UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2004

Commission File Number 0-2525

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

41 South High Street, Columbus, Ohio 43287

Registrant’s telephone number (614) 480-8300

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [X] No [  ]

There were 231,105,691 shares of Registrant’s without par value common stock outstanding on October 31, 2004.

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

INDEX

2

Part 1. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Huntington Bancshares Incorporated

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (Huntington) reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of Management, necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, the results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared according to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, therefore, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) have been omitted. The Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Huntington’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K (2003 Form 10-K), which include descriptions of significant accounting policies, as updated by the information contained in this report, should be read in conjunction with these interim financial statements.

     Certain amounts in the prior year’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.

     For statement of cash flows purposes, cash and cash equivalents are defined as the sum of “Cash and due from banks” and “Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements.” The statement of cash flows for the nine-months ended September 30, 2003, has been corrected to properly reflect the sale of branch offices during the third quarter of 2003.

Note 2 – New Accounting Pronouncements

Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments and Its Application to Certain Investments (EITF 03-1): The Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus about the criteria that should be used to determine when an investment is considered impaired, whether that impairment is other than temporary, and the measurement of an impairment loss. EITF 03-1 also included accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. On September 30, 2004, the FASB issued FSP 03-1-1 which delayed the effective date for the measurement and recognition guidance contained in paragraphs 10–20 of Issue 03-1 due to additional proposed guidance expected to be finalized in the fourth quarter of 2004.

     At September 30, 2004, Huntington had $2.5 billion of debt securities with current market values less than their amortized cost. These debt securities had an aggregate unrealized loss of $32.7 million at September 30, 2004. None of these securities were equity securities or debt securities that can contractually be prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that Huntington would not recover substantially all of its cost. At September 30, 2004, a total of $26.8 million of these debt securities had market values that were 5% or more below their amortized cost. The aggregate unrealized loss for these securities was $1.5 million. The declines in value are the result of interest rate fluctuations and Huntington believes the declines are temporary; therefore, no impairment loss has been recorded except as described in the paragraph below. Until the final FSP 03-1-1 is finalized, Huntington cannot determine the impact that the proposed guidance might have on the financial statements.

     At September 30, 2004, Management made a decision, to sell $11 million of equity securities, with unrealized losses of $0.9 million. Consequently, Huntington recognized the unrealized losses in the third quarter of 2004.

Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-16, Accounting for Investment in Limited Liability Companies (EITF 03-16): The Task Force reached a consensus that an investment in a limited liability company (LLC) that maintains a “specific ownership account” for each investor should be viewed as similar to an investment in a limited partnership for purposes of determining whether a noncontrolling investment in a LLC should be accounted for using the cost method or the equity method. The current rules require a noncontrolling investment in a limited partnership to be accounted for under the equity method unless the interest is so minor that the limited partner may have virtually no influence over the partnership operating and financial policies. The guidance for evaluating an investment in a LLC should be applied for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. The impact of EITF 03-16 was not material to Huntington’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (SAB 105): On March 9, 2004, the SEC issued SAB 105, which summarizes the views of the SEC staff regarding the application of

7

generally accepted accounting principles to loan commitments accounted for as derivative instruments. Specifically, SAB 105 indicated that the fair value of loan commitments that are required to follow derivative accounting under FAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , should not consider the expected future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the future loan. Prior to SAB 105, Huntington did not consider the expected future cash flows related to the associated servicing in determining the fair value of loan commitments. The adoption of SAB 105 did not have a material effect on Huntington’s financial results.

FASB Staff Position No. 106-2, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (FSP 106-2): In December 2003, a law was approved that expands Medicare benefits, primarily adding a prescription drug benefit for Medicare-eligible retirees beginning in 2006. The law also provides a federal subsidy to companies that sponsor postretirement benefit plans providing prescription drug coverage. FSP 106-2 was issued in May 2004 and supersedes FSP 106-1 issued in January 2004. FSP 106-2 specifies that any Medicare subsidy must be taken into account in measuring the employer’s postretirement health care benefit obligation and will also reduce the net periodic postretirement cost in future periods. The new guidance is effective for the reporting periods beginning on or after June 15, 2004. The impact of this new pronouncement was not material to Huntington’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

AICPA Statement of Position No. 03-3, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-3): In December 2003, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued SOP 03-3 to address accounting for differences between the contractual cash flows of certain loans and debt securities and the cash flows expected to be collected when loans or debt securities are acquired in a transfer and those cash flow differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. As such, SOP 03-3 applies to loans and debt securities purchased or acquired in purchase business combinations and does not apply to originated loans. The application of SOP 03-3 limits the interest income, including accretion of purchase price discounts, that may be recognized for certain loans and debt securities. Additionally, SOP 03-3 requires that the excess of contractual cash flows over cash flows expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference) not be recognized as an adjustment of yield or valuation allowance, such as the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent to the initial investment, increases in expected cash flows generally should be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the yield on the loan or debt security over its remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows should be recognized as impairment. SOP 03-3 is effective for loans and debt securities acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004, with early application encouraged. The impact of this new pronouncement is not expected to be material to Huntington’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note 3 – Securities and Exchange Commission Investigation

     As previously disclosed, Huntington continues to have ongoing discussions with the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding resolution of its formal investigation into certain financial accounting matters relating to fiscal years 2002 and earlier and certain related disclosure matters. It is anticipated that a settlement of this matter will involve the entry of an order by the SEC requiring Huntington to comply with various provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933, along with the imposition of a civil money penalty. N