UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
or
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-16103
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
| Ohio | 31-1263732 | |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| 6600 Port Road, Groveport, Ohio | 43125 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Issuers telephone number: (614) 748-1150
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
|
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
| Common Shares, without par value | American Stock Exchange |
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the Issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Check if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of Issuers knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. ¨
State Issuers revenues for its most recent fiscal year. $44,606,118
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates, computed on the basis of the closing sale price on the American Stock Exchange of the common shares as of March 6, 2006, was $23,310,986.
On March 6, 2006, the Issuer had outstanding 6,150,656 common shares without par value, which is the Issuers only class of common equity.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrants Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PART I |
1 | |||
|
I TEM 1. |
D ESCRIPTION OF B USINESS | 1 | ||
|
I TEM 2. |
D ESCRIPTION OF P ROPERTY | 8 | ||
|
I TEM 3. |
L EGAL P ROCEEDINGS | 9 | ||
|
I TEM 4. |
S UBMISSION OF M ATTERS TO A V OTE OF S ECURITY H OLDERS | 9 | ||
|
PART II |
10 | |||
|
I TEM 5. |
M ARKET FOR C OMMON E QUITY AND R ELATED S TOCKHOLDER M ATTERS | 10 | ||
|
I TEM 6. |
M ANAGEMENT S D ISCUSSION AND A NALYSIS O R P LAN OF O PERATION | 12 | ||
|
I TEM 7. |
F INANCIAL S TATEMENTS | 21 | ||
|
I TEM 8. |
C HANGES IN AND D ISAGREEMENTS WITH A CCOUNTANTS ON A CCOUNTING AND F INANCIAL D ISCLOSURE . | 44 | ||
|
I TEM 8A. |
C ONTROLS AND P ROCEDURES | 45 | ||
|
I TEM 8B. |
O THER I NFORMATION | 45 | ||
|
PART III |
46 | |||
|
I TEM 9. |
D IRECTORS , E XECUTIVE O FFICERS , P ROMOTERS AND C ONTROL P ERSONS ; C OMPLIANCE WITH S ECTION 16( A ) OF THE E XCHANGE A CT | 46 | ||
|
I TEM 10. |
E XECUTIVE C OMPENSATION | 46 | ||
|
I TEM 11. |
S ECURITY O WNERSHIP OF C ERTAIN B ENEFICIAL O WNERS AND M ANAGEMENT AND R ELATED S TOCKHOLDER M ATTERS | 46 | ||
|
I TEM 12. |
C ERTAIN R ELATIONSHIPS AND R ELATED T RANSACTIONS | 46 | ||
|
I TEM 13. |
E XHIBITS | 47 | ||
|
I TEM 14. |
P RINCIPAL A CCOUNTANT F EES AND S ERVICES | 55 | ||
|
SIGNATURES |
56 | |||
-i-
INFORMATION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. Portions of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (including information incorporated by reference) include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the Company achieving its financial growth and profitability goals, or its sales, earnings and profitability expectations for the first quarter and year of 2006. The words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, project, should, intend, plan or planning and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date thereof. Investors are cautioned that such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results due to many factors. These factors include changes in general economic conditions, changes in the specific markets for our products and services, adverse business conditions, changes in customer order patterns, increased competition, changes in our business or our relationship with major technology partners or significant customers, pricing pressures, lack of adequate financing to take advantage of business opportunities that may arise, lack of success in technological advancements, risks associated with our new business practices, processes and information systems, and other factors, are described in Item 6 of this Form 10-KSB and under the section entitled Risk Factors on Page 19. The Company undertakes no obligations to publicly update or revise such statements.
| Item 1. | Description of Business |
Business Development
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (PDSi) is a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio in March 1989.
Business of Issuer
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (PDSi or the Company) provides product lifecycle service solutions to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) in the medical, telecommunications, defense, imaging and computer equipment industries, among others. We offer a full range of computer and computer-related product development and manufacturing services to increase product speed to market and engineered product life, and to provide service and support to units in the field through comprehensive product lifecycle management programs encompassing depot repair, advanced exchange, contact center support and end-of-life control.
Our business model has a foundation of technical service and support programs (Service), such as the depot repair and logistics programs we provide the field service organizations of OEMs like Sun Microsystems. The service base provides resources for the development and sale of high-potential engineered computer solutions for specific customers and niche-industry applications
1
(Product). For the 2005 year, we reported revenue of $44.6 million, net earnings of $937,000, and total assets of $24.4 million. Approximately 77% of our 2005 revenue was generated from Products and 23% from Services.
Our products are custom-engineered to meet specific customer or niche-industry requirements that generally cannot be met by an off-the-shelf solution. They are sold to OEMs and then typically resold to end-users as components of the OEMs final products. Our products are usually developed as a result of helping OEMs design, engineer, manufacture, assemble, modify, and/or integrate computer systems or components to fit their specific application needs. Many of our products are based on the high performance computer processing technologies of Sun Microsystems, Inc. (Sun), Intel Corporation (Intel) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), three of worlds leading producers of computer components and systems. We combine their products and other vendor off-the-shelf computer components or peripherals with technologies that we engineer and develop, such as customized circuit boards, enclosures, power supplies and other engineered components and software. By leveraging our expertise and experience in engineering and integrating our internally developed products with Sun, Intel, AMD and other vendors technologies, we are able to offer product solutions with minimal product design and engineering costs to our customers.
Our end-of-life product management service allows our customers to maximize their investment in technology by providing continued support for products no longer in production or supported by the original manufacturer. This allows our customers to eliminate or delay the engineering, software development and re-certification charges required to integrate new technology into their products. For example, when a computer board manufacturer stops manufacturing a particular board, its customer OEMs are left with few alternative sources for the boards they need to continue building or repairing their products. We can provide the boards, purchased from a number of available sources, either new or refurbished, or we can redesign a new board with the same form, fit and function with components that are readily available at the time.
We are a SunSoft Master Distributor authorized to provide our customers with the right to use Solaris, Sun Microsystems UNIX operating system and we are a member of the Sun Partner Advantage Program. We are an authorized Intel Product Dealer and have earned Intel Channel Partner Premier Member status for our distinct level of competency with Intel technologies. We are an authorized AMD Gold Solution Provider. We are an authorized HP Business Development Partner. We are also licensed by Microsoft to distribute embedded Microsoft operating systems.
We also offer complete service and support for several OEMs products, as well as our own, including testing, repair, inventory and logistics services. Depot repair and testing services are provided for advanced technology systems, printed circuit board assemblies, and other computer peripherals and components, where the suspect non-functioning equipment is sent to our designated depot location for testing and repair, if required. We also manage advanced-exchange repair programs. Our highest volume testing and repair is performed on complex printed circuit boards and electro-mechanical data storage devices for Sun, Hewlett-Packard Company (H-P) and Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI), and on standard PC configurations for a
2
home-based computer learning program. For our largest OEM customers, we maintain and share online information management systems that seamlessly connect our companies.
We consider our Products and Services segments to be complementary. New product development keeps our engineers and service technicians on the forefront of technologies being sold that generate new service opportunities. Our services provide a competitive advantage in selling our products since the entire infrastructure is already in place to provide high quality service and support before and after the sale.
Public Announcement Updates
During 2005, we made a number of public announcements. The current status of each is as follows:
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc., announces exhibit at the AdvancedTCA Summit beginning December 6, 2005. - This showcased our extensive AdvancedTCA solutions. We showcased a compute cluster highlighting the scalability of the AdvancedTCA architecture. This demonstration adds Single Board Computers (SBCs), open-source middle-ware and a compute intensive application highlighting a new area of capability for this architecture. We exhibited and presented along side numerous market leaders with a common vision of making AdvancedTCA a driving force in next generation networks. Analysts predict that AdvancedTCA will be a multibillion-dollar market within a few years. The appeal of the technology extends far beyond telecom. Designers working on military/defense, industrial control, process control, instrumentation, medical equipment, storage, and enterprise networking applications are all considering the advantages of AdvancedTCA. The program is in the marketing stage.
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. announces development of the first AMD Opteron(TM) processor-based AdvancedTCA (ATCA) blade reference design kit specifically designed to meet the stringent demands of the ATCA specification for telecommunication equipment providers (TEPs) and carriers.The intent of the ATCA reference design is to provide a simple to use model that OEMs can quickly and easily manufacture as is, modify themselves according to customer needs, or contract with us to modify and complete a unique design with feature requirements provided by the OEM or end customer. The development kit can reduce time-to-market and development costs as the intricacies of the system design according to the ATCA specification have been researched and resolved, resulting in a kit that is completely deployable without modifications. The prototype blade reference is scheduled to be completed by the end of Q1 2006 and generally available to the public by the end of Q2 2006. The program is in the marketing stage.
Competition
Competition for our custom-engineered products comes from three primary sources: (1) other electronic contract manufacturing companies (ECMs) that provide similar engineering and manufacturing services, (2) other value-added computer resellers (VARs) and (3) less expensive off-the-shelf products.
3
We market our customized services and products to specific customers and niche-industries. This reduces competition from larger ECMs (Flextronics, Solectron, Plexus and others) because of the costs involved for them to run the smaller manufacturing volumes typical of these orders. The level of engineering complexity and after-the-sale service and support on some products reduces competition from VARs of all levels of size and geographic coverage. We believe we differentiate ourselves from other competitors through the strength of our close relationships with our very large OEM partners (Sun, Intel, AMD, H-P and others), our ability to offer and deliver complete turnkey solutions in relatively short development cycles, our unique product set and our full service-after-the-sale offering. However, a number of our competitors are more established and have substantially greater technical, manufacturing, marketing and financial resources to develop and market their engineering and manufacturing services or their off-the-shelf products.
The primary competitive factors in the electronic equipment service industry are price, quality and scope of services (based on in-house technical expertise). We compete with the in-house repair centers of OEMs, Third Party Maintenance providers (TPMs), ECMs and other independent depot repair organizations similar to ours. We believe we differentiate ourselves by offering complete packaged solutions backed up by a broad scope of repair and logistics service offerings, including our experience with a wide variety of technologies and very large, well-known and demanding OEM customers, flexibility in tailoring our operating procedures to fulfill stringent quality, documentation and reporting requirements, and offering the most cost-effective solutions to fulfill our customers service needs. However, a number of our competitors are more established and have substantially greater technical, manufacturing, marketing and financial resources to develop and market similar services.
Suppliers
During 2005, approximately 41% of all inventory purchased was manufactured by or for Sun and was purchased directly from Sun or through Suns distribution channel. We believe all critical production components and service parts, or suitable substitutes, are readily available in the marketplace from multiple manufacturers and/or suppliers, new or refurbished, as required by our current customers demands.
Customers
A significant amount of our sales come from a relatively small number of large customers. A major strategic focus continues to be further growth and diversification of our customer base. In 2005, we provided services and/or products to ten Fortune Global 500 companies and nine Fortune 500 companies compared to ten Fortune Global 500 companies and two Fortune 1000 companies in 2004.
Our three largest customers generated approximately 35%, 45% and 49% of sales, respectively, for the years 2005, 2004 and 2003. In 2005, no one customer generated more than 13% of our sales compared to 17% the prior year.
4
Three customers generated approximately 44%, 52% and 44% of our product sales for the years 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Four customers generated 80% of our service sales in 2005. Two customers generated 73% and 82% of total services sales, respectively, for the years 2004 and 2003.
Weve made significant progress in diversifying our customer base. However, the Companys relatively small number of customers can create significant sales volatility. If the sales generated by either of our top four service customers declined significantly, or if product sales of our three largest product customers declined significantly without additional service or product business to replace it, the results of our operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Patents and Trademarks
We own two patents we obtained in the acquisition of GNP Computers. One patent was granted for a telecommunication computer chassis. The other patent was granted for a distributed computing system clustering model that provides soft real-time responsiveness and continuous availability. However, we have deemed that the value of the patents is insignificant to the generation of future revenue.
In 2003, we received notice of the successful registration of the federal trade and service marks for the logo PDSi under Class 9 products and under Class 42 services.
The applications filed in 2001 for federal trade and service marks for Pinnacle Data Systems have been suspended and are awaiting the final disposition of other pending applications.
License and Royalty Agreements
In April 2004, we entered into a U.S. Business Development Partner Agreement with H-P to buy and resell or sublicense products, services and support including the select HP Care Pack Services. The agreement was for an original term expiring in May 2005. In February 2005, the agreement was extended until May 2006. At the time of expiration, orders already accepted shall be governed under the terms and conditions of the agreement. The agreement may also be terminated earlier upon default by either party as defined in the agreement. These products were required in an immaterial amount of product sales in 2005 and 2004, but are expected to be used in a more significant number of sales in future years.
In September 2003, by re-application, we renewed an OEM Customer License Agreement for Embedded Systems with Microsoft Licensing, Inc. (Microsoft) originally issued in 2002, pursuant to which we are licensed to embed binary copies of Microsoft operating systems (as delivered from Microsoft) in our products. The license agreement was for an original term of one year expiring in September 2004. The license is renewable by re-application. The license has been renewed for a term expiring in November 2006. The license can also be terminated earlier by Microsoft upon default by us as defined in the Agreement. These operating systems were required in product sales of approximately $5.8 million in 2005 and $900,000 in 2004 (approximately 17% and 3% of total product sales, respectively).
5
In April 2003, we entered into a Regional Reseller Agreement with Agilent Technologies to buy and resell Agilent Remote Management Products in the United States and Canada. The agreement includes a license to use, execute, reproduce, display and distribute Agilent software in object code for the purpose of integrating Agilents products with our, or our customers, products. The agreement was for an original term of one year expiring in March 2004. The agreement automatically renews for one-year periods unless written notice of non-renewal is given by either party before the current term ends. The agreement may also be terminated earlier upon default by either party as defined in the agreement. The agreement was renewed for a term expiring in March 2005. The agreement expired March 2005. These products were required in product sales of approximately $400,000 in 2005 and $2.3 million in 2004 (approximately 1% and 9% of total product sales, respectively). This agreement was entered into to increase product offerings to our current and prospective customers.
In March 2003, we entered into a Design License Agreement with Sun, pursuant to which we have a limited license to develop, manufacture and sell to one specific customer a product based upon and using the Sun SPARCengine Classic-II Motherboard. The license agreement was for an original term of one year expiring in March 2004. The license may only be renewed by mutual written agreement signed by both parties. The license can be terminated earlier, for any reason or for specific reasons, by either party as defined in the Agreement. The license was not renewed, but the agreement provides us the right to continue to use the technology for existing products. This technology, which was not required for any sales in 2004, was required in product sales of approximately $260,000 in 2005 (approximately 1% of total product sales).
In February 2003, by re-application, we renewed a Technology License and Distribution Agreement with Sun originally issued in 1994, pursuant to which we are licensed to distribute the Sun Solaris ® operating system in our products. The license agreement is for an original term of three years expiring in February 2006. The license automatically renews for up to two one-year periods unless written notice of non-renewal is given by either party before the current term ends. The license can also be terminated earlier upon default by either party as defined in the Agreement. These operating systems were required in product sales of approximately $15.5 million in 2005 and $11.9 million in 2004 (approximately 45% and 42% of total product sales, respectively)
In August 2002, we were authorized by Sun to act as an OEM Technology Partner (OTP), pursuant to which we are authorized and licensed to buy Sun products at specific discount levels for the purpose of modifying them and/or integrating them into our products for resale to our OEM customers. This authorization can be terminated without cause or upon default by either party as defined in the terms and conditions of the General Terms and iForce Business Terms exhibits attached to the OTP Letter of Authorization. This designation or its predecessor Master Value-Added Integrator (MVAI) designation was required in product sales of approximately $18.0 million in 2005 and $11.9 million in 2004 (approximately 52% and 42% of total product sales, respectively).
6
In July 2001, we entered into a Reference Design License Agreement with Sun, pursuant to which we are licensed to develop, manufacture and sell products based upon and using the Sun ULTRSPARC IIe technology. Training and support fees amounting to $35,000 were paid in connection with the license. The license agreement was for an original term of three years expiring in July 2004. The license automatically renews for up to two one-year periods unless written notice of non-renewal is given by either party before the current term ends. The license can also be terminated earlier upon default by either party as defined in the Agreement. The license agreement automatically renewed until July 2006. This technology was required in product sales of approximately $2.8 million in 2005 and $5.1 million in 2004 (approximately 8% and 20% of total product sales, respectively).
In May 1999, we entered into a Reference Design License Agreement with SME, pursuant to which we are licensed to develop, manufacture and sell products based upon and using the Sun AXmp technology. Training and support fees amounting to $40,000 were paid in connection with the license. The license agreement is for an original term of seven years expiring in May 2006. The license automatically renews for one-year periods unless written notice of non-renewal is given by either party before the current term ends. The license can also be terminated earlier upon default by either party as defined in the Agreement. This technology was required in product sales of approximately $180,000 in 2005 and $5.4 million in 2004 (approximately 1% of service sales and 21% of total product sales, respectively).
In October 1997, we entered into a Development and Manufacturing License Agreement with SME pursuant to which we are licensed to develop, manufacture and sell products based upon and using the Sun PCI card and Open Boot PROM technology. We do not anticipate that we will develop any new products based on the technology licensed under this agreement, although we will continue to sell products that we have developed under this license. The license agreement was for an original term of three years expiring in October 2000. However, the license automatically renews for one-year periods unless written notice of non-renewal is given by either party before the current term ends. The license can also be terminated earlier upon default by either party as defined in the Agreement. The license has been automatically renewed for an additional one-year term expiring October 2006. This technology was required in product sales of approximately $2.0 million in 2005 and $1.2 million in 2004 (approximately 6% and 5% of total product sales, respectively).
We have two outstanding royalty agreements with Pigeon Point Software and CSWL Inc. Both agreements are for products under development for customers. We have not yet made royalty payments under these agreements.
Labor Contracts
None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. We consider our relationship with our employees to be very good.
7
Government Approval of Principal Products or Services
Our principal products and services do not generally require government approval, although some of our OEM customers products do require government approval. For example, medical-imaging equipment for which we sell components to our customers may require Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. This may slow the introduction of our customers new products and sometimes extends the time period between successful customer trials and the resulting production orders. We consider this in our business planning. When required, we help our customers get government approval. We also help them prolong the life of their products to delay costly government approval processes.
Governmental Regulation Costs
No federal, state or local laws or regulations in existence or proposed are expected to materially impact our operations or financial position.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are charged to operations when incurred. The Company incurred no research and development expense in 2005 that was not billed to its customers. The amount of research and development expense charged to operations in 2004 was immaterial.
Environmental Compliance Costs
Certain facets of our operations involve the use of substances regulated under various federal, state and local laws governing the environment. The liability for environmental remediation and related costs can be significant, although the Company has not incurred any to this date. Consequently, environmental costs and environmental regulations are not presently material to our operations or financial position. Similarly, no other federal, state or local laws or regulations are expected to materially impact our operations or financial position.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, we had a total of 162 employees, all of whom were full-time.
| Item 2. | Description of Property |
We lease approximately 113,000 square feet of office, warehouse, laboratory and production space in a building located at 6600 Port Road, Groveport, Ohio. We entered into a ten-year lease commencing May 1, 1999. The lease contains annual escalators intended to cover inflationary costs over the life of the lease. Minimum future annual lease payments under the lease as of December 31, 2005 are approximately $590,000. We have the option to extend the term of the lease for an additional five years. The building is in good condition. While we believe that this current space is adequate for the foreseeable future, we have been granted an option to lease an additional 53,000 square feet of warehouse space in this building at the termination of the current lessors lease.
8
We also lease approximately 56,000 of office, warehouse, laboratory and production space in a building located at 555 E. Huntington Drive, Monrovia, California. We assumed a five-year lease in our acquisition of the assets of GNP Computers. The lease terminates on January 31, 2010. The lease contains annual escalators intended to cover inflationary costs over the life of the lease. Minimum future annual lease payments under the lease as of December 31, 2005 are approximately $1,072,000. The building is in good condition.
Our current policy is not to invest in real estate or interests in real estate. We do not invest in real estate mortgages or securities of entities primarily engaged in real estate activities.
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings |
On September 20, 2005 Syntegra (USA), Inc. filed a complaint against us and against one of our customers, Silicon Graphics, Inc., in the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. Syntegra alleges that Silicon Graphics, who is also a former customer of Syntegra, misappropriated certain trade secrets of Syntegra, and that we unfairly benefited from SGIs alleged misappropriation through our relationship with Silicon Graphics. Syntegra has also asserted certain contract claims against Silicon Graphics.
The relief sought by Syntegra as against us is injunctive relief, money damages (if actual damages are not proven, then a reasonable royalty for the use of the alleged trade secret information), restitution of revenue earned by us by virtue of the alleged unfair competition, attorneys fees and costs.
We are vigorously defending each of Syntegras claims, and specifically deny every allegation and any liability to Syntegra of any kind. We further believe that we are entitled to indemnification from Silicon Graphics for all expenses and damages that might arise as a result of this complaint.
We are not and our property is not currently a party to any other pending legal proceedings.
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2005.
9
| Item 5. | Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters |
(a) Market Information . Since September 7, 2000, our common stock has traded on the American Stock Exchange under the stock symbol PNS. Set forth below is the range of high and low sales prices of the common shares on the American Stock Exchange during 2005 and 2004.
| Range of Sales Prices | ||||||
| High | Low | |||||
|
Fiscal Year 2005 |
||||||
|
Fourth quarter (ended December 31) |
$ | 3.20 | $ | 2.60 | ||
|
Third quarter (ended September 30) |
3.28 | 2.70 | ||||
|
Second quarter (ended June 30) |
3.25 | 2.65 | ||||
|
First quarter (ended March 31) |
3.34 | 2.78 | ||||
|
Fiscal Year 2004 |
||||||
|
Fourth quarter (ended December 31) |
$ | 3.50 | $ | 1.90 | ||
|
Third quarter (ended September 30) |
4.54 | 2.00 | ||||
|
Second quarter (ended June 30) |
5.00 | 2.21 | ||||
|
First quarter (ended March 31) |
3.23 | 1.85 | ||||
(b) Holders . On March 6, 2006, there were 89 holders of record of the Companys shares of common stock. Most of the shares not held by officers and directors are held in street name.
(c) Dividends . During the past two years, we have not paid cash dividends, nor have we ever paid cash dividends. Payments of dividends are within the discretion of our board of directors, although our line of credit loan agreement with KeyBank National Association restricts the payment of cash dividends that would cause violations of the loan covenants.
(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans . The following table provides information as of December 31, 2005 with respect to shares of Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans, including the Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the Employee Plan), the stock option agreement, effective September 12, 1997 between Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc., and Thomas OLeary, and the Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. 2000 Director Stock Option Plan (the Director Plan).
10
| (1) | Consists of the Employee Plan and the Director Plan. |
| (2) | Consists of the stock option agreement, effective September 12, 1997 between Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc., and Thomas OLeary,. The material features of this agreement are described below. |
The option agreement between the Company and Thomas OLeary grants Mr. OLeary options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock for a period of 10 years from the date of the grant, although the option is not exercisable until one year from the date of the grant. The agreement provides that if Mr. OLeary ceases to be a director of the Company for any reason other than death, he has 90 days from the date of termination to exercise his option. In the event that Mr. OLeary ceases to be a director of the Company due to death, or if he dies within 90 days of his termination as a director of the Company for any reason, the option may be exercised by his representative within 1 year after the date of death.
The options granted pursuant to the agreement are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and the number of options is subject to adjustment, on a proportionate basis, upon the occurrence of certain events relating to the Companys capital structure. For example, the number of securities to be issued upon exercise of Mr. OLearys options were adjusted upward as a result of the 2-for-1 stock split effective March 31, 2000 and the 2-for-1 stock split effective October 31, 2000.
11
| Item 6. | Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes contained herein.
This annual report, including the following sections, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, but not limited to, statements regarding the Company achieving its financial growth and profitability goals, or its sales, earnings and profitability expectations for the first quarter and year of 2006. The words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, project, should, intend, plan or planning and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date thereof. Investors are cautioned that such statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical or anticipated results due to many factors. These factors include changes in general economic conditions, changes in the specific markets for our products and services, adverse business conditions, changes in customer order patterns, increased competition, changes in our business or our relationship with major technology partners or significant customers, pricing pressures, lack of adequate financing to take advantage of business opportunities that may arise, lack of success in technological advancements, risks associated with our new business practices, processes and information systems, and other factors, including those discussed under Risk Factors on page 19 of this report.
OVERVIEW
Pinnacle Data Systems, Inc. (PDSi, the Company or we) provides product lifecycle service solutions to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) in the medical, telecommunications, defense, imaging, industrial and computer equipment markets, among others. We offer a full range of computer and computer-related product development and manufacturing services to increase product speed to market and engineered product life, and to provide service and support to units in the field through comprehensive product lifecycle management programs encompassing depot repair, advanced exchange, contact center support and end-of-life control.
Our business strategy is to collaborate with the worlds leading OEMs by managing the critical business activities required to successfully deploy information technology (IT) solutions. Our approach includes redefining the outsourced IT solution for OEMs that embed information technologies by offering comprehensive, global and information-laden solutions to fill critical supply-chain, engineering and logistics needs, and differentiating our offerings from other market choices through tangible value propositions based on collaborative execution and business intelligence deliverables. Unlike contract manufacturers, PDSi is skilled at offering hybrid
12
solutions using commercially available technologies combined with proprietary implementations. Unlike distributors, PDSi is technology agnostic and capable of complex engineering programs. Unlike technology providers, PDSi has focused solutions specific to OEMs, not enterprises. Unlike logistics firms, PDSi brings quantitative technical knowledge and engineered platforms to its custom solution development process. We intend to develop a new brand category to address needs of OEMs, consolidate weaker niche players through acquisition, establish a professional services model to parallel that established in the enterprise space and provide its offerings in international markets.
On August 12, 2005, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with GNP Computers, Inc. (GNP) and GNPs principal shareholder, in which we acquired all of the assets and certain liabilities of GNP. The assets totaled approximately $8.7 million, of which $8.3 million was receivables and inventory. Thus far, the acquisition has been accretive by our retaining over 20 customers with similar profiles and expansion opportunities as our existing business, the former GNPs sales office and production facility in suburban Los Angeles, California, an expanded international presence with an Asia-based sales office, additional customers in Asia and Europe, an expanded product line including telecommunications platforms and application-specific devices, and additional technical and engineering expertise and capabilities. None of the acquired customers were under contractual obligation to GNP to meet minimum order quantities before the acquisition and they are not under any of those kind of obligations with us today. They could stop placing orders at any time. The liabilities assumed upon the acquisition consisted of a $2.3 million asset-based line of credit, payables and other accrued liabilities of approximately $6.4 million, which included transaction fees for both parties. Simultaneously with the acquisition, we paid off the asset-based line of credit. In order to facilitate the acquisition, on August 9, 2005, we increased our asset-based line of credit with KeyBank NA to $11 million from $6 million. The market value of the assets was essentially equal to the total of the assumed liabilities and capitalized transaction expenses. As a result, no goodwill or other intangibles were recognized and recorded on the transaction and no long term debt was assumed or incurred. The results of the operations of the California operation subsequent to August 15, 2005 are included in our statement of income.
As a result of the acquisition and the expected organic growth of the combined organizations, we anticipate another record sales year in 2006. Further integration of the two businesses and infrastructure development for growth in the future will occur simultaneously throughout the year. We plan to spend up to $1 million in information technology and systems in 2006 to integrate the businesses and build a platform for future growth, with about half of that amount being capitalized as fixed assets. We will continue evaluating viable acquisition opportunities that meet our established criteria, including strategic fit and projected accretive performance in less than a year. However, we are not currently planning any additional acquisitions before the second half of 2006.
13
The following discussions and analyses are for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared to the year ended
SALES
Sales for 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
| Year |
%
Change |
|||||||
|
($ thousands) |
2005 | 2004 | ||||||
|
Total company |
$ | 44,606 | 34,397 | 30 | % | |||
|
Product |
34,444 | 28,351 | 21 | % | ||||
|
Service |
10,162 | 6,046 | 68 | % | ||||
The increase in product sales for 2005 to a record total was due to increased shipments to medical, telecommunications and defense customers, which more than offset lower shipments to imaging and industrial control customers. The increases in both product and service (mostly test and repair) sales resulted from both the acquisition of GNP Computers and from organic growth in the second half of the year. We anticipate record sales in 2006, starting with strong year-over-year sales in the first quarter.
For 2005, we had three customers that generated revenues of approximately $5.8 million, $5.5 million, and $4.4 million or 13%, 12%, and 10% respectively, of total revenue. In the statements of income, approximately 3% of the revenues from these customers is included in service sales and 97% is included in product sales. In addition, these customers represented 20%, 6%, and 17%, respectively, of accounts receivable at December 31, 2005. This degree of revenue concentration is lower than in recent years and is the result of the growth of the number of active customers both before the acquisition and as a result of the acquisition. While we continually seek new opportunities within our existing customers, we also expect our growth to come from new customers, including international customers, leading to additional customer diversification over time.
GROSS PROFIT
Gross profits for 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
| Year |
%
Change |
||||||||
|
($ thousands) |
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
|
Total company |
$ | 10,547 | $ | 8,015 | 32 | % | |||
|
Product |
4,289 | 5,698 | -25 | % | |||||
|
Service |
6,258 | 2,317 | 170 | % | |||||
14
The gross profits margin percentage for 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
| Year | ||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||
|
Total company |
24 | % | 23 | % | ||
|
Product |
12 | % | 20 | % | ||
|
Service |
62 | % | 38 | % | ||
The decrease in gross profit dollars and percentage on product sales in 2005 was due to sales mix as we implemented first-time programs with large medical, imaging and network equipment customers during the year. The volume in these programs and the resulting increases in operating efficiency and gross profit contribute significantly to bottom line profitability.
The increase in the gross profit dollars and percentage for service sales in 2005 was attributable to the organic growth in service sales as well as the addition of acquired customer programs. The increase in sales volume led to a significant increase in operating leverage compared to 2004, resulting in the higher margins.
OPERATING AND INTEREST EXPENSES
Operating expenses include selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses. Operating and interest expenses for 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
| Year |
%
Change |
||||||||
|
($ thousands) |
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
|
SG&A expense |
$ | 8,739 | $ | 6,616 | 32 | % | |||
|
Interest expense |
289 | 113 | 156 | % | |||||
|
Total expense |
9,028 | 6,729 | 34 | % | |||||
The increase in operating expenses in 2005 resulted primarily from the acquired operations along with planned increases in sales and marketing activities. The 32% increase in operating expenses was comparable to the 30% increase in sales. Operating expenses were 20% of sales in 2005, compared to 19% in 2004.
When recording the acquisition of GNP Computers in August 2005, we recorded various estimates of potential liabilities. In the fourth quarter of 2005, after further research and analysis and consultation with outside experts, we reduced the assumed liabilities from the acquisition by approximately $300,000. The reduction of the accruals resulted in a reduction of SG&A expenses of the same amount in the fourth quarter of 2005.
In 2005, an increased use of the credit line due to higher levels of receivables and inventory related to the acquired operations combined with higher interest rates resulting in higher interest expense compared to 2004. The average daily balance on the line of credit increased to $4.4
15
million in 2005 from $2.6 million in 2004. Interest rates paid on the line of credit ranged from 5.25% to 7.25% in 2005, and from 4.00% to 5.25% in 2004.
INCOME TAXES AND NET INCOME
The effective tax rate used for 2005 was 38%, compared to 31% in 2004, reflecting a decrease in foreign sales and the use of the extra-territorial income tax incentive.
Income before taxes, income taxes and net income for 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
| Year | ||||||
|
($ thousands) |
2005 | 2004 | ||||
|
Income before income taxes |
$ | 1,519 | $ | 1,286 | ||
|
Income tax expense |
582 | 402 | ||||
|
Net income |
937 | 884 | ||||
Earnings per share for 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
| Year | ||||||
| 2005 | 2004 | |||||
|
EPS: |
||||||
|
Basic |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.16 | ||
|
Fully diluted |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.14 | ||
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
||||||
|
Basic |
5,867,986 | 5,572,811 | ||||
|
Fully diluted |
6,284,439 | 6,121,675 | ||||
The increase in net income in 2005 resulted from the increase in service sales, due partly to the acquired operations and partly due to organic growth, and from the higher percentage of services sales to overall sales in 2005, compared to 2004.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
A summary of changes in current assets for 2005 and 2004 follows:
|
($ thousands) |
12/31/05 | 12/31/04 |
% Change |
||||||
|
Accounts receivable |
$ | 12,556 | $ | 4,398 | 185 | % | |||
|
Inventory |
9,233 | 4,080 | 126 | % | |||||
|
Other current assets |
1,740 | 903 | 93 | % | |||||
|
Total |
23,529 | 9,381 | 151 | % | |||||
| < | |||||||||