41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43287

Registrant’s telephone number (614) 480-8300

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

There were 245,275,565 shares of Registrant’s without par value common stock outstanding on April 30, 2006.

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

INDEX

Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2006, December 31, 2005, and March 31, 2005			3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005			4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005			5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005			6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			7
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			26
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			83
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			83
Part II. Other Information
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			83
Item 6. Exhibits			83
Signatures			84
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

Part 1. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

		March 31,				December 31,				March 31,
(in thousands, except number of shares)		2006				2005				2005
		(Unaudited)								(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks		$	797,258			$	966,445			$	914,699
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements			349,098				74,331				144,980
Interest bearing deposits in banks			23,204				22,391				29,551
Trading account securities			111,208				8,619				100,135
Loans held for sale			311,138				294,344				252,932
Investment securities			5,034,359				4,526,520				4,052,875
Loans and leases
Commercial and industrial loans			6,940,649				6,809,208				6,064,019
Commercial real estate loans			4,877,382				4,036,171				4,526,510
Automobile loans			2,053,777				1,985,304				2,066,264
Automobile leases			2,154,883				2,289,015				2,476,098
Home equity loans			4,816,196				4,638,841				4,594,586
Residential mortgage loans			4,604,705				4,193,139				3,995,769
Other consumer loans			697,997				520,488				483,219
Total loans and leases			26,145,589				24,472,166				24,206,465
Allowance for loan and lease losses			(283,839	)			(268,347	)			(264,390	)
Net loans and leases			25,861,750				24,203,819				23,942,075
Operating lease assets			174,839				229,077				466,550
Bank owned life insurance			1,060,305				1,001,542				973,164
Premises and equipment			375,740				360,677				354,979
Goodwill			579,246				212,530				212,200
Other intangible assets			60,563				4,956				5,580
Accrued income and other assets			927,201				859,554				732,879
Total assets		$	35,665,909			$	32,764,805			$	32,182,599
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Liabilities
Deposits in domestic offices
Demand deposits — non-interest bearing		$	3,776,790			$	3,390,044			$	3,186,187
Interest bearing			20,326,575				18,548,943				18,182,951
Deposits in foreign offices			451,798				470,688				401,835
Total deposits			24,555,163				22,409,675				21,770,973
Short-term borrowings			1,687,536				1,889,260				1,033,496
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			1,658,486				1,155,647				903,871
Other long-term debt			2,035,576				2,418,419				3,138,626
Subordinated notes			1,283,359				1,023,371				1,025,612
Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit			39,301				36,957				31,610
Deferred income tax liability			685,559				743,655				781,152
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			640,749				530,320				907,486
Total liabilities			32,585,729				30,207,304				29,592,826
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock — authorized 6,617,808 shares; none outstanding			—				—				—
Common stock — without par value; authorized 500,000,000 shares; issued 257,866,255 shares; outstanding 245,183,441; 224,106,172 and 232,002,213 shares, respectively.			2,548,185				2,491,326				2,484,832
Less 12,682,814; 33,760,083 and 25,864,042 treasury shares respectively.			(273,120	)			(693,576	)			(490,139	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(31,434	)			(22,093	)			(18,686	)
Retained earnings			836,549				781,844				613,766
Total shareholders’ equity			3,080,180				2,557,501				2,589,773
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	35,665,909			$	32,764,805			$	32,182,599

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (Huntington or the Company) reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of Management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, the results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission) and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) have been omitted. The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Huntington’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2005 Form 10-K), which include descriptions of significant accounting policies, as updated by the information contained in this report, should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements.

     Certain amounts in the prior-year’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation.

     For statement of cash flows purposes, cash and cash equivalents are defined as the sum of “Cash and due from banks” and “Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.”

Note 2 — New Accounting Pronouncements

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (Statement No. 123R) - Statement 123R was issued in December 2004, requiring that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Statement 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans. Statement 123R replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (Statement 123) , and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that Statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in APB 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed pro forma net income under the preferable fair-value-based method. Effective January 1, 2006, Huntington has adopted Statement 123R. The impact of adoption to Huntington’s results of operations is presented in Note 10.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections — a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (Statement No. 154) - In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes , and Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements . Statement No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Statement No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The impact of this new pronouncement was not material to Huntington’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

FASB Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140 (Statement No. 155) - On February 16, 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 155. Statement No. 155 amends Statement No. 133 to simplify the accounting for certain derivatives embedded in other financial instruments (hybrid financial instruments) by permitting fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise required bifurcation, provided that the entire hybrid financial instrument is accounted for on a fair value basis. Statement No. 155 also establishes the requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, which replaces the interim guidance in Derivative Instrument Group Issue D1, Recognition and Measurement of Derivatives: Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets . Statement No. 155 amends Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities—a replacement of FASB Statement 125 (Statement No. 140), to allow a qualifying special-purpose entity to hold a derivative financial instrument that pertains to beneficial interests other than another derivative financial instrument. Statement No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption allowed. Huntington adopted Statement No. 155 effective January 1, 2006, with no impact to reported financial results.

FASB Statement No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 ( Statement No. 156) - In March 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 156, an amendment of Statement No. 140. The Statement requires all separately recognized servicing rights be initially measured at fair value, if practicable. For each class of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities, this statement permits Huntington to choose either to report servicing assets and liabilities at fair value or at amortized cost. Under the fair value approach, servicing assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value at each reporting date with changes in fair value recorded in earnings in the period in which the changes occur. Under the amortized cost method, servicing assets and liabilities are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income or net servicing loss and are assessed for impairment based on fair value at each reporting date. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2006, and allows early adoption as of the beginning of a fiscal year for which the entity has not previously issued interim financial statements. Huntington elected to adopt the provisions of Statement No. 156 for mortgage servicing rights effective January 1, 2006 and has recorded mortgage servicing assets using the fair value provision of the standard. The adoption of Statement No. 156 resulted in an $18.6 million increase in the carrying value of mortgage servicing right assets as of January 1, 2006. The cumulative effect of this change was $12.1 million, net of taxes, which is reflected as an increase in retained earnings in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity. (See Note 5).

Proposed Interpretation of Statement No. 109, Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions - In July 2005, the FASB issued an exposure draft of a proposed interpretation on accounting for uncertain tax positions under Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes . The exposure draft contains proposed guidance on the recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions. If adopted as proposed, the Company would be required to recognize, in its financial statements, the best estimate of the impact of a tax position, only if that tax position is probable of being sustained on audit based solely on the technical merits of the position. The proposed effective date for the interpretation was originally scheduled for December 31, 2005, with a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle to be recorded upon the initial adoption. In January 2006, FASB decided to make forthcoming rules on certain tax positions effective in 2007. FASB also moved to a view that such recognition should be changed from the tax position being ''probable of being sustained on audit based solely on the technical merits of the position’’ to a less stringent benchmark of ''more likely than not’’ that the position would be sustained on audit or final resolution through legal action or settlement. FASB expects to publish the planned rules on uncertain tax positions in 2006. Huntington is currently evaluating the impact this proposed interpretation will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Proposed FASB amendment to FAS 128, Earnings Per Share - In September 2005, the FASB issued an Exposure Draft, Earnings Per Share, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 128 . This Exposure Draft would amend FASB Statement No. 128, Earnings Per Share , to clarify guidance for mandatorily convertible instruments, the treasury stock method, contracts that may be settled in cash or shares and contingently issuable shares. The proposed Exposure Draft as currently drafted would be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2006. Retrospective application would be required for all changes to FASB Statement No. 128, except that retrospective application would be prohibited for contracts that were either settled in cash prior to adoption or modified prior to adoption to require cash settlement. Huntington does not expect adoption of this Statement to have a material effect on the calculation of basic or diluted earnings per share.

Proposed FASB amendment to FAS 132, Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R - In March 2006, the FASB issued an Exposure Draft, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”. This Exposure Draft would amend the FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R. The intent of the Exposure Draft is to require an employer to recognize in its statement of financial position the overfunded or underfunded status of its defined benefit plans and to recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs and credits that arise during the period. The comment deadline on this Exposure Draft is May 31, 2006, with a planned effective date for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2006. The Company is reviewing the Exposure Draft and evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements. Management estimates that, based on the provisions of the exposure draft, that, based on the carrying value of its net pension asset at December 31, 2005, the proposed standard would result in a write-down of its pension asset by $155.7 million which would decrease other comprehensive income by $101.2 million in the period that the standard is adopted.

Note 3 — Formal Regulatory Supervisory Agreements

     On March 1, 2005, Huntington announced that it had entered into a formal written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (FRBC), and the Bank had entered into a formal written agreement with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), providing for a comprehensive action plan designed to enhance corporate governance, internal audit, risk management, accounting policies and procedures, and financial and regulatory reporting. The agreements called for independent third-party reviews, as well as the submission of written plans and progress reports by Management and would remain in effect until terminated by the banking regulators.

     On October 6, 2005, Huntington announced that the OCC had lifted its formal written agreement with the Bank dated February 28, 2005, and that the FRBC written agreement remained in effect. Huntington was verbally advised that it was in full compliance with the financial holding company and financial subsidiary requirements under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act). This notification reflected that Huntington and the Bank met both the “well-capitalized” and “well-managed” criteria under the GLB Act. Management believes that the changes it has already made, and is in the process of making, will address the FRBC issues fully and comprehensively.

Note 4 — Business Combination

     On March 1, 2006, Huntington completed its merger with Canton, Ohio-based Unizan Financial Corp. (Unizan). Unizan operated 42 banking offices in five metropolitan markets in Ohio: Canton, Columbus, Dayton, Newark and Zanesville.

     Under the terms of the merger agreement announced January 27, 2004 and amended November 11, 2004, Unizan shareholders of record as of the close of trading on February 28, 2006, received 1.1424 shares of Huntington common stock for each share of Unizan. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity were recorded on the Company’s balance sheet at their fair values as of the acquisition date. Unizan’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated statement of income since the acquisition date.

     The following table shows the excess purchase price over carrying value of net assets acquired, preliminary purchase price allocation, and resulting goodwill:

     Huntington has not formalized its determination of the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities and will adjust goodwill upon completion of the valuation process.

     Of the $56.7 million of acquired intangible assets, $45.0 million was assigned to core deposit intangible and $11.7 million was assigned to customer relationship intangibles. The core deposit and customer relationship intangibles have a weighted average useful life of 10 years and 15 years, respectively.

     Goodwill resulting from the transaction totaled $366.7 million and was assigned to Regional Banking and the Private Financial and Capital Markets Group in the amount of $348.7 million and $18.0 million, respectively.

     The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired on March 1, 2006 related to the acquisition of Unizan:

     Huntington’s consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of Unizan only since March 1, 2006, the date of acquisition. The following unaudited summary information presents the consolidated results of operations of Huntington on a pro forma basis, as if the Unizan acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2006 and 2005.

     The pro forma results include amortization of fair value adjustments on loans, deposits, and debt, and amortization of newly created intangibles and post-merger acquisition related charges. The pro forma number of average common shares

outstanding includes adjustments for shares issued for the acquisition and the impact of additional dilutive securities but does not assume any incremental share repurchases. The pro forma results presented do not reflect cost savings, or revenue enhancements anticipated from the acquisition, and are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of the periods presented, nor are they necessarily indicative of future consolidated results.

Note 5 — Loan Sales and Securitizations

Automobile loans

     Huntington sold $169.8 million of automobile loans in the first quarter of 2006, resulting in pre-tax gains of $0.4 million. There were no automobile loan sales in the first quarter of 2005.

     A servicing asset is established at an initial carrying value based on the relative fair value at the time of the sale. The servicing asset is then amortized against servicing income. Impairment, if any, is recognized when carrying value exceeds the fair value as determined by calculating the present value of expected net future cash flows. The primary risk characteristic for measuring servicing assets is payoff rates of the underlying loan pools. Valuation calculations rely on the predicted payoff assumption, and if actual payoff is quicker than expected, then future value would be impaired.

     Changes in the carrying value of automobile loan servicing rights for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the fair value at the end of each period were as follows:

     Huntington has retained servicing responsibilities and receives annual servicing fees from 0.55% to 1.00% of the outstanding loan balances. Servicing income, net of amortization of capitalized servicing assets, amounted to $3.4 million and $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Residential Mortgage Loans

     A mortgage servicing right (MSR) is established only when the servicing is contractually separated from the underlying mortgage loans by sale or securitization of the loans with servicing rights retained. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company early adopted Statement No. 156. The same risk management practices are applied to all MSRs and, accordingly, MSRs were identified as a single asset class and were re-measured to fair value as of January 1, 2006 with an adjustment to retained earnings.

     At initial recognition, the MSR asset is established at its fair value using assumptions that are consistent with assumptions used at the time to estimate the fair value of the total MSR portfolio. Subsequent to initial capitalization, MSR assets are carried at fair value and are included in other assets. Any increase or decrease in fair value during the period is recorded as an increase or decrease in servicing income, which is reflected in non-interest income in the consolidated income statement.

     A summary of the changes in MSR fair value during the quarter follows:

     MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. While sales of MSRs occur, the precise terms and conditions are typically not readily available. Therefore, the fair value of MSRs is estimated using a discounted future cash flow model. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees and assumptions related to prepayments, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, costs to service, and other economic factors. Changes in the assumptions used may have a significant impact on the valuation of MSRs.

     A summary of key assumptions and the sensitivity of the MSR value at March 31, 2006 to changes in these assumptions follows:

     MSR values are very sensitive to movements in interest rates as expected future net servicing income depends on the projected outstanding principal balances of the underlying loans, which can be greatly impacted by the level of prepayments. The Company hedges against changes in MSR fair value attributable to changes in interest rates through a combination of derivative instruments and trading securities.

     Prior to 2006, servicing rights were evaluated quarterly for impairment based on the fair value of those rights, using a disaggregated approach. The fair value of the servicing rights was determined by estimating the present value of future net cash flows, taking into consideration market loan prepayment speeds, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors. Temporary impairment was recognized in a valuation allowance against the mortgage servicing rights.

     Changes in the impairment allowance of mortgage servicing rights for the three months ended March 31, 2005, were as follows:

     A summary of servicing fee income earned during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

(1)		The average duration assumes a market driven pre-payment rate on securities subject to pre-payment.

     Based upon its assessment, Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss at March 31, 2006, represents an other-than-temporary impairment. In addition, Huntington has the ability to hold these securities for a time necessary, including to maturity, to recover the amortized cost. There were no securities classified as held to maturity at March 31, 2006.

     Other securities include Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock, corporate debt and marketable equity securities.

Note 7 — Other Comprehensive Income

The components of Huntington’s other comprehensive income in the three months ended March 31, were as follows:

     Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

     The average market price of Huntington’s common stock for the period was used in determining the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. Dilutive potential common shares include stock options and options held in deferred compensation plans. Dilutive potential common shares are computed based on the number of shares subject to options that have an exercise price less than the average market price of Huntington’s common stock for the period.

     Options on approximately 5.7 million and 2.6 million shares were outstanding at March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be antidilutive. The weighted average exercise price for these options was $25.68 per share and $26.96 per share at the end of the same respective periods.

Note 9 — Stock-Based Compensation

     Huntington sponsors nonqualified and incentive stock option plans. These plans provide for the granting of stock options to officers, directors and other employees at the market price on the date of the grant. Huntington’s board of directors has approved all of the plans. Shareholders have approved each of the plans, except for the broad-based Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Of the 26.5 million options to purchase shares of common stock authorized for issuance under the plans at March 31, 2006, 21.0 million were outstanding and 5.5 million were available for future grants. Options vest ratably over three years or when other conditions are met. Options granted prior to May 2004 have a maximum term of ten years. All options granted beginning in May 2004 have a maximum term of seven years.

     On January 1, 2006, Huntington adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement No. 123R relating to its stock-based compensation plans. Prior to January 1, 2006, Huntington had accounted for stock-based compensation plans under the intrinsic value method promulgated by APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , and related interpretations. In accordance with APB 25, compensation expense for employee stock options was generally not recognized for options granted that had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

     Under the modified prospective method of Statement No. 123R, compensation expense was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2006, for all unvested stock options, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of Statement No. 123 and for all stock based payments granted after January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of Statement No. 123R. Stock-based compensation expense was recorded in personnel costs in the consolidated statement s of income. Huntington’s financial results for the prior periods have not been restated.

     The following table represents the impact of adoption of Statement 123R on Huntington’s income before income taxes, net income and basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

     Prior to the adoption of Statement 123R, Huntington presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Statement 123R requires the cash flows resulting from tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of compensation costs recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be classified as financing cash flows. As a result, the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost included in net financing cash flows was not significant.

     Consistent with the valuation method used for the disclosure only provisions of Statement No. 123, Huntington is using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock-based compensation expense. This model assumes that the estimated fair value of options is amortized over the options’ vesting periods and the compensation costs would be included in personnel costs on the consolidated statements of income. Forfeitures are estimated at the date of grant based on historical rates and reduce the compensation expense recognized. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the date of grant. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of Huntington’s stock. The expected term of options granted is derived from historical data on employee exercises. The expected dividend yield is based on the dividend rate and stock price on the date of the grant. The following table illustrates the weighted-average assumptions used in the option-pricing model for options granted in each of the periods presented.

     The weighted-average fair value of each option granted for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $4.33 per share and $4.85 per share, respectively.

     The following pro forma disclosures for net income and earnings per diluted common share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are presented as if Huntington had applied the fair value method of accounting of Statement No. 123 in measuring compensation costs for stock options.

     Huntington’s stock option activity and related information for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was as follows:

(1)		Relates to option plans acquired from the merger with Unizan.