $34.93 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. Shares of Common Stock known by the
Registrant to be beneficially owned by directors and officers of the Registrant subject to the
reporting and other requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), are not included in the computation. The Registrant, however, has made no
determination that such persons are affiliates within the meaning of Rule 12b-2 under the
Exchange Act.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Selected portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May
7, 2010 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
PART I
The Company
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive
offices located at 1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-5479, telephone number (412)
394-2800, Internet website address http://www.atimetals.com. References to Allegheny
Technologies, ATI, the Company, the Registrant, we, our and us and similar terms mean
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Our Business
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers in the
world. We use innovative technologies to offer growing global markets a wide range of specialty
metals solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and
superalloys, zirconium, hafnium and niobium, advanced powder alloys, stainless and specialty steel
alloys, grain-oriented electrical steel, tungsten-based materials and cutting tools, carbon alloy
impression die forgings, and large grey and ductile iron castings. Our specialty metals are
produced in a wide range of alloys and product forms and are selected for use in applications that
demand metals having exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or
abrasion, or a combination of these characteristics.
We focus our technological and unsurpassed manufacturing capabilities to serve global end use
markets with highly diversified and specialized product offerings. Strategic end use markets for
our products include:
Aerospace and Defense
. We are a world leader in the production of premium titanium alloys,
nickel-based and cobalt-based alloys and superalloys, and vacuum-melted specialty alloys used in
the manufacture of components for both commercial and military jet engines, as well as replacement
parts for those engines. We also produce titanium alloys, vacuum-melted specialty alloys, and
high-strength stainless alloys for use in commercial and military airframes, airframe components
and missiles. ATI produces unique titanium and high-hard steel alloys as well as engineered parts
and castings for the current and next-generation armored vehicles.
Titanium and titanium alloys are critical metals in aerospace and defense applications.
Titanium and titanium alloys possess an extraordinary combination of properties, including superior
strength-to-weight ratio, good elevated temperature resistance, low coefficient of thermal
expansion, and extreme corrosion resistance. These metals are used to produce jet engine components
such as blades, vanes, discs, and casings, and airframe components such as structural members,
landing gear, hydraulic systems, and fasteners. The latest and next-generation airframes and jet
engines use even more titanium and titanium alloys in component parts in order to minimize weight
and maximize fuel efficiency.
Our nickel-based alloys and superalloys and specialty alloys are also widely used in aerospace
and defense applications. Nickel-based alloys and superalloys remain extremely strong at high
temperatures and resist degradation under extreme conditions. Typical aerospace applications for
nickel-based alloys and superalloys include jet engine shafts, discs, blades, vanes, rings and
casings.
Our recently acquired powder metals business is a supplier of nickel-based superalloy powder
products for use in jet engines and other critical applications. Advanced powder metal engineered
products are preferred for certain near-net-shape parts that require complex alloy chemistries.
Our specialty alloys include vacuum-melted maraging steels used in the manufacture of aircraft
landing gear and structural components, as well as jet engine components.
ATI also offers tungsten cutting tools and machining solutions for difficult-to-machine
specialty metals, such as titanium alloys, nickel-based superalloys, and specialty alloys used in
airframe, jet engine, and armor applications.
We continuously seek to develop new alloys to better serve the needs of this end use market.
For example, we have developed ATI 425
®
alloy, a new cold-rollable alloy, as a lower cost
alternative to the most popular high-strength titanium alloys, for use in airframe components. We
have also developed Allvac 718 Plus
®
alloy, a new nickel-based superalloy that can withstand higher
temperatures than the standard 718 superalloy, for use in legacy jet engines and the next
generation of fuel efficient jet engines. ATI 425
®
MIL cold-rollable titanium is an innovative
new armor alloy that has the advantage of superior formability as compared to conventional
high-strength titanium alloys.
ATI 500 MIL high-hard steel armor is an innovative armor
material that meets the demanding specifications for superior ballistic performance and is easier
to fabricate than similar armor materials.
1
Demand for our products by the aerospace and defense market has increased significantly over
the last several years, but decreased since the onset of the current global recession in 2009.
Based on current forecasts and existing backlogs reported by the two manufacturers of large
commercial aircraft, we expect demand in this market to gradually and steadily improve in 2010 and
recover to stronger growth beginning in 2011.
Oil
and Gas and Chemical Process Industry.
The environments in which oil and gas can be found
in commercial quantities have become more challenging, involving deep offshore wells, high pressure
and temperature conditions, sour wells and unconventional sources, such as shale gas, liquid
natural gas, and oil sands. Future challenging offshore environments are expected to be in remote
locations that are further off the continental shelf, including arctic and tropic locations, often
one mile or more below the waters surface. The metal requirements for equipment, projected to
operate for up to 30 years in these environments, requires the specialty metals that we produce.
All of our business segments produce specialty metals products that are critical to the oil
and gas industry and the chemical process industry. Our specialty metals, including titanium and
titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys, zirconium alloys, stainless and duplex alloys and other
specialty alloys, have the strength and corrosion resistant properties necessary for difficult
environments. Global demand for these materials has been increasing in recent years, particularly
in growing markets in Asia, Middle East, North Africa and South America. We also provide advanced
specialty metals used in offshore oil and gas production, including subsea piping systems and
topside structures.
We have developed ATI2003
®
and ATI 2102 lean duplex alloys for use in deep-water oil and gas
applications. Our full line of duplex alloys and AL-6XN
®
superaustenitic stainless steel in strip
and plate product forms are NORSOK qualified. The NORSOK standards are developed by the Norwegian
petroleum industry and are intended to identify metals used in oil and gas applications that are
safe and cost-effective. Our Datalloy
®
2 non-magnetic stainless is used for drill collars that
enable the most advanced directional drilling techniques to be guided to the exact position desired
for the reservoir.
Tungsten is the most dense and heat resistant metal commercially available. One application
for our tungsten products is oil and gas drill bit inserts and bodies. As drilling methods such as
horizontal drilling become more complex, our advanced tungsten carbide materials are often
specified in order to enable faster drilling and longer drill bit life.
Electrical Energy
. Our specialty metals are widely used in the global electric power
generation and distribution industry. We believe that U.S. and European energy needs and
environmental policies and the electrification of developing countries will continue to drive
demand for our specialty metals products that we sell for use in this industry.
For electrical power generation, our specialty metals, corrosion resistant alloys (CRAs) and
ductile iron castings are used in coal, nuclear, natural gas, and wind power applications. In
coal-fired plants, our CRAs are used for pipe, tube, and heat exchanger applications in water
systems in addition to the pollution control scrubbers. Our CRAs are also used in water systems for
nuclear power plants. For nuclear power plants, we are an industry pioneer in producing
reactor-grade zirconium and hafnium alloys used in nuclear fuel cladding and structural components.
We are a technology leader for large diameter nickel-based superalloys used in natural gas
land-based turbines for power generation. For green energy generation, our alloys are used for
solar and geothermal applications. We are also one of a few U.S. producers of very large ductile
iron castings used for wind turbines.
Nuclear power plants are a clean source of electrical energy, and plans to construct and
refurbish nuclear power plants have been announced in many areas of the world. ATI is a premier
supplier of certified nuclear-grade alloys and specialty alloys for applications that range from
the reactor core to steam water systems to spent-fuel storage, transportation and repository
activities. ATI has a track record in the nuclear energy market that dates to the first commercial
nuclear energy reactor built in the United States. We are investing to expand our production
capabilities and capacity to support expected growth of the nuclear energy market.
For electrical power distribution, our grain-oriented electrical steel (GOES) is used in large
and small power transformers, where electrical conductivity and magnetic properties are important.
We believe that demand for these advanced specialty metals is in the early stage of an expected
long growth cycle as the U.S. rebuilds its electrical energy distribution grid and as developing
countries electrify and build electrical power distribution grids. Beginning January 1, 2010 the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) requires more efficient transformers, which increases premium grade
GOES usage per transformer. ATI is a leading producer of these premium grades of GOES.
Medical
. ATIs advanced specialty metals are used in medical device products that save and
enhance the quality of lives.
Our zirconium-niobium, titanium-and cobalt-based alloys are used for knees, hips and other
prosthetic devices. These replacement devices offer the potential of lasting much longer than
previous implant options.
2
Our biocompatible nickel-titanium shape memory alloy is used for stents to support collapsed
or clogged blood vessels. Reduced in diameter for insertion, these stents expand to the original
tube-like shape due to the metals superelasticity. Our ultra fine diameter (0.002 inch/0.051 mm)
titanium wire is used for screens to prevent blood clots from entering critical areas of the body.
In addition, our titanium bar and wire are used to make surgical screws for bone repairs.
Manufacturers of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) devices rely on our niobium superconducting
wire to help produce electromagnetic fields that allow physicians to safely scan the bodys soft
tissue. In addition, our tungsten heavy alloy materials are used for shielding applications in MRI
devices.
Enhancing and Expanding Our Manufacturing Capabilities and Capacity.
Demand for our products
from the aerospace and defense, oil and gas, chemical process industry, electrical energy, and
medical markets increased significantly over the last several years. We are currently undertaking a
multi-phase program to enhance and expand our capabilities and capacities to produce premium
specialty metals aimed at these strategic markets. Over the last five years we have invested
approximately $1.8 billion of internally generated funds to renew and expand our annual titanium
sponge production capabilities to approximately 46 million pounds; expand our premium titanium
alloy melt and remelt capacity; expand our nickel-based alloy and superalloy melt and remelt
capacity; expand our titanium and specialty alloy plate capacity; expand our premium titanium and
nickel-based superalloy forging capacity; and double the capacity of our reactor-grade zirconium
sponge capacity to 8 million pounds. We believe these investments strengthen and enhance ATIs
leadership position in the production of high technology specialty metals.
Business Segments
We operate in the following three business segments, which accounted for the following percentages
of total revenues of $3.1 billion, $5.3 billion, and $5.5 billion for the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
Information with respect to our business segments is presented below and in Note 13 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
High Performance Metals Segment
Our High Performance Metals segment produces, converts and distributes a wide range of high
performance alloys, including nickel- and cobalt-based alloys and superalloys, titanium and
titanium-based alloys, exotic metals such as zirconium, hafnium, niobium, nickel-titanium, and
their related alloys, and other specialty alloys, primarily in long product forms such as ingot,
billet, bar, shapes and rectangles, rod, wire, seamless tube, and castings. We also produce
nickel-based alloys and superalloys, titanium alloys, and specialty metal powders, and
semi-finished near-net-shape products from these advanced powder alloys. We are integrated from raw
materials (sponge) to melt, remelt, and finish processing in our titanium and titanium alloys, and
zirconium and hafnium alloys products. The major end markets served by our High Performance Metals
segment are aerospace and defense, oil and gas, chemical process industry, electrical energy, and
medical. Most of the products in our High Performance Metals segment are sold directly to end-use
customers. A significant portion of our High Performance Metals segment products are sold under
multi-year agreements. The operating units in this segment are ATI Allvac, ATI Allvac Ltd (U.K.),
ATI Wah Chang, and ATI Powder Metals.
Approximately 65% of High Performance Metals segment revenue is derived from the aerospace and
defense market. Demand for our products is driven primarily by the commercial aerospace cycle and
the growing use of our specialty metals, particularly titanium alloys, in the latest and future
generations of airframes and jet engines. Large aircraft and aircraft engines are manufactured by
a small number of companies, such as The Boeing Company, Airbus S.A.S. (an EADS company),
Bombardier Aerospace (a division of Bombardier Inc.), and Embraer (Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronáutica S.A.) for airframes, and GE Aviation (a division of General Electric Company), Pratt
& Whitney (a United Technologies Corp. company), Rolls-Royce plc, Snecma (SAFRAN Group), and
various joint ventures for jet engines. These companies and their suppliers form a substantial
part of our customer base in this business segment. ATI supplies the aerospace and defense supply
chain with nickel- and cobalt-based alloys and superalloys, titanium alloys, vacuum-melted
specialty alloys, and advanced powder alloys for commercial and military jet engines, both original
engines and spare parts. For commercial and military airframe and structural parts, ATI
manufactures titanium alloys, vacuum-melted specialty alloys, and high-strength stainless alloys.
The loss of one or more of our customers in the aerospace and defense market could have a material
adverse effect on ATIs results of operations and financial condition.
3
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment produces, converts and distributes stainless steel, nickel-based
alloys and superalloys, titanium and titanium-based alloys and specialty alloys, in a variety of
product forms, including plate, sheet, engineered strip, and Precision Rolled Strip
®
products, as
well as grain-oriented electrical steel sheet. The major end markets for our flat-rolled products
are oil and gas, chemical process industry, electrical energy, automotive, food equipment and
appliances, machine and cutting tools, construction and mining, aerospace and defense, and
electronics, communication equipment and computers. The operations in this segment are ATI
Allegheny Ludlum, the Chinese joint venture company known as Shanghai STAL Precision Stainless
Steel Company Limited (STAL), in which we hold a 60% interest, and our 50% interest in the
industrial titanium joint venture known as Uniti LLC. The remaining 40% interest in STAL is owned
by the Baosteel Group, a state authorized investment company whose equity securities are publicly
traded in the Peoples Republic of China. The remaining 50% interest in Uniti LLC is held by
Verkhnaya Salda Metallurgical Production Association (VSMPO), a Russian producer of titanium,
aluminum, and specialty steel products.
Stainless steel, nickel-based alloys and titanium sheet products are used in a wide variety of
industrial and consumer applications. In 2009, approximately 55% by volume of our stainless sheet
products were sold to independent service centers, which have slitting, cutting or other processing
facilities, with the remainder sold directly to end-use customers.
Engineered strip and very thin Precision Rolled Strip products are used by customers to
fabricate a variety of products primarily in the automotive, construction, and electronics markets.
In 2009, approximately 90% by volume of our engineered strip and Precision Rolled Strip products
were sold directly to end-use customers or through our own distribution network, with the remainder
sold to independent service centers.
Stainless steel, nickel-based alloy and titanium plate products are primarily used in
industrial markets. In 2009, approximately 45% by volume of our plate products were sold to
independent service centers, with the remainder sold directly to end-use customers.
Grain-oriented electrical steel is used in power transformers where electrical conductivity
and magnetic properties are important. Nearly all of our grain-oriented electrical steel products
are sold directly to end-use customers.
Engineered Products Segment
The principal business of our Engineered Products segment includes the production of tungsten
powder, tungsten heavy alloys, tungsten carbide materials, and tungsten carbide cutting tools. We
are now integrated from the raw materials (ammonium paratungstate (APT)) to the manufacture of our
tungsten-based products. The segment also produces carbon alloy steel impression die forgings, and
large grey and ductile iron castings, and provides precision metals processing services. The
operating units in this segment are ATI Metalworking Products, ATI Portland Forge, ATI Casting
Service and ATI Rome Metals.
We produce a line of sintered tungsten carbide products that approach diamond hardness for
industrial markets including automotive, oil and gas, chemical process industry, machine and
cutting tools, aerospace, construction and mining, and other markets requiring tools with extra
hardness. Technical developments related to ceramics, coatings and other disciplines are
incorporated in these products. We also produce tungsten and tungsten carbide powders.
We forge carbon alloy steels into finished forms that are used primarily in the transportation
and construction equipment markets. We also cast grey and ductile iron metals used in the
transportation, wind power generation and automotive markets. We have precision metals processing
capabilities that enable us to provide process services for most high-value metals from ingots to
finished product forms. Such services include grinding, polishing, blasting, cutting, flattening,
and ultrasonic testing.
Competition
Markets for our products and services in each of our three business segments are highly
competitive. We compete with many producers and distributors who, depending on the product
involved, range from large diversified enterprises to smaller companies specializing in particular
products. Factors that affect our competitive position are the quality of our products, services
and delivery capabilities, our capabilities to produce a wide range of specialty materials in
various alloys and product forms, our technological capabilities including our research and
development efforts, our marketing strategies, the prices for our products and services, our
manufacturing costs, and industry manufacturing capacity.
We face competition from both domestic and foreign companies. Some of our foreign competitors
are either directly or indirectly government subsidized. In 1999, the United States imposed
antidumping and countervailing duties on dumped and subsidized imports of stainless steel sheet and
strip in coils and stainless steel plate in coils from companies in ten foreign countries. These
duties were
4
reviewed by the U.S. Commerce Department and the U.S. International Trade Commission in 2005
and generally remain in effect. We continue to monitor unfairly traded imports from foreign
producers for appropriate action.
Major Competitors
Nickel-based alloys and superalloys and specialty steel alloys
|
|
|
Carpenter Technology Corporation: A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Metals Corporation, a PCC company: C
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haynes International, Inc.: B
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThyssenKrupp VDM GmbH, a company of ThyssenKrupp Stainless (Germany): C
|
Titanium and titanium-based alloys
|
|
|
Titanium Metals Corporation: C
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMI Titanium, an RTI International Metals Company: C
|
|
|
|
|
|
VSMPO AVISMA (Russia): A
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
|
Cezus, a group member of AREVA (France): A
|
|
|
|
Western Zirconium Plant of Westinghouse Electric Company, owned by Toshiba Corporation: A
|
Stainless steel
|
|
|
AK Steel Corporation: B
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American Stainless (NAS), owned by Acerinox S.A. (Spain): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outokumpu Stainless Plate Products, owned by Outokumpu Oyj (Finland): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imports from
|
|
|
|
|
Arcelor Mittal (France, Belgium and Germany): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexinox S.A. de C.V., group member of ThyssenKrupp AG: B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ThyssenKrupp AG (Germany): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ta Chen International Corporation (Taiwan): B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Various Chinese producers: B
|
Tungsten and tungsten carbide products
|
|
|
Kennametal Inc.: D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iscar (Israel): D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandvik AB (Sweden): D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seco Tools AB (Sweden), owned by Sandvik A.B.: D
|
KEY A = Primarily High Performance Metals segment, B = Primarily Flat-Rolled Products segment, C
= Both High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products segments, D = Primarily Engineered
Products segment
Raw Materials and Supplies
Substantially all raw materials and supplies required in the manufacture of our products are
available from more than one supplier and presently the sources and availability of raw materials
essential to our businesses are adequate. The principal raw materials we use in the production of
our specialty metals are scrap (including iron-, nickel-, chromium-, titanium-, molybdenum-, and
tungsten-bearing scrap), nickel, titanium sponge, zirconium sand and sponge, ferrochromium,
ferrosilicon, molybdenum and molybdenum alloys, manganese and manganese alloys, cobalt, niobium,
vanadium and other alloying materials.
Purchase prices of certain principal raw materials have been volatile. As a result, our
operating results may be subject to significant fluctuation. We use raw materials surcharge and
index mechanisms to offset the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors
in the marketplace may limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay
between the increase in the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such
mechanisms. For example, in 2009 we used approximately 60 million pounds of nickel; therefore a
hypothetical increase of $1.00 per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of
approximately $60 million. We also used approximately 600 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the
production of our flat-rolled products in 2009 so that a hypothetical increase of $0.01 per pound
in ferrous scrap prices would result in increased costs of approximately $6 million.
5
While we are increasing our manufacturing capacity to produce titanium sponge, the major raw
material for our titanium products, a portion of our needs, together with certain other raw
materials, such as nickel, cobalt, and ferrochromium, are available to us and our specialty metals
industry competitors primarily from foreign sources. Some of these foreign sources are located in
countries that may be subject to unstable political and economic conditions, which might disrupt
supplies or affect the price of these materials.
We purchase our nickel requirements principally from producers in Australia, Canada, Norway,
Russia, and the Dominican Republic. Zirconium sponge is purchased from a source in France, while
zirconium sand is purchased from both U.S. and Australian sources. Cobalt is purchased primarily
from producers in Canada. More than 80% of the worlds reserves of ferrochromium are located in
South Africa, Zimbabwe, Albania, and Kazakhstan. We also purchase titanium sponge from sources in
Kazakhstan and Japan.
Export Sales and Foreign Operations
Direct international sales represented approximately 31% of our total annual sales in 2009, 28% of
our total sales in 2008, and 27% of our total sales in 2007. These figures include direct export
sales by our U.S.-based operations to customers in foreign countries, which accounted for
approximately 22% of our total sales in 2009, 21% of our total sales in 2008, and 19% of our total
sales in 2007. Our overseas sales, marketing and distribution efforts are aided by our
international marketing and distribution offices, ATI Europe, ATI Europe Distribution, and ATI
Asia, or by independent representatives located at various locations throughout the world. We
believe that at least 50% of ATIs 2009 sales were driven by global markets when we consider
exports of our customers.
Direct sales by geographic area in 2009, and as a percentage of total sales, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,104.4
|
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
482.7
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
Far East
|
|
|
303.4
|
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
114.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
South America, Middle East and other
|
|
|
50.2
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$
|
3,054.9
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
ATI Allvac Ltd has manufacturing capabilities for melting, remelting, forging and finishing
nickel-based alloys and specialty alloys in the United Kingdom. ATI Metalworking Products, which
has manufacturing capabilities in the United Kingdom and Switzerland, sells high precision
threading, milling, boring and drilling components, tungsten carbide burrs, rotary tooling and
specialty abrasive wheels and discs for the European market from locations in the United Kingdom,
Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy and Spain. Our STAL joint venture in the Peoples Republic of
China produces Precision Rolled Strip products, which enables us to offer these products more
effectively to markets in China and other Asian countries. Our Uniti LLC joint venture allows us to
offer titanium products to industrial markets more effectively worldwide.
Backlog, Seasonality and Cyclicality
Our backlog of confirmed orders was approximately $1.4 billion at December 31, 2009 and $1.3
billion at December 31, 2008. We expect that approximately 67% of confirmed orders on hand at
December 31, 2009 will be filled during the year ending December 31, 2010. Backlog of confirmed
orders of our High Performance Metals segment was approximately $0.5 billion at December 31, 2009
and $0.7 billion at December 31, 2008. We expect that approximately 95% of the confirmed orders on
hand at December 31, 2009 for this segment will be filled during the year ending December 31, 2010.
Backlog of confirmed orders of our Flat-Rolled Products segment was approximately $0.9 billion at
December 31, 2009 and $0.5 billion at December 31, 2008. We expect that 50% of the confirmed orders
on hand at December 31, 2009 for this segment will be filled during the year ending December 31,
2010.
Generally, our sales and operations are not seasonal. However, demand for our products is
cyclical over longer periods because specialty metals customers operate in cyclical industries and
are subject to changes in general economic conditions and other factors both external and internal
to those industries.
Research, Development and Technical Services
We believe that our research and development capabilities give ATI an advantage in developing new
products and manufacturing processes that contribute to the profitable growth potential of our
businesses on a long-term basis. We conduct research and development at our various operating
locations both for our own account and, on a limited basis, for customers on a contract basis.
6
Research and development expenditures for each of our three segments for the years ended December
31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Company-Funded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
9.5
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.3
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-Funded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
Total Research and Development
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
Our research, development and technical service activities are closely interrelated and are
directed toward cost reduction and process improvement, process control, quality assurance and
control, system development, the development of new manufacturing methods, the improvement of
existing manufacturing methods, the improvement of existing products, and the development of new
products.
We own hundreds of United States patents, many of which are also filed under the patent laws
of other nations. Although these patents, as well as our numerous trademarks, technical
information, license agreements, and other intellectual property, have been and are expected to be
of value, we believe that the loss of any single such item or technically related group of such
items would not materially affect the conduct of our business.
Environmental, Health and Safety Matters
We are subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and regulations that govern
the discharge of pollutants, and disposal of wastes, and which may require that we investigate and
remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and
present operations. We could incur substantial cleanup costs, fines, civil or criminal sanctions,
third party property damage or personal injury claims as a result of violations or liabilities
under these laws or non-compliance with environmental permits required at our facilities. We are
currently involved in the investigation and remediation of a number of our current and former sites
as well as third party sites.
We consider environmental compliance to be an integral part of our operations. We have a
comprehensive environmental management and reporting program that focuses on compliance with all
federal, state, regional and local environmental laws and regulations. Each operating company has
an environmental management system that includes mechanisms for regularly evaluating environmental
compliance and managing changes in business operations while assessing environmental impact.
Our
Corporate Guidelines for Business Conduct and Ethics
address compliance with environmental
laws as well as employment and workplace safety laws, and also describe our commitment to equal
opportunity and fair treatment of employees. We continued to realize significant progress in safety
across ATIs operations. As a result of our continuing focus on and commitment to safety, in 2009
our OSHA Total Recordable Incident Rate improved by 2% to 2.45 and our Lost Time Case Rate was
0.38, which we believe to be competitive with world class performance.
Employees
We have approximately 8,500 full-time employees. A portion of our workforce is covered by various
collective bargaining agreements, principally with the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber,
Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (USW),
including: approximately 2,550 Allegheny Ludlum production, office and maintenance employees
covered by collective bargaining agreements that are effective through June 2011, approximately 110
Allvac Albany, Oregon (Oremet) employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is
effective through June 2011, approximately 550 Wah Chang employees covered by a collective
bargaining agreement that continues through March 2013, approximately 85 employees at our Casting
Service facility in LaPorte, Indiana, covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is
effective through December 2011, approximately 115 employees at our Rome Metals facilities in
western Pennsylvania, covered by a collective
7
bargaining agreement that is effective through May 2013, and approximately 100 employees at our
Portland Forge facility in Portland, Indiana, covered by collective bargaining agreements with
three unions that are effective through April 2013.
Available Information
Our Internet website address is http://www.atimetals.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed
or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as
proxy and information statements and other information that we file, are available free of charge
through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material with, or furnish such material to, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Our Internet website and the content contained therein or connected thereto are not
intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You may read and copy materials
we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549.
You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet website at http://www.sec.gov, which contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information that we file electronically with
the SEC.
Executive Management, Including Executive Officers under Federal Securities Laws
The Companys executive officers under the federal securities laws and members of the Companys
management executive committee as of February 12, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
L. Patrick Hassey*
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
Richard J. Harshman*
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
Jon D. Walton*
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Chief Legal and Compliance
Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
|
Dale G. Reid*
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
|
|
Terry L. Dunlap*
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Flat-Rolled Products and ATI Allegheny Ludlum
Business Unit President
|
|
Lynn D. Davis*
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Primary Metals and Exotic Alloys
|
|
Hunter R. Dalton
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Long Products and ATI Allvac Business Unit President
|
|
David M. Hogan
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Group President, ATI Engineered Products and ATI Metalworking Products
Business Unit President
|
|
Carl R. Moulton
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Vice President, International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Such individuals are subject to the reporting and other requirements of Section 16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
Set forth below are descriptions of the business background for the past five years of the
Companys executive management.
L
.
Patrick Hassey
has been President and Chief Executive Officer since October 1, 2003. He was
elected to the Companys Board of Directors in July 2003 and has served as Chairman since May 2004.
Prior to this position, he worked as an outside management consultant to Allegheny Technologies
executive management team. Mr. Hassey was Executive Vice President and a member of the corporate
executive committee of Alcoa, Inc. at the time of his early retirement in February 2003. He had
served as Executive Vice President of Alcoa and Group President of Alcoa Industrial Components from
May 2000 to October 2002. Prior to May 2000, he served as Executive Vice President of Alcoa and
President of Alcoa Europe, Inc.
Richard J. Harshman
has served as Executive Vice President, Finance since October 2003 and
Chief Financial Officer since December 2000. Mr. Harshman was Senior Vice President, Finance from
December 2001 to October 2003 and Vice President, Finance from December 2000 to December 2001.
Previously, he had served in a number of financial management roles for Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and Teledyne, Inc.
Jon D. Walton
has been Executive Vice President, Human Resources, Chief Legal and Compliance
Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2003. Mr. Walton was Senior Vice
President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer from July 2001 to October 2003. Previously, he
was Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.
Dale G. Reid
has served as Vice President, Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
since December 2003. Mr. Reid was Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer from
December 2000 through November 2003.
Terry L. Dunlap
has served as Group President, Flat-Rolled Products since October 2008, and as
ATI Allegheny Ludlum Business Unit President since November 2002.
8
Hunter R. Dalton
has served as Group President, ATI Long Products since October 2008, and as
ATI Allvac Business Unit President since April 2008. Mr. Dalton previously served as Senior Vice
President of Sales and Marketing for ATI Allvac since November 2003.
Lynn D. Davis
has served as Group President, ATI Primary Metals and Exotic Alloys since
October 2008. Mr. Davis was ATI Wah Chang Business Unit President from September 2000 to October
2008.
David M. Hogan
has served as Group President, Engineered Products since April 2007, and as ATI
Metalworking Products Business Unit President since 1997.
Carl R. Moulton
has served as Vice President, International since March 2009. Previously, Mr.
Moulton was President of Uniti LLC since its formation in 2003.
There are inherent risks and uncertainties associated with our business that could adversely affect
our operating performance and financial condition. Set forth below are descriptions of those risks
and uncertainties that we currently believe to be material, but the risks and uncertainties
described are not the only risks and uncertainties that could affect our business. See the
discussion under Forward-Looking Statements in Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Cyclical Demand for Products.
The cyclical nature of the industries in which our customers
operate causes demand for our products to be cyclical, creating potential uncertainty regarding
future profitability. Various changes in general economic conditions may affect the industries in
which our customers operate. These changes could include decreases in the rate of consumption or
use of our customers products due to economic downturns. Other factors that may cause fluctuation
in our customers positions are changes in market demand, lower overall pricing due to domestic and
international overcapacity, currency fluctuations, lower priced imports and increases in use or
decreases in prices of substitute materials. As a result of these factors, our profitability has
been and may in the future be subject to significant fluctuation.
Worldwide economic conditions have recently deteriorated significantly and may remain
depressed, or could worsen, in the foreseeable future. These conditions have had, and may continue
to have, a material adverse effect on demand for our customers products and, in turn, on demand
for our products. If these conditions persist or worsen, our results of operations and financial
condition could be materially adversely affected.
Product Pricing.
From time-to-time, reduced demand, intense competition and excess
manufacturing capacity have resulted in reduced prices, excluding raw material surcharges, for many
of our products. These factors have had and may have an adverse impact on our revenues, operating
results and financial condition.
Although inflationary trends in recent years have been moderate, during most of the same
period certain critical raw material costs, such as nickel, titanium sponge, chromium, and
molybdenum and scrap containing iron, nickel, titanium, chromium, and molybdenum have been volatile
and at historically high levels. While we have been able to mitigate some of the adverse impact of
rising raw material costs through raw material surcharges or indices to customers, rapid increases
in raw material costs may adversely affect our results of operations.
We change prices on certain of our products from time-to-time. The ability to implement price
increases is dependent on market conditions, economic factors, raw material costs and availability,
competitive factors, operating costs and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. The
benefits of any price increases may be delayed due to long manufacturing lead times and the terms
of existing contracts.
Risks Associated with Commercial Aerospace.
A significant portion of the sales of our High
Performance Metals segment represents products sold to customers in the commercial aerospace
industry. The commercial aerospace industry has historically been cyclical due to factors both
external and internal to the airline industry. These factors include general economic conditions,
airline profitability, consumer demand for air travel, varying fuel and labor costs, price
competition, and international and domestic political conditions such as military conflict and the
threat of terrorism. The length and degree of cyclical fluctuation are influenced by these factors
and therefore are difficult to predict with certainty. Demand for our products in this segment is
subject to these cyclical trends. For example, the average price per pound for our titanium mill
products was $11.89 for the period 2002 through 2004, $22.75 in 2005, $33.83 in 2006, $30.14 in
2007, $25.60 in 2008 and $20.92 in 2009, and the average price per pound for our nickel-based and
specialty alloys was $7.19 for the period 2002 through 2004, $11.25 in 2005, $14.35 in 2006, $19.16
in 2007, $18.14 in 2008 and
9
$14.43 in 2009. A downturn in the commercial aerospace industry has had, and may in the future
have, an adverse effect on the prices at which we are able to sell these and other products, and
our results of operations, business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Associated with Strategic Capital Projects.
From time-to-time, we undertake strategic
capital projects in order to enhance, expand and/or upgrade our facilities and operational
capabilities. For instance, over the past four years we have undertaken major expansions of our
titanium and premium-melt nickel-based alloy, superalloy and specialty alloy production
capabilities and a new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility. Our ability
to achieve the anticipated increased revenues or otherwise realize acceptable returns on these
investments or other strategic capital projects that we may undertake is subject to a number of
risks, many of which are beyond our control, including a variety of market, operational,
permitting, and labor related factors. In addition, the cost to implement any given strategic
capital project ultimately may prove to be greater than originally anticipated. If we are not able
to achieve the anticipated results from the implementation of any of our strategic capital
projects, or if we incur unanticipated implementation costs, our results of operations and
financial position may be materially adversely affected.
Dependence on Critical Raw Materials Subject to Price and Availability Fluctuations.
We rely
to a substantial extent on third parties to supply certain raw materials that are critical to the
manufacture of our products. Purchase prices and availability of these critical raw materials are
subject to volatility. At any given time we may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of these
critical raw materials on a timely basis, on price and other terms acceptable, or at all.
If suppliers increase the price of critical raw materials, we may not have alternative sources
of supply. In addition, to the extent that we have quoted prices to customers and accepted customer
orders for products prior to purchasing necessary raw materials, or have existing contracts, we may
be unable to raise the price of products to cover all or part of the increased cost of the raw
materials.
The manufacture of some of our products is a complex process and requires long lead times. As
a result, we may experience delays or shortages in the supply of raw materials. If unable to obtain
adequate and timely deliveries of required raw materials, we may be unable to timely manufacture
sufficient quantities of products. This could cause us to lose sales, incur additional costs, delay
new product introductions, or suffer harm to our reputation.
We acquire certain important raw materials that we use to produce specialty materials,
including nickel, chromium, cobalt, and titanium sponge, from foreign sources. Some of these
sources operate in countries that may be subject to unstable political and economic conditions.
These conditions may disrupt supplies or affect the prices of these materials.
Volatility of Raw Material Costs.
The prices for many of the raw materials we use have been
extremely volatile. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the last-in, first-out (LIFO)
inventory costing methodology, a rapid rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our
operating results. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw materials
and production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these
material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due to the length
of time of our production cycle. For example, in 2009, 2008 and 2007, the effect of falling raw
material costs on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $102.8
million, $169.0 million and $92.1 million, respectively, lower than have been recognized had we
utilized the first-in, first-out (FIFO) methodology to value our inventory. Conversely in 2006, the
increase in raw material costs on the LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales
which was $197.0 million higher than would have been recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology
to value our inventory. In a period of rising raw material prices, cost of sales expense recognized
under LIFO is generally higher than the cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. However,
in a period of declining raw material prices, cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally
lower than cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold.
Availability of Energy Resources.
We rely upon third parties for our supply of energy resources
consumed in the manufacture of our products. The prices for and availability of electricity,
natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions. These market
conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control. Disruptions in
the supply of energy resources could temporarily impair the ability to manufacture products for
customers. Further, increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by
competitors, has and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the extent that these
uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may
have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Associated with Environmental Matters.
We are subject to various domestic and
international environmental laws and regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants, and
disposal of wastes, and which may require that we investigate and remediate the effects of the
release or disposal of materials at sites associated with past and present operations. We could
incur substantial cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage
or personal injury claims as a result of violations or liabilities under these laws or
non-compliance with environmental permits required at our facilities. We are currently involved in
the investigation and remediation of a number of our current and former sites as well as third
party sites. We also could be subject to
10
future laws and regulations that govern greenhouse gas emissions and various matters related to
climate change, which could increase our operating costs.
With respect to proceedings brought under the federal Superfund laws, or similar state
statutes, we have been identified as a potentially responsible party
(PRP) at approximately 37 of
such sites, excluding those at which we believe we have no future liability. Our involvement is
limited or de minimis at approximately 28 of these sites, and the potential loss exposure with
respect to any of the remaining 9 individual sites is not considered to be material.
We are a party to various cost-sharing arrangements with other PRPs at the sites. The terms of
the cost-sharing arrangements are subject to non-disclosure agreements as confidential information.
Nevertheless, the cost-sharing arrangements generally require all PRPs to post financial assurance
of the performance of the obligations or to pre-pay into an escrow or trust account their share of
anticipated site-related costs. In addition, the Federal government, through various agencies, is a
party to several such arrangements.
We believe that we operate our businesses in compliance in all material respects with
applicable environmental laws and regulations. However, from time-to-time, we are a party to
lawsuits and other proceedings involving alleged violations of, or liabilities arising from
environmental laws. When our liability is probable and we can reasonably estimate our costs, we
record environmental liabilities in our financial statements. In many cases, we are not able to
determine whether we are liable, or if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or
range of loss. Estimates of our liability remain subject to additional uncertainties, including the
nature and extent of site contamination, available remediation alternatives, the extent of
corrective actions that may be required, and the participation number and financial condition of
other PRPs, as well as the extent of their responsibility for the remediation. We intend to adjust
our accruals to reflect new information as appropriate. Future adjustments could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations in a given period, but we cannot reliably predict the
amounts of such future adjustments. At December 31, 2009, our reserves for environmental matters
totaled approximately $18 million. Based on currently available information, we do not believe that
there is a reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the
sites with which we are currently associated (either individually or in the aggregate) will be an
amount that would be material to a decision to buy or sell our securities. Future developments,
administrative actions or liabilities relating to environmental matters, however, could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Risks Associated with Current or Future Litigation and Claims.
A number of lawsuits, claims
and proceedings have been or may be asserted against us relating to the conduct of our currently
and formerly owned businesses, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contracting work, employment, employee benefits, taxes,
environmental, health and safety and occupational disease, and stockholder matters. Due to the
uncertainties of litigation, we can give no assurance that we will prevail on all claims made
against us in the lawsuits that we currently face or that additional claims will not be made
against us in the future. While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and
some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to us, we do not believe
that the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one or more of
these matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for that period.
Also, we can give no assurance that any other matters brought in the future will not have a
material effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
Labor Matters.
We have approximately 8500 full-time employees. A portion of our workforce is
covered by various collective bargaining agreements, principally with the USW, including:
approximately 2,550 Allegheny Ludlum production, office and maintenance employees covered by
collective bargaining agreements, which are effective through June 2011; approximately 110 Allvac
Albany, Oregon (Oremet) employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement, which is effective
through June 2011; approximately 550 Wah Chang employees covered by a collective bargaining
agreement, which is effective through March 2013, approximately 85 employees at the Casting Service
facility in LaPorte, Indiana, covered by a collective bargaining agreement, which is effective
through December 2011, approximately 115 employees at our Rome Metals facilities in western
Pennsylvania, covered by a collective bargaining agreement that is effective through May 2013, and
approximately 100 employees at our Portland Forge facility in Portland, Indiana, covered by
collective bargaining agreements with three unions that are effective through April 2013.
Generally, collective bargaining agreements that expire may be terminated after notice by the
union. After termination, the union may authorize a strike. A strike by the employees covered by
one or more of the collective bargaining agreements could have a materially adverse affect on our
operating results. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in concluding collective
bargaining agreements with the unions to replace those that expire.
Export Sales.
We believe that export sales will continue to account for a significant
percentage of our future revenues. Risks associated with export sales include: political and
economic instability, including weak conditions in the worlds economies; accounts receivable
collection; export controls; changes in legal and regulatory requirements; policy changes affecting
the markets for our products; changes in tax laws and tariffs; trade duties; and exchange rate
fluctuations (which may affect sales to international customers and the value of profits earned on
export sales when converted into dollars). Any of these factors could materially adversely affect
our results for the period in which they occur.
11
Risks Associated with Retirement Benefits.
Our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan was
99.6% funded as of December 31, 2009. In accordance with current funding regulations, we are not
required to make a contribution to this pension plan in 2010. However, we may be required to fund
the U.S. defined benefit pension plan in the years beyond 2010 depending upon the value of plan
investments and obligations in the future and changes in laws or regulations that govern pension
plan funding. Depending on the timing and amount, a requirement that we fund our defined benefit
pension plan could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Risks Associated with Acquisition and Disposition Strategies.
We intend to continue to
strategically position our businesses in order to improve our ability to compete. Strategies we
employ to accomplish this may include seeking new or expanding existing specialty market niches for
our products, expanding our global presence, acquiring businesses complementary to existing
strengths and continually evaluating the performance and strategic fit of our existing business
units. From time-to-time, management holds discussions with management of other companies to
explore acquisition, joint ventures, and other business combination opportunities as well as
possible business unit dispositions. As a result, the relative makeup of the businesses comprising
our Company is subject to change. Acquisitions, joint ventures, and other business combinations
involve various inherent risks, such as: assessing accurately the value, strengths, weaknesses,
contingent and other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition or other transaction
candidates; the potential loss of key personnel of an acquired business; our ability to achieve
identified financial and operating synergies anticipated to result from an acquisition or other
transaction; and unanticipated changes in business and economic conditions affecting an acquisition
or other transaction. International acquisitions and other transactions could be affected by export
controls, exchange rate fluctuations, domestic and foreign political conditions and a deterioration
in domestic and foreign economic conditions.
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Insurance.
We have maintained various forms of insurance, including insurance covering claims
related to our properties and risks associated with our operations. Our existing property and
liability insurance coverages contain exclusions and limitations on coverage. From time-to-time, in
connection with renewals of insurance, we have experienced additional exclusions and limitations on
coverage, larger self-insured retentions and deductibles and significantly higher premiums. As a
result, in the future our insurance coverage may not cover claims to the extent that it has in the
past and the costs that we incur to procure insurance may increase significantly, either of which
could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
Political and Social Turmoil.
The war on terrorism and recent political and social turmoil,
including terrorist and military actions and the implications of the military actions in Iraq,
could put pressure on economic conditions in the United States and worldwide. These political,
social and economic conditions could make it difficult for us, our suppliers and our customers to
forecast accurately and plan future business activities, and could adversely affect the financial
condition of our suppliers and customers and affect customer decisions as to the amount and timing
of purchases from us. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations
could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Associated with Government Contracts
. Some of our operating companies perform
contractual work directly for the U.S. Government. Various claims (whether based on U.S. Government
or Company audits and investigations or otherwise) could be asserted against us related to our U.S.
Government contract work. Depending on the circumstances and the outcome, such proceedings could
result in fines, penalties, compensatory and treble damages or the cancellation or suspension of
payments under one or more U.S. Government contracts. Under government regulations, a company, or
one or more of its operating divisions or units, can also be suspended or debarred from government
contracts based on the results of investigations. Currently, there is no material portion of our
business with the U.S. Government which might be subject to renegotiation of profits or termination
of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. Government.
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
None.
Our principal domestic facilities for our high performance metals include titanium sponge
production, melting operations, and production facilities that include processing and finishing
operations. Titanium sponge production is located at Rowley, UT and Albany, OR. Domestic melting
operations are located in Monroe, NC, Bakers, NC, and Lockport, NY (vacuum induction melting,
vacuum arc re-melt, electro-slag re-melt, plasma melting); Richland, WA (electron beam melting);
and Albany, OR (vacuum arc re-melt). Production of high performance metals, most of which are in
long product form, takes place at our domestic facilities in
12
Monroe, NC, Lockport, NY, Richburg, SC, Albany, OR, and Oakdale, PA. Our production of exotic
alloys takes place at facilities located in Albany, OR, Huntsville, AL, and Frackville, PA.
Our principal domestic locations for melting stainless steel and other flat-rolled specialty
metals are located in Brackenridge, Midland, Natrona and Latrobe, PA. Hot rolling of material is
performed at our domestic facilities in Brackenridge, Washington and Houston, PA. Finishing of our
flat-rolled products takes place at our domestic facilities located in Brackenridge, Bagdad,
Vandergrift, Midland and Washington, PA, and in Wallingford and Waterbury, CT, New Castle, IN, New
Bedford, MA, and Louisville, OH. We previously announced plans to construct a new advanced
specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility for our Flat-Rolled Products business segment
at our existing Brackenridge, PA site. This investment, which is expected to take approximately
four years to complete, is designed to produce exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled
coils at reduced cost with shorter lead times and require lower working capital requirements.
Our principal domestic facilities for the production of our engineered products are located in
Nashville, TN, Huntsville, Grant and Gurley, AL, Houston, TX, and Waynesboro, PA (tungsten powder,
tungsten carbide materials and carbide cutting tools and threading systems). Other domestic
facilities in this segment are located in Portland, IN and Lebanon, KY (carbon alloy steel
forgings); LaPorte, IN and Alpena, MI (grey and ductile iron castings); and southwestern
Pennsylvania (precision metals conversion services).
Substantially all of our properties are owned, and four of our properties are subject to
mortgages or similar encumbrances securing borrowings under certain industrial development
authority financings.
We also own or lease facilities in a number of foreign countries, including France, Germany,
Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the Peoples Republic of China. We own and/or lease and operate
facilities for melting and re-melting, machining and bar mill operations, laboratories and offices
located in Sheffield, England. Through our STAL joint venture, we operate facilities for finishing
Precision Rolled Strip products in the Xin-Zhuang Industrial Zone, Shanghai, China.
Our executive offices, located in PPG Place in Pittsburgh, PA, are leased.
Although our facilities vary in terms of age and condition, we believe that they have been
well maintained and are in sufficient condition for us to carry on our activities.
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
In a letter dated May 20, 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
informed a subsidiary of the Company that it alleges that the company and forty other potentially
responsible parties (PRPs) are not in compliance with a 2003 Unilateral Administrative Order (UAO)
issued to the company and the PRPs for the South El Monte Operable Unit of the San Gabriel Valley
(California) Superfund Site, a multi-part area-wide groundwater cleanup. At that time, the EPA
indicated that it may take action to enforce the UAO and collect penalties, as well as
reimbursement of the EPAs costs associated with the site. Since that time, the PRPs mediated with
the EPA to resolve their obligations under the UAO on both technical and legal grounds, and
enforcement of the UAO has been stayed. By letter dated January 26, 2010, the EPA proposed a
settlement to the company that would resolve EPAs claims as well as claims of the parties that are
funding and performing the cleanup. The PRPs will continue to mediate a resolution of this matter.
In November 2007, the EPA sent a subsidiary of the Company a Notice of Violation (NOV)
alleging that the companys Natrona, PA facility is operating in violation of the Clean Air Act.
The notice invited the company to meet with the EPA to discuss a resolution of the NOV. The company
and the EPA met in 2008 and 2009 and have made progress in resolving this matter.
We become involved from time-to-time in various lawsuits, claims and proceedings relating to
the conduct of our current and formerly owned businesses, including those pertaining to product
liability, patent infringement, commercial, employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental,
health and safety and occupational disease, and stockholder matters. While we cannot predict the
outcome of any lawsuit, claim or proceeding, our management believes that the disposition of any
pending matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or
liquidity. The resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters, including those
described above, however, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for
that period.
Information relating to legal proceedings is included in Note 16. Commitments and
Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and incorporated herein by
reference.
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
Not applicable.
13
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
|
Common Stock Prices
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (symbol ATI). At February 12, 2010, there
were approximately 5,210 record holders of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated common stock. We
paid a quarterly cash dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock for each quarter of 2008 and
2009. The ranges of high and low sales prices for shares of our common stock for the periods
indicated were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
2009
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
31.83
|
|
|
$
|
44.09
|
|
|
$
|
36.95
|
|
|
$
|
46.31
|
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
16.92
|
|
|
$
|
21.22
|
|
|
$
|
25.80
|
|
|
$
|
29.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
March 31
|
|
June 30
|
|
September 30
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
87.32
|
|
|
$
|
85.49
|
|
|
$
|
58.85
|
|
|
$
|
29.74
|
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
59.00
|
|
|
$
|
58.40
|
|
|
$
|
26.60
|
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
|
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys stock repurchases during the period covered
by this report, including purchases under ATIs publicly announced share repurchase program
described below, and also including shares repurchased by ATI from employees to satisfy
employee-owed taxes on share-based payments.
ATIs Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500 million on November 1, 2007.
Repurchases of Company common stock are made in the open market or in unsolicited or privately
negotiated transactions. Share repurchases are funded from internal cash flow and cash on hand. The
number of shares purchased, and the timing of the purchases, are based on several factors,
including other investment opportunities, the level of cash balances, and general business
conditions. As of December 31, 2009, 6,837,000 shares of common stock had been purchased under this
program at a cost of $339.5 million. All of these purchases were made in the open market. There
were no share repurchases under this program in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of
|
|
of Shares that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
Average Price
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
|
January 1-31, 2009
|
|
|
34,308
|
|
|
$
|
21.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
February 1-28, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
March 1-31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
34,308
|
|
|
|
21.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1-30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
May 1-31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
June 1-30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1-31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
August 1-31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
September 1-30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1-31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
November 1-30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
December 1-31, 2009
|
|
|
18,959
|
|
|
|
36.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, 2009
|
|
|
18,959
|
|
|
$
|
36.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
160,505,939
|
|
|
|
14
Cumulative Total Stockholder Return
The graph set forth below shows the cumulative total stockholder return (i.e., price change plus
reinvestment of dividends) on our common stock from December 31, 2004 through December 31, 2009 as
compared to the S&P 500 Index and a Peer Group of companies. We believe the Peer Group of
companies, which is defined below, is representative of companies in our industry that serve
similar markets during the applicable periods. The total stockholder return for the Peer Group is
weighted according to the respective issuers stock market capitalization at the beginning of each
period. The graph assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company / Index
|
|
Dec-04
|
|
Dec-05
|
|
Dec-06
|
|
Dec-07
|
|
Dec-08
|
|
Dec-09
|
|
|
|
Allegheny Technologies
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
168.15
|
|
|
|
425.27
|
|
|
|
407.48
|
|
|
|
122.30
|
|
|
|
219.32
|
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
104.91
|
|
|
|
121.48
|
|
|
|
128.16
|
|
|
|
80.74
|
|
|
|
102.11
|
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
111.56
|
|
|
|
149.99
|
|
|
|
204.51
|
|
|
|
87.44
|
|
|
|
124.77
|
|
Source: Standard & Poors
Peer Group companies for the cumulative five year total return period ended December 31, 2009 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AK Steel Holding Corp.
|
|
Precision Castparts Corp.
|
|
ALCOA Inc.
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
Brush Engineered Materials
|
|
RTI International Metals Inc.
|
|
Carpenter Technology Corp.
|
|
Schnitzer Steel Industries CL A
|
|
Castle (A M) & Co.
|
|
Steel Dynamics Inc.
|
|
Commercial Metals
|
|
Timken Co.
|
|
Gerdau Ameristeel Corp.
|
|
Titanium Metals Corp.
|
|
Kennametal Inc.
|
|
United States Steel Corp.
|
|
Ladish Co. Inc.
|
|
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products
|
|
Nucor Corp.
|
|
Worthington Industries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
The following table sets forth selected volume, price and financial information for ATI. The
financial information has been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in
this report for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. The historical selected
financial information may not be indicative of our future performance and should be read in
conjunction with the information contained in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s lbs.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals titanium mill products
|
|
|
23,588
|
|
|
|
32,530
|
|
|
|
30,689
|
|
|
|
27,361
|
|
|
|
24,882
|
|
|
High Performance Metals nickel-based and
specialty alloys
|
|
|
32,562
|
|
|
|
42,525
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
42,873
|
|
|
|
39,939
|
|
|
High Performance exotic alloys
|
|
|
5,067
|
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
4,304
|
|
|
|
4,018
|
|
|
Flat Rolled Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
367,195
|
|
|
|
500,375
|
|
|
|
491,891
|
|
|
|
502,524
|
|
|
|
495,868
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
474,950
|
|
|
|
584,389
|
|
|
|
557,016
|
|
|
|
889,105
|
|
|
|
652,870
|
|
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products total
|
|
|
842,145
|
|
|
|
1,084,764
|
|
|
|
1,048,907
|
|
|
|
1,391,629
|
|
|
|
1,148,738
|
|
|
Average Prices (per lb.):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals titanium mill products
|
|
$
|
20.92
|
|
|
$
|
25.60
|
|
|
$
|
30.14
|
|
|
$
|
33.83
|
|
|
$
|
22.75
|
|
|
High Performance Metals nickel-based and
specialty alloys
|
|
|
14.43
|
|
|
|
18.14
|
|
|
|
19.16
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
11.25
|
|
|
High Performance exotic alloys
|
|
|
57.79
|
|
|
|
48.53
|
|
|
|
41.85
|
|
|
|
40.39
|
|
|
|
40.38
|
|
|
Flat Rolled Products:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
1.22
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products combined average
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
1,300.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,944.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,067.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,806.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,246.0
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
1,516.1
|
|
|
|
2,909.1
|
|
|
|
2,951.9
|
|
|
|
2,697.3
|
|
|
|
1,900.5
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
238.8
|
|
|
|
455.7
|
|
|
|
433.0
|
|
|
|
432.7
|
|
|
|
393.4
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sales
|
|
$
|
3,054.9
|
|
|
$
|
5,309.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,452.5
|
|
|
$
|
4,936.6
|
|
|
$
|
3,539.9
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
$
|
234.7
|
|
|
$
|
539.0
|
|
|
$
|
729.1
|
|
|
$
|
657.2
|
|
|
$
|
335.1
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
71.3
|
|
|
|
385.0
|
|
|
|
512.0
|
|
|
|
356.1
|
|
|
|
159.0
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
(23.8
|
)
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
56.7
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit
|
|
$
|
282.2
|
|
|
$
|
944.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,273.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,070.0
|
|
|
$
|
541.6
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
867.7
|
|
|
|
1,154.1
|
|
|
|
880.7
|
|
|
|
316.0
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
573.5
|
|
|
|
753.9
|
|
|
|
582.2
|
|
|
|
369.3
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
38.0
|
|
|
$
|
573.5
|
|
|
$
|
753.9
|
|
|
$
|
582.2
|
|
|
$
|
367.3
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI
|
|
$
|
31.7
|
|
|
$
|
565.9
|
|
|
$
|
747.1
|
|
|
$
|
574.1
|
|
|
$
|
362.4
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
3.79
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
|
$
|
3.77
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.26
|
|
|
$
|
5.61
|
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.26
|
|
|
$
|
5.61
|
|
|
$
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions except per share amounts and ratios)
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
1.5
|
x
|
|
|
19.4
|
x
|
|
|
25.0
|
x
|
|
|
18.1
|
x
|
|
|
6.5
|
x
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$
|
1,373.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,235.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,544.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,344.8
|
|
|
$
|
926.1
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,346.0
|
|
|
|
4,170.4
|
|
|
|
4,095.6
|
|
|
|
3,280.5
|
|
|
|
2,729.9
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,037.6
|
|
|
|
494.6
|
|
|
|
507.3
|
|
|
|
529.9
|
|
|
|
547.0
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
1,071.1
|
|
|
|
509.8
|
|
|
|
528.2
|
|
|
|
553.6
|
|
|
|
560.4
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
708.8
|
|
|
|
469.9
|
|
|
|
623.3
|
|
|
|
502.6
|
|
|
|
362.7
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI Stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,012.2
|
|
|
|
1,957.4
|
|
|
|
2,222.0
|
|
|
|
1,502.5
|
|
|
|
807.8
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
71.6
|
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,089.6
|
|
|
|
2,029.0
|
|
|
|
2,279.2
|
|
|
|
1,540.4
|
|
|
|
828.3
|
|
|
|
In 2009, we adopted changes to the financial accounting standards regarding the presentation of
noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. Under the provisions of this
accounting standards change, the income statement presentation has been revised to separately
present consolidated net income, which now includes the amounts attributable to the Company plus
noncontrolling interests, formerly termed minority interests, and net income attributable solely to
the Company. In addition under the new accounting standard, noncontrolling interests are considered
to be a component of equity. Noncontrolling interests were previously classified within other
long-term liabilities. As a result of adopting this accounting standard change, the balance sheet
and the income statement have been recast retrospectively for all periods presented for the
presentation of noncontrolling interest in our STAL joint venture.
In 2009, we completed several proactive liability management actions including the issuance of
$350 million of 9.375% 10-year Senior Notes and $402.5 million of 4.25% 5-year Convertible Senior
Notes. Proceeds from these transactions were used to retire $183.3 million of our outstanding
8.375% Notes due in 2011 and to fund a voluntary pretax $350 million cash contribution to our
domestic pension plan to significantly improve its funded position.
Net income for 2005 included a $20.9 million net special gain, which included the tax benefit
associated with the reversal of the Companys remaining valuation allowance for U.S. Federal net
deferred tax assets of $44.9 million, partially offset by asset impairments and charges related to
legal matters of $22.0 million, and a $2.0 million charge, reported as a cumulative effect
accounting change for conditional asset retirement obligations.
For purposes of determining the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings include pre-tax
income plus fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest). Fixed charges consist of interest on
all indebtedness (including capitalized interest) plus that portion of operating lease rentals
representative of the interest factor (deemed to be one-third of operating lease rentals).
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
Certain statements contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements. Actual results or performance could
differ materially from those encompassed within such forward-looking statements as a result of
various factors, including those described below. Net income and net income per share amounts
referenced below are attributable to Allegheny Technologies Incorporated.
Overview of 2009 Financial Performance
While 2009 presented a challenging business environment, we remained profitable and enhanced our
position in key global growth markets, launched new production facilities, and maintained our
strong balance sheet. Net income attributable to ATI for the full year 2009 was $31.7 million, or
$0.32 per share, compared to $565.9 million, or $5.67 per share, for 2008. Results of 2009 included
after-tax charges of $17.0 million, or $0.17 per share, related to second quarter 2009 actions to
retire debt and the tax consequences of our $350 million voluntary pension contribution. Sales in
2009 were $3.05 billion compared to $5.31 billion for 2008. Direct international sales for 2009
represented 31% of our total sales compared to 28% for 2008. For 2009, the Flat-Rolled Products
segment generated 48%, the High Performance Metals generated 45%, and the Engineered Products
segment generated 7% of our direct international sales.
Our 2009 results reflect ATIs positioning as a globally focused, diversified high-value
specialty metals company with strong cash flow and liquidity, and a solid balance sheet. The
aerospace and defense market and the global infrastructure markets specifically, oil and gas,
chemical process industry, and electrical energy, and the medical market have been driving our
performance for the last
17
several years. For 2009, 31% of our sales were to the aerospace and defense market, 19% to the
oil and gas markets and the chemical process industry, 19% to the electrical energy market, and 4%
to the medical market. These major high-value global markets represented 73% of ATIs 2009 sales.
In our High Performance Metals segment, year-over-year sales decreased 33% to $1.30 billion,
due primarily to lower raw material surcharges, reduced base prices, and reduced demand from the
aerospace market, as the supply chain adjusted to aircraft production delays, and decreased demand
from the aeroengine aftermarket and the chemical processing market as a result of the weak global
economy. The declines in these markets were partially offset by increased demand for our materials
from the defense and nuclear energy markets. Operating profit for the High Performance Metals
segment was $234.7 million, a 56% decrease compared to 2008, due primarily to lower shipments,
lower average base selling prices for most of our products as a result of a more competitive
pricing environment, and idle facility, workforce reduction, and start-up costs of $31.2 million.
Improved margins on our exotic alloys, and benefits from our gross cost reduction efforts partially
offset the profitability decline.
In our Flat-Rolled Products segment, sales decreased 48% to $1.52 billion primarily as a
result of lower raw material surcharges and lower product shipments due to the global economic
recession, and lower average base selling prices for many of our products. Total product shipments
decreased 22% for the full year 2009, as demand for high value and standard stainless products
remained at depressed levels. However, shipments of standard stainless products, after reaching a
low in the fourth quarter of 2008, increased sequentially during 2009 as service center and other
customers started to replenish inventory positions. Operating profit for the Flat-Rolled Products
segment was $71.3 million, an 81% decrease compared to 2008. The decline in 2009 operating profit
was due primarily to lower shipments, lower average base selling prices for most of our products,
and idle facility and workforce reduction costs of $19.3 million, which were partially offset by
the benefits from our gross cost reduction efforts.
In our Engineered Products segment, 2009 sales decreased 48% to $238.8 million primarily due
to decreased demand from all the major markets for our products: oil and gas, transportation,
construction and mining, and cutting tools. The significant sales decline resulted in an operating
loss of $23.8 million for 2009 compared an operating profit of $20.9 million for 2008. In
addition, operating results for 2009 were adversely affected by idle facility and workforce
reduction costs of $5.7 million.
For 2009, total segment operating profit decreased to $282.2 million compared $944.9 million
for 2008. Total segment operating profit as a percentage of total sales was 9.2% in 2009, compared
to 17.8% in 2008.
During 2009, we enhanced our positions in key global growth markets, continued to enhance our
manufacturing capabilities, reduced costs, and maintained our strong balance sheet. We also
realized continued success in implementing the ATI Business System, which is continuing to drive
lean manufacturing throughout our operations. Our accomplishments during 2009 from these important
efforts included:
|
|
|
We continued to grow our global market presence as direct international sales exceeded 31% of
total sales. We believe at least 50% of ATIs 2009 sales were driven by global markets when we
consider exports of our customers.
|
|
|
|
We continued to improve our positions with key customers in the aerospace, oil and gas,
electrical energy, and medical markets as we entered into new long-term agreements to assist
them in dealing with Mission Critical Metallics
®
, manufacturing, and certainty of supply
challenges they face.
|
|
|
|
We continued to expand our industry leading technology portfolio by making important research
and development investments. Our new products are gaining traction in the marketplace and we
are particularly pleased with the acceptance of ATI 425
®
alloy, an innovative new
titanium alloy, ATI 718 Plus
®
alloy, our groundbreaking nickel-based superalloy,
and our ATI 500 MIL alloy which is the first new armor plate product released to the
market in over 40 years. These products are aimed at improving manufacturability to help
customers get to near-net-shape quicker and at reduced costs. Our new duplex stainless alloys
use lower amounts of nickel and/or molybdenum. These products are designed to be more cost
effective and typically provide higher strength and better corrosion resistance than
conventional stainless alloys.
|
|
|
|
We continued to realize significant benefits from our strategic focus on key high value
specialty products, including titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and specialty
alloys, exotic alloys, and grain-oriented electrical steel. In 2009, sales of these key high
value products represented 61% of our total sales compared to 42% in 2002, the last business
cycle trough. These sales mix increases were achieved utilizing our manufacturing capabilities
across both our High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products segments and demonstrate our
ability to profitably supply the marketplace with both long and flat-rolled products.
|
|
|
|
We continued to build a foundation for profitable growth. We significantly increased
strategic capital investments in our businesses to support the expected long-term growth in
our markets, especially for titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys,
and vacuum melted specialty alloys. During the past five years, we have invested $1.8 billion,
of which
|
18
|
|
|
$454 million was spent in 2009, to expand our titanium sponge production, and our melting,
rolling, finishing, and product capabilities. During this same five year period, we have
generated over $2.2 billion in cash flow from operations which has allowed us to self-fund these
important investments. Our recently completed and on-going major strategic capital projects
include:
|
|
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production capabilities.
Titanium sponge is an important raw material used to produce our titanium mill products.
Our greenfield premium-grade titanium sponge (jet engine rotating parts) facility in Rowley,
UT commenced initial production in December 2009. We plan to ramp production at this
facility during 2010 in a systematic manner to consistently provide the best quality and
cost competitive product. When this Utah sponge facility is fully operational, our total
annual sponge production capacity including our Albany, OR standard grade titanium sponge
facility is projected to be approximately 46 million pounds. These secure supply sources
are intended to reduce our purchased titanium sponge and purchased titanium scrap
requirements. In addition, the Utah facility will have the infrastructure in place to
further expand annual capacity by approximately 18 million pounds, bringing the total annual
capacity at that facility to 42 million pounds, if needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The design and construction of a $260 million titanium alloys and nickel-based alloys and
superalloys forging facility at our operations in North Carolina. This new facility, which
was constructed in phases through 2009, includes a new 10,000 ton press forge and a new
700mm radial forge, both of which we believe is the largest of its kind in the world for
producing these types of alloys. The facility also includes billet conditioning and
finishing equipment. The conditioning, finishing and inspection assets commenced operations
in the 2008 third quarter and the forging equipment commenced operations in the third
quarter 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The design and construction of a new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing
facility at our existing Brackenridge, PA site. The project is estimated to cost
approximately $1.16 billion and take at least four years to complete. Engineering,
permitting and site preparation are nearly completed for the facility. Our new advanced
hot-rolling and processing facility is designed to be the most powerful mill in the world
for production of specialty metals. It is designed to produce exceptional quality, thinner,
and wider hot-rolled coils at reduced cost with shorter lead times, and require lower
working capital requirements. When completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals
hot rolling and processing facility will provide unsurpassed manufacturing capability and
versatility in the production of a wide range of flat-rolled specialty metals. We expect
improved productivity, lower costs, and higher quality for our diversified product mix of
flat-rolled specialty metals, including nickel-based and specialty alloys, titanium and
titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision Rolled Strip
®
products, and stainless sheet and
coiled plate products. It is designed to roll and process exceptional quality hot bands of
up to 78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility,
we are consolidating our Natrona, PA grain-oriented electrical steel melt shop into ATIs
Brackenridge, PA melt shop. This consolidation is expected to improve the overall
productivity of ATIs flat-rolled grain-oriented electrical steel and other stainless and
specialty alloys, and reduce the cost of producing slabs and ingots. The investment should
also result in significant reduction of particulate emissions. We expect to realize
considerable cost savings from this project beginning in the second half of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products through capital expansions
of zirconium sponge production and VAR melting. This new zirconium sponge and melting
capacity better positions ATI for the current and expected strong growth in demand from the
nuclear energy and chemical process industry markets. We believe ATI is now the worlds
largest producer of critical reactor grade zirconium sponge for the nuclear energy market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Chinese joint venture company known as Shanghai STAL Precision Stainless Steel
Company Limited (STAL), in which ATI has a 60% interest, completed an expansion of its
Precision Rolled Strip
®
operations in Shanghai, China which nearly triples STALs precision
rolling and slitting capacity. This expansion better positions STAL to benefit from Chinas
electronics and telecommunications manufacturing market for cell phones and smartphones, as
well as Chinas rapidly growing automotive parts manufacturing market. We believe STAL is
the largest producer of these thin strip products in China and that our new facility gives
us a significant competitive advantage in this growing market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In October 2009, we acquired the assets of Crucible Compaction Metals and Crucible
Research, a western Pennsylvania producer of advanced powder metal products, for
approximately $39 million. This acquisition, which has been named ATI Powder Metals,
expands our specialty metals product portfolio. Powder metals are used in the production of
complex alloy chemistries, typically when conventional processes can not be used. Powder
metals represent a growth opportunity for ATI as more powder metals are used in the
aerospace industry for the latest generation of jet engines and for the production of
near-net-shape parts. Additional markets for these powder metals products include oil and
gas, electrical energy, and medical.
|
19
|
|
|
We currently plan to spend approximately $375 million for capital expenditures in 2010 and we
expect capital spending to remain in this range for the next few years as we complete our
strategic projects.
|
|
|
|
We realized significant cash generation in 2009 with cash flow from operations of $218.5
million, which included a voluntary after-tax cash pension contribution of $241.5 million.
Excluding the voluntary net cash pension contribution, cash flow from operations was $460
million for 2009. Cash on hand at the end of 2009 was $708.8 million, an increase of $238.9
million from year-end 2008.
|
|
|
|
We continued to maintain our strong balance sheet. In June 2009, we completed several
proactive liability management actions including the issuance of $350 million of 9.375%
10-year Senior Notes and $402.5 million of 4.25% 5-year Convertible Senior Notes. Proceeds
from these transactions were used to retire $183.3 million of our outstanding 8.375% Notes due
in 2011 and to fund a voluntary $350 million cash contribution to our domestic pension plan to
significantly improve its funded position. At the end of 2009, our pension plan was
essentially fully funded while our net debt to total capitalization ratio and our total debt
to total capital ratio remained conservative at 15.3% and 34.7%, respectively.
|
|
|
|
We continued to realize significant progress in safety across ATIs operations. As a result
of our continuing focus on and commitment to safety, in 2009 our OSHA Total Recordable
Incident Rate improved by 2.4% to 2.45 and our Lost Time Case Rate was 0.38, which we believe
to be competitive with world class performance.
|
|
|
|
We realized continued success from the ATI Business System, which is continuing to drive lean
manufacturing throughout our operations. In addition to the improved safety performance
discussed above, we realized $173 million in gross cost reductions in 2009, which exceeded our
goal of $100 million. We have targeted additional gross cost reductions of at least $100
million in 2010.
|
Looking ahead, we expect to see gradual and steady improvement in most of our global markets
in 2010. Further, we expect to recover and profitably grow faster than our core global markets as
a result of our new and extended long-term agreements and innovative new products that improve our
market position, and our leading manufacturing capabilities. We continue to believe that the
aerospace and defense and global infrastructure markets, namely chemical process industry, oil and
gas, electrical energy, and medical, have strong growth potential over the intermediate and
long-term. We intend to use these difficult market conditions to continue to positively
differentiate ATI as a uniquely positioned, diversified, technology-driven global specialty metals
producer.
Results of Operations
Sales were $3.05 billion in 2009, $5.31 billion in 2008 and $5.45 billion in 2007. Direct
international sales represented approximately 31% of 2009 sales, 28% of 2008 sales and 27% of 2007
sales.
Segment operating profit was $282.2 million in 2009, $944.9 million in 2008, and $1.27 billion
in 2007. Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and
results of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses, net interest expense,
retirement benefit expense, other costs net of gains on asset sales and restructuring costs, if
any. We believe segment operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of
controllable operating results at the business segment level.
Income before tax was $64.9 million in 2009, $867.7 million in 2008, and $1.15 billion in
2007.
Net income attributable to ATI was $31.7 million for 2009, $565.9 million for 2008, and $747.1
million for 2007.
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Profit (Loss)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Profit
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
(8
|
%)
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
20
Information with respect to our business segments is presented below and in Note 13 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
High Performance Metals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
%Change
|
|
2008
|
|
%Change
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
1,300.0
|
|
|
|
(33
|
%)
|
|
$
|
1,944.9
|
|
|
|
(6
|
%)
|
|
$
|
2,067.6
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
234.7
|
|
|
|
(56
|
%)
|
|
|
539.0
|
|
|
|
(26
|
%)
|
|
|
729.1
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Direct
international sales as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
Our High Performance Metals segment produces, converts and distributes a wide range of high
performance alloys, including titanium and titanium-based alloys, nickel- and cobalt-based alloys
and superalloys, exotic alloys such as zirconium, hafnium, niobium, nickel-titanium, and their
related alloys, and other specialty metals, primarily in long product forms such as ingot, billet,
bar, rod, wire, shapes and rectangles, seamless tube and castings. These products are designed for
the high performance requirements of such major end markets as aerospace and defense, electrical
energy, oil and gas, chemical process industry, and medical. The operating units in this segment
are ATI Allvac, ATI Allvac Ltd (U.K.), ATI Wah Chang and ATI Powder Metals.
2009 Compared to 200
8
Sales for the High Performance Metals segment for 2009 decreased 33% to $1.30 billion, due
primarily to reduced demand from the aerospace market, as the supply chain adjusted to aircraft
production delays, and decreased demand from the aeroengine aftermarket and the chemical processing
market as a result of the weak global economy. The declines in these markets were partially offset
by increased demand for our materials from the defense and nuclear energy markets. Direct
international sales as percentage of total segment sales increased to 32.8% primarily due to sales
of exotic alloys. Comparative information on the segments products for the years ended December
31, 2009 and 2008 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
%Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
|
23,588
|
|
|
|
32,530
|
|
|
|
(27
|
%)
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty alloys
|
|
|
32,562
|
|
|
|
42,525
|
|
|
|
(23
|
%)
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
|
5,067
|
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
(7
|
%)
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
$
|
20.92
|
|
|
$
|
25.60
|
|
|
|
(18
|
%)
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty alloys
|
|
$
|
14.43
|
|
|
$
|
18.14
|
|
|
|
(20
|
%)
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
$
|
57.79
|
|
|
$
|
48.53
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
Aerospace represents a significant market for our High Performance Metals segment, especially
for premium quality specialty metals used in the manufacture of jet engines for the original
equipment and spare parts markets. In addition, we have become a larger supplier of specialty
metals used in airframe construction. In 2009, sales of our material into the airframe market
represented approximately 38% of our aerospace market sales.
Over the past several years, we have entered into long-term agreements with our customers to
assist them in dealing with Mission Critical Metallics
®
, manufacturing, and certainty of supply
challenges they face. In September 2009, we signed a ten-year sourcing agreement with Rolls-Royce
plc for the supply of nickel-based superalloy disc-quality products for commercial jet engine
applications with potential revenue estimated to be between $750 million and $1 billion. In January
2007, we announced a long-term sourcing agreement with GE Aviation for the supply of premium
titanium alloys, nickel-based superalloys, and vacuum-melted specialty alloys products for
commercial and military jet engine applications. Historical and anticipated revenues under this
agreement plus ATI Allvacs direct sales to GE Aviation for the period 2007 through 2011 could
exceed $2 billion. In addition, in October 2006 we announced a long-term agreement with The Boeing
Company to supply titanium alloys products for Boeings aircraft airframes and structural
components, including Boeings 787 Dreamliner. Total revenues under this contract may be as much as
$2.5 billion for the years 2007 through 2015. This long-term agreement includes both long-product
forms which are manufactured within the High Performance Metals segment, and a significant amount
of plate products which are manufactured utilizing assets of both the High Performance Metals and
Flat-Rolled Products segments. Revenues and profits associated with these titanium mill products
covered by the long-term agreement are included primarily in the results for the High Performance
Metals segment.
21
The commercial aerospace markets use of titanium alloys is expected to increase significantly
as new aircraft airframe designs use a larger percentage of titanium alloys. For example, the new
Boeing 787 Dreamliner airframe (excluding engines) is expected to require the purchase of
approximately 250,000 pounds of titanium alloy mill products per aircraft, a significant increase
over any previous commercial aircraft airframe. New aircraft designs from Airbus, the A380 and
A350-XWB, and from defense contractors are also expected to utilize a greater percentage of
titanium alloys. Given the significant current backlogs of Boeing and Airbus, as well as the engine
manufacturers, this increasing demand for titanium alloys mill products is expected to last into
the next decade. However, The Boeing Company has experienced production difficulties with the
construction of the new Boeing 787 which have delayed the planned first delivery of this new
aircraft to the fourth quarter of 2010, a delay of over 2 years. These production difficulties,
along with decreased demand in the aeroengine aftermarket due to weakness in the global economy,
resulted in excess availability of materials in the aerospace supply chain. This excess
availability of material has had an adverse effect in 2009 and 2008 on the demand and selling
prices for certain of the materials we produce, especially titanium alloys and nickel-based
superalloys. This supply condition also resulted in the temporarily idling our Albany, OR titanium
sponge facility at the end of July 2009 to adjust titanium production and inventory levels to
current market demand.
For the period from 2004 to 2008, airline revenue passenger miles and freight miles have
increased annually 5.4% and 2.4%, respectively, according to the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) data. In 2009, airline revenue passenger miles and freight miles decreased 4.1%
and 13.0%. Based on January 2010 forecasts, the ICAO expects growth of between 4.5% and 7.0%
annually for the next 4 years based on the demand for passenger and freight travel from developing
economies, especially in Asia and the Middle East, and expected continuing economic growth in the
rest of the world. New commercial and military jet aircraft deliveries have increased 4.5% annually
since 2005. Independent forecasts from both Airline Monitor and Forecast International project a
reduction in deliveries in 2010 followed by continuing growth of commercial and military jet
aircraft deliveries for the next 4 years. Because of the current economic downturn, the actual
rate and timing of future aircraft deliveries is uncertain. Due to manufacturing cycle times,
demand for our specialty metals leads the deliveries of new aircraft by 12 to 18 months. In
addition, as our specialty metals are used in rotating components of jet engines, demand for our
products for spare parts is impacted by aircraft flight activity and engine refurbishment
requirements of U.S. and foreign aviation regulatory authorities.
Airline Miles Revenue Passenger (Worldwide, per year, in billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
75
|
|
80
|
|
85
|
|
90
|
|
95
|
|
00
|
|
05
|
|
09
|
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
1176
|
|
|
|
1396
|
|
|
|
1887
|
|
|
|
2311
|
|
|
|
2532
|
|
Source: International Civil Aviation Organization
22
Airline Miles Freight (Worldwide, tons per year, in billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
75
|
|
80
|
|
85
|
|
90
|
|
95
|
|
00
|
|
05
|
|
09
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Source: International Civil Aviation Organization
23
Sources: Airline Monitor, Forecast International
Commercial & Military Jet Aircraft Build Rate and Forecast
(Worldwide, per year)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
2000
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
Boeing deliveries
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
Airbus deliveries
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
Regional Jet del.
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
Military A/C del
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
|
Total deliveries
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
High Performance Metals segment operating profit for 2009 decreased 56% to $234.7 million
compared to 2008 primarily due to lower shipments, lower average selling prices for most of our
products, and $31.2 million for idle facility, workforce reduction, and start-up costs. Improved
margins on our exotic alloys, and benefits from our gross cost reduction efforts partially offset
the profitability decline. In addition, operating profit over the past several years has been
affected by volatile raw material costs. Titanium and titanium scrap prices decreased significantly
in 2009 and 2008. These and other raw material costs are largely recovered in product selling
prices through raw material indices which attempt to match purchased material costs with shipments.
However in an environment of rapidly declining, or increasing costs, these raw material indices
included in product selling prices may not completely match related raw material costs due to the
long manufacturing times for some of our products. The rapid decrease in raw material costs in late
2008 had a significant negative effect on operating profit as shipments produced with raw material
purchased earlier in the year at higher costs were sold based upon raw material indices which
reflected lower raw material prices. These negative impacts on operating profit were offset by LIFO
inventory valuation reserve benefits of $33.0 million in 2009 and $70.6 million in 2008.
24
We continued to aggressively reduce costs in 2009. Gross cost reductions, before the effects
of inflation, totaled approximately $81 million. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $33
million from procurement savings, $30 million from operating efficiencies, $11 million from other
fixed cost savings, and $7 million from reductions in compensation and benefit expenses. Cost
reductions include savings from reducing the size of the workforce by approximately 17%.
On October 23, 2009, we expanded our specialty metals product portfolio by acquiring the
assets of Crucible Compaction Metals and Crucible Research, a western Pennsylvania producer of
advanced powder metal products, for approximately $39 million in cash. Results for these
operations, which have been named ATI Powder Metals, have been included in the High Performance
Metals segment results from the date of acquisition.
2008 Compared to 2007
Sales for the High Performance Metals segment decreased 6% to $1.94 billion in 2008, due primarily
to decreased demand from the aerospace and defense market, primarily as a result of delays in
aircraft build schedules and the weakening global economy, and the softening demand in the oil and
gas market as a result of the rapid decline in crude oil and natural gas prices in the second half
of 2008 due to the weakening global economy. The declines in these markets were partially offset by
increased demand for our exotic materials, especially from the chemical process industry and
nuclear energy markets. While our direct international sales of exotic material increased 8%,
overall direct international sales decreased $77.8 million, or 12%, to $583.0 million, and
represented 30% of sales for the High Performance Metals segment. Comparative information on the
segments products for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
|
32,530
|
|
|
|
30,689
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty alloys
|
|
|
42,525
|
|
|
|
44,688
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
5,169
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products
|
|
$
|
25.60
|
|
|
$
|
30.14
|
|
|
|
(15
|
%)
|
|
Nickel-based and specialty alloys
|
|
$
|
18.14
|
|
|
$
|
19.16
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
Exotic alloys
|
|
$
|
48.53
|
|
|
$
|
41.85
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
Segment operating profit for 2008 decreased 26% to $539.0 million compared to 2007 primarily
due to lower volume and average selling prices for our nickel-based alloys and specialty alloys,
and lower average selling prices for our titanium alloys, which were partially offset by increased
shipments of our titanium and exotic alloys, and the benefits from our gross cost reduction
efforts. In addition, operating profit in 2008 and 2007 was affected by volatile raw material
costs. Nickel and nickel-bearing scrap, and titanium and titanium scrap prices decreased
significantly in 2008 and the second of half of 2007 after increasing significantly during the
first half of 2007. These material costs are largely recovered in product selling prices through
raw material indices which attempt to match purchased material costs with shipments. However in an
environment of rapidly declining, or increasing costs, these raw material indices included in
product selling prices may not completely match related raw material costs. The fall in raw
material costs in 2008 and in the second half of 2007 had a significant negative effect on
operating profit as shipments produced with raw material purchased earlier in the year at higher
costs were sold based upon raw material indices which reflected lower raw material prices. These
negative impacts on operating profit were offset by LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefits of
$70.6 million in 2008 and $96.3 million in 2007.
We continued to aggressively reduce costs in 2008. Gross cost reductions, before the effects
of inflation, totaled approximately $65 million. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $55
million from operating efficiencies and procurement savings, and $10 million from reductions in
compensation and benefit expenses.
Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
1,516.1
|
|
|
|
(48
|
%)
|
|
$
|
2,909.1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
%)
|
|
$
|
2,951.9
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
71.3
|
|
|
|
(81
|
%)
|
|
|
377.4
|
|
|
|
(25
|
%)
|
|
|
505.2
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
Direct international sales as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
25
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment produces, converts and distributes stainless steel,
nickel-based alloys, specialty alloys, and titanium and titanium-based alloys, in a variety of
product forms including plate, sheet, engineered strip, and Precision Rolled Strip products, as
well as grain-oriented electrical steel sheet. The major end markets for our flat-rolled products
are electrical energy, oil and gas, chemical processing, automotive, food processing equipment and
appliances, construction and mining, electronics, communication equipment and computers, and
aerospace and defense. The operations in this segment are ATI Allegheny Ludlum, our 60% interest in
the Chinese joint venture company known as Shanghai STAL Precision Stainless Steel Company Limited
(STAL), and our 50% interest in the industrial titanium joint venture known as Uniti LLC. The
remaining 40% interest in STAL is owned by the Baosteel Group, a state authorized investment
company whose equity securities are publicly traded in the Peoples Republic of China. The
financial results of STAL are consolidated into the segments operating results with the 40%
interest of our minority partner recognized in the consolidated statement of income as net income
attributable to noncontrolling interests. The remaining 50% interest in Uniti LLC is held by VSMPO,
a Russian producer of titanium, aluminum, and specialty steel products. We account for the results
of the Uniti joint venture using the equity method since we do not have a controlling interest.
2009 Compared to 2008
Sales for the Flat-Rolled Products segment for 2009 were $1.52 billion, or 48% lower than 2008, due
primarily to lower raw material surcharges and lower product shipments as a result of the global
economic recession. Total product shipments decreased 22% for the full year 2009, as demand for
high value and standard stainless products remained at depressed levels. However, shipments of
standard stainless products, after reaching a low in the fourth quarter of 2008, increased
sequentially during 2009 as service center and other customers started to replenish inventory
positions. Comparative information on the segments products for the years ended December 31, 2009
and 2008 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
367,195
|
|
|
|
500,375
|
|
|
|
(27
|
%)
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
474,950
|
|
|
|
584,389
|
|
|
|
(19
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
842,145
|
|
|
|
1,084,764
|
|
|
|
(22
|
%)
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
(24
|
%)
|
|
Standard
|
|
$
|
1.22
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
(43
|
%)
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
(33
|
%)
|
|
|
The average transaction prices to customers, which include the effect of lower average raw
material surcharges, decreased by 33% to $1.77 per pound in 2009. Direct international sales as a
percentage of total segment sales increased to 30% in 2009, which represented a historic high.
While the majority of direct international sales were for high-value products, sales of standard
products, primarily stainless steel cold roll sheet, are increasing in significance.
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment high-value product shipments, which include engineered strip,
Precision Rolled Strip, super stainless steel, nickel-based alloys, specialty alloys, titanium, and
grain-oriented electrical steel products, decreased 27% in 2009 while average transaction prices
for these high-value products decreased 24%. Demand for our engineered strip and Precision Rolled
Strip, while lower than 2008, improved throughout 2009 as customers restocked inventory positions
and demand improved from the housing market for energy efficient material. Demand for our titanium
products from the chemical process industry and oil and gas markets was negatively impacted
weakness in the global economy and uncertainty in financial markets for project financing.
Shipments of our grain-oriented electrical steel products, while negatively impacted by the
downturn in residential and commercial construction, benefited from our long-term supply agreements
with key customers. Shipments of titanium and ATI-produced Uniti titanium products declined 30% to
approximately 10.3 million pounds in 2009.
Shipments of our standard products, which primarily include stainless steel hot roll and cold roll
sheet, and stainless steel plate, decreased 19% while average transaction prices for these products
decreased by 43%. In 2009, consumption in the U.S. of stainless steel strip, sheet and plate
products decreased by more than 25%, compared to 2008 consumption, according to the Specialty Steel
Institute of North America (SSINA), using annualized October 2009 information. The 2009 annual
consumption of 930 million tons is the lowest level in at least 15 years.
26
US ADC of Stainless Sheet and Strip (hot rolled and cold rolled)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
1999
|
|
2000
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009*
|
|
Millions of Tons
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
1.55
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
2009 represents Oct YTD annualized
|
Source: SSINA
The majority of our flat-rolled products are sold at prices that include surcharges for raw
materials, including purchased scrap, that are required to manufacture our products. These raw
materials include nickel, iron, chromium, and molybdenum. Nickel, which comprises a significant
percentage of our material costs, continued to be volatile during 2009. The cost of nickel
increased 103% during the first eight months of 2009 to an average monthly cost of $8.91 per pound
in August 2009. During the next four months of 2009, the cost of nickel declined 13% to an average
monthly cost of $7.74 per pound in December 2009. Our other major raw materials were also volatile
during 2009 with chromium declining 14%, and iron and molybdenum increasing 29% and 19%,
respectively.
27
Iron Scrap Prices
($/Gross Ton)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
00
|
|
01
|
|
02
|
|
03
|
|
04
|
|
05
|
|
06
|
|
07
|
|
08
|
|
09
|
|
129
|
|
85
|
|
74
|
|
105
|
|
173
|
|
233
|
|
255
|
|
229
|
|
297
|
|
221
|
|
275
|
Nickel Prices
($/lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
00
|
|
01
|
|
02
|
|
03
|
|
04
|
|
05
|
|
06
|
|
07
|
|
08
|
|
09
|
|
3.67
|
|
3.32
|
|
2.69
|
|
3.26
|
|
6.43
|
|
6.25
|
|
6.09
|
|
15.68
|
|
11.79
|
|
4.39
|
|
7.74
|
Source: London Metals Exchange
28
Chromium Prices
($/lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
00
|
|
01
|
|
02
|
|
03
|
|
04
|
|
05
|
|
06
|
|
07
|
|
08
|
|
09
|
|
0.39
|
|
0.41
|
|
0.29
|
|
0.35
|
|
0.54
|
|
0.69
|
|
0.54
|
|
0.66
|
|
1.71
|
|
1.03
|
|
0.89
|
Source: Platts Metals Week
Molybdenum Prices
($/lb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
00
|
|
01
|
|
02
|
|
03
|
|
04
|
|
05
|
|
06
|
|
07
|
|
08
|
|
09
|
|
2.56
|
|
2.23
|
|
2.36
|
|
3.26
|
|
7.26
|
|
31.24
|
|
26.58
|
|
24.78
|
|
32.38
|
|
9.60
|
|
11.38
|
Source: Platts Metals Week
Operating income was $71.3 million, an 81% decrease compared to 2008. The decline in 2009
operating profit was due primarily to lower shipments, lower average base selling prices for most
of our products, and idle facility and workforce reduction costs of $19.3 million, which were
partially offset by the benefits from our gross cost reduction efforts. In addition, operating
profit in 2009 and 2008 was affected by volatile raw material costs. Nickel and nickel-bearing
scrap, iron scrap, chromium, and molybdenum prices decreased significantly in 2008, especially in
the fourth quarter. These material costs are largely recovered in product selling prices through
raw material surcharges which attempt to match purchased material costs with shipments. However in
an environment of rapidly declining, or increasing costs, these raw material indices included in
product selling prices may not completely match our raw material costs due to the long
manufacturing cycle times for some of our products. The rapid fall in raw material costs in 2008
had a significant negative effect on operating profit in 2008, and in the first half of 2009, as
shipments produced with raw material purchased earlier at higher costs were sold based upon raw
material surcharges which reflected lower raw material costs. This negative impact on operating
profit was offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $60.8 million in 2009 and $89.8
million in 2008.
We continued to aggressively reduce costs and streamline our flat-rolled products operations.
In 2009, we achieved gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately $77
million in our Flat-Rolled Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $62
million from procurement savings and operating efficiencies and $15 million from reductions in
compensation and benefit expenses. Cost reductions include the savings from reducing the size of
the workforce by approximately 14%.
2008 Compared to 200
7
Sales for the Flat-Rolled Products segment for 2008 were $2.91 billion, or 1% lower than 2007, due
primarily to lower average base selling prices and raw material surcharges for most products, which
were partially offset by increased product shipments. While total product shipments increased 3%
for the full year 2008, demand for many of our products declined significantly in the second half
of
29
2008, and especially in the fourth quarter, as a result of the worsening effects of the financial
credit crisis and the weakening global economy. Demand for our high value products, such as
specialty alloys and titanium sheet, and grain-oriented electrical steel, improved during the first
nine months of 2008 from the global electrical energy, oil and gas, and chemical process industry
markets but softened in the fourth quarter. Shipments of standard stainless products increased 5%
for the full year but declined significantly in the second half of 2008 as demand from service
center and other customers weakened considerably. Comparative information on the segments products
for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
2007%
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Volume (000s pounds):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
|
500,375
|
|
|
|
491,891
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
584,389
|
|
|
|
557,016
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
|
1,084,764
|
|
|
|
1,048,907
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
Standard
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
(11
|
%)
|
|
Total Flat-Rolled Products
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
(5
|
%)
|
|
|
Total shipments in 2008 increased by 3% to 1,085 million pounds compared to shipments of 1,049
million pounds in 2007. The average transaction prices to customers, which include the effect of
lower average raw material surcharges, decreased by 5% to $2.65 per pound in 2008. Our direct
international sales increased $100.3 million, or 15%, to a record $780.7 million, and represented
27% of sales for the Flat-Rolled Products segment. While the majority of direct international sales
were for high-value products, sales of standard products, primarily stainless steel cold roll
sheet, increased to $184 million, which represents an increase of approximately 124% since 2006.
Our Flat-Rolled Products segment high-value product shipments, which include engineered strip,
Precision Rolled Strip products, super stainless steel, nickel-based alloys, specialty alloys,
titanium, and grain-oriented electrical steel products, increased 2% while average transaction
prices for these high-value products increased 1%. Strong demand for our titanium products from the
chemical process industry, and oil and gas markets, and for our grain-oriented electrical steel
products from the electrical energy distribution market was offset by lower demand for our
engineered strip, Precision Rolled Strip products, nickel-based alloys, and super stainless steel
products. Shipments of titanium and ATI-produced Uniti titanium products grew 41% to approximately
14.7 million pounds, and shipments of our grain-oriented electrical steel products grew 9%, both
compared to 2007.
Shipments of our standard products, which primarily include stainless steel hot roll and cold
roll sheet, and stainless steel plate, increased 5% while average transaction prices for these
products decreased by 11%. In 2008, consumption in the U.S. of stainless steel strip, sheet and
plate products decreased by more than 14%, compared to 2007 consumption, according to the Specialty
Steel Institute of North America (SSINA). The decrease in shipments was primarily attributable to
weakening demand from consumer and industrial markets due to the U.S. recession and inventory
adjustments by service center customers primarily for stainless steel sheet.
The majority of our flat-rolled products are sold at prices that include surcharges for raw
materials, including purchased scrap, that are required to manufacture our products. These raw
materials include nickel, iron, chromium, and molybdenum. Nickel, which comprises a significant
percentage of our material costs, continued to be volatile during 2008. The cost of nickel
increased 20% during the first three months of 2008 to an average monthly cost of $14.16 per pound
in March 2008. However, during the next nine months of 2008, the cost of nickel declined 69% to an
average monthly cost of $4.39 per pound in December 2008. The 2008 fourth quarter was an
exceptional period of volatility for our other major raw materials: iron, chromium, and molybdenum
which declined in value during the quarter by approximately 60%, 52%, and 71%, respectively.
Operating income was $377.4 million, a 25% decrease compared to 2007. The decline in 2008
operating profit was due primarily to lower average base selling prices for most of our products,
which was partially offset by increased shipments and the benefits from our gross cost reduction
initiatives. In addition, operating profit in 2008 and 2007 was affected by volatile raw material
costs. Nickel and nickel-bearing scrap, iron scrap, chromium, and molybdenum prices decreased
significantly in 2008, especially in the fourth quarter. These material costs are largely recovered
in product selling prices through raw material surcharges which attempt to match purchased material
costs with shipments. However in an environment of rapidly declining, or increasing costs, these
raw material indices included in product selling prices may not completely match our raw material
costs due to the long manufacturing cycle times for some of our products. The rapid fall in raw
material costs in 2008 had a significant, negative effect on operating profit as shipments produced
with raw material purchased earlier in the year at higher costs were sold based upon raw material
surcharges which reflected lower raw material costs. This negative impact on operating profit was
offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $89.8 million in 2008. During 2007, the
average cost of our raw materials in our Flat-Rolled Products segment increased
30
approximately 6% compared to the 2006 average cost. These increased costs, largely offset by
lower inventory quantities, resulted in a LIFO inventory valuation charge of $1.9 million for 2007.
We continued to aggressively reduce costs and streamline our flat-rolled products operations.
In 2008, we achieved gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately $59
million in our Flat-Rolled Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $52
million from procurement savings and operating efficiencies and $7 million from reductions in
compensation and benefit expenses.
In the first quarter 2007, we entered into a new labor agreement with the United Steelworkers
represented at ATIs Allegheny Ludlum operations. The new agreement expires on June 30, 2011. The
new agreement provides for profit sharing above specified minimum pre-tax profit for the
Flat-Rolled Products segment and is capped to provide for no more than $20 million of profit
sharing payments under this provision over the four-year life of the contract. Any profit sharing
payments under this provision are contributed to an independently administered VEBA (Voluntary
Employee Benefit Association) trust. As a result of this new agreement, we recognized a
non-recurring pre-tax charge of $4.8 million.
Engineered Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
% Change
|
|
2008
|
|
% Change
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
238.8
|
|
|
|
(48
|
%)
|
|
$
|
455.7
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
433.0
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss)
|
|
|
(23.8
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
(35
|
%)
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit (loss) as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
(10.0
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
Direct international sales as a percentage of sales
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
%
|
|
|
Our Engineered Products segment includes the production of tungsten powder, tungsten heavy
alloys, tungsten carbide materials and carbide cutting tools. The segment also produces carbon
alloy steel impression die forgings, and large grey and ductile iron castings, and provides
precision metals processing services. The operations in this segment are ATI Metalworking Products,
ATI Portland Forge, ATI Casting Service and ATI Rome Metals.
The major markets served by our products of the Engineered Products segment include a wide
variety of industrial markets including oil and gas, machine and cutting tools, transportation,
construction and mining, electrical energy, aerospace and defense, and automotive.
2009 Compared to 2008
Sales for the Engineered Products segment decreased 48% to $238.8 million in 2009 as the global
economic recession severely depressed demand and selling prices of most of our products from all of
our major markets.
The significant sales decline resulted in an operating loss of $23.8 million for 2009 compared
an operating profit of $20.9 million for 2008. Operating results for 2009 were adversely affected
by idle facility and workforce reduction costs of $5.7 million. The decline in profitability was
partially offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $9.0 million primarily as a
result of lower raw material costs and the benefits of gross cost reductions. In 2008, operating
profit included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $8.6 million.
In 2009, we achieved gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately
$14 million in our Engineered Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $8
million from procurement savings and operating efficiencies, and $6 million from lower compensation
and benefit expenses. Cost reductions include savings associated with reducing the size of the
workforce by approximately 36%.
2008 Compared to 2007
Sales for the Engineered Products segment increased $22.7 million to $455.7 million in 2008. Demand
for our tungsten and tungsten-carbide products improved from the cutting tool, construction and
mining, and electrical energy markets, but was lower from the oil and gas market for down-hole
drilling applications. Demand increased for our forged products from the transportation market.
Demand for our cast products improved from the electrical energy market for wind and natural gas
power generation applications. Demand remained steady for our titanium precision metal processing
conversion services, primarily due to the aerospace market. While total sales increased 5% for full
year 2008, demand for many of our products declined significantly in the fourth quarter of 2008 as
a result of the worsening effects of the financial credit crisis and the weakening global economy.
31
Segment operating profit in 2008 declined to $20.9 million, or 4.6% of sales, compared to
$32.1 million, or 7.4% of sales for 2007. The decline in operating profit was primarily due to a
more competitive pricing environment for our tungsten and tungsten-carbide products, higher raw
material costs and $4.7 million of start-up expenses associated with our Alpena, MI casting
operation. This decline was partially offset by increased shipment volumes and the benefits of
gross cost reductions. In addition, a rapid decline during the 2008 fourth quarter in raw material
costs, primarily tungsten scrap, cobalt, and forging steel, resulted in higher cost material
purchased earlier in the year flowing through cost of sales and not matching raw material
surcharges included in selling prices due to manufacturing cycle time. This compression in profit
margins was partially offset by a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $8.6 million. In
2007, operating profit included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $2.3 million as a
result of higher raw material costs and inventory levels.
In 2008, we achieved gross cost reductions, before the effects of inflation, of approximately $10
million in our Engineered Products segment. Major areas of gross cost reductions included $7
million from operating efficiencies and procurement savings and $3 million from lower compensation
and benefit expenses.
Corporate Expenses
Corporate expenses were $53.1 million in 2009 compared to $56.8 million in 2008, and $73.8 million
in 2007. The decline in corporate expenses year over year was primarily the result of lower
expenses associated with annual and long-term performance-based incentive compensation programs.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net of interest income and interest capitalization, was $19.3 million for 2009
compared to $3.5 million for 2008 and $4.8 million for 2007. The increase in interest expense in
2009 was primarily due to debt issuances completed in the 2009 second quarter.
Interest expense is presented net of interest income of $2.1 million for 2009, $9.8 million
for 2008, and $26.0 million for 2007. The decline in interest income over the periods was primarily
resulted from lower interest rates on invested cash offsetting the favorable benefit of higher cash
balances.
Increased capital expenditures associated with strategic investments to expand our production
capabilities resulted in higher interest capitalization in 2009, 2008 and 2007. Interest expense in
2009, 2008, and 2007 was reduced by $39.0 million, $25.0 million, and $9.8 million, respectively,
related to interest capitalization on major strategic capital projects.
In prior years, we entered into receive fixed, pay floating interest rate swap contracts
related to our $300 million, 8.375% 10-year Notes due in 2011 (2011 Notes), which were later
settled, resulting in a gain. The settlement gain is being amortized into income as an offset to
interest expense over the remaining life of the 2011 Notes. Interest expense decreased by $1.3
million in 2009, $2.0 million in 2008, and $1.8 million in 2007 due to these previously settled
interest rate swap agreements.
In June 2009, we completed the issuance of $350 million of new 9.375% 10-year Senior Notes and
a tender offer for our existing 2011 Notes. As a result of the tender offer, in June 2009 we
retired $183.3 million of the 2011 Notes, which resulted in a special charge for debt
extinguishment of $9.2 million pre-tax, or $5.5 million after-tax, in the second quarter 2009.
Other Expenses, Net of Gains on Asset Sales
Other expenses, net of gains on asset sales, includes charges incurred in connection with closed
operations, pretax gains and losses on the sale of surplus real estate, non-strategic investments
and other assets, and other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented primarily in
selling and administrative expenses, and in other income in the consolidated statements of income
and resulted in net charges of $13.8 million in 2009, $8.5 million in 2008 and $10.2 million in
2007. Other expenses for 2009, 2008 and 2007 primarily related to legal costs associated with
closed operations.
Retirement Benefit Expense
Retirement benefit expense, which includes pension and postretirement medical benefits, increased
in 2009 after declining from 2004 through 2008. The increase in retirement benefit expense in 2009
was primarily due to lower returns on plan assets in 2008, which was partially offset by the
benefits of voluntary pension contributions made over the last several years. During the past six
years, we have made $765.2 million of voluntary pension contributions to our U.S. qualified defined
benefit pension plan, including $350 million in the second quarter of 2009. The decline in
retirement benefit expense from 2004 through 2008 primarily resulted from actual returns on plan
assets exceeding expected returns, and the positive benefits of voluntary pension contributions.
Retirement benefit expense
32
was $121.9 million for 2009, $8.4 million for 2008, and $30.3 million for 2007. Retirement benefit
expenses are included in both cost of sales and selling and administrative expenses. Retirement
benefit expense included in cost of sales and selling and administrative expenses for the years
ended 2009, 2008 and 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
85.4
|
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense
|
|
$
|
121.9
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense for 2010 is expected to decrease to approximately $90
million, a $31.9 million reduction from 2009. We expect pension expense to decline to approximately
$71.4 million, a decrease of $27.2 million compared to pension expense of $98.6 million in 2009.
This expected decrease is a result of the benefit of higher than expected returns on pension plan
assets in 2009 and the benefits resulting from our $350 million voluntary pension contribution made
in the second quarter 2009, partially offset by utilizing a lower discount rate to value the plans
obligations.
Income Taxes
Net income for 2009 included a provision for income taxes of $26.9 million, or 41.4% of income
before tax, for U.S. Federal, foreign and state income taxes. The 2009 provision for income taxes
included a non-recurring charge of $11.5 million recognized in the second quarter 2009 primarily
associated with the tax consequences of the June 2009 $350 million voluntary cash contribution to
our pension plan. Results of operations for 2008 included a provision for income taxes of $294.2
million, or 33.9% of income before tax. The results for 2008 benefited from a $11.9 million
favorable adjustment of prior years taxes. Results of operations for 2007 included a provision for
income taxes of $400.2 million, or 34.9% of income before tax. The results for 2007 benefited from
a $23.1 million reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance with respect to certain state tax
credits expected to be realized in future periods.
Deferred taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense for
financial and income tax reporting purposes, and differences between the fair value of assets
acquired in business combinations accounted for as purchases for financial reporting purposes and
their corresponding tax bases. Deferred income taxes represent future tax benefits or costs to be
recognized when those temporary differences reverse. At December 31, 2009, we had a net deferred
tax asset of $39.4 million. A significant portion of our deferred tax assets relates to retirement
benefit obligations, which have been recorded in the accompanying financial statements but which
are not recognized for income tax reporting purposes until the benefits are paid. These benefit
payments are expected to occur over an extended period of years.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings under
existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including a substantial
expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years. We did not borrow funds under our
domestic senior unsecured credit facility during 2009, 2008, or 2007. However, as of December 31,
2009 approximately $10 million of this facility was utilized to support letters of credit.
If we needed to obtain additional financing using the credit markets, the cost and the terms
and conditions of such borrowings may be influenced by our credit rating. As of December 31, 2009,
Moodys Investor Services senior unsecured debt rating for our Company was Baa3 with a stable
ratings outlook. As of December 31, 2009, Standard & Poors Ratings Services corporate credit and
senior unsecured debt rating for our Company was BBB- with a stable ratings outlook. Changes in
our credit rating do not impact our access to, or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
Cash flow from operations for 2009 was $218.5 million, which includes a reduction in managed
working capital of $350.5 million due to lower business activity and raw material costs, partially
offset by a voluntary net cash pension contribution of $241.5 million ($350 million contribution
less $108.5 million U.S. Federal income tax refund). Excluding the voluntary net cash pension
contribution, cash flow from operations was $460 million for 2009. During 2009 we invested $454.3
in capital expenditures, including approximately $39 million for the acquisition of a specialty
powder metals business. Cash provided by financing activities was $474.1 million in 2009 due to
receipt of $734.4 million of net proceeds from the second quarter 2009 debt issuances, partially
offset by debt retirements of $188.8 million and dividend payments of $70.6 million. At December
31, 2009, cash and cash equivalents on hand totaled $708.8 million, an increase of $238.9 million
from year end 2008.
33
In 2008, cash generated by operations of $784.5 million was used to invest $515.7 million in
capital expenditures, repurchase $278.3 million of the Companys common stock, pay dividends of
$71.4 million, and fund a $30 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. qualified defined
benefit pension plan, decreasing our cash balance $153.4 million, to $469.9 million at December 31,
2008. In 2007, cash generated by operations of $809.8 million and the proceeds from the exercises
of stock options of $5.5 million were used to invest $457.1 million in capital expenditures and
purchases of businesses, fund a $100 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. qualified
defined benefit pension plan, purchase $61.2 million of the Companys common stock, pay dividends
of $58.1 million, repay debt of $23.9 million, and increase cash balances by $121.0 million to
$623.3 million at December 31, 2007.
We use cash flow from operations before voluntary pension plan contributions in order to
evaluate and compare fiscal periods that do not include these contributions, and to make resource
allocation decisions among operational requirements, investing and financing alternatives.
Managed Working Capital
As part of managing the liquidity of the business, we focus on controlling inventory, accounts
receivable and accounts payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working
capital, we exclude the effects of the LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete
inventory reserves, and reserves for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature,
are managed separately. We also measure managed working capital as a percentage of the prior two
months annualized sales to evaluate our performance based on recent levels of business volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
03
|
|
04
|
|
05
|
|
06
|
|
07
|
|
08
|
|
09
|
|
Millions/$
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
% of Annualized
Revenue
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
29.5
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
In 2009, managed working capital, which we define as gross inventory plus gross accounts
receivable less accounts payable, decreased by $350.5 million due to lower business activity and
decreased costs for certain raw materials. The decline in managed
34
working capital was a source of cash in 2009, as gross inventory declined $184.0 million,
accounts receivable declined $137.8 million, and accounts payable increased $28.7 million. Managed
working capital was also a source of $214.8 million of cash in 2008 due to declining business
levels, primarily in the fourth quarter 2008, and lower raw material costs. During 2008, gross
inventory declined $203.5 million and accounts receivable declined $124.9 million, which was
partially offset by an accounts payable decrease of $82.0 million. In 2007, the favorable impact
of improved operating results on cash flow from operations was offset by continuing investment in
managed working capital of $44.3 million to support the higher business levels and the effect of
higher costs for certain raw materials. Managed working capital has increased approximately $485
million over the past six years. Increases in managed working capital are expected to represent a
future source of cash if the level of business activity declines. Managed working capital as a
percent of annualized sales was 34.5% at the end of 2009, compared to 35.2% at the end of 2008, and
32.2% at the end of 2007. Managed working capital as a percentage of sales has increased from
historical levels due to a continuing shift in mix to more value added products, primarily in the
High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products business segments, which have a longer
manufacturing process. Days sales outstanding, which measures actual collection timing for accounts
receivable, increased slightly in 2009 compared to 2008 primarily as a result of increased
international sales which have longer delivery schedules. Gross inventory turns, which excludes the
effect of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, declined across all of our business segments due to
significantly lower business activity.
The Components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
392.0
|
|
|
$
|
530.5
|
|
|
$
|
652.2
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
825.5
|
|
|
|
887.6
|
|
|
|
916.1
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(308.6
|
)
|
|
|
(278.5
|
)
|
|
|
(388.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
908.9
|
|
|
|
1,139.6
|
|
|
|
1,179.9
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
102.8
|
|
|
|
205.6
|
|
|
|
374.6
|
|
|
Corporate and other
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
60.2
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital
|
|
$
|
1,061.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,411.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,626.5
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior 2 months sales
|
|
$
|
3,076.4
|
|
|
$
|
4,008.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,058.5
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a % of annualized sales
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
|
|
35.2
|
%
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures, including the acquisition of businesses, for 2009 were $454.3 million,
compared to $515.7 million in 2008, and $447.4 million in 2007. Over the past five years, we have
generated $2.2 billion in cash provided by operating activities and invested $1.8 billion in
capital projects and for the acquisition of businesses. At the end of 2009, capital expenditures
over the past five years represented 55% of total property, plant and equipment before accumulated
depreciation. This percentage is a significant indicator of the modern nature of the Companys
productive capacity.
We have significantly expanded and continue to expand our manufacturing capabilities to meet
current and expected demand growth from the aerospace (engine and airframe) and defense, oil and
gas, chemical process industry, electrical energy, and medical markets, especially for titanium and
titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, specialty alloys, and exotic alloys.
These self-funded capital investments include:
|
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production capabilities.
Titanium sponge is an important raw material used to produce our titanium mill products.
Our greenfield premium-grade titanium sponge (jet engine rotating parts) facility in Rowley,
UT commenced initial production in December 2009. We plan to ramp production at this
facility during 2010 in a systematic manner to consistently provide the best quality and
cost competitive product. When this Utah sponge facility is fully operational, our total
annual sponge production capacity including our Albany, OR standard grade titanium sponge
facility is projected to be approximately 46 million pounds. These secure supply sources
are intended to reduce our purchased titanium sponge and purchased titanium scrap
requirements. In addition, the Utah facility will have the infrastructure in place to
further expand annual capacity by approximately 18 million pounds, bringing the total annual
capacity at that facility to 42 million pounds, if needed. At the end of July 2009, we
temporarily idled our Albany, OR titanium sponge facility to adjust production and inventory
levels to current market demand for titanium and titanium-based products.
|
35
|
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs mill products processing and finishing capabilities for titanium
and titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys.
Projects include a $260 million expansion of our titanium and superalloy forging capacity at
our Bakers, NC facility through the addition of an integrated 10,000 ton press forge, 700mm
radial forge, and conditioning, finishing and inspection facilities to produce large
diameter products needed for certain demanding applications. The conditioning, finishing
and inspection facilities commenced operations in the third quarter 2008, and the forging
equipment began operations in the third quarter 2009. Forging is a hot-forming process that
produces wrought forging billet and forged machining bar from an ingot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility at our existing
Brackenridge, PA site. The project is estimated to cost approximately $1.16 billion and take
at least four years to complete. Engineering, permitting and site preparation are nearly
completed for the facility. Our new advanced hot-rolling and processing facility is designed
to be the most powerful mill in the world for production of specialty metals. It is designed
to produce exceptional quality, thinner, and wider hot-rolled coils at reduced cost with
shorter lead times, and require lower working capital requirements. When completed, we
believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility will provide
unsurpassed manufacturing capability and versatility in the production of a wide range of
flat-rolled specialty metals. We expect improved productivity, lower costs, and higher
quality for our diversified product mix of flat-rolled specialty metals, including
nickel-based and specialty alloys, titanium and titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision
Rolled Strip
®
products, and stainless sheet and coiled plate products. It is designed to
roll and process exceptional quality hot bands of up to 78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility,
we are consolidating our Natrona, PA grain-oriented electrical steel melt shop into ATIs
Brackenridge, PA melt shop. This consolidation is expected to improve the overall
productivity of ATIs flat-rolled grain-oriented electrical steel and other stainless and
specialty alloys, and reduce the cost of producing slabs and ingots. The investment should
also result in significant reduction of particulate emissions. We expect to realize
considerable cost savings from this project beginning in second half of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products through capital expansions
of zirconium sponge production and VAR melting. This new zirconium sponge and melting
capacity better positions ATI for the current and expected strong growth in demand from the
nuclear energy and chemical process industry markets. We believe that ATI is now the worlds
largest producer of critical reactor grade zirconium sponge for the nuclear energy market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our STAL joint venture commenced an expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China in
late 2006. This expansion nearly tripled STALs rolling and slitting capacity to produce
Precision Rolled Strip
®
products at a cost of approximately $103 million. The additional
slitting capacity commenced operations in June 2009, and the remainder of the facility was
completed in the second half of 2009. STAL is now much better positioned to benefit from
Chinas electronics and telecommunications manufacturing market for cell phones and
smartphones, as well as Chinas rapidly growing automotive parts manufacturing market. We
believe STAL is the largest producer of these thin strip products in China and that our new
facility gives us a significant competitive advantage in this growing market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On October 23, 2009, we acquired the assets of Crucible Compaction Metals and Crucible
Research, a western Pennsylvania producer of advanced powder metal products, for
approximately $39 million. This acquisition, which has been named ATI Powder Metals,
expands our specialty metals product portfolio. Powder metals are used in the production of
complex alloy chemistries, typically when conventional processes can not be used. Powder
metals represent a growth opportunity for ATI as more powder metals are used in the
aerospace industry for the latest generation of jet engines and for the production of
near-net-shape parts. Additional markets for these powder metals products include oil and
gas, electrical energy, and medical.
|
We currently expect that our projected 2010 capital expenditures will be approximately $375
million, and we expect capital spending to remain in this range for the next few years as we
complete these strategic projects.
Debt
Total debt outstanding increased by $561.3 million, to $1,071.1 million at December 31, 2009, from
$509.8 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in debt was primarily due to new debt issuances,
net of debt retirements, discussed below.
Convertible Notes
In June 2009, we issued and sold $402.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 4.25%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (the Convertible Notes). Interest is payable semi-annually on
June 1 and December 1 of each year. Net proceeds of $390.2 million from the sale of the
Convertible Notes were used to make a $350 million voluntary cash contribution to our U.S. defined
benefit pension plan, and the balance was used for general corporate purposes including funding of
contributions to trusts established to fund retiree
36
medical benefits. The Convertible Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the
Company and rank equally with all of its existing and future senior unsecured debt. The
underwriting fees and other third-party expenses for the issuance of the Convertible Notes were
$12.3 million and will be amortized to interest expense over the 5-year term of the Convertible
Notes.
We do not have the right to redeem the Convertible Notes prior to the stated maturity date.
Holders of the Convertible Notes have the option to convert their notes into shares of ATI common
stock at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately
preceding the stated maturity date (June 1, 2014). The initial conversion rate for the Convertible
Notes is 23.9263 shares of ATI common stock per $1,000 (in whole dollars) principal amount of notes
(9,630,336 shares), equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $41.795 per share, subject to
adjustment, as defined in the Convertible Notes. Other than receiving cash in lieu of fractional
shares, holders do not have the option to receive cash instead of shares of common stock upon
conversion. Accrued and unpaid interest that exists upon conversion of a note will be deemed paid
by the delivery of shares of ATI common stock and no cash payment or additional shares will be
given to holders.
If the Company undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the Convertible Notes, holders
may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their notes at a price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest up to, but
excluding, the repurchase date. Such a repurchase will be made in cash.
2019 Notes
In June 2009, we issued $350 million aggregate principal amount of 9.375% unsecured Senior
Notes with a maturity of June 2019 (the 2019 Notes). Interest is payable semi-annually on June 1
and December 1 of each year. Net proceeds of $344.2 million from the sale of the 2019 Notes were
used to retire $183.3 million of the Companys 2011 Notes, as discussed below, and for general
corporate purposes. The underwriting fees, discount and other third-party expenses for the
issuance of the 2019 Notes were $5.8 million and will be amortized to interest expense over the
10-year term of the 2019 Notes. The 2019 Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of the
Company and rank equally with all of its existing and future senior unsecured debt. The 2019 Notes
restrict our ability to create certain liens, to enter into sale leaseback transactions, and to
consolidate, merge or transfer all, or substantially all, of our assets. We have the option to
redeem the 2019 Notes, as a whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, on at least 30
days, but not more than 60 days, prior notice to the holders of the Notes at a redemption price
specified in the 2019 Notes. The 2019 Notes are subject to repurchase upon the occurrence of a
change in control repurchase event (as defined in the 2019 Notes) at a repurchase price in cash
equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes repurchased, plus any accrued and
unpaid interest on the 2019 Notes repurchased.
Retirement of 2011 Notes
In June 2009, we completed a tender offer for our 8.375% Notes due in 2011 (the 2011 Notes)
of which $300 million in aggregate principal amount was outstanding prior to the tender offer. As a
result of the tender offer, we retired $183.3 million of the 2011 Notes and recognized a pre-tax
charge of $9.2 million in the 2009 second quarter for the costs of acquiring the 2011 Notes. As of
December 31, 2009, $116.7 million in face value of the 2011 Notes remain outstanding.
Debt Ratios and Other
In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net debt to
total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be available to
reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. At year-end 2009, our net debt to total
capitalization was 15.3%, compared to 2.0% at December 31, 2008, and a negative 4.5% at December
31, 2007. At December 31, 2007, our cash on hand exceeded our total debt. Total debt to total
capitalization was 34.7% at December 31, 2009 compared to 20.7% at December 31, 2008, and 19.2% at
December 31, 2007.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,071.1
|
|
|
$
|
509.8
|
|
|
Less: Cash
|
|
|
(708.8
|
)
|
|
|
(469.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
Net debt
|
|
$
|
362.3
|
|
|
$
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt
|
|
$
|
362.3
|
|
|
$
|
39.9
|
|
|
Total ATI stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,012.2
|
|
|
|
1,957.4
|
|
|
|
|
Net ATI capital
|
|
$
|
2,374.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,997.3
|
|
|
Net debt to ATI capital
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,071.1
|
|
|
$
|
509.8
|
|
|
Total ATI stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,012.2
|
|
|
|
1,957.4
|
|
|
|
|
Total ATI capital
|
|
$
|
3,083.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,467.2
|
|
|
Total debt to ATI capital
|
|
|
34.7
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
In May 2009, we amended our $400 million senior unsecured domestic bank group credit agreement
which extends through July 31, 2012 to redefine the two financial covenants to provide additional
financial flexibility. The amendment restated the definition of consolidated earnings before
interest and taxes, and consolidated earnings before income, taxes, depreciation and amortization
as used in the interest coverage and leverage ratios to exclude any non-cash pension expense or
income and restates the definition of consolidated indebtedness used in the leverage ratio, which
previously was based on gross indebtedness, to be net of cash on hand in excess of $50 million. As
of December 31, 2009, there had been no borrowings made under the facility, although approximately
$10 million of the facility was used to support letters of credit. The unsecured facility requires
us to maintain a leverage ratio (consolidated total indebtedness divided by consolidated earnings
before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization) of not greater than 3.25, and maintain an
interest coverage ratio (consolidated earnings before interest and taxes divided by interest
expense) of not less than 2.0. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, our leverage ratio
was 1.47, and our interest coverage ratio was 7.91.
The Company has an additional separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of December 31, 2009, $29 million in letters of credit were outstanding under this facility.
STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60% interest, has a revolving
credit facility with a group of banks which extends though early August 2012. Under the credit
facility, STAL may borrow up to 205 million renminbi (approximately $30 million at December 2009
exchange rates) at an interest rate equal to 90% of the applicable lending rate published by the
Peoples Bank of China. The credit facility is supported solely by STALs financial capability
without any guarantees from the joint venture partners, and is intended to be utilized in the
future for the expansion of STALs operations, which are located in Shanghai, China. The credit
facility requires STAL to maintain a minimum level of shareholders equity, and certain financial
ratios. As of December 31, 2009, there had been no borrowings made under this credit facility.
STAL had approximately $4 million in letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2009.
These letters of credit are supported solely by STALs financial capability without any guarantees
from the joint venture partners.
Interest rate swap contracts have been used from time-to-time to manage our exposure to
interest rate risks. At December 31, 2009, we have no interest rate swap contracts in place. We
have deferred gains on settled receive fixed, pay floating interest rate swap contracts
associated with our outstanding 2011 Notes. These gains on settlement, which occurred in 2004 and
2003, remain a component of the reported balance of the 2011 Notes, and are ratably recognized as a
reduction to interest expense over the remaining life of the Notes, which is approximately two
years. At December 31, 2009, the deferred settlement gain was $1.8 million. The result of the
receive fixed, pay floating arrangements was a decrease in interest expense of $1.3 million, $2.0
million, and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively,
compared to the fixed interest expense of the 2011 Notes.
A summary of required payments under financial instruments (excluding accrued interest) and
other commitments are presented below.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
1-3
|
|
4-5
|
|
After 5
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Total
|
|
1 year
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
years
|
|
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt including Capital Leases
|
|
$
|
1,069.9
|
|
|
$
|
33.5
|
|
|
$
|
129.0
|
|
|
$
|
404.7
|
|
|
$
|
502.7
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
Other Long-term Liabilities (A)
|
|
|
119.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.5
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
|
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw Materials (B)
|
|
|
885.2
|
|
|
|
308.6
|
|
|
|
173.1
|
|
|
|
170.9
|
|
|
|
232.6
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (C)
|
|
|
82.6
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,267.0
|
|
|
$
|
419.0
|
|
|
$
|
407.6
|
|
|
$
|
620.2
|
|
|
$
|
820.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of Credit (D)
|
|
$
|
503.8
|
|
|
$
|
69.1
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
430.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Guarantees
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
|
Other long-term liabilities exclude pension liabilities and accrued postretirement
benefits.
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
|
We have contracted for physical delivery for certain of our raw materials to meet a
portion of our needs. These contracts are based upon fixed or variable price provisions. We used
current market prices as of December 31, 2009, for raw material obligations with variable pricing.
|
|
|
|
(C)
|
|
We have various contractual obligations that extend through 2015 for services involving
production facilities and administrative operations. Our purchase obligation as disclosed
represents the estimated termination fees payable if we were to exit these contracts.
|
|
|
|
(D)
|
|
Drawn amounts were $26.3 million at December 31, 2009 under foreign credit agreements, and
drawn amounts are included in total debt. Drawn amounts also include $10.3 million utilized under
the $400 million domestic senior unsecured credit facility for standby letters of credit, which
renew annually, and $28.8 million under a separate letter of credit facility. These letters of
credit are used to support: $30.0 million in workers compensation and general insurance
arrangements, and $9.1 million related to environmental, legal and other matters.
|
Retirement Benefits
At December 31, 2009, our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan was essentially fully funded.
The value of the liabilities of the qualified defined benefit pension plan exceeded pension plan
investments as of the end of 2009, by $9 million, or approximately 0.4%. We have not been required
to make cash contributions to this defined benefit pension plan since 1995. However, during the
past six years, we have made $765.2 million in voluntary cash and stock contributions to this plan
to improve the plans funded position. These voluntary contributions were comprised of cash
contributions of $350 million in 2009, $30 million in 2008, and $100 million during each of 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively, plus $50 million during 2004. Additionally in the fourth quarter of
2008, we contributed 1.5 million shares of ATI common stock, valued at $35.2 million, to the
pension plan. Based on current regulations and actuarial studies, we do not expect to be required
to make cash contributions to our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan for 2010. However, we
may elect, depending upon investment performance of the pension plan assets and other factors, to
make additional voluntary cash contributions to this pension plan in the future.
We fund certain retiree health care benefits for Allegheny Ludlum using investments held in a
Company-administered Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) trust. This allows us to recover
a portion of the retiree medical costs. In accordance with our labor agreements, during 2009, 2008,
and 2007, we funded $13.8 million, $34.3 million, and $30.8 million, respectively, of retiree
medical costs using the investments of this VEBA trust. We may continue to fund certain retiree
medical benefits utilizing the investments held in this VEBA. The value of the investments held in
this VEBA was approximately $17 million as of December 31, 2009.
Dividends
We paid a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock for each quarter of 2009 and 2008.
The payment of dividends and the amount of such dividends depends upon matters deemed relevant by
our Board of Directors, such as our results of operations,
39
financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects, any limitations imposed by law, credit
agreements or senior securities, and other factors deemed relevant and appropriate.
Critical Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with United
States generally accepted accounting principles. When more than one accounting principle, or the
method of its application, is generally accepted, management selects the principle or method that
is appropriate in our specific circumstances. Application of these accounting principles requires
our management to make estimates about the future resolution of existing uncertainties; as a
result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In preparing these financial statements,
management has made its best estimates and judgments of the amounts and disclosures included in the
financial statements giving due regard to materiality.
Inventories
At December 31, 2009, we had net inventory of $825.5 million. Inventories are stated at the lower
of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or market,
less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing
and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued utilizing the
LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using average cost or FIFO
methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw materials and
production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even though these
material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due to the length
of time of our production cycle. The prices for many of the raw materials we use have been
extremely volatile during the past four years. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the
LIFO inventory costing methodology, a rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our
operating results, while, conversely, a fall in material costs results in a benefit to operating
results. For example, in 2009, 2008 and 2007, the effect of falling raw material costs on our LIFO
inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $102.8 million, $169.0 million and
$92.1 million, respectively, lower than would have been recognized had we utilized the FIFO
methodology to value our inventory. However, in 2006 the effect of increases in raw material costs
on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in cost of sales which were $197.0 million higher
than would have been recognized if we utilized the FIFO methodology to value our inventory. In a
period of rising prices, cost of sales expense recognized under LIFO is generally higher than the
cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold. Conversely, in a period of declining raw
material prices, cost of sales recognized under LIFO is generally lower than cash costs incurred to
acquire the inventory sold.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be comparable
to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to the
differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory valuation
methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as an
expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At December 31, 2009, no
significant reserves were required. It is our general policy to write-down to scrap value any
inventory that is identified as obsolete and any inventory that has aged or has not moved in more
than twelve months. In some instances this criterion is up to twenty-four months due to the longer
manufacturing and distribution process for such products.
Asset Impairment
We monitor the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets. An impairment charge
is recognized when the expected net undiscounted future cash flows from an assets use (including
any proceeds from disposition) are less than the assets carrying value, and the assets carrying
value exceeds its fair value. Changes in the expected use of a long-lived asset group, and the
financial performance of the long-lived asset group and its operating segment, are evaluated as
indicators of possible impairment. Future cash flow value may include appraisals for property,
plant and equipment, land and improvements, future cash flow estimates from operating the
long-lived assets, and other operating considerations. There were no significant charges for
impairment of long-lived assets in the periods presented.
Retirement Benefits
We have defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans covering substantially all of our
employees. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, benefit expenses recognized in
financial statements for defined benefit pension plans are determined on an actuarial basis, rather
than as contributions are made to the plan. A significant element in determining our pension
(expense) income in accordance with the accounting standards is the expected investment return on
plan assets. In establishing the expected return on plan investments, which is reviewed annually in
the fourth quarter, we take into consideration input from our third party pension plan asset
managers and actuaries regarding the types of securities the plan assets are invested in, how those
investments have performed historically, and expectations for how those investments will perform in
the future. Our expected long-term return on pension plan investments has been 8.75% for each of
the past five years. We apply this assumed rate to the market value of plan assets
40
at the end of the previous year. This produces the expected return on plan assets that is included
in annual pension (expense) income for the current year. The actual return on pension plan assets
for 2009 was 16.4%. For 2008, actual investment results were a negative 25.3%, reversing a trend of
positive returns of 10.9% for 2007, 18.2% for 2006, 9.7% for 2005, and 11.7% for 2004. Based upon
our strategic allocation of pension assets across the various investments asset classes, our
expected long-term return on pension plan investments for 2010 remains at 8.75%. The effect of
increasing, or lowering, the expected return on pension plan investments by 0.25% results in
additional pretax annual income, or expense, of approximately $5.4 million. The cumulative
difference between this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred and
amortized into pension income or expense over future periods. The amount of expected return on plan
assets can vary significantly from year-to-year since the calculation is dependent on the market
value of plan assets as of the end of the preceding year. U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles allow companies to calculate the expected return on pension assets using either an
average of fair market values of pension assets over a period not to exceed five years, which
reduces the volatility in reported pension income or expense, or their fair market value at the end
of the previous year. However, the Securities and Exchange Commission currently does not permit
companies to change from the fair market value at the end of the previous year methodology, which
is the methodology that we use, to an averaging of fair market values of plan assets methodology.
As a result, our results of operations and those of other companies, including companies with which
we compete, may not be comparable due to these different methodologies in calculating the expected
return on pension investments.
In accordance with accounting standards, we determine the discount rate used to value pension
plan liabilities as of the last day of each year. The discount rate reflects the current rate at
which the pension liabilities could be effectively settled. In estimating this rate, we receive
input from our actuaries regarding the rates of return on high quality, fixed-income investments
with maturities matched to the expected future retirement benefit payments. Based on this
assessment at the end of December 2009, we established a discount rate of 6.2% for valuing the
pension liabilities as of the end of 2009, and for determining the pension expense for 2010. We had
previously assumed a discount rate of 6.85% at the end of 2008 and 6.25% for the end of 2007. The
estimated effect of changing the discount rate by 0.50%, would decrease pension liabilities in the
case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase pension liabilities in the case of a decrease
in the discount rate by approximately $100 million. Such a change in the discount rate would
decrease pension expense in the case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase pension
expense in the case of a decrease in the discount rate by approximately $8 million. The effect on
pension liabilities for changes to the discount rate, as well as the net effect of other changes in
actuarial assumptions and experience, are deferred and amortized over future periods in accordance
with the accounting standards.
As discussed above, gains and losses due to differences between actual and expected results
for investment returns on plan assets, and changes in the discount rate used to value benefit
obligations are deferred and recognized in the income statement over future periods. However for
balance sheet presentation, these gains and losses are included in the determination of benefit
obligations, net of plan assets, included on the year-end statement of financial position. At
December 31, 2009, the Company had $996 million of losses, primarily related to negative investment
returns on plan assets in 2008, which have been recognized on the 2009 year-end balance sheet
through a reduction in stockholders equity which will be recognized in the income statement
through expense amortizations over future years.
We also sponsor several postretirement plans covering certain hourly and salaried employees
and retirees. These plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible employees.
Under most of the plans, our contributions towards premiums are capped based upon the cost as of
certain dates, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans,
we maintain the right to amend or terminate the plans in the future. In accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting standards, postretirement expenses recognized in financial statements
associated with defined benefit plans are determined on an actuarial basis, rather than as benefits
are paid. We use actuarial assumptions, including the discount rate and the expected trend in
health care costs, to estimate the costs and benefit obligations for these plans. The discount
rate, which is determined annually at the end of each year, is developed based upon rates of return
on high quality, fixed-income investments. At the end of 2009, we determined the rate to be 6.2%,
compared to a 6.85% discount rate in 2008, and a 6.25% discount rate in 2007. The estimated effect
of changing the discount rate by 0.50%, would decrease postretirement obligations in the case of an
increase in the discount rate, or increase postretirement obligations in the case of a decrease in
the discount rate by approximately $17 million. Such a change in the discount rate would decrease
postretirement benefit expense in the case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase
postretirement benefit expense in the case of a decrease in the discount rate by approximately $0.5
million. Based upon predictions of continued significant medical cost inflation in future years,
the annual assumed rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered benefits of health care plans
is 9.92% in 2010 and is assumed to gradually decrease to 5.0% in the year 2028 and remain level
thereafter.
Certain of these postretirement benefits are funded using plan investments held in a
Company-administered VEBA trust. The expected return on plan investments is a significant element
in determining postretirement benefits expenses in accordance with accounting standards. In
establishing the expected return on plan investments, which is reviewed annually in the fourth
quarter, we take into consideration the types of securities the plan assets are invested in, how
those investments have performed historically, and expectations for how those investments will
perform in the future. For 2009, our expected return on investments held in the VEBA trust was
8.3%. This assumed long-term rate of return on investments is applied to the market value of plan
assets at the end of the previous year. This produces the expected return on plan investments that
is included in annual postretirement benefits expenses for the current year. The actual return on
investments held in the VEBA trust was a negative 15.9% in 2009 and a negative 9.5% in 2008
41
due primarily to losses on private equity investments. These investments losses during the
past two years reversed a trend of positive returns of 16.9% in 2007, 50.0% in 2006, and 11.6% in
both 2005 and 2004. Our expected return on investments in the VEBA trust is 8.3% for 2010. The
expected return on investments held in the VEBA trust is expected to be lower than the return on
pension plan investments due to the mix of assets held by the VEBA trust and the expected reduction
of VEBA trust assets due to benefit payments.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
As required, in the first quarter 2009, we adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) to consolidation accounting and reporting. These changes, among others,
required that noncontrolling interests, formerly termed minority interests, be considered a
component of equity for all periods presented. Noncontrolling interests were previously classified
within other long-term liabilities. In addition, the practice of reporting minority interest
expense or benefit changed. The income statement presentation has been revised to separately
present consolidated net income, which now includes the amounts attributable to ATI plus
noncontrolling interests (minority interests), and net income attributable solely to ATI, for all
periods presented. Absent a change in control, increases and decreases in the noncontrolling
ownership interest amount are accounted for as equity transactions. As a result of adopting this
accounting change, the balance sheet and the income statement have been recast retrospectively for
the presentation of noncontrolling interest in our STAL joint venture.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted changes issued by the FASB for fair value measurements as they
relate to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. These changes define fair value,
establish a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, and expand disclosures about fair value measurements. The fair value changes
apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to
be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. The adoption of this change, as it relates to
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, had no impact on the financial statements. The
provisions will be applied at such time a fair value measurement of a nonfinancial asset or
nonfinancial liability is required, which may result in a fair value that is materially different
than would have been calculated prior to the adoption of these changes in the definition and
measurement of fair value.
Forward-Looking Statements
From time-to-time, the Company has made and may continue to make forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in
this report relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates,
believes, estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast,
outlook, projects, and similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are based on
managements current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which the Company is unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual
results or performance to materially differ from any future results or performance expressed or
implied by such statements. Various of these factors are described in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and will be described from time-to-time in the Company filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the Companys Annual Reports on Form 10-K
and the Companys subsequent reports filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, which are
available on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and on the Companys website at
http://www.atimetals.com. We assume no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative financial instruments, from
time to time, to hedge our exposure to changes in raw material prices, foreign currencies, and
interest rates. We monitor the third-party financial institutions which are our counterparty to
these financial instruments on a daily basis and diversify our transactions among counterparties to
minimize exposure to any one of these entities. Fair values for derivatives were measured using
exchange-traded prices for the hedged items including consideration of counterparty risk and the
Companys credit risk.
Interest Rate Risk.
We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At December 31, 2009, we had approximately $42
million of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately
1.5%. Approximately $20 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate.
Since the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest,
we are exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest expense in
situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a hypothetical 1% increase in the
rate of interest on the $22 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not subjected to a cap
would result in increased annual financing costs of approximately $0.2 million.
Volatility of Energy Prices.
Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, have
and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the
42
extent that these uncertainties cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased
energy prices may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We
use approximately 8 to 10 million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon business
conditions, in the manufacture of our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us to risk of
higher gas prices. For example, a hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of natural gas
would result in increased annual energy costs of approximately $8 to $10 million. We use several
approaches to minimize any material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations from volatile energy prices. These approaches include incorporating an energy surcharge
on many of our products and using financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy price
volatility.
At December 31, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to
natural gas cost volatility represented approximately 50% of our forecasted requirements through
2011. The net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges at December 31, 2009 was an
unrealized pre-tax loss of $17.1 million, of which $10.2 million was presented in accrued
liabilities, $7.5 million was presented in other long-term liabilities, $0.3 million was presented
in other current assets, and $0.3 million was presented in other assets on the balance sheet. The
effects of the hedging activity will be recognized in income over the designated hedge periods.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the effects of natural gas hedging activity increased cost of
sales by $15.1 million.
Volatility of Raw Material Prices.
We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2009 we used approximately 60 million pounds of nickel; therefore a hypothetical change of $1.00
per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of approximately $60 million. In
addition, in 2009 we also used approximately 600 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the production
of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per pound would result in increased
costs of approximately $6 million. While we enter into raw materials futures contracts from
time-to-time to hedge exposure to price fluctuations, such as for nickel, we cannot be certain that
our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that we have adequate controls to
monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess exposure to price volatility
in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of December 31, 2009, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements primarily at
the request of our customers related to firm orders, for approximately 10% of our estimated total
annual nickel requirements in 2010. A minor amount of nickel hedges extend into 2012. Any gain or
loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included in the cost of sales. At December 31,
2009, the net mark-to-market valuation of our outstanding raw material hedges was an unrealized
pre-tax gain of $15.4 million, comprised of $14.9 million included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $0.5 million in other long-term assets on the balance sheet.
Foreign Currency Risk.
Foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit
transactional exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We sometimes purchase foreign
currency forward contracts that permit us to sell specified amounts of foreign currencies expected
to be received from our export sales for pre-established U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates.
The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign currencies in which export sales are
denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows of a portion
of the forecasted future export sales transactions which otherwise would expose the Company to
foreign currency risk. At December 31, 2009, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge
our exposure to foreign currency, primarily euros, represented approximately 5% of our forecasted
total international sales through 2011. At December 31, 2009, the net mark-to-market valuation of
the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was an unrealized pre-tax gain of $7.4 million,
of which $3.8 million is included in other current assets and $3.6 million in other long-term
assets on the balance sheet. In addition, we may also designate cash balances held in foreign
currencies as hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions.
43
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
consolidated equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Allegheny Technologies Incorporated at December
31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
As described in Note 9 to the financial statements, the Company changed its measurement date for
pensions and other postretirement benefits in 2008. As described in Note 12 to the financial
statements, the Company changed its accounting for income tax uncertainties in 2007.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), Allegheny Technologies Incorporateds internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 25, 2010
44
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
3,054.9
|
|
|
$
|
5,309.7
|
|
|
$
|
5,452.5
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,646.5
|
|
|
|
4,157.8
|
|
|
|
4,003.1
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expenses
|
|
|
315.7
|
|
|
|
282.7
|
|
|
|
296.7
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, other income and income taxes
|
|
|
92.7
|
|
|
|
869.2
|
|
|
|
1,152.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
Debt extinguishment costs
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
867.7
|
|
|
|
1,154.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
294.2
|
|
|
|
400.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
573.5
|
|
|
|
753.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ATI
|
|
$
|
31.7
|
|
|
$
|
565.9
|
|
|
$
|
747.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income attributable to ATI per common share
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
7.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income attributable to ATI per common share
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
5.67
|
|
|
$
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
45
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
708.8
|
|
|
$
|
469.9
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
392.0
|
|
|
|
530.5
|
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
825.5
|
|
|
|
887.6
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
71.3
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
1,997.6
|
|
|
|
1,929.4
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,907.9
|
|
|
|
1,633.6
|
|
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired
|
|
|
207.8
|
|
|
|
190.9
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
63.1
|
|
|
|
281.6
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
169.6
|
|
|
|
134.9
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
4,346.0
|
|
|
$
|
4,170.4
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
308.6
|
|
|
$
|
278.5
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
258.8
|
|
|
|
322.0
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
78.2
|
|
|
Short term debt and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
624.6
|
|
|
|
693.9
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,037.6
|
|
|
|
494.6
|
|
|
Accrued postretirement benefits
|
|
|
424.3
|
|
|
|
446.9
|
|
|
Pension liabilities
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
378.2
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
119.3
|
|
|
|
127.8
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
2,256.4
|
|
|
|
2,141.4
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.10: authorized-
50,000,000 shares; issued-none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10: authorized-500,000,000
shares; issued-102,404,256 shares at December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008; outstanding- 98,070,474 shares at
December 31, 2009 and 97,330,969 shares at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
653.6
|
|
|
|
651.8
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,230.5
|
|
|
|
2,286.7
|
|
|
Treasury stock: 4,333,782 shares at December 31, 2009 and
5,073,287 shares at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(208.6
|
)
|
|
|
(244.8
|
)
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(673.5
|
)
|
|
|
(746.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total ATI Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
2,012.2
|
|
|
|
1,957.4
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
71.6
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
2,089.6
|
|
|
|
2,029.0
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
4,346.0
|
|
|
$
|
4,170.4
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
46
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
38.0
|
|
|
$
|
573.5
|
|
|
$
|
753.9
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
132.6
|
|
|
|
118.8
|
|
|
|
102.9
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
123.6
|
|
|
|
129.0
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefits (a)
|
|
|
(280.6
|
)
|
|
|
(52.9
|
)
|
|
|
(102.4
|
)
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
141.4
|
|
|
|
121.7
|
|
|
|
(41.3
|
)
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
67.8
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
(117.4
|
)
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
(109.9
|
)
|
|
|
33.3
|
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
(26.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
(47.4
|
)
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
218.5
|
|
|
|
754.5
|
|
|
|
701.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(415.4
|
)
|
|
|
(515.7
|
)
|
|
|
(447.4
|
)
|
|
Purchases of businesses and investments in ventures
|
|
|
(38.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
Asset disposals and other
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(453.7
|
)
|
|
|
(513.9
|
)
|
|
|
(451.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt
|
|
|
752.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(194.6
|
)
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
|
(15.3
|
)
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under credit facilities
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(8.6
|
)
|
|
Debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(70.6
|
)
|
|
|
(71.4
|
)
|
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|
Shares repurchased for income tax withholding on share-based
compensation
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(15.8
|
)
|
|
|
(50.1
|
)
|
|
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercises of stock options
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
Taxes on share-based compensation
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(278.3
|
)
|
|
|
(61.2
|
)
|
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
474.1
|
|
|
|
(394.0
|
)
|
|
|
(128.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
238.9
|
|
|
|
(153.4
|
)
|
|
|
121.0
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
469.9
|
|
|
|
623.3
|
|
|
|
502.3
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
708.8
|
|
|
$
|
469.9
|
|
|
$
|
623.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Includes annual voluntary cash contributions of $(350) million in 2009, $(30) million in 2008 and $(100) million in 2007.
|
Amounts presented on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows may not agree to the corresponding changes in balance sheet items due to the
accounting for purchases and sales of businesses and the effects of foreign currency translation.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
47
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and Subsidiaries
Statements of Changes in Consolidated Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATI Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
637.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,166.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(311.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
37.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,540.4
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747.1
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
753.9
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
plans and other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
Change in unrealized gains on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.0
|
|
|
$
|
821.1
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
832.1
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61.2
|
)
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.57 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58.1
|
)
|
|
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
Employee stock plans
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
56.7
|
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
$
|
693.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,830.7
|
|
|
$
|
(75.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(237.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,279.2
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565.9
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
573.5
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
plans and other postretirement benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(426.1
|
)
|
|
|
(426.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(426.1
|
)
|
|
|