Item
1. Business.
Who
We Are
We
are a
diversified property/casualty insurance group that serves businesses and
individuals in specialty and niche markets. We offer standard commercial
insurance, specialty commercial insurance and personal insurance in selected
market subcategories that are characteristically low-severity and short-tailed
risks. We focus on marketing, distributing, underwriting and servicing
property/casualty insurance products that require specialized underwriting
expertise or market knowledge. We believe this approach provides us the best
opportunity to achieve favorable policy terms and pricing. The insurance
policies we produce are written by our three insurance company subsidiaries
as
well as unaffiliated insurers.
We
market, distribute, underwrite and service our property/casualty insurance
products through four operating units, each of which has a specific focus.
Our
HGA Operating Unit primarily handles standard commercial insurance, our TGA
Operating Unit concentrates on excess and surplus lines commercial insurance,
our Aerospace Operating Unit specializes in general aviation insurance and
our
Phoenix Operating Unit focuses on non-standard personal automobile insurance.
The subsidiaries comprising our TGA Operating Unit and our Aerospace Operating
Unit were acquired effective January 1, 2006.
Each
operating unit has its own management team with significant experience in
distributing products to its target markets and proven success in achieving
underwriting profitability and providing efficient claims management. Each
operating unit is responsible for marketing, distribution, underwriting and
claims management while we provide capital management, reinsurance, actuarial,
investment, financial reporting, technology and legal services and back office
support at the parent level. We believe this approach optimizes our operating
results by allowing us to effectively penetrate our selected specialty and
niche
markets while maintaining operational controls, managing risks, controlling
overhead and efficiently allocating our capital across operating
units.
We
expect
future growth to be derived from increased retention of the premiums we write,
organic growth in the premium production of our existing operating units and
selected, opportunistic acquisitions that meet our criteria. In 2005, we
increased the capital of our insurance company subsidiaries, enabling them
to
retain significantly more of the business produced by our operating units.
For
the year ended December 31, 2007, approximately 80% of the total premium we
produced was retained by our insurance company subsidiaries, while the remaining
20% was written for or ceded to unaffiliated insurers. We expect to continue
to
increase our retention of the total premium we produce. We believe increasing
our overall retention will drive greater near-term profitability than focusing
solely on growth in premium production and market share.
What
We Do
We
market
standard commercial, specialty commercial and personal property/casualty
insurance products which are tailored to the risks and coverages required by
the
insured. We believe that most of our target markets are underserved by larger
property/casualty underwriters because of the specialized nature of the
underwriting required. We are able to offer these products profitably as a
result of the expertise of our experienced underwriters. We also believe our
long-standing relationships with independent general agencies and retail agents
and the service we provide differentiate us from larger property/casualty
underwriters.
Our
HGA
Operating Unit primarily underwrites low-severity, short-tailed commercial
property/casualty insurance products in the standard market. These products
have
historically produced stable loss results and include general liability,
commercial automobile, commercial property and umbrella coverages. Our HGA
Operating Unit currently markets its products through a network of approximately
200 independent agents primarily serving businesses in the non-urban areas
of
Texas, New Mexico, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and Washington.
Our
TGA
Operating Unit primarily offers commercial property/casualty insurance products
in the excess and surplus lines market. Excess and surplus lines insurance
provides coverage for difficult to place risks that do not fit the underwriting
criteria of insurers operating in the standard market. Our TGA Operating Unit
focuses on small- to medium-sized commercial businesses that do not meet the
underwriting requirements of standard insurers due to factors such as loss
history, number of years in business, minimum premium size and types of business
operation. Our TGA Operating Unit primarily writes general liability, commercial
automobile and commercial property policies. Our TGA Operating Unit markets
its
products through 39 independent general agencies with offices in Texas,
Louisiana, Oklahoma and Arkansas, as well as approximately 730 independent
retail agents in Texas.
Our
Aerospace Operating Unit offers general aviation property/casualty insurance
primarily for private and small commercial aircraft and airports. The aircraft
liability and hull insurance products underwritten by our Aerospace Operating
Unit are targeted to transitional or non-standard pilots who may have difficulty
obtaining insurance from a standard carrier. Airport liability insurance is
marketed to smaller, regional airports. Our Aerospace Operating Unit markets
these general aviation insurance products through approximately 200 independent
specialty brokers in 47 states.
Our
Phoenix Operating Unit offers non-standard personal automobile policies which
generally provide the minimum limits of liability coverage mandated by state
law
to drivers who find it difficult to obtain insurance from standard carriers
due
to various factors including age, driving record, claims history or limited
financial resources. Our Phoenix Operating Unit markets this non-standard
personal automobile insurance through approximately 1,640 independent retail
agents in 11 states.
Our
insurance company subsidiaries are American Hallmark Insurance Company of Texas
(“AHIC”), Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Company (“PIIC”) and Hallmark Specialty
Insurance Company (“HSIC”) (formerly known as Gulf States Insurance Company).
Effective January 1, 2006, our insurance company subsidiaries entered into
a
pooling arrangement, which was subsequently amended on December 15, 2006,
pursuant to which AHIC would retain 46.0% of the net premiums written, PIIC
would retain 34.1% of the net premiums written and HSIC would retain 19.9%
of
the net premiums written. As of June 5, 2006, A.M. Best Company (“A.M.
Best”),
a
nationally recognized insurance industry rating service and publisher,
pooled
its ratings of our three insurance company subsidiaries and assigned a financial
strength rating of “A-” (Excellent) and an issuer credit rating of “a-” to each
of our individual insurance company subsidiaries and to the pool formed by
our
insurance company subsidiaries.
Our
four
operating units are segregated into three reportable industry segments for
financial accounting purposes. The Standard Commercial Segment presently
consists solely of the HGA Operating Unit and the Personal Segment presently
consists solely of our Phoenix Operating Unit. The Specialty Commercial Segment
includes both our TGA Operating Unit and our Aerospace Operating Unit. The
following table displays the gross premiums produced by these reportable
segments for affiliated and unaffiliated insurers for the years ended December
31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, as well as the gross premiums written and net premiums
written by our insurance subsidiaries for these reportable segments for the
same
periods.
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
Gross
Premiums Produced:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
|
$
|
90,985
|
|
$
|
91,679
|
|
$
|
81,721
|
|
|
Specialty
Commercial Segment (1)
|
|
|
151,003
|
|
|
156,490
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Personal
Segment
|
|
|
55,916
|
|
|
45,135
|
|
|
36,345
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
297,904
|
|
$
|
293,304
|
|
$
|
118,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Premiums Written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
|
$
|
90,868
|
|
$
|
91,070
|
|
$
|
52,952
|
|
|
Specialty
Commercial Segment (1)
|
|
|
102,688
|
|
|
77,740
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Personal
Segment
|
|
|
55,916
|
|
|
45,135
|
|
|
36,515
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
249,472
|
|
$
|
213,945
|
|
$
|
89,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Premiums Written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
|
$
|
84,222
|
|
$
|
82,220
|
|
$
|
51,249
|
|
|
Specialty
Commercial Segment (1)
|
|
|
98,005
|
|
|
75,573
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Personal
Segment
|
|
|
55,916
|
|
|
45,135
|
|
|
37,003
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
238,143
|
|
$
|
202,928
|
|
$
|
88,252
|
|
|
1
|
The
subsidiaries included in the Specialty Commercial Segment were acquired
effective January 1, 2006 and, therefore, are not included in the
year
ended December 31, 2005.
|
Operational
Structure
Our
insurance company subsidiaries retain a portion of the premiums produced by
our
operating units. The following chart reflects the operational structure of
our
organization, the subsidiaries comprising our operating units and the operating
units included in each reportable segment as of December 31, 2007.
Standard
Commercial Segment / HGA Operating Unit
The
Standard Commercial Segment of our business presently consists solely of our
HGA
Operating Unit. Our HGA Operating Unit markets, underwrites and services
standard commercial lines insurance primarily in the non-urban areas of Texas,
New Mexico, Idaho, Oregon, Montana and Washington. The subsidiaries comprising
our HGA Operating Unit include American Hallmark Insurance Services, a regional
managing general agency, and ECM, a claims administration company. American
Hallmark Insurance Services targets customers that are in low-severity
classifications in the standard commercial market, which as a group have
relatively stable loss results. The typical customer is a small- to medium-sized
business with a policy that covers property, general liability and automobile
exposures. Our HGA Operating Unit underwriting criteria exclude lines of
business and classes of risks that are considered to be high-severity or
volatile, or which involve significant latent injury potential or other
long-tailed liability exposures. ECM administers the claims on the insurance
policies produced by American Hallmark Insurance Services. Products offered
by
our HGA Operating Unit include the following:
|
|
·
|
Commercial
automobile.
Commercial
automobile insurance
provides
third-party bodily injury and property damage coverage and first-party
property damage coverage against losses resulting from the ownership,
maintenance or use of automobiles and trucks in connection with an
insured’s business.
|
|
|
·
|
General
liability.
General
liability insurance provides coverage for third-party bodily injury
and
property damage claims arising from accidents occurring on the insured’s
premises or from their general business
operations.
|
|
|
·
|
Umbrella.
Umbrella
insurance provides coverage for third-party liability claims where
the
loss amount exceeds coverage limits provided by the insured’s underlying
general liability and commercial automobile
policies.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial
property.
Commercial
property insurance provides first-party coverage for the insured’s real
property, business personal property, and business interruption losses
caused by fire, wind, hail, water damage, theft, vandalism and other
insured perils.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial
multi-peril.
Commercial
multi-peril insurance provides a combination of property and liability
coverage that can include commercial automobile coverage on a single
policy.
|
|
|
·
|
Business
owner’s.
Business
owner’s insurance
provides
a package of coverage designed for small- to medium-sized businesses
with
homogeneous risk profiles. Coverage includes general liability, commercial
property and commercial automobile.
|
Our
HGA
Operating Unit markets its property/casualty insurance products through
approximately 200 independent agencies operating in its target markets. Our
HGA
Operating Unit applies a strict agent selection process and seeks to provide
its
independent agents some degree of non-contractual geographic exclusivity. Our
HGA Operating Unit also strives to provide its independent agents with
convenient access to product information and personalized service. As a result,
the Standard Commercial Segment has historically maintained excellent
relationships with its producing agents, as evidenced by the 19-year average
tenure of the 24 agency groups which each produced more than $1.0 million in
premium during the year ended December 31, 2007. During 2007, the top ten agency
groups produced approximately 39%, and no individual agency group produced
more
than 8%, of the total premium volume of our HGA Operating Unit.
Our
HGA
Operating Unit writes most risks on a package basis using a commercial
multi-peril policy or a business owner’s policy. Umbrella policies are written
only when our HGA Operating Unit also writes the insured’s underlying general
liability and commercial automobile coverage. Through December 31, 2005, our
HGA
Operating Unit marketed policies on behalf of Clarendon National Insurance
Company (“Clarendon”), a third-party insurer. Our HGA Operating Unit earns a
commission based on a percentage of the earned premium it produced for
Clarendon. The commission percentage is determined by the underwriting results
of the policies produced. ECM receives a claim servicing fee based on a
percentage of the earned premium produced, with a portion deferred for casualty
claims. On July 1, 2005, our HGA Operating Unit began marketing new policies
for
AHIC and presently markets all new and renewal policies exclusively for
AHIC.
All
of
the commercial policies written by our HGA Operating Unit are for a term of
12
months. If the insured is unable or unwilling to pay for the entire premium
in
advance, we provide an installment payment plan that allows the insured to
pay
20% down and the remaining payments over eight months. We charge a flat $7.50
installment fee per payment for the installment payment plan.
Specialty
Commercial Segment
The
Specialty Commercial Segment of our business includes both our TGA Operating
Unit and our Aerospace Operating Unit. All of the subsidiaries comprising our
TGA Operating Unit and our Aerospace Operating Unit were acquired effective
January 1, 2006. Our TGA Operating Unit and our Aerospace Operating Unit were
reported as separate segments during the first three quarters of 2006, but
were
aggregated into a single segment commencing in the fourth quarter of 2006 in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). During
2007, our TGA Operating Unit accounted for approximately 80% of the aggregate
premiums produced by the Specialty Commercial Segment, with the remaining 20%
coming from our Aerospace Operating Unit.
TGA
Operating Unit.
Our TGA
Operating Unit markets, underwrites, finances and services commercial lines
insurance in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma with a particular emphasis
on commercial automobile, general liability and commercial property risks
produced on an excess and surplus lines basis. Excess and surplus lines
insurance provides coverage for difficult to place risks that do not fit the
underwriting criteria of insurers operating in the standard market. Our TGA
Operating Unit also markets, underwrites and services certain non-strategic
legacy personal lines insurance products in Texas, including dwelling fire,
homeowners and non-standard personal automobile coverages. During 2007, our
TGA
Operating Unit completed the transition of new and renewal business for
non-standard personal automobile coverages to our Phoenix Operating Unit. The
subsidiaries comprising our TGA Operating Unit include Texas General Agency,
which is a regional managing general agency, TGASRI, which brokers mobile home
insurance, and PAAC, which provides premium financing for policies marketed
by
Texas General Agency and certain unaffiliated general and retail agents. Texas
General Agency accounts for approximately 95% of the premium volume financed
by
PAAC.
Our
TGA
Operating Unit focuses on small- to medium-sized commercial businesses that
do
not meet the underwriting requirements of traditional standard insurers due
to
issues such as loss history, number of years in business, minimum premium size
and types of business operation. During 2007, commercial automobile, general
liability and commercial property insurance accounted for approximately 97%
of
the premiums produced by our TGA Operating Unit, with the remaining 3% coming
from legacy personal lines products. Target risks for commercial automobile
insurance are small- to medium-sized businesses with ten or fewer vehicles
which
include artisan contractors, local light- to medium-service vehicles and retail
delivery vehicles. Target risks for general liability insurance are small
business risk exposures including artisan contractors, sales and service
organizations, and building and premiums exposures. Target risks for commercial
property insurance are low- to mid-value structures including office buildings,
mercantile shops, restaurants and rental dwellings, in each case with aggregate
property limits of less than $500 thousand. The commercial insurance products
offered by our TGA Operating Unit include the following:
|
|
|
Commercial
automobile.
Commercial
automobile insurance provides third-party bodily injury and property
damage coverage and first-party property damage coverage against
losses
resulting from the ownership, maintenance or use of automobiles and
trucks
in connection with an insured’s
business.
|
|
|
·
|
General
liability.
General
liability insurance provides coverage for third-party bodily injury
and
property damage claims arising from accidents occurring on the insured’s
premises or from their general business
operations.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial
property.
Commercial
property insurance
provides
first-party coverage for the insured’s real property, business personal
property, theft and business interruption losses caused by fire,
wind,
hail, water damage, theft, vandalism and other insured perils. Windstorm,
hurricane and hail are generally excluded in coastal
areas.
|
Our
TGA
Operating Unit produces business through a network of 39 general agents with
57
offices in four states, as well as through approximately 730 retail agents
in
Texas. Our TGA Operating Unit strives to simplify the placement of its excess
and surplus lines policies by providing prompt quotes and signature-ready
applications to its independent agents. During 2007, general agents accounted
for approximately 79% of total premiums produced by our TGA Operating Unit,
with
the remaining 21% being produced by retail agents. During 2007, the top ten
general agents produced approximately 47%, and no general agent produced more
than 10%, of the total premium volume of our TGA Operating Unit. During the
same
period, the top ten retail agents produced approximately 4%, and no retail
agent
produced more than 1%, of the total premium volume of our TGA Operating Unit.
All
business of our TGA Operating Unit is currently produced under a fronting
agreement with member companies of the Republic Group (“Republic”) which grants
our TGA Operating Unit the authority to develop underwriting programs, set
rates, appoint retail and general agents, underwrite risks, issue policies
and
adjust and pay claims. During 2006 and 2007, AHIC assumed 50% and 60%,
respectively, of the premium written under this fronting agreement pursuant
to a
reinsurance agreement with Republic which expires on December 31, 2008. AHIC
may
assume a maximum of 70% of the written premium produced in 2008. Commission
revenue is also generated under the fronting agreement on the portion of
premiums not assumed by AHIC. An additional commission may be earned if certain
loss ratio targets are met. Additional revenue is generated from fully earned
policy fees and installment billing fees charged on the legacy personal lines
products.
The
majority of the commercial policies written by our TGA Operating Unit are for
a
term of 12 months. Exceptions include a few commercial automobile policies
that
are written for a term that coincides with the annual harvest of crops and
special event general liability policies that are written for the term of the
event, which is generally one to two days. Commercial lines policies are paid
in
full up front or financed with various premium finance companies, including
PAAC.
Aerospace
Operating Unit.
Our
Aerospace Operating Unit markets, underwrites and services general aviation
property/casualty insurance in 47 states. The subsidiaries comprising our
Aerospace Operating Unit include Aerospace Insurance Managers, which markets
standard aviation coverages, ASRI, which markets excess and surplus lines
aviation coverages, and ACMG, which handles claims management. Aerospace
Insurance Managers is one of only a few similar entities in the U.S. and has
focused on developing a well-defined niche centering on transitional pilots,
older aircraft and small airports and aviation-related businesses. Products
offered by our Aerospace Operating Unit include the following:
|
|
|
Aircraft.
Aircraft
insurance provides third-party bodily injury and property damage
coverage
and first-party hull damage coverage against losses resulting from
the
ownership, maintenance or use of
aircraft.
|
|
|
|
Airport
liability.
Airport
liability insurance provides coverage for third-party bodily injury
and
property damage claims arising from accidents occurring on airport
premises or from their operations.
|
Our
Aerospace Operating Unit generates its business through approximately 200
aviation specialty brokers. These specialty brokers submit to Aerospace
Insurance Managers requests for aviation insurance quotations received from
the
states in which we operate and our Aerospace Operating Unit selectively
determine the risks fitting its target niche for which it will prepare a quote.
During 2007, the top ten independent specialty brokers produced approximately
31%, and no broker produced more than 6%, of the total premium volume of our
Aerospace Operating Unit.
Our
Aerospace Operating Unit independently develops, underwrites and prices each
coverage written. We target pilots who may lack experience in the type of
aircraft they have acquired or are transitioning between types of aircraft.
We
also target pilots who may be over the age limits of other insurers. We do
not
accept aircraft that are used for hazardous purposes such as crop dusting or
heli-skiing. Liability limits are controlled, with approximately 93% of the
aircraft written in 2007 bearing per-occurrence limits of $1,000,000 and
per-passenger limits of $100,000 or less. The average insured aircraft hull
value for aircraft written in 2007 was approximately $141,000.
Prior
to
July 1, 2006, our Aerospace Operating Unit produced policies for American
National Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“ANPAC”) under a reinsurance
program which ceded 100% of the business to several reinsurers. Under this
arrangement, revenue was generated primarily from commissions based on written
premiums net of cancellations and endorsement return premiums. An additional
commission may be earned based upon the profitability of the business to the
reinsurers. Beginning July 1, 2006, we began issuing general aviation policies
through our insurance companies and currently 35 of the 47 states are written
through our insurance companies with the remaining 12 states written under
a
fronting arrangement with ANPAC and reinsured by AHIC.
Personal
Segment / Phoenix Operating Unit
The
Personal Segment of our business presently consists solely of our Phoenix
Operating Unit. Our Phoenix Operating Unit markets and services non-standard
personal automobile policies in Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas,
Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Louisiana, Missouri and Montana. We conduct this
business under the name Phoenix General Agency. Phoenix General Agency provides
management, policy and claims administration services to PIIC and includes
the
operations of American Hallmark General Agency, Inc. and Hallmark Claims
Services, Inc. Our non-standard personal automobile insurance generally provides
for the minimum limits of liability coverage mandated by state laws to drivers
who find it difficult to purchase automobile insurance from standard carriers
as
a result of various factors, including driving record, vehicle, age, claims
history, or limited financial resources. Products offered by our Phoenix
Operating Unit include the following:
|
|
|
Personal
automobile liability.
Personal
automobile liability insurance provides coverage primarily at the
minimum
limits required by law for automobile liability exposures, including
bodily injury and property damage, arising from accidents involving
the
insured.
|
|
|
|
Personal
automobile physical damage.
Personal
automobile physical damage insurance provides collision and comprehensive
coverage for physical damage exposure to the insured vehicle as a
result
of an accident with another vehicle or object or as a result of causes
other than collision such as vandalism, theft, wind, hail or water.
|
Our
Phoenix Operating Unit markets its non-standard personal automobile policies
through approximately 1,640 independent agents operating in its target
geographic markets. Subject to certain criteria, our Phoenix Operating Unit
seeks to maximize the number of agents appointed in each geographic area in
order to more effectively penetrate its highly competitive markets. However,
our
Phoenix Operating Unit periodically evaluates its independent agents and
discontinues the appointment of agents whose production history does not satisfy
certain standards. During 2007, the top ten independent agency groups produced
approximately 14%, and no individual agency group produced more than 3%, of
the
total premium volume of our Phoenix Operating Unit.
During
2007, personal automobile liability coverage accounted for approximately 75%
and
personal automobile physical damage coverage accounted for the remaining 25%
of
the total premiums produced by our Phoenix Operating Unit. Phoenix General
Agency currently offers one-, two-, three-, six- and twelve-month policies.
Our
typical non-standard personal automobile customer is unable or unwilling to
pay
a full or half year's premium in advance. Accordingly, we currently offer a
direct bill program where the premiums are directly billed to the insured on
a
monthly basis. We charge installment fees for each payment under
the direct bill program.
Our
Phoenix Operating Unit markets non-standard personal automobile policies in
Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, Louisiana,
Missouri, and Montana directly for PIIC. In Texas, our Phoenix Operating Unit
markets non-standard personal automobile policies both through reinsurance
arrangements with unaffiliated companies and, since the fourth quarter of 2005,
directly for PIIC. We provide non-standard personal automobile coverage in
Texas
through a reinsurance arrangement with Old American County Mutual Fire Insurance
Company (“OACM”). Phoenix General Agency holds a managing general agency
appointment from OACM to manage the sale and servicing of OACM policies. PIIC
reinsures 100% of the OACM policies produced by Phoenix General Agency under
these reinsurance arrangements.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We
believe that we enjoy the following competitive strengths:
·
Specialized
market knowledge and underwriting expertise.
All of
our operating units possess extensive knowledge of the specialty and niche
markets in which they operate, which we believe allows them to effectively
structure and market their property/casualty insurance products. Our Phoenix
Operating Unit has a thorough understanding of the unique characteristics of
the
non-standard personal automobile market. Our HGA Operating Unit has significant
underwriting experience in its target markets for standard commercial
property/casualty insurance products. In addition, our TGA Operating Unit and
Aerospace Operating Unit have developed specialized underwriting expertise
which
enhances their ability to profitably underwrite non-standard property/casualty
insurance coverages.
·
Tailored
market strategies.
Each of
our operating units has developed its own customized strategy for penetrating
the specialty or niche markets in which it operates. These strategies include
distinctive product structuring, marketing, distribution, underwriting and
servicing approaches by each operating unit. As a result, we are able to
structure our property/casualty insurance products to serve the unique risk
and
coverage needs of our insureds. We believe that these market-specific strategies
enable us to provide policies tailored to the target customer which are
appropriately priced and fit our risk profile.
·
Superior
agent and customer service.
We
believe that performing the underwriting, billing, customer service and claims
management functions at the operating unit level allows us to provide superior
service to both our independent agents and insured customers. The easy-to-use
interfaces and responsiveness of our operating units enhance their relationships
with the independent agents who sell our policies. We also believe that our
consistency in offering our insurance products through hard and soft markets
helps to build and maintain the loyalty of our independent agents. Our
customized products, flexible payment plans and prompt claims processing are
similarly beneficial to our insureds.
·
Market
diversification.
We
believe that operating in various specialty and niche segments of the
property/casualty insurance market diversifies both our revenues and our risks.
We also believe our operating units generally operate on different market
cycles, producing more earnings stability than if we focused entirely on one
product. As a result of the pooling arrangement among our insurance company
subsidiaries, we are able to allocate our capital among these various specialty
and niche markets in response to market conditions and expansion opportunities.
We believe that this market diversification reduces our risk profile and
enhances our profitability.
·
Experienced
management team.
Our
senior corporate management has an average of over 20 years of insurance
experience. In addition, our operating units have strong management teams,
with
an average of more than 25 years of insurance industry experience for the heads
of our operating units and an average of more than 15 years of underwriting
experience for our underwriters. Our management has significant experience
in
all aspects of property/casualty insurance, including underwriting, claims
management, actuarial analysis, reinsurance and regulatory compliance. In
addition, Hallmark’s senior management has a strong track record of acquiring
businesses that expand our product offerings and improve our profitability
profile.
Our
Strategy
We
are
striving to become a leading diversified property/casualty insurance group
offering products in specialty and niche markets through the following
strategies:
·
Focusing
on underwriting discipline and operational efficiency.
We seek
to consistently generate an underwriting profit on the business we write in
hard
and soft markets. Our operating units have a strong track record of underwriting
discipline and operational efficiency which we seek to continue. We believe
that
in soft markets our competitors often offer policies at a low or negative
underwriting profit in order to maintain or increase their premium volume and
market share. In contrast, we seek to write business based on its profitability
rather than focusing solely on premium production. To that end, we provide
financial incentives to many of our underwriters and independent agents based
on
underwriting profitability.
·
Increasing
the retention of business written by our operating units.
Our
operating units have a strong track record of writing profitable business in
their target markets. Historically, the majority of those premiums were retained
by unaffiliated insurers. During 2005, we increased the capital of our insurance
company subsidiaries which has enabled us to retain significantly more of the
premiums our operating units produce. We expect to continue to increase the
portion of our premium production retained by our insurance company
subsidiaries. We believe that the underwriting profit earned from this newly
retained business will drive our profitability growth in the
near-term.
·
Achieving
organic growth in our existing business lines.
We
believe that we can achieve organic growth in our existing business lines by
consistently providing our insurance products through market cycles, expanding
geographically, expanding our agency relationships and further penetrating
our
existing customer base. We believe that our extensive market knowledge and
strong agency relationships position us to compete effectively in our various
specialty and niche markets. We also believe there is a significant opportunity
to expand some of our existing business lines into new geographical areas and
through new agency relationships while maintaining our underwriting discipline
and operational efficiency. In addition, we believe there is an opportunity
for
some of our operating units to further penetrate their existing customer bases
with additional products offered by other operating units.
·
Pursuing
selected, opportunistic acquisitions.
We seek
to opportunistically acquire insurance organizations that operate in specialty
or niche property/casualty insurance markets that are complementary to our
existing operations. We seek to acquire companies with experienced management
teams, stable loss results and strong track records of underwriting
profitability and operational efficiency. Where appropriate, we intend to
ultimately retain profitable business produced by the acquired companies that
would otherwise be retained by unaffiliated insurers. Our management has
significant experience in evaluating potential acquisition targets, structuring
transactions to ensure continued success and integrating acquired companies
into
our operational structure.
Distribution
We
market
our property/casualty insurance products solely through independent general
agents, retail agents and specialty brokers. Therefore, our relationships with
independent agents and brokers are critical to our ability to identify, attract
and retain profitable business. Each of our operating units has developed its
own tailored approach to establishing and maintaining its relationships with
these independent distributors of our products. These strategies focus on
providing excellent service to our agents and brokers, maintaining a consistent
presence in our target niche and specialty markets through hard and soft market
cycles and fairly compensating the agents and brokers who market our products.
Our operating units also regularly evaluate independent general and retail
agents based on the underwriting profitability of the business they produce
and
their performance in relation to our objectives.
Except
for the products of our Aerospace Operating Unit, the distribution of
property/casualty insurance products by our business segments is geographically
concentrated. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, five states
accounted for approximately 79% of the gross premiums retained by our insurance
subsidiaries. The following table reflects the geographic distribution of our
insured risks, as represented by direct and assumed premiums written by our
business segments for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007.
|
State
|
|
Standard
Commercial Segment
|
|
Specialty
Commercial Segment
|
|
Personal
Segment
|
|
Total
|
|
Percent
of Total
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
$
|
22,870
|
|
$
|
70,346
|
|
$
|
15,839
|
|
$
|
109,055
|
|
|
43.7
|
%
|
|
Oregon
|
|
|
32,467
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
33,479
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
New
Mexico
|
|
|
14,623
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
9,091
|
|
|
24,095
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
14,062
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
16,282
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
12,824
|
|
|
13,978
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
All
other states
|
|
|
6,846
|
|
|
29,868
|
|
|
15,869
|
|
|
52,583
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
90,868
|
|
$
|
102,688
|
|
$
|
55,916
|
|
$
|
249,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
of total
|
|
|
36.4
|
%
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
The
underwriting process employed by our operating units involves securing an
adequate level of underwriting information, identifying and evaluating risk
exposures and then pricing the risks we choose to accept. Each of our operating
units offering commercial or aviation insurance products employs its own
underwriters with in-depth knowledge of the specific niche and specialty markets
targeted by that operating unit. We employ a disciplined underwriting approach
that seeks to provide policies appropriately tailored to the specified risks
and
to adopt pricing structures that will be supported in the applicable market.
Our
experienced commercial and aviation underwriters have developed underwriting
principles and processes appropriate to the coverages offered by their
respective operating units.
We
believe that managing the underwriting process through our operating units
capitalizes on the knowledge and expertise of their personnel in specific
markets and results in better underwriting decisions. All of our underwriters
have established limits of underwriting authority based on their level of
experience. We also provide financial incentives to many of our underwriters
based on underwriting profitability.
To
better
diversify our revenue sources and manage our risk, we seek to maintain an
appropriate business mix among our operating units. At the beginning of each
year, we establish a target net loss ratio for each operating unit. We then
monitor the actual net loss ratio on a monthly basis. If any line of business
fails to meet its target net loss ratio, we seek input from our underwriting,
actuarial and claims management personnel to develop a corrective action plan.
Depending on the particular circumstances, that plan may involve tightening
underwriting guidelines, increasing rates, modifying product structure,
re-evaluating independent agency relationships or discontinuing unprofitable
coverages or classes of risk.
An
insurance company's underwriting performance is traditionally measured by its
statutory loss and loss adjustment expense ratio, its statutory expense ratio
and its statutory combined ratio. The statutory loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio, which is calculated as the ratio of net losses and loss adjustment
expenses incurred to net premiums earned, helps to assess the adequacy of the
insurer’s rates, the propriety of its underwriting guidelines and the
performance of its claims department. The statutory expense ratio, which is
calculated as the ratio of underwriting and operating expenses to net premiums
written, assists in measuring the insurer’s cost of processing and managing the
business. The statutory combined ratio, which is the sum of the statutory loss
and loss adjustment expense ratio and the statutory expense ratio, is indicative
of the overall profitability of an insurer’s underwriting activities, with a
combined ratio of less than 100% indicating profitable underwriting
results.
The
following table shows, for the periods indicated, (i) our gross premiums written
(in thousands); and (ii) our underwriting results as measured by the net
statutory loss and loss adjustment expense (“LAE”) ratio, the statutory expense
ratio, and the statutory combined ratio.
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Gross
premiums written
|
|
$
|
249,472
|
|
$
|
213,945
|
|
$
|
89,467
|
|
|
Statutory
loss & LAE ratio
|
|
|
61.7
|
%
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
60.3
|
%
|
|
Statutory
expense ratio
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
Statutory
combined ratio
|
|
|
91.8
|
%
|
|
90.9
|
%
|
|
93.1
|
%
|
Our
HSIC
insurance company subsidiary was acquired effective January 1, 2006 and,
therefore, is not included in the statutory ratios for 2005. These statutory
ratios do not reflect the deferral of policy acquisition costs, investment
income, premium finance revenues, or the elimination of inter-company
transactions required by GAAP.
The
premium-to-surplus percentage measures the relationship between net premiums
written in a given period (premiums written, less returned premiums and
reinsurance ceded to other carriers) to policyholders surplus (admitted assets
less liabilities), determined on the basis of statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by insurance regulatory authorities. Insurance companies
are expected to maintain a premium-to-surplus percentage of not more than 300%.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, our consolidated
premium-to-surplus ratios were 151%, 151%, 81%, respectively. The increase
in
premium-to-surplus percentage in 2006 reflects additional retention of premiums
produced by the Standard Commercial Segment and Specialty Commercial Segment,
as
well as increased premiums written in the Personal Segment.
Claims
Management and Administration
We
believe that effective claims management is critical to our success and that
our
claims management process is cost-effective, delivers the appropriate level
of
claims service and produces superior claims results. Our claims management
philosophy emphasizes the delivery of courteous, prompt and effective claims
handling and embraces responsiveness to policyholders and agents. Our claims
strategy focuses on thorough investigation, timely evaluation and fair
settlement of covered claims while consistently maintaining appropriate case
reserves. We seek to compress the cycle time of claim resolution in order to
control both loss and claim handling cost. We also strive to control legal
expenses by negotiating competitive rates with defense counsel and vendors,
establishing litigation budgets and monitoring invoices.
Each
of
our operating units uses its own staff of specialized claims personnel to manage
and administer claims arising under policies produced through their respective
operations. The claims process is managed through a combination of experienced
claims managers, seasoned claims supervisors, trained staff adjusters and
independent adjustment or appraisal services, when appropriate. All adjusters
are licensed in those jurisdictions for which they handle claims that require
licensing. Limits on settlement authority are established for each claims
supervisor and staff adjuster based on their level of experience. Independent
adjusters have no claim settlement authority. Claim exposures are periodically
and systematically reviewed by claim supervisors and managers as a method of
quality and loss control. Large loss exposures are reviewed at least quarterly
with senior management of the operating unit and monitored by Hallmark senior
management.
Claims
personnel receive in-house training and are required to attend various
continuing education courses pertaining to topics such as best practices, fraud
awareness, legal environment, legislative changes and litigation management.
Depending on the criteria of each operating unit, our claims adjusters are
assigned a variety of claims to enhance their knowledge and ensure their
continued development in efficiently handling claims. As of December 31, 2007,
our operating units had a total of 49 claims managers, supervisors and adjusters
with an average of approximately 19 years experience.
Analysis
of Losses and LAE
Our
consolidated financial statements include an estimated reserve for unpaid losses
and loss adjustment expenses. We estimate our reserve for unpaid losses and
loss
adjustment expenses by using case-basis evaluations and statistical projections,
which include inferences from both losses paid and losses incurred. We also
use
recent historical cost data and periodic reviews of underwriting standards
and
claims management practices to modify the statistical projections. We give
consideration to the impact of inflation in determining our loss reserves,
but
do not discount reserve balances.
The
amount of reserves represents our estimate of the ultimate net cost of all
unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred. These estimates are subject
to the effect of trends in claim severity and frequency. We regularly review
the
estimates and adjust them as claims experience develops and new information
becomes known. Such adjustments are included in current operations, including
increases and decreases, net of reinsurance, in the estimate of ultimate
liabilities for insured events of prior years.
Changes
in loss development patterns and claim payments can significantly affect the
ability of insurers to estimate reserves for unpaid losses and related expenses.
We seek to continually improve our loss estimation process by refining our
ability to analyze loss development patterns, claim payments and other
information within a legal and regulatory environment which affects development
of ultimate liabilities. Future changes in estimates of claim costs may
adversely affect future period operating results. However, such effects cannot
be reasonably estimated currently.
Reconciliation
of reserve for unpaid losses and LAE
.
The
following table provides a reconciliation of our beginning and ending reserve
balances on a net-of-reinsurance basis for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, to the gross-of-reinsurance amounts reported in our balance
sheets at December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
As
of and for Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
Reserve
for unpaid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance recoverables, January
1
|
|
$
|
72,801
|
|
$
|
25,997
|
|
$
|
17,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
of subsidiaries effective January 1
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
4,562
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for losses and LAE for claims occurring in the current
period
|
|
|
139,332
|
|
|
88,294
|
|
|
36,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in reserve for unpaid losses and LAE for claims occurring
in
prior periods
|
|
|
(6,414
|
)
|
|
(1,177
|
)
|
|
(2,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
for losses and LAE, net of reinsurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
period
|
|
|
(54,809
|
)
|
|
(28,154
|
)
|
|
(17,414
|
)
|
|
Prior
periods
|
|
|
(30,061
|
)
|
|
(16,721
|
)
|
|
(8,073
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve
for unpaid losses and LAE at December 31, net of reinsurance
recoverable
|
|
$
|
120,849
|
|
$
|
72,801
|
|
$
|
25,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
recoverable on unpaid losses and LAE at December 31
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve
for unpaid losses and LAE at December 31, gross of
reinsurance
|
|
$
|
125,338
|
|
$
|
77,564
|
|
$
|
26,321
|
|
The
$6.4
million, $1.2 million and $2.4 million favorable development in prior accident
years recognized in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, represent normal changes
in our loss reserve estimates attributable to favorable loss development in
each
of our segments. The loss reserve estimates for prior years were decreased
to
reflect this favorable loss development when the available information indicated
a reasonable likelihood that the ultimate losses would be less than the previous
estimates.
SAP/GAAP
reserve reconciliation.
The
differences between the reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
reported in our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with
GAAP and those reported in our annual statements filed with the Texas Department
of Insurance, the Arizona Department of Insurance and the Oklahoma Insurance
Department in accordance with statutory accounting practices (“SAP”) as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below.
|
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Reserve
for unpaid losses and LAE on a SAP basis (net of reinsurance recoverables
on unpaid losses)
|
|
$
|
120,798
|
|
$
|
72,796
|
|
|
Loss
reserve discount from the PIIC acquisition
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
Unamortized
risk premium reserve discount from the PIIC acquisition
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Estimated
future unallocated LAE reserve for claim service subsidiaries
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Reserve
for unpaid losses and LAE on a GAAP basis (net of reinsurance recoverables
on unpaid losses)
|
|
$
|
120,849
|
|
$
|
72,801
|
|
Analysis
of loss and LAE reserve development.
The
following table shows the development of our loss reserves, net of reinsurance,
for years ended December 31, 1997 through 2007. Section A of the table shows
the
estimated liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of
reinsurance, recorded at the balance sheet date for each of the indicated years.
This liability represents the estimated amount of losses and loss adjustment
expenses for claims arising in prior years that are unpaid at the balance sheet
date, including losses that have been incurred but not yet reported to us.
Section B of the table shows the re-estimated amount of the previously recorded
liability, based on experience as of the end of each succeeding year. The
estimate is increased or decreased as more information becomes known about
the
frequency and severity of claims.
Cumulative
Redundancy/Deficiency (Section C of the table) represents the aggregate change
in the estimates over all prior years. Thus, changes in ultimate development
estimates are included in operations over a number of years, minimizing the
significance of such changes in any one year.
|
ANALYSIS
OF LOSS AND LAE DEVELOPMENT
|
|
As
of and for Year Ended December
31
|
|
|
|
|
1997
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
A.
Reserve for Unpaid Losses & LAE, Net of Reinsurance
Recoverables
|
|
$
|
4,668
|
|
$
|
4,580
|
|
$
|
5,409
|
|
$
|
7,451
|
|
$
|
7,919
|
|
$
|
8,411
|
|
$
|
21,197
|
|
$
|
17,700
|
|
$
|
25,997
|
|
$
|
72,801
|
|
$
|
120,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
Net Reserve Re-estimated as of :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
year later
|
|
|
4,985
|
|
|
4,594
|
|
|
5,506
|
|
|
7,974
|
|
|
8,096
|
|
|
8,875
|
|
|
20,003
|
|
|
15,300
|
|
|
24,820
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two
years later
|
|
|
4,954
|
|
|
4,464
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
|
7,863
|
|
|
8,620
|
|
|
8,881
|
|
|
19,065
|
|
|
15,473
|
|
|
24,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
years later
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
|
4,225
|
|
|
5,216
|
|
|
7,773
|
|
|
8,856
|
|
|
8,508
|
|
|
19,698
|
|
|
13,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four
years later
|
|
|
4,757
|
|
|
4,179
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
7,901
|
|
|
8,860
|
|
|
8,446
|
|
|
18,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five
years later
|
|
|
4,732
|
|
|
4,111
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
7,997
|
|
|
8,855
|
|
|
8,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
years later
|
|
|
4,687
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
5,153
|
|
|
7,999
|
|
|
8,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven
years later
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
5,153
|
|
|
8,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight
years later
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
5,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
years later
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten
years later
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Net Cumulative Redundancy (Deficiency)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
353
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
(965
|
)
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
2,646
|
|
|
3,738
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
6,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.
Cumulative Amount of Claims Paid, Net of Reinsurance Recoveries,
through:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
year later
|
|
|
3,326
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
5,377
|
|
|
5,691
|
|
|
5,845
|
|
|
12,217
|
|
|
8,073
|
|
|
16,721
|
|
|
30,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two
years later
|
|
|
4,287
|
|
|
3,476
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
7,070
|
|
|
7,905
|
|
|
7,663
|
|
|
15,814
|
|
|
12,004
|
|
|
22,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
years later
|
|
|
4,387
|
|
|
3,911
|
|
|
4,909
|
|
|
7,584
|
|
|
8,603
|
|
|
8,228
|
|
|
18,162
|
|
|
13,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four
years later
|
|
|
4,571
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
5,014
|
|
|
7,810
|
|
|
8,798
|
|
|
8,374
|
|
|
17,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five
years later
|
|
|
4,618
|
|
|
4,051
|
|
|
4,966
|
|
|
7,960
|
|
|
8,821
|
|
|
8,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
years later
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
|
5,116
|
|
|
7,970
|
|
|
8,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven
years later
|
|
|
4,664
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
5,124
|
|
|
7,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight
years later
|
|
|
4,675
|
|
|
4,203
|
|
|
5,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
years later
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten
years later
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net
Reserve, December 31
|
|
$
|
120,849
|
|
$
|
72,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
Recoverables
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
Gross
Reserve, December 31
|
|
$
|
125,338
|
|
$
|
77,564
|
|
|
Net
Re-estimated Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
|
Re-estimated
Reinsurance Recoverable
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,052
|
|
|
Gross
Re-estimated Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74,439
|
|
|
Gross
Cumulative Redundancy
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,125
|
|
Reinsurance
We
reinsure a portion of the risk we underwrite in order to control our exposure
to
losses and to protect our capital resources. We cede to reinsurers a portion
of
these risks and pay premiums based upon the risk and exposure of the policies
subject to such reinsurance. Ceded reinsurance involves credit risk and is
generally subject to aggregate loss limits. Although the reinsurer is liable
to
us to the extent of the reinsurance ceded, we are ultimately liable as the
direct insurer on all risks reinsured. Reinsurance recoverables are reported
after allowances for uncollectible amounts. We monitor the financial condition
of reinsurers on an ongoing basis and review our reinsurance arrangements
periodically. Reinsurers are selected based on their financial condition,
business practices and the price of their product offerings. Our reinsurance
facilities are subject to annual renewal.
The
following table presents our gross and net premiums written and earned and
reinsurance recoveries for each of the last three years.
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Gross
premiums written
|
|
$
|
249,472
|
|
$
|
213,945
|
|
$
|
89,467
|
|
|
Ceded
premiums written
|
|
|
(11,329
|
)
|
|
(11,017
|
)
|
|
(1,215
|
)
|
|
Net
premiums written
|
|
$
|
238,143
|
|
$
|
202,928
|
|
$
|
88,252
|
|
|
Gross
premiums earned
|
|
$
|
238,080
|
|
$
|
162,216
|
|
$
|
59,632
|
|
|
Ceded
premiums earned
|
|
|
(12,777
|
)
|
|
(10,155
|
)
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
Net
premiums earned
|
|
$
|
225,303
|
|
$
|
152,061
|
|
$
|
59,184
|
|
|
Reinsurance
recoveries
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
$
|
5,225
|
|
$
|
(492
|
)
|
Our
insurance company subsidiaries presently retain 100% of the risk associated
with
all non-standard personal automobile policies marketed by our Phoenix Operating
Unit. We currently reinsure the following exposures on business generated by
our
HGA Operating Unit, our TGA Operating Unit and our Aerospace Operating
Unit:
|
|
·
|
Property
catastrophe.
Our property catastrophe reinsurance reduces the financial impact
a
catastrophe could have on our commercial property insurance lines.
Catastrophes might include multiple claims and policyholders. Catastrophes
include hurricanes, windstorms, earthquakes, hailstorms, explosions,
severe winter weather and fires. Our property catastrophe reinsurance
is
excess-of-loss reinsurance, which provides us reinsurance coverage
for
losses in excess of an agreed-upon amount. We utilize catastrophe
models
to assist in determining appropriate retention and limits to purchase.
The
terms of our property catastrophe reinsurance, effective July 1,
2007,
are:
|
|
|
|
We
retain the first $2.0 million of property catastrophe losses;
and
|
|
|
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us 100% for each $1.00 of loss in excess of
our $2.0
million retention up to $28.0 million for each catastrophic occurrence,
subject to a maximum of two events for the contractual
term.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial
property.
Our commercial property reinsurance is excess-of-loss coverage intended
to
reduce the financial impact a single-event or catastrophic loss may
have
on our results. The terms of our commercial property reinsurance,
effective July 1, 2007, are:
|
|
|
|
We
retain the first $1.0 million of loss for each commercial property
risk;
|
|
|
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us for the next $5.0 million for each commercial
property risk; and
|
|
|
|
Individual
risk facultative reinsurance is purchased on any commercial property
with
limits above $6.0 million.
|
|
|
·
|
Commercial
casualty.
Our commercial casualty reinsurance is excess-of-loss coverage intended
to
reduce the financial impact a single-event loss may have on our results.
The terms of our commercial casualty reinsurance, effective July
1, 2007,
are:
|
|
|
|
We
retain the first $1.0 million of any commercial liability risk: and
|
|
|
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us for the next $5.0 million for each commercial
liability risk.
|
|
|
·
|
Aviation.
We
purchase reinsurance specific to the aviation risks underwritten
by our
Aerospace Operating Unit. This reinsurance provides aircraft hull
and
liability coverage and airport liability coverage on a per occurrence
basis on the following terms:
|
|
|
|
We
retain the first $350,000 of each aircraft hull or liability loss
or
airport liability loss;
|
|
|
|
Our
reinsurers reimburse us for the next $1.15 million of each aircraft
hull
loss and for the next $650,000 of each airport liability loss;
and
|
|
|
|
Our
reinsurers provide additional reimbursement of $4.0 million for each
airport liability loss and aircraft liability loss, excluding passenger
liability.
|
Investment
Portfolio
Our
investment objective is to maximize current yield while maintaining safety
of
capital together with sufficient liquidity for ongoing insurance operations.
Our
investment portfolio is composed of fixed-income and equity securities. As
of
December 31, 2007, we had total invested assets of $267.6 million. If market
rates were to increase by 1%, the fair value of our fixed-income securities
as
of December 31, 2007 would decrease by approximately $5.5 million. The following
table shows the fair values of various categories of fixed-income securities,
the percentage of the total fair value of our invested assets represented by
each category and the tax equivalent book yield based on fair value of each
category of invested assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2007
|
|
As
of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Percent
of
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Percent
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Total
|
|
Yield
|
|
Value
|
|
Total
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
50,096
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
40,483
|
|
|
25.6
|
%
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
Municipal
bonds
|
|
|
98,923
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
52,132
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
US
Treasury bonds
|
|
|
99,047
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
40,407
|
|
|
25.5
|
%
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
US
Treasury bills and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
short-term
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
25,275
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
Mortgage
backed securities
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
8
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
250,694
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
$
|
158,305
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
The
weighted average credit rating for our fixed-income portfolio, using ratings
assigned by Standard and Poor’s Rating Services (a division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.), was AA at December 31, 2007. The following table shows the
distribution of our fixed-income portfolio by Standard and Poor’s rating as a
percentage of total market value as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
As
of
|
|
As
of
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"AAA"
|
|
|
73.6
|
%
|
|
68.5
|
%
|
|
"AA"
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
"A"
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
"BBB"
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
"BB"
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
"B"
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
"CCC"
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
The
following table shows the composition of our fixed-income portfolio by remaining
time to maturity as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2007
|
|
As
of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of
|
|
|
|
Percentage
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
Remaining
time to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less
than one year
|
|
|
15,189
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
67,060
|
|
|
42.4
|
%
|
|
One
to five years
|
|
|
162,524
|
|
|
64.8
|
%
|
|
44,018
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
Five
to ten years
|
|
|
53,305
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
42,616
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
More
than ten years
|
|
|
19,673
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
4,603
|
|
|
2.9
|
|